<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Clarification on &#8220;Unrepatriated Earnings&#8221; and Uncompetitive U.S. Tax Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/2009/03/05/a-clarification-on-unrepatriated-earnings-and-uncompetitive-us-tax-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/2009/03/05/a-clarification-on-unrepatriated-earnings-and-uncompetitive-us-tax-policy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/2009/03/05/a-clarification-on-unrepatriated-earnings-and-uncompetitive-us-tax-policy/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/?p=203#comment-676</guid>
		<description>Lots of offshore credit card processing firms sprang up years ago to service the online casinos and internet pharmacies and other companies that all went offshore to avoid US compliance.

The offshore credit card processing industry is ready and waiting to service your small business too.

(disclosure: I am not in this industry, but am  in an allied industry)

As Skanderberg notes, it&#039;s a very good way to Galt (ala John Galt) and help Atlas shrug.  

You can do this.  Especially if you business is fully or partly internet based.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of offshore credit card processing firms sprang up years ago to service the online casinos and internet pharmacies and other companies that all went offshore to avoid US compliance.</p>
<p>The offshore credit card processing industry is ready and waiting to service your small business too.</p>
<p>(disclosure: I am not in this industry, but am  in an allied industry)</p>
<p>As Skanderberg notes, it&#8217;s a very good way to Galt (ala John Galt) and help Atlas shrug.  </p>
<p>You can do this.  Especially if you business is fully or partly internet based.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skanderbeg</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/2009/03/05/a-clarification-on-unrepatriated-earnings-and-uncompetitive-us-tax-policy/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Skanderbeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/?p=203#comment-675</guid>
		<description>Over the next few months, I&#039;m going to be trying to get assessments from other countries (ones that I deal with) if The Powers That Be in those places are noticing this idiocy and are actually going to actively try to take advantage of it.

I don&#039;t have ANY information at all on this &quot;what-if&quot; I&#039;m saying in a moment (that&#039;s the disclaimer!!!!), but just try to imagine what a coup it would be if Estonia could get Cisco to relocate their base there.

This was once unthinkable.  That&#039;s rapidly becoming no longer the case....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the next few months, I&#8217;m going to be trying to get assessments from other countries (ones that I deal with) if The Powers That Be in those places are noticing this idiocy and are actually going to actively try to take advantage of it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have ANY information at all on this &#8220;what-if&#8221; I&#8217;m saying in a moment (that&#8217;s the disclaimer!!!!), but just try to imagine what a coup it would be if Estonia could get Cisco to relocate their base there.</p>
<p>This was once unthinkable.  That&#8217;s rapidly becoming no longer the case&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itrytobenice</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/2009/03/05/a-clarification-on-unrepatriated-earnings-and-uncompetitive-us-tax-policy/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>itrytobenice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/?p=203#comment-674</guid>
		<description>And between these tax rules and card check, is it an wonder that American companies are locating their production facilities overseas?  The next thing to move is the headquarters, and then we will be free to purchase their foreign produced, foreign owned products with our devalued dollars.  Inflation anyone?  Trade deficits?  

Oh.  Yeah.  It&#039;s coming.  The Ds think the government is the benevolent power in this country, and it&#039;s been said that we deserve the government we have.  And we&#039;re going to get it good and hard.

BTW, even if card check doesn&#039;t pass, don&#039;t think for a moment that Hilda Solis isn&#039;t going to kill US companies with her union Labor Bureau.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And between these tax rules and card check, is it an wonder that American companies are locating their production facilities overseas?  The next thing to move is the headquarters, and then we will be free to purchase their foreign produced, foreign owned products with our devalued dollars.  Inflation anyone?  Trade deficits?  </p>
<p>Oh.  Yeah.  It&#8217;s coming.  The Ds think the government is the benevolent power in this country, and it&#8217;s been said that we deserve the government we have.  And we&#8217;re going to get it good and hard.</p>
<p>BTW, even if card check doesn&#8217;t pass, don&#8217;t think for a moment that Hilda Solis isn&#8217;t going to kill US companies with her union Labor Bureau.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreyCloak</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/2009/03/05/a-clarification-on-unrepatriated-earnings-and-uncompetitive-us-tax-policy/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>GreyCloak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/?p=203#comment-673</guid>
		<description>What makes you think that anybody in Congress understands tax law ?... it&#039;s all been written by lobbyists, and they don&#039;t read the bills they pass. Heck ... former Senators can&#039;t file accurate tax returns.

In 2003 or 2004, Bush dropped the &quot;repatriated&quot; profits&quot; tax to 5% for a year ... $200 billion came back into the US.

These days, were I a corporation, I&#039;d be happy to keep my overseas profits overseas ... use the cash to build more factories overseas ... and hire overseas workers to run them.

