From the diaries…
With no great pleasure, I must lay out the case against Barack Obama, Demagogue in Chief.
Barack Obama, as most politicians, loves the argument by anecdote. In his health care speech on September 9 in support of government health care, he brought up several cases of people who had lost their insurance because their insurance company had discovered they’d made false statements on their applications. If you knowingly make false statements on a government application, you go to jail for perjury. Unless you’re an Obama appointee, that is.
The Obama speech was full of deceptions. For instance:
Then there’s the problem of rising costs. We spend one-and-a-half times more per person on health care than any other country, but we aren’t any healthier for it. This is one of the reasons that insurance premiums have gone up three times faster than wages. It’s why so many employers – especially small businesses – are forcing their employees to pay more for insurance, or are dropping their coverage entirely. It’s why so many aspiring entrepreneurs cannot afford to open a business in the first place, and why American businesses that compete internationally – like our automakers – are at a huge disadvantage. And it’s why those of us with health insurance are also paying a hidden and growing tax for those without it – about $1000 per year that pays for somebody else’s emergency room and charitable care. [emphasis added]
We spend more per person. So? We are not those other countries, and they are not us. Notice that he didn’t say we were not better off or as healthy for it, merely “no healthier”. But we are in fact healthier for it than the people of say, Chad, which is covered under “any other country”. And we don’t wait years for care, and are not denied care by government edict, especially for the preventative tests like colonoscopies and PSA tests Mr. Obama says will save us so much, but are discouraged under government-run health systems. More importantly, even if we were less healthy, it would still be okay with me, because we are more free because of our system.
More below...
He says this excess spending is the reason for rising insurance premiums. As an exercise in oversimplification, he’s done a fine job there. But there is no law — yet — saying that a business has to provide insurance for its employees, so why would rising rates keep anyone from starting a business? If anything, his demand that employers provide insurance, or pay an equivalent fine, is exactly what will keep businesses from starting, or expanding past the point of his choosing.
He says American businesses like our automakers can’t compete with foreign companies because our companies have to pay higher health care costs. No, they can’t compete because they are saddled with union contracts that demand Cadillac coverage for current and retired workers, contracts that also demand insane work rules pitting employer and employee against one another. Foreign car companies with plants in the United States do just fine, with American workers, on American soil, with American health care.
Finally, he admits to the biggest lie in this entire health care debate: claiming that people without insurance do not get health care. We mandate, by law, that people can walk up to a public hospital and receive care if they need it, insured or not. If they can’t walk, an ambulance will come pick them up for a ride. Charitable hospitals routinely write off the cost of caring for people who cannot afford it, and in fact, doing so is their core mission. Cost recovery is already built in to the system.
Skipping a bit:
Let me repeat this: nothing in our plan requires you to change what you have.
The fallacy here is in the construction: you won’t have to change your policy, but what you have will change or go away. As he said, insurance companies will be required to cover a list of mandated health problems and procedures. There will be maximum out-of-pocket rates, and maximum co-payments. So insurance rates will change, and you may not be able to afford your current plan (or your insurance company may get out of the health insurance business). Most importantly, if your employer decides that it will be cheaper to drop coverage altogether and pay whatever fee, penalty, fine, or tax is required to send you to the public option, then you will lose your insurance.
Allow me to skip to the most illogical part of his entire speech:
Reducing the waste and inefficiency in Medicare and Medicaid will pay for most of this plan. Much of the rest would be paid for with revenues from the very same drug and insurance companies that stand to benefit from tens of millions of new customers. This reform will charge insurance companies a fee for their most expensive policies, which will encourage them to provide greater value for the money – an idea which has the support of Democratic and Republican experts. And according to these same experts, this modest change could help hold down the cost of health care for all of us in the long-run.[emphasis added]
If there is “waste and inefficiency in Medicare and Medicaid”, let’s get rid of it today. Show it to us, Dear Leader. I think the waste and inefficiency he’s talking about is keeping old people alive past their Obama-approved expiration dates.
But here’s the thing: those tens of millions of new customers can only provide money to the system if they are healthy and don’t need the care. If they use medical care enough to make up for the premiums (or new taxes) they pay, then there is no advantage to the government. And these “revenues from the very same drug and insurance companies” will come not from pixie dust and tickets to unicorn trail rides, but from the premiums paid by ordinary customers. In other words, the cost will all be passed down to the customer or their taxpaying grandchildren, one way or another.
