Mr. President, you’ve made quite a thing of late of running around the world “apologizing” for one perceived past sin of America after another.
But it does no credit to a man – nor to his native manliness – to continually apologize for things in which he was not involved.
It’s long past time for you and your Administration to own up to any spur-of-the-moment misunderstandings, and correct what was done wrong.
In 1989, it would have been unfathomable for any American in a position of political leadership to call for the reinstatement in power in Romania of the dreadful Nikolai Ceausescu (and his equally-dreadful wife Elena).
You need to face up to the situation in Honduras – right now – and not inflict that sort of travesty on the Honduran people.
More below the fold.
During the first few chaotic hours and days of recent events in Honduras, everyone can be forgiven for simply assuming that it was the same-old, same-old of Latin America – coups, juntas, etc.
But as the reality on the ground has made itself clear, we now know that this is not what happened.
The sitting President of Honduras wished to contravene the country’s constitution, so as to remain in office in violation of the constitution’s provisions. When the various constitutional offices and officers reminded him of that fact – and properly exercised their responsibilities to the defense of that constitution – President Zelaya resorted to dismissals, threats, and finally outright mob rule.
What has transpired in Honduras is a proper defense of the constitution against an attempted “auto-golpe” (self-coup) by Mr. Zelaya.
As was better said elsewhere,
The Honduran Supreme Court, congress, attorney general and members of Zelaya’s cabinet opposed his move as unconstitutional. The supreme court ordered the military to remove Zelaya from office. Honduras has no impeachment process as we know it.
. . . .
Now Roberto Micheletti, a member of Zelaya’s own political party, is president of Honduras. Despite protests from Zelaya’s supporters, the nation’s trade unions, business groups, Catholic Church, and most citizens supported Zelaya’s ouster — no one wanted a tyrant, let alone one propped up by drug lords and marxist thugs like Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro.
Mr. President, the Honduran constitution has passed an important test. The constitutional officers and members of the Honduran government have properly used their authority to defend that constitution – and to enforce the rule of law.
Mr. President, these are courageous and proper actions that need to be praised and aided – not mindlessly condemned, let alone (unthinkably) undone.
Mr. President, I do not know why you – and members of your Administration – have been so slow to catch on to the reality of events in Honduras. I realize that Washington inertia often leads to a stability fetish – of not wanting to have to start over from diplomatic scratch with new leaders.
But given that the loudest squealing is coming from America’s worst enemies in the hemisphere – that should give you pause.
Mr. President, many of us remember the dreadful episodes of the 1980s, when many American “leftists” were screaming loudly for our government to abandon our friends in the region – particularly in countries such as El Salvador and…. Honduras – and willfully turn those countries over to the tender mercies of violent communist “revolutionary” groups such as the FMLN. Fortunately, those opinions were loud but in a minority; President Reagan held the line in Central America, and saved those countries from tyranny. Significantly, when the Soviet Union collapsed, all of those “indigenous” (sic) communist insurgency movements simply evaporated.
Mr. President, it will be no credit to you – or to this country and its reputation-and-standing in the world – to essentially try to re-run the 1980s, but with the discredited, failed lunacy of siding with our enemies and abandoning our friends now actually being implemented.
Mr. President, as I said at the outset, it would have been unthinkable for any American leader of any political stripe to insist in 1989, following the deserved ouster of the reviled Ceausescu dictatorship, that Romanians re-instate Nikolai and Elena Ceausescu into power.
Unfortunately, at this point, you and your administration – and a collection of interesting “friends” in the region – are insisting on doing exactly that to the people of Honduras.
If you insist on doing this, ponder that at some point in the future, one of your successors may feel compelled to travel to Tegucigalpa and apologize to the Honduran people for the actions that you and your administration took back in 2009.
Mr. President, you must apologize and change course. There is no time to waste. Both the liberty of the Honduran people and the good name of the United States of America are at stake.
