Why Terrorists Are Too Dangerous For U.S. Prisons

Somebody Ask Louis Pepe

By Dan McLaughlin Posted in Comments (25) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Yesterday's news that Congressional Democrats, led by Virginia Congressman Jim Moran, plan to close the Guantanamo Bay prison and bring the terrorists held there to be held in the U.S., is a terrible idea for several reasons, but for one of them, you need look no further than to ask Louis Pepe, the former prison guard at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in lower Manhattan who was attacked on November 1, 2000 by Mamdouh Mahmud Salim, a high-ranking Al Qaeda terrorist who was awaiting trial for the 1998 embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania:

Prosecutors allege that Salim jabbed a sharpened comb, purchased in the MCC commissary, into the eye of corrections officer Louis Pepe. Pepe was blinded in the eye, paralyzed in half of his body, and rendered unable to speak clearly.

The jail no longer sells combs to inmates.

The attack, prosecutors allege, was part of a plan to take guards hostage and escape from the jail.

Pepe's detailed description of the attack paints a horrific, if all too familiar, portrait of the brutality of the jihadists behind bars:

Read On...

Pepe said he will tell the judge how he properly handcuffed the inmates before they slipped free, blinded him with hot sauce, beat him repeatedly and even tried to rape him before stabbing him to get his keys in a bid to free other suspected terrorists. "Both of them did it, not just one," Pepe said excitedly, his right eye wide open and a piece of gauze resting in the socket where the left eye used to be....Pepe said the attack lasted an hour, rather than the 20 minutes that prison authorities maintain it took for help to arrive from less-isolated parts of Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Center.

Pepe described how he resisted throughout the attack, even giving the inmates his house keys when they demanded his prison keys. He said the inmates scrawled the sign of the cross in his blood on his chest before they left him for dead. In the end, Pepe walked out of the cellblock, the sharpened comb still stuck in his eye.

According to a 2004 interview, he has suffered terribly since the attack:

For more than two years, Pepe was hospitalized. He suffered a stroke that left him partially paralyzed, along with pneumonia, a collapsed lung, seizures, infections, a blood clot and high fevers. He underwent brain surgery and spent three weeks in a coma...

Pepe sleeps on a small donated bed and maneuvers his wheelchair across worn floors. Almost no one visits him. Pepe said his pain, from the collapsed left side of his head to the stroke-damaged legs, is chronic. "Every day it hurts so much that it feels like I'm going to be dead," he said.

It should not surprise us that men who are willing to strap bombs to themselves, fly airplanes into buildings, decapitate women and massacre schoolchildren would be willing to perform extreme acts of cruelty and violence to escape from confinement. At Guantanamo, their prison is on an island, the sea to one side, a fortified border to a brutal and paranoid Communist dictatorship on the other. There's nowhere to go. Put these guys in Jim Moran's district, or your home town - whether in a civilian prison awaiting trial (like Salim) or a military brig - and they will do anything in their power to do to more prison guards what they did to Louis Pepe.

« Boeing v. AirbusComments (7) | Jim Talent Makes the Case for a Bigger MilitaryComments (3) »
Why Terrorists Are Too Dangerous For U.S. Prisons 25 Comments (0 topical, 25 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
but hey by absentee

At least he didn't call him a f****t. Now THAT would be something for the country to get riled up about.

This world is ridiculous.

absentee

war by RBMN

The ACLU may not see these guys as military, as prisoners of war, but they see themselves that way. They see themselves as soldiers on a "divine" mission and they act accordingly. Their war against the West continues every minute, every day, every week, every year. We're stupid if we let ourselves forget that.

ugh by jwl1975

I am not at all suprised that my moronic Congressman Jim Moran is pushing this.

I think if we put them in the right prisons as part of the general population, we might be finding that they are begging to go back home to Gitmo.

There are certain things that many prison gangs to serious offense to:
Sexual predators, particularly pedophiles
and people who are violently hostile to their religions are the 2 big ones.

There are those who look on Dresden and Tokyo and Hiroshima as some of the greatest evils ever perpetrated by man. I look on them and thank the perpetrators for saving millions.

inmates by The Brian

Wow, they fashioned a shiv out of an ordinary household item. Who has ever heard of a non-jihadist inmate doing something like that?

There is a difference, however by Dan McLaughlin

One difference is that these guys are trained killers, as most inmates - even violent ones - aren't. But what makes them qualitatively different is that their religious/political ideology makes them impossible to deter and thus much more likely to engage in organized attacks on the guards even while incarcerated.