Obama’s ending was impassioned, clear, and utterly wrong-headed. As usual, he could not avoid being deceptive; it’s his nature.
You see, our predecessors understood that government could not, and should not, solve every problem. They understood that there are instances when the gains in security from government action are not worth the added constraints on our freedom. But they also understood that the danger of too much government is matched by the perils of too little; that without the leavening hand of wise policy, markets can crash, monopolies can stifle competition, and the vulnerable can be exploited.
Markets can still crash. Government is the ultimate monopoly. And the lack of health insurance to people we are already caring for does nothing to exploit them, even if it were a problem of regulation, like antitrust laws or creation of the SEC. What he’s talking about is wholly different, a wealth redistribution scheme. Selling it as the same thing as those others is dishonest.
Mr. Obama brought nothing new to the discussion in his speech to Congress. We must not let his deceptions pass.
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
Dang, that was excellent.
Bill S (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 10:48AM EST (link)Well done, Socrates. That one was a no-brainer front-page promotion.
“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins
Thanks, bs.
Loren Heal (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:17AM EST (link)I watched the tail end of the speech after turning in for the night. Mrs. Socrates went to sleep before he finished, but I couldn’t sleep after what I’d just heard.
–
Join the Concord Project, and follow @lheal, if you dare.
Nicely done, Soc.
baserunr (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 10:50AM EST (link)I think the metric that is most often as a proxy for “healthier” used is “Life Expectancy”, which is generally life expectancy at birth. By this standard, we don’t measure up as well as many other countries. But if you look a little farther down the line, you’ll find that once you reach ever-advancing ages, there is no better place to be than in the US for healthcare. To quote Mark Steyn “…By age 40, Americans’ life expectancy has caught up with Britons’. By 60, it equals Germany’s. At the age of 80, Americans have greater life expectancy than Swedes.” This doesn’t seem like an ineffective healthcare system to me. It seems like one that works, and very well. Can’t we just let me pick the healthcare I want? If I can do this with my car, and pick ANY insurer in the US, why can’t I get my health insurance this way?
“The day you think you know it all is the day your trouble starts.”
That's because we're more free.
Loren Heal (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:07AM EST (link)We make all kinds of choices they don’t. We choose to eat more crappy food, because we’re not content to live on beans and rice. We choose to drive more, because we aren’t content to wait for the government train. We fight in wars from which they cower, while they are content to live inside the penumbra of our shield.
–
Join the Concord Project, and follow @lheal, if you dare.
It's because we save the babies
Incredible (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 12:15PM EST (link)You could make the case that Chinese youth are healthier than American youth. The fact of the matter is that it is because they execute unhealthy babies.
It’s the same as the anti-incarceration argument. We incarcerate more people per capita than China. That has a lot to do with the fact they put a bullet in the back of your head instead of three hots and a cot.
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” Thomas Jefferson
Join the RedState Strike Force
Thank God
gonzo55 (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 10:59AM EST (link)we have at least some courage on our side in the person of Joe Wilson, who is willing to call it like he sees it even if that (gasp!) means disrespecting the office of the President. I only wish the rest of Congress weren’t so spineless, falling over themselves to put distance between them and Congressman Wilson. Obama LIES, people will die because of it, and no one, save people like Congressman Wilson, is willing to raise a finger. Disgusting.
“Facts are stubborn things” — Ronald Wilson Reagan
great job!! nt
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:03AM EST (link)conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
He has some nerve
jimc1969 Thursday, September 10th at 11:14AM EST (link)He has some nerve talking about american companies competing.
Yes, its all about healthcare, NOT Sarbanes Oxley, or that stupid tax on re-patriated profits ( which he wants to make WORSE !!! )
The complexitity & high rate of our corp tax structure…….
What would Cap & trade ( an Obama Favorite ) do to our competiveiness !!!
Hes something else, REALLY !!!!
Too LITTLE government?
toughintn (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:15AM EST (link)“But they also understood that the danger of too much government is matched by the perils of too little; that without the leavening hand of wise policy, markets can crash, monopolies can stifle competition, and the vulnerable can be exploited.”
Wow.
I’d like to imagine having “too little government.”
Seriously.
