<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Massachusetts Provides Further Example of How Not to Solve Health Care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-210</guid>
		<description>So you would have preferred if Romney didn&#039;t get involved in the process?  The Democrats would have passed an even worse bill (since they have super majorities in both houses).  Romney would have vetoed the bill.  The Democrats would have overturned the veto before the ink was dry.

At least Romney stalled the slide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you would have preferred if Romney didn&#8217;t get involved in the process?  The Democrats would have passed an even worse bill (since they have super majorities in both houses).  Romney would have vetoed the bill.  The Democrats would have overturned the veto before the ink was dry.</p>
<p>At least Romney stalled the slide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eschristian</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>eschristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-209</guid>
		<description>then this would not be possible.  That is the problem - you can&#039;t really play with liberals because of the fact that one day they may be in charge and they cannot leave well enough alone they have to corrupt anything they touch.  But in my opinion I agree with Ronald Reagan about socialized medicine under any name is a bad idea - that is what was done by Mitt Romney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then this would not be possible.  That is the problem &#8211; you can&#8217;t really play with liberals because of the fact that one day they may be in charge and they cannot leave well enough alone they have to corrupt anything they touch.  But in my opinion I agree with Ronald Reagan about socialized medicine under any name is a bad idea &#8211; that is what was done by Mitt Romney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuiko</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>zuiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Every state in the union does that... so if that is the road to single payer, we are already on that road in all 50 states. And probably a lot further down in some states than Mass is. That&#039;s why you can&#039;t just sell insurance nationwide... it has to be tailored to every state. Every state has a bunch of regulations on what must be covered, how it must be covered, and how it can be priced. Some states even have requirements about what kind of entity can offer the insurance (in MN only not-for-profits can be HMOs). So that kind of regulation doesn&#039;t make Mass an exceptional case.

We can certainly agree that the idea of price controls on premiums is totally idiotic, but I&#039;m not seeing how this statement is at all true:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Under former Governor Mitt Romney, the state of Massachusetts undertook the largest single step towards single payer health care of any government entity in the United States to date. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

The Federal government has taken leaps towards single payer (Medicare, Medicaid, VA). Other states have done just as much or more regulating coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every state in the union does that&#8230; so if that is the road to single payer, we are already on that road in all 50 states. And probably a lot further down in some states than Mass is. That&#8217;s why you can&#8217;t just sell insurance nationwide&#8230; it has to be tailored to every state. Every state has a bunch of regulations on what must be covered, how it must be covered, and how it can be priced. Some states even have requirements about what kind of entity can offer the insurance (in MN only not-for-profits can be HMOs). So that kind of regulation doesn&#8217;t make Mass an exceptional case.</p>
<p>We can certainly agree that the idea of price controls on premiums is totally idiotic, but I&#8217;m not seeing how this statement is at all true:</p>
<blockquote><p>Under former Governor Mitt Romney, the state of Massachusetts undertook the largest single step towards single payer health care of any government entity in the United States to date. </p></blockquote>
<p>The Federal government has taken leaps towards single payer (Medicare, Medicaid, VA). Other states have done just as much or more regulating coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Given the political make up of Massachusetts (as DocJ reminded me over on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/story/brian_simpson/2009/01/06/massachusetts_provides_further_example_of_how_not_to_solve_health_care#comment-9742&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TMR&lt;/a&gt;) did not favor a conservative plan.  I think, given that makeup, that this was the best that we could have hoped for under a Romney administration.  At least for now they aren&#039;t into full blown government control.  Given the indications in the article I linked to however, it may only be a manner of time before Patrick takes the final step and institutes a single payer plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the political make up of Massachusetts (as DocJ reminded me over on <a href="http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/story/brian_simpson/2009/01/06/massachusetts_provides_further_example_of_how_not_to_solve_health_care#comment-9742" rel="nofollow">TMR</a>) did not favor a conservative plan.  I think, given that makeup, that this was the best that we could have hoped for under a Romney administration.  At least for now they aren&#8217;t into full blown government control.  Given the indications in the article I linked to however, it may only be a manner of time before Patrick takes the final step and institutes a single payer plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-206</guid>
		<description>However when you couple it with the state choosing what qualifies as insurance you get a disaster.  The requirements and mandates on policies in Massachusetts are some of the highest in the nation [There is something about those northeastern states and their desire to drive up the cost of insurance as they are all among the worst].