"No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong." - Winston Churchill

trained killers by The Brian

Yeah, we saw from the Zarqawi video just how far that training goes.

At any rate, this story doesn't sound like anything that couldn't be solved by better prisons. I find it hard to believe that two "properly handcuffed" inmates both just happened to be able to slip their cuffs at the same time. And a response time of somewhere between 20 minutes to an hour is fairly ridiculous.

The idea that our prisons aren't equipped to handle brutal inmates seems absurd. And the idea that we're dealing with large numbers of highly trained supermen even more so.

We're not by cos

Guantanamo has a few truly dangerous people, and a lot who aren't.

yes, yes by absentee

Lots of poor innocent poverty stricken immigrants, falsely accussed by an inhuman dictator, yes? Poor little things, let's free them immediately!

absentee

I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish with that ridicule, but are you denying the well-documented & generally accepted fact that Guantanamo held a few very dangerous people and a lot more who were not dangerous (hundreds of whom have already been released into freedom) ?

Whether they're poor, or "immigrants" (from where? to where?) or who they were accused by is irrelevant.

35 have been recaptured or killed attempting to kill our soldiers again. That's just the ones who we know about. How many more of those "hundreds [who] have already been released" went back to what we caught them doing the first time?

These are illegal combatants who have been taken prisoner. You might want to read the Geneva Conventions. They are not granted any rights by any law or treaty ever signed by the USA (or anyone else I can think of). It would and has already been, the height of stupidity to release them before the end of hostilities. And outright stupidity to bring them into US prisons, which would give them access to the US legal system (well, more access, rather) and better propaganda use for the enemies of this nation.

"Always be honest with yourself. Even if you are honest with no one else."
--me

...when we're too busy paying for the incarceration of criminal aliens:

"In 1980, our federal and state prisons
housed fewer than 9,000 criminal aliens. By the end of 1999, these same
prisons housed over 68,000 criminal aliens.1 Today, criminal aliens account
for over 54 percent of federal prison inmates and represent the fastest
growing segment of the federal prison population. Over the past five
years, an average of more than 72,000 aliens have been arrested annually
on drug charges alone."

...

"Incarceration of criminal aliens cost an estimated $624 million to
state prisons (1999) and $891 million to federal prisons (2002), according
to the most recent available figure from the Bureau of Justice
Statistics."

"The New York State Senate Committee on Cities estimates that the annual
criminal justice costs for criminal aliens in New York is $270 million.
The Committee has called for a national moratorium on immigration to
help alleviate this problem.2 According to the Illinois Governor’s
Office, Illinois spends over $40 million just on the incarceration of
criminal aliens. The cost to Florida’s judicial and correction system for
criminal aliens was $73 million in 1993. 3 In 1988, there were 5,500
illegal immigrants in California’s prisons. By fiscal year 1994- 1995, that
is estimated to have increased to more than 18,000 illegal immigrants in
state prisons—a three-fold increase. California taxpayers have spent
over a billion dollars in the last five years to keep these convicted
felons in prison, and the FY 94–95 cost of incarcerating these offenders
exceeded $375 million.4 The federal government has begun to reimburse
heavily alien-impacted states for some of the costs of illegal alien
prisoners in their state prisons. For 1996, Congress appropriated $300
million for this program."

Yeah, what we really need is more criminal aliens in our prisons.

I see... by cos

A non-ideological serial killer who just happens to like to kill people for fun, can be "deterred" because he doesn't have that jihadist ideology. A mentally unstable & retarded violent criminal who was abused his whole life and now lashes out to hurt people, can be "deterred" simply because he doesn't have that super-special jihadist ideology. A drug dealer whose gang is in a fight of honor with another gang, and happens to be placed in the same cell block as some of their members, can be deterred from attacking the guard who tries to separate them, because his gang loyalty and honor isn't an "ideology" like those jihadists have.

Is far less likely to coordinate with others and ends up being a single actor.

A guard who steps in between members of warring gangs is either stupid or is supported by several other guards and aided by the fact that the gang members are distracted by trying to kill each other. Also, the guards
are aided by the fact that your average gang member doesn't want to die.

Jihadists face none of those constraints. They will work with anyone who will assist them in killig Americans, even other Americans. They don't care about dieing and even welcome the prospect (72 virgins anyone?). And they are, on average, as bad as, if not worse than, the most hardened member of the worst prison gang. They have no compunctions about who they kill or how.