Thank you.
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
JFK's Inaugural Address
hampa (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 1:08PM EST (link)I will be at a Tea Party on Boston Common on July 4th. I’ll be carrying a sign that says, “The torch has been passed to a new generation–” John Kennedy- 1961. Barack Obama-2009.
I googled JFK’s speach to be sure it was the inaugural address that I am quoting from and of course ended up reading the whole thing. I am one of the few people in Mass. who did not vote for JFK,(or his little brother),but he had some great speech writers. Take a few minutes and see what he had to say in 1961.
” We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans—born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage—and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world”.
President Obama should read this speech every morning with his breakfast and understand the fact that the “Torch” has been passed to him. Of course he has passed it on to AIG and General Motors but that is another story.
Go ahead and read the speech the words are as true right now as they were in 1961.
I find it unbelievable that he could stand on European soil that is soaked in the blood of heroes from two wars and apologize to anyone. EVER.
Don't hold your breath waiting for that apology.
Brian Hibbert (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 1:27PM EST (link)Obama’s really good at apologizing for things he thinks someone else did wrong, but I don’t think you’ll ever see him say “I made a mistake.”.
Candidate for Trustee of Illinois Central College
Socialism doesn’t work. It looks nice on paper, but it’s been tried and it’s failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.
Take back our party!
Check out Unified Patriots
Obama's contempt for America
jonreagan (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 2:40PM EST (link)I think the flip side of Obama’s apologies abroad—-which are always vague and unspecific—-is his failure to speak of the many great things this country has done. The Berlin Airlift, defeating Communism/Nazism/Totalitarianism; needless to say, it’s a pretty lengthy list.
Aside from that being shameful and unpatriotic, it’s just plain stupid from a pragmatic point of view. In his insatiable desire to be liked by Muslims (e.g., the Cairo speech), why wouldn’t he speak of American success in stopping ethnic cleansing in Kosovo and Bosnia? Of driving Iraq out of Kuwait? Of coming to the aid of Indonesia after the Tsunami? Instead, he apologizes for our country, reflecting the contempt that he and his grim wife hold for America.
He’ll learn soon enough: neither friend nor foe repects grovelling.
obama only gift is
bobojake (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 3:35PM EST (link)DECEPTION AND LIES
If Carter had won
Erick Brockway (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 2:43PM EST (link)This is essentially “What would the world look like without Reagan” it seems to me.
Obama will even be worse than Carter could’ve been, and he proves that on a daily basis.
Note to lefties;
“Don’t be afraid to see what you see.” -Ronald Reagan
Activists taking Action
Join the RedState Strike Force
It remains to be seen if
kyle8 (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 2:47PM EST (link)he is actually worse than Carter. He might be smarter than Carter and less stubborn, so that he might have the ability to change and react when he sees the carnage caused by his policies.
Carter was far too much the narcissist for that.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Smarter than Carter?
Erick Brockway (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 2:51PM EST (link)Or “slicker”?
Note to lefties;
“Don’t be afraid to see what you see.” -Ronald Reagan
Activists taking Action
Join the RedState Strike Force
Carter is a personal thing to me
kyle8 (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 2:57PM EST (link)I will not tar a president, especially after only six months, with being “worse than Carter”. It will take quite a bit to be Worse than Carter.
Hitler was Worse than Carter, Stalin was worse than Carter, Pol Pot was worse than Carter.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
I don't think he's necessarily smarter than Carter.
janis (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 2:57PM EST (link)But I do think that the thing that animates him—rage and hatred for this country and all it has stood for— make him much more dangerous. Carter didn’t know that his policies would damage America as much as they did, but Obama is fully aware of the damage and just champing at the bit to do lots more. Should he have a moment of “weakness” and falter in his destruction of our country, I have no doubt that the First Grizzly and assorted radical henchmen will keep him on task.
au contraire
kyle8 (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 3:00PM EST (link)Carter hates this country with a white hot hate. I dare you to read his latest book on public policy if you don’t believe me.
