Hey, Mr. President, does the U.S. deserve nuclear power like Iran?


President Barack Obama’s contradictions, idiocies, and blatant deceptions may have reached rock bottom today. He told the BBC that Iran has the right to nuclear power as long as it uses it peacefully.
Obama says Iran’s energy concerns legitimate
By NANCY ZUCKERBROD
The Associated Press
Tuesday, June 2, 2009 9:24 AM

 

LONDON — President Barack Obama suggested that Iran may have some right to nuclear energy _ provided it proves by the end of the year that its aspirations are peaceful.

In a BBC interview broadcast Tuesday, he also restated plans to pursue direct diplomacy with Tehran to encourage it set aside any ambitions for nuclear weapons it might harbor.

Iran has insisted its nuclear program is aimed at generating electricity. But the U.S. and other Western governments accuse Tehran of seeking atomic weapons.

 
 
Now I have a quick question for the president. Does the United States have the right to nuclear power? You tend to think not and have been all over the board on the subject. Is the United States less deserving than Iran? Less reliable? Tennessee Senator Lamar Alexander has suggested we build 20 nuclear plants in the near term. Are you on board with the senator?
 
I think the answer is “no.” And since you want Iran to have nuclear power, and your socialist idol France has power, if you don’t want the United States to have it the reason is obvious. You want to further harm the United States economy to level the playing field for other nations. You are not concerned about health and safety issues. You are concerned about other nations being economically equal to the United States. And those nations apparently include Iran.
 
Pathetic.
In other news, the president told the BBC he wouldn’t push human rights issues in Iran.

Asked what he would say during his visit about human rights abuses, including the detention of political prisoners in Egypt, Obama indicated no stern lecture would be forthcoming.

He said he hoped to deliver the message that democratic values are principles that “they can embrace and affirm.”

Words escape me.


Category: , ,

RSS feed

3 Comments Leave a comment

GC HIGHLY RECCOS - precisely stated - I would also add

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Tuesday, June 2nd at 7:24PM EST (link)

Does the US deserve the right to drill for more of its own oil and build refineries?

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Oil is strategic imperative, and should be treated as such:

JLenardDetroit (Diary) Tuesday, June 2nd at 7:59PM EST (link)

was my first thought and we have heard that kind of talk before, but NOTHING ever gets done about it – which reminded me of something…. happened to be yours where I responded: Drill as act of civil disobedienceNext Republican President needs to correct both of these situations…

Military mobilization to DRILL, BABY, DRILL

moot point now, but… directly to your Diary title… an out of the box thought…

With a Republican President we could have, and under Bush should have, mobilized a Secret Special Forces (not in the sense you may be thinking off hand) with recruitment throughout the Oil Industry ranks, equipment/materials (quietly, secretly – to the degree that’s possible – could’ve done it overseas in Iraq under the guise of/for use in the Middle East then brought them and all materials back here), etc… for use in ANWAR and/or anywhere else for RAPID DEPLOYMENT and IMMEDIATE DRILLING under the ROLE OF COMMANDER IN CHIEF and use of ARMED FORCES in the NAME OF NATIONAL SECURITY and got our da… darn… Resources started out of the Ground.

Of course it would be challenged, but let the Liberals challenge it all they like as we drag it out all the way to the SCOTUS. In the meantime, drilling our little hind-sides off. Building a bigger Military reserve and selling the rest off to US Oil companies.

I know that will sound a tad too close to a National owned/run Oil company to many. I think that when you think about how/why I would look to put those “officially” Military Personnel to work you might reconsider. Once those FEDERAL LANDS were in use by the Military to produce Oil, it would be difficult for the Democrats to just shut them back off again. My thoughts, would be they’d shut it down under the Secret (of course, wouldn’t stay secret long) Military Operations, but hope that Public support would then say it’s been opened to drilling so hand it over to the US Oil companies to continue “legally.” Legally, of course, as the Military way would be deemed “Illegal” by Dems.

The whole ENERGY issue is, of course, defense strategy related also and the same need of “independence” they keep talking about has to be pushed for Nuclear…. The problem almost always comes down to NIMBY, but some plants that exist have room for expansion – the NIMBY doesn’t really apply as the plants (like in MI, Fermi II) already are there and online and additional reactors could be built to bring online.

Regards from NoMoTown (the MOTORlessCITY)
“Liberals, looking to do for? America what they’ve done for? Detroit! which is DESTROY IT!”
“I think, therefore I am Conservative”
“Conservative by choice, Republican by necessity”
“You can lead a Liberal to the Truth/Facts, but you cannot make them THINK!”
“Romney [No, not my first choice] does NOT have a MORMON problem. He has a, far too many Americans; these days; are MORONS problem!”


(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (message) (Warning: Children Will Die!!)
Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
The first Liberal was Satan” – a Rush caller (other Quotes)

amen JL' - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Tuesday, June 2nd at 10:40PM EST (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson