Gëzuar Ditën e Flamurit!


Celebrating Albanian Independence Day

Whereas on November 28th, 1443, Skanderbeg returned to his hometown of Kruja, raised the red-and-black double-eagle flag, and declared Albania to be in rebellion against Ottoman occupation.

Whereas on November 28th, 1912, Ismail Kemal raised the red-and-black double-eagle flag over the port of Vlorë and declared Albania to be independent of the Ottoman Empire.

(Let’s take this from the top below the fold, which includes a historical discourse on why YOU should care about this.)


Whereas on November 28th, 1443, Skanderbeg returned to his hometown of Kruja, raised the red-and-black double-eagle flag, and declared Albania to be in rebellion against Ottoman occupation.

Whereas on November 28th, 1912, Ismail Kemal raised the red-and-black double-eagle flag over the port of Vlorë and declared Albania to be independent of the Ottoman Empire.

Whereas, during the Communist period, Albania was the most oppressed and ruined country among the captive nations, yet today is free and the most pro-American country on Earth.

Whereas Albanian combat troops have proudly served (and continue to serve) with distinction in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Whereas Albania has been formally invited to join the NATO alliance, and should accede to full membership in 2009.

Whereas Albania has instituted some of the most aggressive free-market reforms in the world – including a flat-rate income tax – that now make it one of the lowest-taxed jurisdictions on the planet.

Whereas as Albania is the only country in Europe with an at-or-above replacement birthrate.

Whereas The United States of America and The Republic of Albania share the distinction of being known as “The Land of Eagles.”

We do hereby establish and proclaim today, November 28th, to be a day of celebration of Albanian Independence Day (Albanian Flag Day) at RedState.com.

Gëzuar Ditën e Flamurit! (Happy Flag Day!)


Occasions like this seem to call for some sort of video-themed music, so for now I’ll offer two items of interest.

The first is the national anthem, the “Himni i Flamurit” (“Hymn to the Flag”) in this somewhat-karaoke version – so that everyone can practice their language skills and sing along:

The second is a pair of “folksy” versions of the old song “Besa Besë” and of the national anthem – including the rarely-heard second verse, as performed by the folk ensemble Valle Shota:


You’re probably wondering why you should care at all about any of this.

But here’s why. It’s because Skanderbeg and a small group of Albanians saved Western Civilization.

Here’s the short version of the story.

When Skanderbeg returned to Kruja and raised the double-eagle flag in rebellion against Ottoman domination, a huge storm that had been rumbling in the east for more than two decades was about to break.

Beginning sometime in the 10th or 11th century, Turkish tribes and clans had been drifting down from the steppes of central Asia and settling in Anatolia. At the tail end of the 13th century, one particular clan, headed by Osman, expanded its power – Osman subdued the rival Turkish tribes and unified them into a single authority. From Osman’s name comes the moniker assigned to this newly unified Turkish power – the Ottomans.

The Ottomans quickly developed a (deservedly) fearsome reputation for foot-soldiering and for cavalry skills – the latter brought with them from their long-term horse-based culture of the central Asian steppes.

The Ottomans expanded rapidly, largely at the expense of the decaying Byzantine Empire. By the early part of the 14th century, the Ottomans had bypassed fortified Constantinople, crossed the Dardanelles, and begun to rapidly expand their power in southeastern Europe. By 1443, the Ottomans were attacking into Hungary.

The Ottoman system was a strange one, combining (to various degrees over time) a fervor for expanding the sway of Islam with a straightforward conquest-based spoils system. The latter was the only way that the Ottoman sultans could effectively recruit the various clan leaders into their projects of conquest – by offering them the spoils of land in conquered territories. These Ottoman “landlords” owned and exploited the land as absentee landlords; local lords-of-the-manor were charged with running the day-to-day operations and channeling the proceeds back to the absentee landlords. This system became so entrenched in many places that the local name for these lords-of-the-manor persists in local languages to this day; the Romanian term hospodar is a good example.

However, the early part of the 15th century saw the rise of the Ottoman sultan Mehmet II. Mehmet is still known as “The Conqueror” – both for his general achievements, and for his signal accomplishment.

Mehmet leaned heavily toward the “Islamic fervor” pole of the two competing Ottoman drivers. He dreamed of being the great conqueror who would finally complete the divine mission of universal Islamic domination of the world.

Mehmet had obvious goals. He wanted to capture both Constantinople – and Rome. With those symbolic goals achieved, Mehmet would then have a free hand to complete the conquest of a weak and fractured remainder of Europe.