Aside from  &quot;tax havens&quot; like Caribbean islands that offer PO Boxes to contain corporate headquarters (__ see Tyco, R. Allen Stanford ), most corporate assets overseas are used to produce and sell products overseas. Capital already went out the door ... would you rather US companies expanded into China, or Chinese companies expanded into the US?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes you think that anybody in Congress understands tax law ?&#8230; it&#8217;s all been written by lobbyists, and they don&#8217;t read the bills they pass. Heck &#8230; former Senators can&#8217;t file accurate tax returns.</p>
<p>In 2003 or 2004, Bush dropped the &#8220;repatriated&#8221; profits&#8221; tax to 5% for a year &#8230; $200 billion came back into the US.</p>
<p>These days, were I a corporation, I&#8217;d be happy to keep my overseas profits overseas &#8230; use the cash to build more factories overseas &#8230; and hire overseas workers to run them.</p>
<p>Aside from  &#8220;tax havens&#8221; like Caribbean islands that offer PO Boxes to contain corporate headquarters (__ see Tyco, R. Allen Stanford ), most corporate assets overseas are used to produce and sell products overseas. Capital already went out the door &#8230; would you rather US companies expanded into China, or Chinese companies expanded into the US?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adjoran</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/2009/03/05/a-clarification-on-unrepatriated-earnings-and-uncompetitive-us-tax-policy/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Adjoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/?p=203#comment-672</guid>
		<description>which lays eggs of gold.  And, like the greedy fools in the fairy tale, they figure to cut it open and get all those wonderful golden eggs at once.

We know how well that strategy turns out . . . 

One of the fundamental stupidities of leftists - and the economically uneducated public at large - is their failure to understand the simple truth:  there is NO SUCH THING as a &quot;corporation.&quot;  It&#039;s a metaphor, a legal construction which enables the raising of venture capital.  Without this fictional entity, anyone who burned himself on a GE toaster could sue not only the company and its insurers, but every single stock and bondholder.

By incorporating an enterprise, the passive investors are shielded from personal liability for misdeeds of the company (of course, egregious misdeeds will cost them in the value of their investment, but they need not fear being dragged personally into court by some hack lawyer in Mississippi because the company didn&#039;t de-ice the sidewalk in front of their office fast enough).

Without this shield, investors would face far greater risk than that of the basic business endeavor, and so would demand far greater return.  Capital would become prohibitively expensive, so little business expansion could take place.

So the &quot;corporations&quot; against which the self-righteous leftist ignoramuses rail are really the people who work for them, and the investors who own their stocks and bonds - the overwhelming majority of whom are pension funds held for other workers.  The only measurable difference between the leftist anti-corporate morons and the people represented by the legal artifice of the corporation is that the latter have real jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>which lays eggs of gold.  And, like the greedy fools in the fairy tale, they figure to cut it open and get all those wonderful golden eggs at once.</p>
<p>We know how well that strategy turns out . . . </p>
<p>One of the fundamental stupidities of leftists &#8211; and the economically uneducated public at large &#8211; is their failure to understand the simple truth:  there is NO SUCH THING as a &#8220;corporation.&#8221;  It&#8217;s a metaphor, a legal construction which enables the raising of venture capital.  Without this fictional entity, anyone who burned himself on a GE toaster could sue not only the company and its insurers, but every single stock and bondholder.</p>
<p>By incorporating an enterprise, the passive investors are shielded from personal liability for misdeeds of the company (of course, egregious misdeeds will cost them in the value of their investment, but they need not fear being dragged personally into court by some hack lawyer in Mississippi because the company didn&#8217;t de-ice the sidewalk in front of their office fast enough).</p>
<p>Without this shield, investors would face far greater risk than that of the basic business endeavor, and so would demand far greater return.  Capital would become prohibitively expensive, so little business expansion could take place.</p>
<p>So the &#8220;corporations&#8221; against which the self-righteous leftist ignoramuses rail are really the people who work for them, and the investors who own their stocks and bonds &#8211; the overwhelming majority of whom are pension funds held for other workers.  The only measurable difference between the leftist anti-corporate morons and the people represented by the legal artifice of the corporation is that the latter have real jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: civil_truth</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/2009/03/05/a-clarification-on-unrepatriated-earnings-and-uncompetitive-us-tax-policy/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>civil_truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/skanderbeg/?p=203#comment-671</guid>
		<description>What I find scarely is that our administration/congressional leaders have got to understand these numbers. Which means that they are intentional sabotaging our economy in order to create a discontent that they hope to parley into full expropriation of companies - or offer to trade relief for political alliance. A mafiosa avenue to dictatorship.

Which also means that they&#039;ve got to be planning to make U.S. companies captive by prevent them from moving capital overseas. Or perhaps seize all U.S.-based assets if a company tries to move. I think things are going to get a lot worse unless there are enought patriots in congress who will defy the Jacobians and put an end to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find scarely is that our administration/congressional leaders have got to understand these numbers. Which means that they are intentional sabotaging our economy in order to create a discontent that they hope to parley into full expropriation of companies &#8211; or offer to trade relief for political alliance. A mafiosa avenue to dictatorship.</p>
<p>Which also means that they&#8217;ve got to be planning to make U.S. companies captive by prevent them from moving capital overseas. Or perhaps seize all U.S.-based assets if a company tries to move. I think things are going to get a lot worse unless there are enought patriots in congress who will defy the Jacobians and put an end to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