Say for example I was a &lt;b&gt;very&lt;/b&gt; wealthy individual living in Boston.  I have more than enough money to self insure for basic needs and even most catastrophic care.  I want to go out and buy a policy with a $1M deductible and no copays on anything.  I can&#039;t do that in Massachusetts.  I now have to &lt;i&gt;waste&lt;/i&gt; money on a policy that I don&#039;t want.  I am required to purchase what the government says I have to or I am penalized.

That may not be &quot;single payer&quot; but it does accomplish the same purpose.  Everyone pays at least the same amount for a product that they don&#039;t necessarily want or need.

And yes, the auto insurance market does function the same way.  For whatever reason, there isn&#039;t the same pressure on that market to continually raise the standards of what qualifies as insurance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However when you couple it with the state choosing what qualifies as insurance you get a disaster.  The requirements and mandates on policies in Massachusetts are some of the highest in the nation [There is something about those northeastern states and their desire to drive up the cost of insurance as they are all among the worst].</p>
<p>Say for example I was a <b>very</b> wealthy individual living in Boston.  I have more than enough money to self insure for basic needs and even most catastrophic care.  I want to go out and buy a policy with a $1M deductible and no copays on anything.  I can&#8217;t do that in Massachusetts.  I now have to <i>waste</i> money on a policy that I don&#8217;t want.  I am required to purchase what the government says I have to or I am penalized.</p>
<p>That may not be &#8220;single payer&#8221; but it does accomplish the same purpose.  Everyone pays at least the same amount for a product that they don&#8217;t necessarily want or need.</p>
<p>And yes, the auto insurance market does function the same way.  For whatever reason, there isn&#8217;t the same pressure on that market to continually raise the standards of what qualifies as insurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eschristian</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>eschristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-205</guid>
		<description>to phase out medicare, etc...

To me - that guy Madoff that stole the money in the ponzi scheme is no different than Medicare and Social Security - all operate as ponzi schemes - take new investors/tax payers and pay for original investors/tax payers.

It is not something that could be done overnight but it could be done.  Fire most hospital administrators and get conservative leadership - ex. Michelle Obama was a hospital admin. in Chicago (does that tell you anything?).  She made what something like $400,000/year (after her husband becomes Senator) to teach culture diversity - how many aspirins would that buy?  And you wonder why an aspirin costs $50/aspirin.  Alot of hospital administrators resemble our Congress and the Big 3 Auto Execs. and AIG - but don&#039;t worry hospitals have been being bailed out by taxpayers for many years - they were the original bailouts!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to phase out medicare, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>To me &#8211; that guy Madoff that stole the money in the ponzi scheme is no different than Medicare and Social Security &#8211; all operate as ponzi schemes &#8211; take new investors/tax payers and pay for original investors/tax payers.</p>
<p>It is not something that could be done overnight but it could be done.  Fire most hospital administrators and get conservative leadership &#8211; ex. Michelle Obama was a hospital admin. in Chicago (does that tell you anything?).  She made what something like $400,000/year (after her husband becomes Senator) to teach culture diversity &#8211; how many aspirins would that buy?  And you wonder why an aspirin costs $50/aspirin.  Alot of hospital administrators resemble our Congress and the Big 3 Auto Execs. and AIG &#8211; but don&#8217;t worry hospitals have been being bailed out by taxpayers for many years &#8211; they were the original bailouts!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eschristian</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>eschristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I did use my great-grandmother as an example, she is on medicare, but at 95 it&#039;s not like she would be accepted by an insurance carrier - and that is besides the point.

If you take Hillary, Obama, or Romney&#039;s plan and change our current system (flaws and all) and change it to any of their systems you will get what Massachusetts is getting right now.  That was the point of my comment.

I agree Medicare is a ponzi scheme just like social security and all other liberals programs but if it were changed to any of the above mentioned plans it would be like giving Medicare steroids - it would completely finish our system off.  It would cause rationing as mentioned before.