I’m trying to IMAGINE that, right now.
And come on! The Biblical imagery doesn’t ring true.
The “leavening hand of wise policy”?
WISE?
Proverbs 13:20 — “He who walks with the wise grows wise, but a companion of fools suffers harm.”
(Uh, too many examples to list.)
LEAVENING HAND?
Galatians 5:9 — “A little yeast works through the whole batch of dough.”
(Yeah, and that “leavening hand” is destroying a lot of financial dough as it works through the whole economy.)
"fishy"
texas214 (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:15AM EST (link)I think Rep. Wilson was trying to report the President to the “fishy”, fishy@whitehouse.gov or somesuch, email site after some of the whoppers he told last night.
Good article.
Excellent piece, Socrates! The speech was fallacy
Achance (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:16AM EST (link)piled on fallacy and premised on lies. Trouble is, the electorate has reached a medieval level of ignorance and superstition so they, those who watched anyway, were so enthralled by the emotion and spectacle that they never got to the fact that it was all a bright shining lie.
In Vino Veritas
A medieval level of ignorance and superstition...
Steph C (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:48AM EST (link)followed by a swift return to a medieval level of existence in all aspects when lords, ladies, overlords, and kings decided for the people under their rule, whether it was right or wrong, good or evil. And we will be serfs (the medieval term for slaves).
Every race and culture at one time or another has been enslaved by some other race. Why should now be any different?
“[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.” –Candidus in the Boston Gazette, 1772
Hillbilly Politics
I fear we have a citizenry no longer capable of participating
Achance (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 12:09PM EST (link)in a republican democracy. Each time Pomp and Circumstances gets played a whole new crop of functional illiterates with no critical thinking skills and driven wholly by emotion is set loose on the Country. Comrade Obama’s single greatest demographic was the 20-somethings.
What I’d really like to see is a requirement to pass the same citizenship test that legal immigrants must pass in order to register to vote.
In Vino Veritas
Unfortunately, I have to agree with you.
Steph C (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 12:12PM EST (link)Unfortunate because it is true and profoundly sad.
“[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.” –Candidus in the Boston Gazette, 1772
Hillbilly Politics
We've had a young houseguest for a few weeks,
Achance (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 12:26PM EST (link)a friend of our oldest son who needed a place for “a couple of weeks.” That couple of weeks is turning out to have a very expansive definition but that’s not the story. He’s 25, I think, and working on his Master’s degree, which means he’s “better” educated than either of us. He never had a good home life so he was at our house a lot back when the kids were in school here. Now he’s back as what passes for an educated, employed adult and has tried to fit in with us, eat meals, watch TV, go fishing, do chores etc. with us – and talk with us. Trouble is, you can’t talk with him because he simply doesn’t know enough about anything but sports and movies to engage in a conversation. Mention something in the news, he doesn’t know what you’re talking about. Mention something from history, he can’t follow you, likewise literature. A normal, educated adult conversation about something that you heard or saw today is simply beyond him. He’s not stupid in the sense that his synapses fire quickly, he has no disability, he’s just abysmally ignorant about everything in the World except popular culture. Unfortunately, in my experience he is all too typical of his peers.
In Vino Veritas
Try talking to more people.
Loren Heal (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 12:46PM EST (link)My wife works in a nursing home. I was there the other night after hours, when three of the young CNAs were sitting around filling out forms and talking about politics.
All three were politically engaged. One didn’t trust Obama simply because of his name, but also because he was pro-abortion. Another didn’t like him because he was giving money to everyone but her. Another was a True Believer McBushLied Obamabot Truther.
Their ideas were all screwy, but they at least had them.
In my second job delivering pizzas, I’ve met lots of under-30 people. They’re all over the map in their politics. A heavy plurality of them realize, for instance, that the minimum wage keeps them from getting more hours, makes the store’s prices higher which makes business slower which also keeps them from getting more hours, and keeps them at the same pay rate as the lazy new people who ought to be fired.
–
Join the Concord Project, and follow @lheal, if you dare.
Barack Obama the liar that keeps getting called out
Richard Mullins (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:35AM EST (link)as such and infuriates Conservatives when he keep carping on Jim DeMint and statement about Healthcare will be Obama’s “Waterloo”. I makes me angry very time BO goes carping on it. I makes my blood boil and makes me think of him as the biggest divider in history.
