So far so good in Delaware


In the last few days, since Christine O’Donnell won that glorioous upset-victory over the liberal GOP Establishment, its been pretty much all positive for her and the Tea Party that supported her.  She’s raised a tremendous amount of money, she immediately saw her 16 point defecit cut to 11 points, she’s had tons and tons of positive media attention, pretty much everything has gone her way, other than that dumb move to cancel Sunday Talk show appearances, hopefully she will bring in some new, more professional campaign people who would never make a dumb mistake like that, and who will also get her on shows like O’Reilly and Greta. 

Another major development of course is that her opponent, Chris Coons, has been revealed not only as a fellow who has run up a major defecit despite imposing a massive tax increase on the People, but he in fact described himself as a Marxist.  As if all that weren’t enough, Senator Harry Reid has referred to Coons as ‘my favorite candidate’ and ‘my pet’, that latter comment reportedly will be showing up (if it hasn’t already) in ads paid for by Senator Jim DeMint’s group to the tune of a quarter-million dollars.   In contrast, the DSCC is spending money on behalf of Coons, perhaps even more ‘effectively’ than Castle’s campaign did, and by ‘effectively’ I mean with hilarious stupidity.  As you may recall, Castle basicly attacked O’Donnell as not rich enough for the US Senate, highlighting her past financial difficulties, and suggesting that he, the limosine liberal, would never have those difficulties.  Apparently the DSCC is doing the exact same thing in their own ads, only there’s a kicker, they’re actually not just attacking Christine, but themselves as well! 

I’d like to quote the liberal website ‘Swing State Project’ who said it better than I could, be prepared to laugh when you read what a liberal thinks of the DSCC’s latest Delaware ad campaign:  “DSCC ad says Christine O’Donnell will “fit right in in Washington,” thanks to her personal fiscal irresponsibility. Uh, do they remember who is in charge in DC?”  As funny, and true, as their question was, there’s another point that the Elites of both parties are missing also.  Of course the point that the DSCC, and the Castle folks before them, missed is that it isn’t ‘financial irresponsibility’ to have bills you can’t pay when you simply don’t make the kind of money that these limosine liberals make.  Sure, if you make a million dollars a year then yes, not paying your taxes or not paying your mortgage is total financial irresonsibility.  But when you make 5800 dollars a year (as I think I read recently that’s what she made last year) its more like she’s a financial genius for not having to totally declare bankruptcy at some point.   

Of course the most recent ‘controversy’ surrounds not her lack of wealth, but her misbehavior in High School.  The fact that she ‘dabbled in witchcraft’ back then has been the talk of the media for the last couple days.  This too invites the narrative to be painted quite favorably for Christine in that she can say (as Dick Morris noted on Hannity), basicly ‘Yes I had some friends that were into witchcraft a long time ago, but my opponent has friends that are into big taxes and big spending now’.  Thats quite a stark difference in relevancy for a US Senate seat, and the comparisons just write themselves.  It also of course invites bringing up the whole Marxist thing as well, as O’Reilly did last night. 

With the huge financial advantage, the huge campaign-narrative advantage of a strong Conservative vs a big taxing, big defecit-spending Marxist, it’s really only a matter of time until the polls show not just a dramatic tightening of the race, but in fact of Christine going back into the lead, a lead she had not that long ago, it was only about 2 months ago that she had a 41-39 lead over Coons.  Obviously the fact that the DSCC is already running ads on behalf of Coons tells you everything you need to know about whether they think Christine ‘can win’ or not.  They’re scared of Christine, I’ve heard that Olberman spent a whole show last week on Christine, and just last night spent the first 25 minutes of his show on her.  Happily for me, I did not see either of those shows, so I’m relying on second hand information there :) .  But assuming its true, it certainly shows how seriously they’re taking her candidacy.  A win for Christine in a supposedly ‘safe’ for Democrats state like Delaware will go a very long way indeed to proving what some of us already know, that Conservatism is popular, that the Tea Party is Mainstream, and that the American People are sending a clear message in favor of Conservative Change in November!