By contrast, I believe Obama’s hatred is a bit more detached and ambivalent, like all of his passions.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Oh, I believe you kyle8. Just don't think that Carter's
janis (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 3:09PM EST (link)hatred for America was in evidence when he was POTUS. I think that’s something that grew and festered in him during the Reagan years when he saw what a success Reagan was and how much people admired him. (Discounting the usual suspects, of course.) The hostages were released on Reagan’s first day in office, underlining brilliantly and forever just how ineffective Carter was and how much the mullahs held him in contempt. Reagan went on to economic success and foreign policy success in quantities that Carter couldn’t even imagine, much less emulate.
Then there were the Clinton years, when a man from Arkansas with the morals of a hypersexed tomcat and the charm of a snake-oil pitchman was the much ballyhooed POTUS of a lifetime. Between the two of them, Carter became even smaller and more of a failure than he was while in office. What’s not to hate here for him? His hatred is the only way, apparently, that he has left to him to vindicate him from his own failures.
Carter was Smeagol
David Hinz (Diary) Saturday, July 4th at 10:09PM EST (link)…after he lost, his hatred festered and became on obsession…
…pure and simple — today Carter is Gollum…
The Minority Report — The HinzSight Report — TMRB.tv — MFOB “Miss Tagart, do you know the hallmark of the second-rater? It’s resentment of another man’s achievement.”
Loosssstt! My preciousssss legacy! Losssssstt! nt
TNJim (Diary) Saturday, July 4th at 10:14PM EST (link)I think you're onto something there, David
civil truth (Diary) Saturday, July 4th at 10:30PM EST (link)Though I don’t think his anti-Semitism came forth after the election fully formed, like Aphrodite; the seed was there earlier.
The greatest evil…is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern. -C.S. Lewis
http://www.gmsplace.com/
Is Hillary resigning as Secretary of State
bobojake (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 3:33PM EST (link)so she can challenge obama in 2012???????
Just a simple question.
You are exactly right.
Flagstaff (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 10:16PM EST (link)Unfortunately, Obama is completely left.
Zelaya attempted to do in Honduras the very thing that Leftists accused Bush of preparing to do for his entire 8 years. They were ridiculous, of course, but they believed that because it was precisely the kind of thing that one of theirs would do. Now one of theirs has tried to do it, and they are so committed to the left that many of them can’t see it.
I never understood what happened in Venezuela during the Bush years–Chavez was out, then he was back in. Or was that Ortega in Nicaragua? I’ve lost track. In any event, President Bush seemed to let an opportunity to depose a dictator slip away from him. Now President Obama seems eager to do the same, for undoubtedly a very different reason.
If Zelaya returns to office, it will be an indicator of just how weak the true democratic movement has become.
“The press is so powerful in its image-making role that it can make a criminal look like he’s the victim and make the victim look like he’s the criminal. If you aren’t careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”– Malcolm X, Audubon Ballroom, December 13, 1964
Honduras 2009, USA 2016?
MikeInOhio Saturday, July 4th at 9:14PM EST (link)Obama’s reaction to developments in Honduras make me wonder….
Suppose Obama wins re-election in 2012. And suppose he wants to run again in 2016. Sure, the Constitution does not permit this. But who would stop him?
I don’t think the ‘birth certificate’ controversy had merit, but it ended because of the ruling that nobody had standing in the case. If Obama attempts a third term, who has ‘standing’ to stop him?
It may be the responsibility of the Secretary of State to certify the election, but if it is an Obama appointee, we should not expect impartial adherance to the law. The Justice Department is forfeiting an already-won case against the Black Panthers – it is clear that the priority is not with the law.
So, who would stop a third Obama term?
Wrong Secretary of State (nt)
Neil Stevens (Diary) Saturday, July 4th at 9:25PM EST (link)RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder