Though, I did find there were some iffy moments where Letterman sarcastically spat out some cringe-worthy talking points that I would have liked to have rebutted.

VB

I found my self loving her from the opening and almost liking Letterman by the time it was over.

What a great interview. Sure he made his views known, but there was nothing outrageous. Reasonable people believe the more leftish things he said.

Every school kid in America (and everyone at HuffPo, for that matter) should watch that.

I haven’t watched Letterman in years because every time I did, my blood pressure would sky rocket. He has been so typically so over the top with the lefty stuff over the past decade. I don’t think he thought this interview would go the way it did. Well done, Pam!

Tea Party participants are every day hard working individual Americans who see the government over stepping Constitutional rights.

stay tuned and on alert– although it did appear that Letterman was giving the nice lady fair treatment, just keep in mind that he’s done this before– invite people on that he fundamentally disagrees with (remember he had Rush on the Late Show as well) then subsequently rip into either them personally or politically– I will NEVER forgive Letterman for his personal attacks via his failed attempts at monologue humor on Sarah Palin and family, until he sincerely apologizes for it, which to me has always meant, aplogize in person–

Talk about GIRL POWER! You and Pam Stout form a multitude! Thanks for speaking so eloquently for all of us wretched refuse yearning to breathe free.

Not sure what Letterman has up his greasy little sleeve, but we’ll take our victories where we can get them.

and I was surprised to see Pam there. Letterman did get in his digs at the Tea Partiers and I told my wife when it was over that he was trying to trap Pam or get her riled up to have her say something outrageous. She did a great job in her defense and you could tell she was nervous. It was a great representation for all of us who are just fed up with the current politicians. BRAVO!

into neatly every show for two years that attacked Bush ceaselessly. He was show JFK’s inaugural, even Reagan at the Berlin Wall, then someone in costume giving the “Gettysburg Address,” and feature Bush at some open event where he um’ed in answering an unplanned or unscripted question and Letterman would have them loop the “um” for two or three minutes. He did this routine repeatedly, and I wrote him repeatedly, and finally I just stopped watching.

As to this mention even by little o of the tea parties having “some legitimate” concerns, it is just a slight dawning on the left that attacking over 50% of the electorate as Nazis and racists was prob. not a good political move. It doesn’t mean they won’t oppose any disagreement as if it were a terrorist threat. After all, that’s why they just arrested some “Christian militia” goofs in MI. They are sending a message that if you are on the right, you are suspect.

But I imagine it is much like o’s acknowledgement that we are going to need oil, natural gas and coal for prob. another century and “opening” some offshore drilling, which is not really anything new or any change in his outlawing Bush’ true new regs. on continental shelf use. Noting of substance, but just a liturgy of what is already in the pipeline (pun) as o locks up more land and stifles most real energy development.

If he listened to himself, he would be on the right track. He says we will need fossil fuels for a long time and have abundant resources ourselves, and then he keeps denies the West Coast and most of AL for oil development, like throwing a bone to developers by offering VA, where as far as I know, few commodities exist.

NJ, on the other hand, really has oil and nat. off our coast, have the refineries and pipelines in place, have nat. gas storage that most states do not have, need the jobs and industry (having lost 240,000 since 2007, but immediately, our nitwit pols. and Cong. reps. pledged never to allow drilling, as if technology and the environment were mutually exclusive and if we were still stuck in 1969 in CA.

Haven’t watched Letterman for years. Pam did a superb job, especially when he tried to trap her into the birther thing.

Did you see how easy it was to explain the precinct strategy for taking the Republican Party back to its roots (as set forth in its platform)? Just took Pam a couple of sentences to explain the strategy.

Bravo!

Now, if we could only get some conservative Republican incumbents to say the same thing!

Thank you.
ColdWarrior
No More Scozzafavas!
Act! Become a Republican precinct committeeman. NOW!

Great job, Pam!

So…will Letterman make the leap between two grains of sand and draw any conclusions at all about a ruling Democrat party who has done nothing but criticize the TEA Party movement? I won’t hold my breath.

The left has fantasies of another Perot split of the vote. I’m glad she got her message out but don’t fall for Letterman’s latest charade.

The left wants a three person race. (It is the ONLY legitimate way Barry can win). So do some RINOs and even a television commentator or two who act like they are on your side. Beware. Be very very careful!

They never call us that to our faces on camera.

When he does one of the interviews, he is one of the best interviewers in all of media. It is probably the only thing he takes seriously.

It is amazing to see someone from “that media” actually treat Tea Partiers with some modicum of fairness. I cannot remember when I have seen it last. Even though he did come at her with a bit of the far left attitude he was polite and respectful and she was wonderful.
I wonder if his ratings increase when Conan was doing the Tonight Show got him a bit arrogant and then when the ratings began to tank when Leno took back over as well as the fact that Sarah did NBC but not him got him some religion. Sarah consciously did NBC to hurt his ratings , I am sure and I bet he feared Leno becoming the go to place for the right . Whatever the motivation, it is nice to see a little respect and decency.

Libs want a c conservative third party to split the vote. Expect more soft interviews.

How many times did he ask about the the Tea Party “candidate” and an enigmatic leader needing to emerge.

nominate herself for US President. Sounds like she’s got more sense than our current president.

Great interview. Thank’s for posting this Lori.

I was also thrilled that she mentioned the Precinct Project and replacing the current GOP leadership rather than a third party. I think she said something like “everybody loses” when third parties split the vote.

The Alinsjy media is desperately trying to publically mock the Tea Party and it is only working with the youngest least informed among us, kids don’t know much about politics, but they do know they don’t want to be mocked pubically – it is the most effective weapon the left uses. Thanks for the post