Richard Phillip Mullins BlogThe Squash Satire SiteNews on Happy Jet Airlines
Rmullins Pics
Rpmullins Twitter
Joe Biden is like a Decrepit Park owner with a Meth lab that happens to not only be a dealer but a user.
Let’s Bankrupt the Democratic paty. Make spend all the money to defend thier candidates.
Where do they come from?
ss396 Thursday, September 10th at 11:43AM EST (link)I can see the “new” insurance company customers, since he is going to compel people into a system of insuring against risks that they do not currently have. But, from where do these tens of millions of new drug company customers hail? Is he also going to compel massive purchases of drugs?
If you pay someone to sit on his butt, you can’t be surprised when he does.
Excellent, Socrates. You are right, nothing new was brought to the table.
spainishirish (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 11:54AM EST (link)Obama is convinced, wrongly, that he can repackage and no one will notice. I imagine the typical Blue Dog today only has one question: what has changed? The question sort of answers itself.
Wonderful rebuttal, Soc!
Tom Anderson (Diary) Thursday, September 10th at 3:20PM EST (link)This is a great piece that hits the nail on the head. It’s just too bad that the Prevaricator-in-Chief doesn’t realize how big his nose is getting.
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
- Edmund Burke
Who Funds the Radical Left in America?
clifwest Thursday, September 10th at 9:00PM EST (link)Western Journalism.com
Home
Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report
Become a Correspondent
Who Funds the Radical Left In America?
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues
List of properties and social security numbers associate with Barack Obama and family
About Western Center
The Team
Contact Us
Obama appoints Homosexual Propagandist to Education
Search: Topics: Select category Cable Censored News FCC New Media News Outrageous Lies Print Radio TV Uncategorized Subscribe to PostsSubscribe to Comments
You are here: Home / Who Funds the Radical Left In America?
Who Funds the Radical Left In America?
By Steve Baldwin, Exclusive to Western Center for Journalism
Very few Americans realize there exists a large network of far left philanthropists and foundations in America dedicated to destroying the American way of life, our Christian-based culture and our free enterprise system. They seek to remove America from its constitutional foundations and move it toward a European-style socialism. Much of this effort is coordinated by a little known group called the Tides Foundation and its related group, the Tides Center.
The Strategic Principles of the Tides Foundation
Over the course of its 33 year history, the Tides network has given hundreds of millions of dollars to anti-free enterprise groups, gun control groups, anti-private property groups, abortion rights groups, homosexual groups, groups engaged in voter fraud, anti-military groups, and organizations that seek to destroy America’s constitutional basis. All told, over 100 leftist organizations have received funding from one of the two Tides groups.
Not surprisingly, this network of anti-American groups played a key role in electing Barack Obama by using classic propaganda techniques in making false allegations about Bush (he lied regarding WMDs, he stole the election in Florida, he knew in advance about 9/11, etc, etc.) and created the impression that Bush and by extension, the GOP, was corrupt. Obama, of course, was portrayed as the reformer who would save America from this corruption.
Millions of Americans fell for this mythology and so without being openly partisan, this vast network of far left groups, along with its media allies, was able to manipulate American public opinion during the last election cycle. Meanwhile, anyone who tried to reveal Obama’s real agenda, his role in the corrupt Chicago political machine, his socialist political associations, or his soft spot for Middle Eastern terrorists was labeled a kook by this same network.
The amount of funding the Tides Foundation and Tides Center provides the hard left is unprecedented. Indeed, its financial disclosures show that the Tides Center has raised between $48 and $71 million each year since 1998 and the bulk of this revenue is contributed back to far left groups. The closely-aligned Tides Foundation has reported revenues of between $59 and $77 million every year since 2002. The two tax exempt groups are supposed to be non-partisan, but they are certainly extremely political and they push the envelope regarding what non-profit groups are allowed to do politically. All together, both Tides groups have contributed over $500 million to the organized left.
The list of hard-left causes is long and there is not enough space to review them all. But here’s a brief review of a few of them:
Environmental Extremist groups
Members of the Ruckus Society
The Ruckus Society is a group of environmental anarchists dedicated to the violent overthrow of America. One of its projects is to train people to disrupt events such as political party conventions using street blockades and other violent techniques. Its director has publicly stated that, “you can use vandalism strategically.” They received $200,000 from the Tides Foundation.