Sounds like we agree, because I believe in minute clinics (I would use one), HSA&#039;s (I have one) and other free market solutions to our current mess - and you are right it may be too little too late (I pray not).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did use my great-grandmother as an example, she is on medicare, but at 95 it&#8217;s not like she would be accepted by an insurance carrier &#8211; and that is besides the point.</p>
<p>If you take Hillary, Obama, or Romney&#8217;s plan and change our current system (flaws and all) and change it to any of their systems you will get what Massachusetts is getting right now.  That was the point of my comment.</p>
<p>I agree Medicare is a ponzi scheme just like social security and all other liberals programs but if it were changed to any of the above mentioned plans it would be like giving Medicare steroids &#8211; it would completely finish our system off.  It would cause rationing as mentioned before.</p>
<p>Sounds like we agree, because I believe in minute clinics (I would use one), HSA&#8217;s (I have one) and other free market solutions to our current mess &#8211; and you are right it may be too little too late (I pray not).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuiko</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>zuiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-203</guid>
		<description>As an example of how things are working right now and would be working wrong if we were to completely socialize. The only difference between the two scenarios is that in one we have enough people paying for and few enough people receiving benefits from that we can write IOUs to cover the shortfall. If we expanded Medicare eligibility we&#039;d run into the same rationing you describe. Heck, we&#039;ll run into it anyway in 10 years no matter what we do. The system as it is now is not sustainable.

I certainly agree that government is the problem. Starting all the way back with the wage controls after WWII, which resulted in employers providing free insurance, which resulted into nobody paying doctor&#039;s bills any more, which resulted in out of control health care costs.

Minute clinics are good, HSAs are also good, but I am afraid it is too little too late at this point. I don&#039;t see a way back that people would even tolerate politically, much less embrace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an example of how things are working right now and would be working wrong if we were to completely socialize. The only difference between the two scenarios is that in one we have enough people paying for and few enough people receiving benefits from that we can write IOUs to cover the shortfall. If we expanded Medicare eligibility we&#8217;d run into the same rationing you describe. Heck, we&#8217;ll run into it anyway in 10 years no matter what we do. The system as it is now is not sustainable.</p>
<p>I certainly agree that government is the problem. Starting all the way back with the wage controls after WWII, which resulted in employers providing free insurance, which resulted into nobody paying doctor&#8217;s bills any more, which resulted in out of control health care costs.</p>
<p>Minute clinics are good, HSAs are also good, but I am afraid it is too little too late at this point. I don&#8217;t see a way back that people would even tolerate politically, much less embrace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eschristian</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>eschristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-202</guid>
		<description>I said government (Medicare/Medicaid) is the problem and not the solution.  I said the system is not perfect but if it becomes completely socialized medicine we are screwed.

We do still have free market involvement - the minute clinics at the pharmacies - run by Nurse Practitioners are a great example of how if the government gets out of the way the system is successful and much better than the red tape we have to go through when dealing with Medicare and other government programs.

What I am saying is we are close to socialized medicine because of the liberal programs in place - but currently we do not have complete socialized medicine.  Our medical system has areas that need to be fixed - mainly dealing with the current government problems like you mentioned - reimbursements, etc...

Massachusetts is the best example out there as to NOT going ahead with liberals plans.

Following Massachusetts plan is like giving a diabetic a candy bar and then a balanced meal and then saying well your blood sugar is up anyways - just eat candy from now on and let us see if that makes it better.

Massachusetts took our problems that we currently have and put those problems on steroids.