Category: , , , , ,

RSS feed

9 Comments Leave a comment

The campaign finance thing could bite her

Death_of_the_Donkey (Diary) Tuesday, September 21st at 8:46AM EST (link)

if the reports are true and she used campaign money for personal expenses, that may actually have real sticking power (I personally have no tolerance for that crap). The witchcraft thing was a stupid comment to make, but really only of consequence to our entertainment based media.

That organization that is making a big stink about O'Donnell is Soros funded

RealQuiet (Diary) Tuesday, September 21st at 8:50AM EST (link)

That should tell you everything. It’s nothing but a politically motivated attack, not some independent organization. Not worried one bit about that :)

I disagree

Death_of_the_Donkey (Diary) Tuesday, September 21st at 9:09AM EST (link)

It is either true or not. Presumably she made FEC filings and that is what they are basing the reports on. And even if she didn’t these transactions would be really easy to track (ie the source that paid the bills). And like I said, if true, they are very damning.

 
 

Apparently, in some cases this is legal.

cwilson (Diary) Tuesday, September 21st at 9:12AM EST (link)

You can pay yourself a salary. At one point, the law capped that salary at whatever you earned the previous year — but then it was realized that this would prevent lower-income people from running: why should a doctor get to pay himself $250K from campaign funds, but a schoolteacher only $40K, if both are running for the same office?

I’m not sure what the rules are now, but like I said — if she paid herself a salary, and then used that salary to pay her bills…it seems that is kosher.

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom — go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen! –Samuel Adams

I believe you are correct cwilson

Scope (Diary) Tuesday, September 21st at 10:39AM EST (link)

During a Republican primary in a neighboring district, almost all of the candidates had salary expenses on their SEC filings. It was legal. If a candidate takes what is considered “excessive” amounts for salary, it is considered more than a little unwise and unethical, but, it is legal. If someone pays for a new roof on their house out of campaign funds, it is illegal, as Ted Stevens found out. If a candidate pays for traveling expenses, directly related to campaign events, it is legal, as was seen with the Rubio campaign. I don’t know what kind of expenses O’Donnell had on her filings, but, there are legitimate and legal expenses.

 
 
 

Good post SirGladiator

RealQuiet (Diary) Tuesday, September 21st at 8:53AM EST (link)

One point I disagree on. I think it actually was a good move to cancel her national show appearances. She’s sky high right now. David Gregory and Bob Schieffer were sharpening their knives over at Meet the Press and Face the Nation. She did have an appearance scheduled over at Fox News but she turned that one down as well. Remember she had a debate with Coons like a day or two after her primary victory. She probably was dog tired. I think it was smart of her to stay put and build her ground game and ads. She’ll be fine.

 

Chris Coons and his link to

texasgalt (Diary) Tuesday, September 21st at 10:25AM EST (link)

Liberation Theology and it’s more than a dabble.

American Spectator has the story:

http://tiny.cc/1nrmn

Twitter Button from twitbuttons.com

texasgalt- I read that article earlier

Scope (Diary) Tuesday, September 21st at 10:52AM EST (link)

and it is long, but, worth the read, as most work from Jeffrey Lord is. This should be the focus of the O’Donnell/Coons election, not dabbling in witchcraft when in high school. Coons didn’t dabble with “Marxism cloaked as Christianity” he was right there in the middle of it all. Coons isn’t just Harry Reids “pet” because he is a fellow Democrat, he would be right there next to Reid pushing his Marxist agenda, and, at a time when the voters are overwhelmingly rejecting the Progressive Marxist destruction of America.

O’Donnell will do well.

Scope, I hope you are right

texasgalt (Diary) Tuesday, September 21st at 4:39PM EST (link)

It be real nice to see voters give a good kick to Reid and his pet.

Twitter Button from twitbuttons.com