The California Wildlands Project received Tides funding and it is dedicated to placing millions of acres of land off limits to humans. The Natural Resources Defense Council received support from Tides and is notorious for defending the rights of animals and plants over the rights of humans. If they had their way, civilization would be returned to a primitive state. The NRDC ran ads attacking President Bush during his last presidential campaign. Another Tides recipient is Greenpeace which, despite its friendly-sounding name, is best known for its illegal actions at sea that often endanger humans. Greenpeace received $250,000 from Tides.
Anti-Anti-Terrorist groups
The Tides entities fund the Iraq Peace Fund and the Peace Strategies Fund, which in turn have funded much of the anti-war movement and led to the creation of the hysterical anti-war group MoveOn.org and the radical website Indymedia. The later group has coordinated radical activists worldwide to fight American foreign policy interests.
The Tides Foundation also funded the anti-war group United for Peace and Justice, headed by longtime Communist Party member and pro-Castro apologist Leslie Cagan. Indeed, when UFPJ co-founder Medea Benjamin visited Cuba, she stated that the contrast between Cuba and America “made it seem like I died and went to heaven.” Tides has announced that it supports “nonviolent responses to terrorism,” as if that will have any effect whatsoever on the agenda of the terrorists. This attitude is dangerously naïve.
Islamic groups
Apparently, the Tides Foundation does not consider any Islamic group to be a threat, even if they have been implicated in terrorist activities by the government. It has funded the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR), probably the leading front group for Islamic radicals in America. Indeed, three of CAIR’s leaders have been arrested for pro-jihadist activities and CAIR spends much of its time attacking American efforts to track, monitor, and arrest domestic terrorists. They have opposed, for example, virtually every effort by the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI to monitor Islamic radicals known to be engaged in pro-jihadist activity.
But rather then be concerned with Islamic terrorism after 9/11, the Tides Foundation poured half of a million dollars into an effort to protect the rights of homosexual Arabs. Another Tides recipient, the Democratic Justice Fund, works to east restrictions on Muslim immigration to the United States from countries designated as “terrorist nations.”
The Tides groups also funds other groups who work against the creation of internal security measures such as the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee.
Radical Legal groups
William Kuntsler
The National Lawyers Guild receives support from the Tides foundation. The NLG began as the legal arm of the U.S. Communist Party and still functions today as a legal support arm for terrorists, spies, and other anti-American scum. Conventions of the NLG sound ridiculously like a politburo meeting or a cheering section for worldwide jihad with speakers praising terrorists worldwide. Also receiving Tides funding via the Peace Strategies Fund is the Center for Constitutional Rights, headed by long-time Marxist psychopath William Kunstler. CCR opposed every effort by the Bush Administration to make it difficult for terrorists to operate in America. One Tides press statement announced that CCR was educating people “about the dangers posed by government anti-terrorism activities.” In other words, the U.S. government is the threat, not Islamic jihadists. Finally, the Tides also funds the ACLU which spends much of its time fighting for the “rights” of non-citizen terrorists.
Voter Fraud groups
When the story broke last year about how ACORN founder Wade Rathke was caught embezzling a million dollars from ACORN, it was Tides founder Drummond Pike who reimbursed ACORN for the missing money. Pike did not want an investigation of ACORN that would force it to open its books. With ongoing investigations in at least a dozen states involving ACORN and voter fraud, you can understand Pike’s concern. Not only that, but Rathke sits on the board of both the Tides Center and Tides Foundation.
With the Tides Foundation and Tides Center now the largest funder of the left in America today, Drummond Pike may be one of the most powerful men in America. This scruffy, California-based, anti-war activist, founded the Tides Foundation in 1976 and has managed to raise millions of dollars from America’s leading foundations. What he promises them is anonymity since they are able to claim they are simply contributing to a foundation self described as being “committed to a society based on fairness, equal justice and equally shared economic opportunities…” That sounds fairly innocuous. The contributors therefore have some “deniability” about how their money is used but Pike then directs this money to a massive network of hard-left groups. Indeed, Pike even states, “Anonymity is very important to most of the people we work with.”
But that scam needs to come to an end and these donors need to be held accountable for their actions. It is extremely hypocritical for individuals and foundations whose wealth is due to America’s free enterprise system to support causes that seek to destroy our way of life.