Ottoman diplomacy had already enjoyed great success in exploiting the hyper-fractious politics of Europe – coming in on one side of a conflict, winning, and then taking over their erstwhile allies. This could continue.

And Mehmet also knew that he now had better technologies. While the early Ottomans were nearly unbeatable in open battle, their infantry and cavalry were ineffective against heavily fortified cities. But Mehmet had modernized, and his armies now had excellent siege cannon.

Mehmet put these abilities to good use. In 1453, after relentlessly blasting the walls with these new cannon, the Ottomans breached the fortifications of Constantinople and stormed into the city. The Byzantine Empire was no more, and Mehmet made Constantinople his new capitol.

However, Mehmet’s Italian project faced a problem. With Skanderbeg having taken Albania away from the Ottomans ten years earlier, Mehmet’s easy route into Italy – from the Albanian coast and across the Straits of Otranto – was now blocked.

Thus, all of the furies that Mehmet had prepared to unleash on Italy and Rome were instead thrown at tiny Albania. And in that regard, Mehmet received a very nasty surprise.

Led by Skanderbeg and his outstanding generalship, the Albanians were able to hold off the Ottomans – defeating them time and again. In 1461, Mehmet led an unbelievably large army – reputed to have been 300,000 strong – into Albania to try to complete the conquest. However, Skanderbeg, skillfully handling outnumbered forces and making good use of fortified positions, ran rings around Mehmet’s oversized army. By the following year, Mehmet’s battered army withdrew from Albania in disgrace.

During the critical 25-year period from 1443 to 1468, the Ottomans were unable to subdue Albania. Skanderbeg defeated them each and every time – compiling, depending on the exact nature of the counting, a record of twenty-two victories and no losses.

But, alas, defensive resistance against overwhelming force cannot go on forever – particularly when it is in the charge of a leader as energetic and gifted as was Skanderbeg. So the story does not have a happy ending.

In 1468, at age 63, Skanderbeg died – of natural causes, unbeaten and unconquered. With no one of even minimally-comparable skills (either military or political) to take his place, Albanian resistance faced a fatal crisis.

Mehmet himself understood this perfectly. When he was informed of Skanderbeg’s death, he was beside himself with joy. “Christendom,” he chortled, “has lost both her shield – and her sword.”

But for Mehmet, his time and his chance had also passed. So much time and so many resources had been dissipated in the mountains of Albania that his grand project, which still burned in his heart, was no longer possible.

Following the passing of Skanderbeg, Mehmet did finally manage to subdue Albania. And in one of history’s forgotten but very frightening moments, Mehmet did manage to send a force across the Adriatic from the Albanian coast into Italy – which captured the Italian port city of Otranto in 1480. Mehmet still harbored the dream of capturing Rome, and this was a last-gasp attempt, with Otranto to serve as the bridgehead.

But in the following year, 1481, Mehmet himself died. The Turkish bridgehead at Otranto, already more a stretch of ideology than a solid military position, was of little interest – even to those holding it. Italian troops, dispatched by the Pope, were quickly able to chase out the Turkish garrison and send it packing back across the Adriatic – for good. The Ottomans never again threatened Italy.

After Mehmet II passed from the scene, the Ottoman Empire changed greatly. Mehmet’s successors increasingly moved toward the pole of a spoils-based conquest system; no succeeding Ottoman sultan ever matched Mehmet’s interest in being “the completer” of the final, universal Islamic conquest. The Ottomans continued to press forward into the rich land of central Europe – more for the prize of the land-as-spoils than for Islamic fervor. The high-water-mark came in 1683, when the Ottomans nearly captured Vienna – with Vienna being saved by a Polish army coming to its rescue.

But after Mehmet II, Ottoman conquest-energy was much more disproportionately focused to the south and east. The Ottomans conquered the Middle East, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and the Arabian Peninsula; thus, the Ottoman sultans became the secular guardians of the sacred sites of Mecca and Medina – a role they held until 1917. The Ottomans also expanded northward, controlling all of what is now Romania, as well as the entire littoral of the Black Sea – which became, in effect, an Ottoman lake.

But even in this form, the huge bulk of the Ottoman Empire produced drastic changes in European history. Before the encroachment of the Ottomans, most of the “action” in Europe was in the middle of the continent; the areas on the Atlantic coast were dim and foggy backwaters. The intrusion of the Ottomans into the middle of the continent drastically altered this situation; tied down battling the Ottomans, the powers of central Europe weakened and lost influence – and the lost strength and vigor shifted to the littoral areas.

