It was disturbing today to see the RINO’s out in force rushing breathlessly to sign a treaty with a (former?) communist country.

In the courtroom, at the ballot box, on the airwaves and the soon to be regulated internet we must keep pushing back the green weenies.

For all their false claims to be advocates of the poor and middle class, Leftists pursue one policy after another that raises the cost of living for all Americans yet hits those in the lowest income brackets the hardest.

The recent food safety bill and the continuation of ethanol subsidies raise the price of food.

Cap & Trade by design would ave raised the price of energy and every thing dependent on transport which, is just about everything.

The Sierra Club and other earth firsters now want to limit the number of power plants that are built? Why? What is their plan to mitigate the harm to the public from higher energy prices? Or perhaps they know that more money spent on energy leaves less disposable income for consumption. And the Left is solidly against American consumerism.

As with C&T the Left will demand energy subsidies for the poor thus further reducing the disposable income of the middle class as we not only have to pay higher energy prices but have to also subsidize the poor. We’ll be paying twice for energy price hikes.

And why is it that the Left refuses to oppose illegal, and even legal, immigration since more people naturally leads to increased demand for energy.

Is it any wonder that only wealthy countries can afford the luxury of an environmental movement? The rest of the world is just trying to survive and prosper.

I hate the eco-Marxist Left. They must be fought.

Do any of these groups get federal funding? If so we MUST work with GOP lawmakers to eliminate taxpayer funding of these, and all, Leftists.

I read the following in the Washington Post this evening; “The Sierra Club, meanwhile, is bolstering its long-standing campaign to block the construction of power plants across the country, assembling a team of 100 full-time employees to focus on the issue in 45 states.”

Your goal to reduce available energy supplies will result in higher energy prices which, naturally, will impact the poor and middle class the hardest. If people spend more on energy it leaves less money for food, clothing, housing, other necessities as well as wants. Why do you support policies that will harm those most vulnerable to higher energy prices and what are your plans to address this if you’re successful in limiting our available energy?

You have supported ethanol which has done more harm than good to the environment as well as driven up the cost of food.

You oppose the use of US natural resources that only makes us more dependent on hostile and environmentally backward nations.

You oppose nuclear power, which is 100% carbon free, and as a result the environmental movement more than the coal industry is responsible for our massive CO2 emissions because without your opposition to nuclear power we could have transitioned to nuclear decades ago and our emissions would be magnitudes lower since, as we all know, electricity generation produces 70% of US emissions.

And why do you refuse to oppose illegal and legal immigration with the resulting demand for even more energy and consumption natural resources. Your failure to oppose population growth while simultaneously pushing to limit energy supplies is baffling.

My only assumption on this final point is that it is just cowardice on your part and on the part of the entire environmental movement as limiting population growth is the quickest way to reduce resource demand and the resulting stress on our environment.

I look forward to your response.

learn from the European energy crisis, they embrace it. That is exactly what they want here, only more so!

the Sierra Club says it is for conservation but works against it. For a period of years in the 60′s and early 70′s most every home heated with oil or electricity. When these costs went up, people began to burn wood for heat and many continue to do so. Because of the rise in food costs because of so much corn used for ethanol, hunting is on the rise and shamefully poaching is also. It appears to me that the Sierra Club is cutting off it’s nose to spite it’s face.

Saved me some typing on this depressing day. Our own creeps are worse than the commie p—-ks. We forget to watch our traitors like Goober and Mitch, to say nothing of Collins, Murkowski, and Snowe. I say, we need to replace virtually anyone we had last decade—anybody notice the antics of that brain dead airhead McCain this week,?