Just a Company of American paratroopers, a guitar plugged
into the outpost's PA system, and a whole lot of demolitions.
Anticipating the shellacking: Senator Obama explains his Kentucky loss on email and Fox News.
They're spying on him! Spying on him... with rays!
By Moe Lane Posted in 2008 | Barack Obama | The Best Democratic Primary EVER — Comments (39) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Yeah, I stole that from Terry Pratchett. You knew that I was a geek when you started reading this.
Anyway, you get the feeling that right now Barry's main goal in life is to not vomit from the sheer weariness of it all. Via Hot Air:
Obama blames Fox News, e-mail for likely loss in Kentucky
By Ryan Alessi | Lexington Herald-LeaderLEXINGTON, Ky. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, facing a likely defeat in next Tuesday's primary election, won't travel to Kentucky before the voting, but said he hopes to have much more time to win over Kentucky voters before the November general election.
He also blamed Fox News for disseminating "rumors" about him and said that that and e-mails filled with misinformation that have been "systematically" dispersed have hurt him in Kentucky.
"When we're able to campaign in a place like Iowa for several months and I can visit and talk to people individually, I do very well. That's harder to do at this stage in the campaign," Obama said in a brief telephone interview Friday. "And once we get past the primary, we'll ble [I assume that this is merely a typo for "be able," although it would truly rock if Senator Obama was at the point of glossolalia in this campaign - ML]to focus more on those states where we need to make sure people know my track record."
In contrast, Obama's rival, Sen. Hillary Clinton, will make five stops in Kentucky over the weekend, including appearances at two university campuses.
Of course she did.
Read on.
First off: yeah, Senator Clinton's so totally living off of other people's life force at this point, isn't she? I'd be more worried about that except that she isn't eating anybody I know, and frankly I'm so far down her list that we'd need to repeal the 22nd Amendment before I was in any real danger of having my soul consumed. Never a dull moment in this primary, let me tell you. And the best days are still to come.
Well, best days for me and mine.
Second: I know that it's McClatchy and everything, but he really is blaming email and Fox News.
“Part of it is because there have been these e-mails that have been sent out very systematically, presumably by various political opponents, although I don’t know who,” he said. “And there are a lot of voters who get their news from Fox News. Fox has been pumping up rumors about my religious beliefs or my patriotism or what have you since the beginning of the campaign.”
Now, I understand that this is precisely what a lot of current Obama supporters want to hear, but there's a problem with that; there aren't enough Obama supporters to let him win the election. In case you haven't noticed, there aren't enough Obama supporters to let him decisively win the Democratic primary by now (the two parties are usually done at this point, remember? - and by "usually" I mean "as has been the case throughout my lifetime"). He could possibly get more Obama supporters; in fact, I assume that this would be his long-term strategy. But if he wants to do that, I think that he may want to consider not coming up with excuses about why people aren't going to vote for him in Kentucky. Or at least come up with excuses that might be a little closer to objective reality.
Now, I can hear in the distance, But... it's TRUE! That really is why Obama's going to lose Kentucky! That awful Fox News! Those emails! Well, my response to that... is to grin evilly, actually. After I'm done doing that, I might suggest gently that anyone who actually does think that might as well quit now: because if Obama's appeal to working class, White voters can be so easily overridden by a news network's lack of idolatry and the existence of spam email chains, he's doomed anyway. I might even suggest that his campaign should possibly restart from zero and actually connect with those working class, White voters on their terms, not his.
Might. It'd all depend if I thought anybody on the Other Side had both the mother-wit to take me seriously, and the pull to do anything about it. The fact that you're seeing this should be taken as a suggestion that I've decided that there's nobody with that combination, thankfully.
Moe Lane
PS: By the way, Senator: if you miss so badly those carefree days where you could burrow down into one State and really get into the concerns, fears, and yes, hopes of its citizens, well, I can think of at least one Democrat who'll happily pay your airfare back to Illinois.
Until then, kindly suck it up, would you? We're choosing a President, not the Whiner-in-Chief.
« Walking Back The Cat — Comments (3) | $10.00 to start cleaning up the GOP or stop complaining. — Comments (21) »
Anticipating the shellacking: Senator Obama explains his Kentucky loss on email and Fox News. 39 Comments (0 topical, 39 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
(with apologies if that's been used)
Kimchi on the popcorn, please.
soli Deo gloria
I don't know why. It's so concise, and flows so easily that it sounds like an official title if you don't think about how insulting it is. Maybe it's just too snide.
--
Gone 2500 years, still not PC.
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
"Speaker-in-Law" would imply a certain Queen Stork style to the woman that has been notably absent in her tenure thus far.
The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!
She doesn't have the relevance to acquire a nickname. Even Sheets Byrd or Dick Turban have acquired nicknames; it's sad the woman who sits two heartbeats from the Presidency doesn't command unserious derision.
--
Gone 2500 years, still not PC.
To go along with being a sore winner.
But it balances rather well with his need to reinvent himself from his name to what he said just last week.
And of course this all highlights his snobbery rather well, no?
in the upcoming 5K on email and Fox news. Without them, I'd have gotten off my lardy butt and run this winter, but as it is I'm out of shape.
Their fault entirely.
--
Gone 2500 years, still not PC.
Its too bad KY isn't a caucus state. I do well in caucus states. My minions can bully caucus voters into thinking they're racist if they don't vote for me.
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
Many of the liberal elite believe that only a small number of rubes and yahoos watch Fox News, but the rest of America joins in condemning them — and their viewers — for being racist, sexist, bigoted pigs. That is why, when the liberal elitist Barack Obama makes comments like this about Fox News, the liberal elitists he surrounds himself with all nod in agreement. None of them ever watch Fox News themselves, they don't know anyone who does, and they have no idea what its programming is actually like. They simply hold opinions based on assumptions found at the end of their long, long snoots.
Drink Good Coffee. You can sleep when you're dead.
Let's all start referring to him as "the big B.O." as our special term of endearment for the poor, beleaguered soul.
HTML Help for Red Staters
"If we want to take this party back, and I think we can someday, let’s get to work." – Barry Goldwater
Perhaps you might want to start calling him Mr. President.
Never elect a man of low character to high office
Let alone California, New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, or even freaking Massachusetts. Michigan and Florida are currently as far from his grasp as the freaking moon. What's he planning to make that up with, the Mole People?
The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!
*Texan Democrats may have their odd rituals involving double votes and a mixed primary/caucus, but normal people are not required to take them seriously.
By blaming Fox News for Obama's losses, he's implicitly admitting that lots of moderate Democrats watch Fox News, and are guided by what they see there.
All this time, the Left has been claiming that Fox News is only for Republicans and conservatives. Back when DailyKOS and MoveOn.org were demanding that Democrats should refuse to appear on Fox News, one of their reasons was that "90% of Fox News viewers vote Republican anyway, so we don't need them." (Check their archives and see for yourself.)
The Left has always had trouble staying on message.
I don't think he has watched Fox News much lately....he has a LOT of fans that are on that channel every day.
Shep Smith is a BIG FAN!
What you people don't / won't realize, is that only the far Right takes Fox "News" seriously; so when Sean Hannity gets on his 24-hour Reverend Wright hate-fest, he is preaching to the proverbial choir.
nt
the miniscule amount of the general population that propogates your garbage, than pardon me; I hate to disturb those in a grandiose delusional stupor :)
And I wouldn't talk about grandiose when you're running the kind of candidate you're running.
You're feeding it. Just stop it, people!
Unfair. Unbalanced. Unmedicated. -- IMAO
Your gone so I don't expect you to actually reply. Just thought I would point out the complete lack of thought that went into your attempt to make a nuisance of yourself.
Work on it a bit. You may get better but for now you are just comical.
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
I am not well-versed in your neanderthal, knuckle-dragging acronysisms.
I'm ready to propogate those acronysisms.
My real name is Osouraki al-Maliki, and I have infiltrated your Fascist website! Actually, I am a WASP, who actually thinks about issues. BTW, freedom from religion is implicity implied in the First Amendment to our Constitution.
Actually, I am a WASP, who actually thinks about issues
No, you pretend that the reality all around you doesn't apply to people you don't know in places you've never been. Ergo, though you may be a WASP and somehow not only not kill Catholics but work with them, you can ignore that and claim that Sunni and Shi'a -- like AQ and Iran, who have been working together in Iraq for years now -- would never do so.
Ditto being friends with secular people. Can happen for you, can't ever happen in the ME, with Saddam and AQ, despite the mountains of documents proving their operational relationship.
How about Saddam's financial sponsorship of Palestinian terrorists killing Jews? Wait, that's made up too, since Saddam's secular.
You don't think at all. You'd like to believe that you do, but you don't.
BTW, freedom from religion is implicity implied in the First Amendment to our Constitution.
Hm. You also can't read (and are pretty unwieldy with the English language, as well). Freedom from the state's imposing an official religion is directly included in the First Amendment. Freedom from others around you openly practicing theirs is not, and you'd know that if you actually treated the Constitution like you do other manuscripts and documents, instead of like a Frankenstein's Monster that suddenly comes alive and speaks gibberish that isn't found anywhere in the print document.
Jeff's in fine form today, no?
Unfair. Unbalanced. Unmedicated. -- IMAO
I think he was confusing the U.S. Constitution
with the Communist Manifesto:
"There are, besides, eternal truths, such as Freedom, Justice, etc. that are common to all states of society. But Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis; it therefore acts in contradiction to all past historical experience."
Support libertarian Republicans here and here.
www.rlc.org
www.fairtax.org
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
Like Jefferson and Adams, if memory serves...
by Jack SavageNo problems Ski
by JoliphantYou can't make a living in this country
by kowalskiI don't see the connection
by JoliphantIf you do agree with it
by kowalskiI just disagree with it.
by kowalskiTell the Character of a man by his enemies
by Matt SanchezI'm putting the troll in a bind
by Neil StevensJust for a laugh on this day
by Neil StevensPunishment trumps pandering now.
by gandolphxxMay I also suggest...
by birdmojoExcellent reminder, haystack! n/t
by Vegas RickGOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!
by GOP4EverI have no opinion re Webb.
by redneck hippieyou mean this one?
by pilgrimI'm reluctant to answer that question ;)
by kowalski
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com




All this popcorn consumption's bound to drive up food prices even further. BEST. PRIMARY. EVER.
"Logic refutes liberalism" - Rush Limbaugh