And it was in these littoral states that a new and revolutionary idea arose. The Ottoman Empire sat across all the trade routes to the east – and at that time, the ability to levy fees on the thriving spice trade was enriching the Ottomans and impoverishing the western Europeans. In frustration, the littoral Europeans began to wonder if they could find a literal work-around. Would it be possible to bypass the Ottomans (and their chokehold on the spice trade) by sailing around them? By sailing around Africa perhaps? Or, more radically, perhaps even by sailing westward around the other side of the globe?

(The story from there is well-known.)

But none of this would have happened if Mehmet II had been able to pursue his dream – for which he had originally had ample time and resources. Without the quarter-century of defiance from Skanderbeg and the Albanians, Mehmet would have had a good chance of realizing his dream – of moving into Italy, taking Rome, and then mopping up what was left of Europe as he saw fit.

Skanderbeg and his men were unable to save Albania. But by carrying on the fight, they were actually able to save something much more important.

Skanderbeg and the Albanians saved civilization itself.

And that is why we should all celebrate today….


Category: ,

RSS feed

18 Comments Leave a comment

Long Live Skanderbeg!

Diogenes314 (Diary) Friday, November 28th at 11:53AM EST (link)

Great post. Thanks for the historical perspective.

 

Now this post deserves wider attention

Neil Stevens (Diary) Friday, November 28th at 12:08PM EST (link)

Nice work. Time to dig up Share This and see how to operate it.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

 

Unfortunately, you'll never learn any of this

Achance (Diary) Friday, November 28th at 12:33PM EST (link)

if your history is from high school or survey level college courses.

In Vino Veritas

Here, I did a bit

Neil Stevens (Diary) Friday, November 28th at 12:35PM EST (link)

Some others are already handling Digg for good posts, so instead I registered for Reddit.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

 
 

A Handful of Good Men and Women

kowalski (Diary) Friday, November 28th at 12:38PM EST (link)

Just in case nobody thinks that their individual actions matter, that the “little old me” is someone can who can be excused from a call to duty, that someone else will shoulder the burden in your place, please celebrate today with the Albanians and understand the sacrifice and courage that history requires of us all.

 

Well said, Skanderbeg

olsmithie (Diary) Friday, November 28th at 1:01PM EST (link)

Stories of such courage against seemingly insurmountable odds exist, but as with most history today it is watered down and politically correct(ed).

Thanks for reminding us!

Freedom isn’t free…

Regards

 

Isn't The Related Story to This That Montenegro Maintained Its Independence...

IJB Friday, November 28th at 1:04PM EST (link)

…All through this period? I always found maps of Middle Ages Europe curious because all of southern Europe was shown to be Ottoman, except for a little tiny area corresponding to Montenegro.

It’s one of the reasons why I was rooting for Montenegro to finally throw of Serbia over the last decade – Montenegro was one of the longest lasting independent states in all of Europe!

Anyway, cheers!

 

Skanderbeg Lied. People Died.

tankertodd (Diary) Friday, November 28th at 2:23PM EST (link)

Skanderbeg clearly precipitated the Ottoman aggression by not doing more diplomacy with Mehmet II. This Cowboy, Go-It-Alone Diplomacy was a failed strategy that resulted in the loss of Albanian life.

Albanians should have chosen a leader that could speak so beautifully and so persuasively to Mehmet II that he would have magically forgotten all his aggression and desires for dominion. But alas, no, and look what instead Albania and the Western World got with that Skanderbeg (who I heard had a C average at Yale).

/sarcasm

———————————
The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race – Chief Justice Roberts

I submitted it to Digg...

mbecker908 (Diary) Friday, November 28th at 2:46PM EST (link)
 

The few

Michael DeWeese (Diary) Friday, November 28th at 4:54PM EST (link)

This history should be remembered and repeated as much as the Spartan 300.

 

If there's one thing that cannot be said about RedState

Bill S (Diary) Friday, November 28th at 5:37PM EST (link)

it is “They have no variety in their diaries”.

Nice one, Skan. You are an Albanian force of one.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 

Awesome, Skanderbeg

Kenny Solomon (Diary) Friday, November 28th at 6:13PM EST (link)

I read it all twice just to make sure I got it.

Amazing.

Cheers !

 

History begets greatness

ss396 Friday, November 28th at 7:14PM EST (link)

It takes a Hero to right the wrongs of History. As Jefferson wrote “…all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.” How long to endure the foreign occupation with its strange oppresions, but for the Hero risen from among us.