If you’ve ever heard the clique “Limousine Liberal,” this is a perfect description for these people.
Four of its largest supporters are as follows:
The Heinz Endowment.
Led by John Kerry’s wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry, this group has contributed at least $8.1 million to the Tides entities since 1994. This is the endowment created by the Heinz food empire which Teresa Heinz still has ownership interest in.
George Soros.
Soros is an eccentric billionaire who has been funding anti-American groups and causes for a decade. He was convicted of insider trading in France in 2005 and is the leading force behind the effort to legalize all drugs. While he is the founder of the Open Society organization, he hides a great deal of his wealth in offshore banks considered havens for money laundering. He has given more than $7 million to the Tides Foundation. Tides founder Drummond Pike serves as the treasurer for Soros’s Democracy Alliance, a major funder of ACORN.
Ford Foundation. This foundation consistently supports causes Henry Ford would never have supported and has become one of the largest donors to Tides, giving them millions of dollars since 1997. Not only that, but the Ford Motor company itself also gives to Tides.
Rockefeller Foundation: They have been funding the left in America for 40 years, so this is no surprise.
Other large Tides donors include: the Pew Charitable Trust, the James Irvine Foundation, Citigroup Foundation, Kellogg Foundation, Hearst Foundation, Fannie Mae Foundation, JP Morgan Foundation, Bank America Foundation, Chase Manhattan Foundation, Verizon Foundation, David & Lucile Packard Foundation, AT & T Foundation, Bell Atlantic Foundation, Citicorp Foundation, ARCO Foundation, US West Foundation, John D. MacArthur Foundation, ALCOA Foundation, Richard King Mellon Foundation, and the Carnegie Foundation.
What’s sad is that many of these foundations were originally endowed by America’s first generation of great capitalists but have decided to spit on the legacy created by these captains of industry. It is very doubtful William Randolph Hearst, J.P. Morgan, John D. MacArthur, Andrew Carnegie, Richard Mellon, Henry Ford, John D. Rockefeller, or W. K. Kellogg, would support efforts to move America toward socialism or assist terrorists who desire to destroy America. These foundations have been captured by the left and now use the money created by free enterprise to attack the very system which created such wealth.
But the Tides organizations have also successfully raised millions from fairly new foundations as well, such as foundations created by: Hewlett Packard, Verizon, ARCO, Citigroup, and AT& T. This potent combination of old and new wealth is posed to radically change America due not only to how Tides Center and Foundation has combined this wealth to create and fund the hard-left infrastructure in America, but also due to how the Media has unabashedly bought into all the themes perpetrated by this network of groups.
But Americans need to realize that this is how the hard left in America is now funded. Indeed, this is the same network used by the Obama campaign machine to manipulate public opinion. This coalition of left wing groups and hijacked foundations will destroy America unless Americans wake up and quit funding the corporations linked to these foundations.
The impact this group is having was evident just recently in the debate on the Stimulus legislation and the Cap and Trade initiative. A project of the Tides Center is the Apollo Alliance, a group “designed to bring together the elements of organized labor with the community organizers with the green groups, the environmental groups, and to access all of the big foundation money that’s been supportive of those causes in the past,” according to Phil Kerpen, director of policy for Americans for Prosperity.
A former board member of the Apollo Alliance is Van Jones, a self described communist now serving as President Obama’s new “green jobs” czar. Apollo Alliance leaders claim to have written both the stimulus bill and the Cap and Trade bill. It is shocking to realize that unelected radicals now appear to have more power than our elected members of Congress.
Van Jones
One way to reduce the power of this alliance would be to boycott the products and services these organizations are involved with such as Ford automobiles, Heinz food products, Bank of America, Kellogg cereals, HP computers, etc. While these foundations usually no longer have any financial association with the corporations that originally endowed them, you can be sure the people from both entities still travel in the same circles. If thousands of Americans, for example, told Ford dealers they will no longer buy Ford cars as long as the Ford Foundation funds anti-American causes, the Foundation will quickly get the message. If thousands of Americans wrote the Hewlett Packard Company and informed them they will cease to purchase HP computer products as long as its foundation funds the left, you can be sure HP will pressure its foundation to back off its agenda.
Clifton L. West