Put General Motors Down


it is time for GM to take that trip to the vet

By any reasonable measure, GM, or at least its North American operation, is mortally wounded. The auto industry in the US is a mature one with very little room left to grow. The industry in general, and GM in particular, is saddled with excess and inefficient manufacturing capacity, extortionate union contracts which, for reasons known only to them, management agreed to, and enormous pension and health care liabilities to a pool of retirees which now outnumbers current employees.

At this juncture we’ve “loaned” GM $13.4 billion and GM’s CEO Rick Wagoner is asking for $16.6 billion more if it is to survive. Let’s not kid ourselves. Unlike the Chrysler bailout (for a much better analysis of what the 1979 bailout did and didn’t do, you should read James Hickel’s The Chrysler Bailout Bust), we’re not getting this money back and if $13.4 billion didn’t stop the hemorrhaging, then another $16.6 billion is just a larger band aid.

It is encouraging to see that many Republicans are coming to this conclusion, no matter how belatedly. Over the weekend, John McCain, Richard Shelby, and John Boehner all advocated letting GM go into bankruptcy.

While this is useful as a sign that reality is setting in, it is also akin to telling a fatally ill patient that he’s going to be fine. Chapter 11 is not going to help GM, or Chrysler for that matter, because their problem is not debt. Their problems, which predate the current economic downturn, are anemic sales and sky high overhead that can no longer be foisted off on consumers.

The only solution for GM is liquidation.

This really isn’t as drastic as it appears at first blush. Several product lines of GM are profitable. They can be sold to other manufacturers. Let’s not forget that the Jeep brand started out with Willys, then was owned by Kaiser, then by AMC, and finally by Chrysler. The more modern manufacturing facilities can probably find a buyer but the older ones will be shut down. GM owns lots of patents. These can be sold. It’s overseas operations can be spun off or sold. And, of course, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation will end up assuming the wreckage of GM’s profligate benefits plan.

We can’t allow inefficient behemoths to become wards of the state. If we have any faith, whatsoever, in free enterprise and free markets we need to take GM to the vet.


Category: , ,

RSS feed

13 Comments Leave a comment

Not a trip to the vet...

liberalrepublican (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 12:00PM EST (link)

A trip to the farm…

Where GM can play in the sunshine and fields all day along with buggy whip makers.

“Broadly speaking, liberalism emphasizes individual rights and equality of opportunity. … including extensive freedom of thought and speech, limitations on the power of governments, the rule of law, the free exchange of ideas, a market or mixed economy”

A trip behind the barn

mallcopsaysno Tuesday, March 10th at 12:01PM EST (link)

No sense calling these loans if they’re never coming back to us. No sense throwing good money after bad either. Time to end this charade. RIP, GM.

Maybe e-verify

Greg (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 12:11PM EST (link)

can be implemented to save some shovel ready jobs for these poor union works and stop undocumented works from applying.

 
 
 

Too much in UAW dues at stake.

Achance (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 12:07PM EST (link)

None of this is about bailing out GM, the Ds couldn’t care less about a bunch of filthy capitalists, even silly capitalists who thought they could get along with unions and Democrats. GM could probably recover in bankruptcy, but it would do so at the expense of the UAW (and the taxpayers on the retirement/H&W costs). The government simply isn’t going to let GM use bankruptcy to get out of its contract because the others will have to follow suit to stay competitive; pattern bargaining in reverse.

The only solution to this from a Democrat/UAW perspective is feed GM and Chrysler from the public teat until EFCA is passed and the Southern plants are organized and put on the national pattern agreement.

In Vino Veritas

exactly on the mark

streiff (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 12:12PM EST (link)

bailing out GM and Chrysler is all about preserving the UAW’s ability to deliver votes for Democrats.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

Funny

red4ever (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 12:30PM EST (link)

Ford — the only Big 3 automaker to not take government money — managed to get concessions out of the UAW to stay in business. No big drama about it either. It was just quietly done.

So obviously, Ford knows something the others 2 don’t.

The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.
Dante

They know how to get just enough concession

Achance (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 1:15PM EST (link)

to have a slight competitive advantage without provoking the UAW to did in. Ford is actually gaming the system more than the other two by setting the table for putting the retirement/H&W tab on the taxpayers.

In Vino Veritas

 

Yeah, how to borrow money a few years back

Reaper0Bot0 (formerly Han_Pritcher) (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 1:16PM EST (link)

Ford leveraged everything they had, including the logo, for a large block of financing before the markets went to hell and gone. That money won’t last forever – they were just fortunate in their timing.

I wish Ford well, but their comparative strength is at least partly due to luck. As to the concessions? I’m sure the employees of the other two manufacturers will follow suit shortly.

 
 

On a somewhat Machiavellian note, if GM is bailed out...

streetwise (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 12:41PM EST (link)

we let the Dems run up the tab, point out the futility when the next cash infusion occurs, and let the public get so fed up that they will be ready for tea parties on crack.

From a business perspective, voluntary restructuring is best, and would probably even work for GM. But the company clearly does not want to change. Bankruptcy is no magic bullet. Dysfunctional managements and unions are perfectly capable of going down the road to liquidation.

 
 

Can The D's Pull It Off? And For How Long?

IJB Tuesday, March 10th at 2:19PM EST (link)

I think they may have enough political capital to pull off one more bailout of GM and Chrysler. (And they may not even be able to pull that off.)

But after that? I think that string will be played out. No matter how hard they try, they won’t be able to keep the UAW afloat when people are starving. That *won’t* play.

Sooner or later, their day of reckoning is coming.
And it might be sooner.

 
 

Have GM become Captain Motors...

larryp Tuesday, March 10th at 1:09PM EST (link)

Keep Chev and Cadillac, spin Buick to the Chinese, Pontiac to the Australians,
Make all Suvs and Trucks as GMC (still a pretty good marque). All this downsizing is like the CAW is doing in Canada. Laser-beamed salavaging with Canada Govt funds. And the GOP needs to set up some clinics up there as to why Detroiters and Michiganers should never ever vote Donk again.

CAWS downsizing? This word has an actual definition.

Alberta (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 2:50PM EST (link)

Last I read in the FinPo the CAWs major concession was a wage freeze and not a wage reduction. They also where not prepared to lose anymore workers, which, you know, would be downsizing.

S Harp on the Kud show said he was only making government funds available out of political considerations. The PM said that if they wanted plants in Ontario, GM said they would have to pay X for it. In the real world, this is called extortion. Well, in the real world, when someone makes a claim on you when they have no leverage its called absurd, but we dont live in the real world, now do we?

As to why our Calgary born PM is making Albertans pay for Ontarios union workers? Upper and Lower Canada.

Sir, my concern is not whether God is on our side; my greatest concern is to be on God’s side, for God is always right.
Abraham Lincoln

 
 

I'm convinced there are scenarios where

liandro (Diary) Tuesday, March 10th at 6:40PM EST (link)

bankruptcy would have been far better for GM, especially if they could have shed a good chunk of the overhead that is weighing them down. The problem, as mentioned above, is getting the UAW to release the Dems to allow it–which would be tantamount to a death knell for the UAW in in current form and power.

If the government had any role in any of this, it would have been to guarantee GM’s restructuring in the absence of the very-hard-to-find private investments, and then only after a very thorough changing of GM into a profitable business model.

Even with that, I’m sure there are wiser heads then mine that could point out why it still might have been too much government involvement (and again, that is assuming the union would ever release the Dems to allow it on terms that would inevitably weaken the UAW).