The liberals would have us believe that the forces of History are immutable; that the Ottomans would have eventually fallen, anyway. Perhaps that is true, but Skanderbeg saved the Europeans from what, 200-300+ years of agony?

I have never understood the doctrine of the false glory of shared suffering. I salute you, Skanderbeg of Albania.

If you pay someone to sit on his butt, you can’t be surprised when he does.

that's funny tankertodd :-)

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Friday, November 28th at 7:41PM EST (link)
 

Nice Story - but the conclusions are wrong

jaszkowski Saturday, November 29th at 1:00AM EST (link)

The idea that somehow the Albanians saved Rome for all time is just plain wrong.

The Battle of Lepanto happened in 1571, which was another attempt at taking Italy by the Ottoman Empire:

The five-hour battle was fought at the northern edge of the Gulf of Patras, off western Greece, where the Ottoman forces sailing westwards from their naval station in Lepanto met the Holy League forces, which had come from Messina. Victory gave the Holy League temporary control over the Mediterranean, protected Rome from invasion, and prevented the Ottomans from advancing into Europe. This last major naval battle fought solely between rowing vessels was one of history’s most decisive, inasmuch as “after Lepanto the pendulum swung back the other way and the wealth began to flow from East to West, a pattern that continues to this day”, as well “as a ‘crucial turning point in the ongoing conflict between the Middle East and Europe, which has not yet completely been resolved.”.

That is left out of this article, which makes it appear that Albania somehow turned the tide for all time. Though not involving Rome, there is also the little matter of the Battle at the Gates of Vienna in the 17th Century. I had several ancestors there. What would have been the outcome had that battle gone the other way?

I appreciate what that Albanians did, of course, but this completely oversells it. Many nations played a role in stopping the Ottomans. No one, in my opinion, gets this kind of exclusive claim on having saved Western Civilization. At best, you can say they saved it for that stretch of history. Until the Poles smashed them and then showed the impotence of the Janissaries against modern infantry, the Ottoman Empire was a threat.

Of course, having been a service in the past, does not excuse the problems Albanians have caused of late in the Balkans, or their nasty mafia which is probably their number 1 export.

 

Good job Skanderbeg.

itrytobenice (Diary) Saturday, November 29th at 1:03AM EST (link)

You’re a hero. An old hero, but a hero nonetheless.

And thanks for the history lesson.

Proper grammar saves lives.

Let’s eat Grandma.
Let’s eat, Grandma.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 

Nice story but has a few flaws

Lysander the Spartan (Diary) Saturday, November 29th at 11:50PM EST (link)

Although Skanderbeg is a hero for Albania and for many of those who resisted Ottoman oppression (Like my ancestors)there are some facts that need to be made clearer here.

It was not Turkish cannons that led to their victory in Constantinople in 1453. The cannons failed to successfully breach Byzantine defenses (as did the underground tunnels the Turks attempted to built). The siege’s success was due to the overwhelming military and naval superiority of the Ottomans, the weak Byzantine government and military (created mainly from 80 years of Venetian occupation), and the lack of any real foreign assistance.

You do not mention how Skanderbeg was fighting on the side of the Turks for many years prior to his defecting to the Albanian side and how Skanderbeg was the main reason why the Turks were successful in expanding throughout the Balkans during that time. If you give him credit for resisting Turkish expansion then you must equally give him blame for achieving it.

As a Turkish Janissary, Skanderbeg was familiar with their tactics and strategies which gave him a big advantage especially when fighting the Turks in guerilla warfare (although he did fight them in open battles on few occasions). A historical comparison can be made with Skanderbeg and the Egyptian Mamlukes who were the first to defeat the Mongols and prevent their expansion into Africa since they themselves were were familiar with their tactics.

Skanderbeg was defeated by the Ottomans at the Siege of Berat in 1455. Either way though, he did achieve many more victories.

Skanderbeg may not have died of natural causes. Most historians believe he died of malaria or cholera.

Although Skanderbeg did successfully resist the Ottomans, most Albanians did submit to Islam (although in most cases conversion was against their will or for economic reasons)and take part in the vanguard of Ottoman expansion for the next 200 years.

Either way the Skanderbegs (both the blogger and the historical figure) have my respect for standing up to oppression and fighting for freedom. The world needs more Skanderbegs!