This all adds up to one of two possible outcomes in typical prison populations.
They will either unite the various gangs and execute a very powerful, coordinated prison riot and potential escape.
Or they will convince the other gangs that they are too dangerous and will be eliminated.

I am sure everyone here is hoping the prisoners opt for choice #2 if the Jihadists Are incarcerated in American prisons.

There are those who look on Dresden and Tokyo and Hiroshima as some of the greatest evils ever perpetrated by man. I look on them and thank the perpetrators for saving millions.

...undeserved privileges and freedoms. I also think prisoner-on-prisoner violence must be reduced. But none of these reforms should come about as a result of the prison system's response to murder, mayhem and proselytizing by Jihadi prisoners. Are you also OK with the huge surge in prison rape that is bound to come with the Jihadis?

A few years back Jim was approached by an eight year old who put his hand in his pocket, said he had a gun, and told Jim to "stick 'em up". Jim fearlessly discovered the kid had no gun but drove him to a police station for charging.

Subsequently Jim wasn't incarcerated in an asylum, nor arrested for kidnapping, but for all I know the kid is now a Republican.

From a Democratic point of view, admittedly perverse, it makes sense to transfer the prisoners. The lawyers who help keep the party afloat are complaining about the commute to Gitmo and once in the U.S. their numbers, both in persons and visits can at least triple. As can the presence of outraged journalists in need of a fix now that Libby has been crucified.

I can see an upsurge in hotel bookings and new housing starts near the prisons, interstate transfers of wealth, and untold incidents of contempt and near assaults on local peasants by the twin Praetorian Guards of Progressivism. Overcooked lamb in the prisons kitchens will obliterate any memories of gas chambers, and Dick Cheney, or somebody, will replace Heinrich Himmler as Beast of the Millennium.

Whatever terrorists do return to their ways will never be noticed.

"a man's admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him". Tocqueville

he's real tough on women as well as little kids.

"A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition." -- Rudyard Kipling

we let him spend the night in a cell with some of his terrorist friends..
====
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." -- James Madison

We've always had prisoners in the US who attack guards. We've had murders and riots for about as long as we've had prisons. Prisons have people in them who are not terrorists or jihadis but are violent, dangerous, insane, or all three. We don't use that as an excuse to ship them all off to some legal limbo.

Guantanamo, on the other hand, clearly has a lot of innocent non-jihadis along with some terrorists and real terrorist suspects. We've already released hundreds of people from Guantanamo after concluding that they're not dangerous, and some of them are walking free, but often after having spent years there.

I don't understand the sense in either side of this argument: We've always had, and always will have, dangerous violent prisoners in the US - moving the people from Guantanamo won't significantly increase their numbers. And we've got a lot of people at Guantanamo who are not violent or dangerous...

... except in one big way: their existence is prompting even conservatives to lose their strength of belief in the 4th amendment.

But then my faith in the 16th amendment is even more shattered.
The entire Constitution hangs by a thread awaiting the pleasures of a band of rapacious neo-con Goths and Vandals. Freedom is extinct, terror reigns, little children are hidden in closets, doors bolted and double locked before sleepless nights interrupted by the screams of the innocent and the pounding of hob nailed boots in the streets.

And many Americans, unable to stand it anymore, rush to their drugstores to purchase ample supplies of both laxatives and sedatives. An idea potentially beneficial to some.

"a man's admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him". Tocqueville

Dangerous Prisoners by itdiehard

If these POW are moved to USA prisons, it will make the prisons even more dangerous. I believe theie was a 60 minutes or 48 hour show that documented the molsum extremis movement into the prisons.

in our prisons.
Let's see.. mix gasoline fumes and a match... wonder what will happen.
====
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." -- James Madison

No POWs at Gitmo by Raven

Only illegal combatants and suspected illegal combatants (aka terrorists).

There are those who look on Dresden and Tokyo and Hiroshima as some of the greatest evils ever perpetrated by man. I look on them and thank the perpetrators for saving millions.

My solution by n2sooners

I was actually thinking about this earlier today and I think I have come up with the perfect solution. We will have a vote in the house to shut down Gitmo. If it passes, we will take the prisoners, divide them by the number of yes votes, and send them to the home districts of all those voting to shut it down. Just make sure this is known before the vote.

Better yet, we can just hand over custody to those voting yes and they can take responsibility for the terrorists and keep them at their homes under house arrest. Hope their spouses and children don't mind while they are in Washington working those five day work weeks.


blog advertising is good for you



blog advertising is good for you


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


Image

image

Get RedState by E-mail



Delivered by FeedBurner

©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service