<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>steverichmond's Diary</title>
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/steverichmond</link>
	<description>Just another RedState: Where the VRWC Conspires Online weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:11:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>No, Ma’am</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Promoted from the diaries &#8211; ed.</em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>A year ago, Barbara Boxer &#8211; my state’s junior senator &#8211; made news across the country when, during a Senate Committee hearing, she laid into Brigadier General Michael Walsh of the Corps of Engineers.<span> </span>BGen Walsh made the mistake of calling her “Ma’am” in answering a question.<span> </span>She went off on Walsh telling him to call her “Senator” as she had worked so hard for the title.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">For many military people and veterans who don’t track political news day-to-day and are relatively apolitical (that was me, until recently), it was one of a handful of political news items to cross our radar.<span> </span>I remember my reaction at the time—a brief “what the hell has her knickers all in a bunch” question, knowing that Walsh was paying her a compliment.<span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Later, however, I thought about my reaction to the incident and began to see it in an altogether different and more serious light.<span> </span>Barbara Boxer after so many years in the Senate has no idea at all of the culture of the Armed Forces of the United States.<span> </span>She literally does not understand the requirements incumbent on those who have sworn the Oath, to support and defend our Constitution against all enemies.</p>
<p><span id="more-3"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Boxer has a deplorable record when it comes to the most critical military issue: Troop funding.<span> </span>In 1991, she voted against a supplemental to support troops on the ground in Kosovo.<span> </span>In 2001, she voted against $847M to fund much needed mission critical and force protection maintenance.<span> </span>And in 2003, unlike our senior senator, Dianne Feinstein, Boxer voted with only 12 other Senators to try to defeat a $87B supplemental for supporting troops in the field and their families at home.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The fact is: Boxer is no friend of the military or veterans, and for me, that’s reason number one why she needs to go this November.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">For other Californians, there will be other reasons.<span> </span>Recently, a friend of mine who I have known since Vietnam was talking about the water problem in the San Joaquin Valley.<span> </span>He has been trying to find a way around the federal government’s moves to cut water to the farmers in that area&#8211; shutting down farms and agribusiness because of concerns regarding a small fish that lives in the area.<span> </span>Barbara Boxer has been the driving force behind these out-of-kilter efforts that put fish before families, and those living in a now dried-up former breadbasket where unemployment stands at over 20% know it.<span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">That’s another good reason why Boxer needs to be retired.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">But for those of us who swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, which is now under a furious attack thanks to figures like Boxer, we now have two good reasons to send Ms. Boxer home, and send Carly Fiorina to Washington.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><span>Steve Richmond served in the U.S. Marine Corps and is the Statewide Chair of Veterans for Carly.</span></em></p>
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/steverichmond/2010/06/16/no-maam/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