Lysander

Ottoman Oddness

Skanderbeg (Diary) Sunday, November 30th at 10:48AM EST (link)

Fair enough comments and criticism, Lysander!

Hopefully you can have time to read this before you sail from Aegospotami to Athens.

In any case, since the write-up was mainly about Albanian Independence Day (and the double-significance thusly of 28 November) and since it was already going to be very long, I omitted the prior biographical background on Skanderbeg. He did serve in the Ottoman Army, but the story is more interesting and illuminating than just that.

He was born in Kruja in 1405 as George Kastrioti; his father was the leader of the largest and most powerful clandom in Albania. Sometime shortly thereafter (1413 I think), as the Ottomans advanced into Europe, his father was defeated by the Ottomans. As was becoming Ottoman practice (see below), his father was forced to send troops to the Ottoman army, and to send hostages including his son. Young George was taken away, was force-converted to Islam, and groomed to serve in the Ottoman army.

He demonstrated such amazing martial skill and spirit that he rose quickly in the ranks (the Ottomans were still meritocratic in that regard at that time – which is one thing that made them dangerous) and soon was a young general. Being noted for both fighting/leadership skill and chivalry, his Turkish colleagues called him “Lord Alexander” after Alexander the Great. The Middle Eastern version of “Alexander” is “Iskander” and the Turkish word for “lord” (in the secular sense) is “bey” – so he became known as “Iskander Bey” – from which comes his eventual nom de guerre of “Skanderbeg” (or some other close form of that).

We don’t know why, but for some reason – even though he should have been fully Turk-icized by that point – Skanderbeg hadn’t forgotten his origins. Clearly things went on (both in minds and in action) that we don’t know about. But while on campaign in Hungary in 1443, during a battle against the Hungarian hero of similar provenance, Jan Hunyadi, Skanderbeg and a large Albanian contingent defected to the Hungarians and fought the Turks. It was after this battle that Skanderbeg and his Albanian contingent returned to Albania and launched the rebellion against the Ottomans – on 28 November 1443. Plus, by converting back to Christianity, he became an apostate.

Skanderbeg’s forced service at a young age was a forerunner (or aspect of) a repulsive Ottoman practice that fell largely upon the Balkan peoples – the “youth levy.” Every year, Ottoman agents would visit the towns and villages and select the most promising young boys (ages of 6 or 7 or so) and take them away to be converted to Islam and trained as the best soldiers. This was the origin of the fearsome Janissary corps – which was the spearpoint of Ottoman conquest for several centuries (before it degenerated into a quasi-business enterprise and was literally annihilated by a later Sultan who was sick of that government within his government). One of the cruel ironies of history is that most of the troops who stormed Constantinople in 1453 were probably Serbian and Bosnian by birth.

(BTW, the Ottomans did indeed overwhelm Constantinople with massive force – and since the Byzantine Empire had decayed so badly by that time, the fortifications of Constantinople had crumbled badly by that time. But Mehmet II did indeed deploy cannon, and as you noted also employed siege-engineering techniques. This was a new development for the Ottomans, and it shows how dangerous Mehmet really was – since he was not only an Islamic fanatic, but also grasped the importance of new military technology in ways that his still-nomads-at-heart predecessors had not.)

For the three or four of you who might see this now-old thread, one thing I would strongly recommend is some study of the Ottoman system and its odd peculiarities. The youth levy was one of them, but there were others. There was a great deal of forced conversion to Islam, and also “voluntary” conversion to escape various onerous practices – the “youth levy” was one of them (only Christian youths were acceptable – read Daniel Pipes’ doctoral dissertation), and the “jizya” (a “behavioral tax” on non-Muslims) was another, and of course advancement in the Ottoman system required conversion. Many people (including my ancestors :-) ) fled to the high mountains rather than convert or pay the jizya – where they lived for centuries as badly impoverished shepherds. One advantage of the post-Mehmet shift of the Ottomans to less religious fervor and more merchantilism/spoils/exploitation was that it just wasn’t worth the bother to chase a few shepherds around in the remote mountains.

In an irony of history, the Ottomans eventually discouraged (or outright-banned) Christians from converting – since they were so heavily dependent on the funds raised by the jizya tax.

But as noted above, the oddities of the Ottoman world are worth studying since the debris they left behind still clutters the scene. If you look at many of today’s most irksome trouble spots – the Balkans, the Caucasus, and the Middle East – one thing they share is that they were the permanent edges of the long-term (four or five centuries) Ottoman domain. This legacy undergirds much of today’s troubles in ways we don’t completely grasp.