We need reform (good reform - not more government involvement).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said government (Medicare/Medicaid) is the problem and not the solution.  I said the system is not perfect but if it becomes completely socialized medicine we are screwed.</p>
<p>We do still have free market involvement &#8211; the minute clinics at the pharmacies &#8211; run by Nurse Practitioners are a great example of how if the government gets out of the way the system is successful and much better than the red tape we have to go through when dealing with Medicare and other government programs.</p>
<p>What I am saying is we are close to socialized medicine because of the liberal programs in place &#8211; but currently we do not have complete socialized medicine.  Our medical system has areas that need to be fixed &#8211; mainly dealing with the current government problems like you mentioned &#8211; reimbursements, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Massachusetts is the best example out there as to NOT going ahead with liberals plans.</p>
<p>Following Massachusetts plan is like giving a diabetic a candy bar and then a balanced meal and then saying well your blood sugar is up anyways &#8211; just eat candy from now on and let us see if that makes it better.</p>
<p>Massachusetts took our problems that we currently have and put those problems on steroids.</p>
<p>We need reform (good reform &#8211; not more government involvement).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuiko</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>zuiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-201</guid>
		<description>How requiring people to buy health insurance has anything to do with single payer systems. Are we on the road to single payer government run auto insurance since we require people to purchase that? Don&#039;t get me wrong, I am not a fan of health insurance mandates... but I don&#039;t see what making this into something it&#039;s not really accomplishes. 

Health care is a mess in Mass, but it&#039;s also a mess in every other state of the union. I don&#039;t see insurance mandates as the fix for it, but I can&#039;t really say I got a lot of other politically feasible ideas on how to fix the system, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How requiring people to buy health insurance has anything to do with single payer systems. Are we on the road to single payer government run auto insurance since we require people to purchase that? Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am not a fan of health insurance mandates&#8230; but I don&#8217;t see what making this into something it&#8217;s not really accomplishes. </p>
<p>Health care is a mess in Mass, but it&#8217;s also a mess in every other state of the union. I don&#8217;t see insurance mandates as the fix for it, but I can&#8217;t really say I got a lot of other politically feasible ideas on how to fix the system, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuiko</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>zuiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-200</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting you use someone covered under Medicare as an example of the the free market at work. Medicare/Medicaid/VA... it&#039;s all socialized medicine. We have been operating under a half socialized health care system for 40 years now. Yes, eventually you have to ration because the taxpayers can&#039;t pay the bills otherwise. We try to get by now in the case of medicare by lowering doctor reimbursements below market rates and limiting the ages of those that can get into the program. But mostly writing lots and lots of IOUs to pay for it. 

That won&#039;t be enough eventually, then we&#039;ll just have to straight up ration care with lines like other countries do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting you use someone covered under Medicare as an example of the the free market at work. Medicare/Medicaid/VA&#8230; it&#8217;s all socialized medicine. We have been operating under a half socialized health care system for 40 years now. Yes, eventually you have to ration because the taxpayers can&#8217;t pay the bills otherwise. We try to get by now in the case of medicare by lowering doctor reimbursements below market rates and limiting the ages of those that can get into the program. But mostly writing lots and lots of IOUs to pay for it. </p>
<p>That won&#8217;t be enough eventually, then we&#8217;ll just have to straight up ration care with lines like other countries do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eschristian</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>eschristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-199</guid>
		<description>and I am here to tell you when/IF Obama and his liberal friends are able to get socialized medicine here in the U.S. - I WILL LEAVE the healthcare profession (and I am not alone).  I actually have went back to college to get another degree in prep. for this possibility and to pursue my goals.

Why I as a Registered Nurse will NOT work in the healthcare system IF socialized medicine (under any name) is put into place:

1) I cannot ethically and with good conscience stand by and watch people not get treatment because the government decides the financial benefits outway the risks of helping a person.
***example - my 95-year-old great-grandmother still lives at home and cooks and able to take care of herself with slight assistance by our family.  Last spring she fell and broke her hip - under our current system she had her hip replaced, went to a rehab center, and returned home to home health (for less time than most of our younger patient&#039;s stay under our care) and back to cooking and able to live comfortably in her home.
***so let&#039;s take this to scenario #2 - under socialized medicine my great-grandmother wound meet one of two fates - either she would have to wait 6 months or more for hip to be replaced and SUFFER with a broken hip and not be able to return to home,  OR the most likely scenario she would not qualify for hip surgery, the decision would have been taken out of the hands of my great-grandmother and our family and into the hands of the government - she would have suffered until she dies.
*****THANK GOD we have the system that we have - I know our system has problems but trust me socialized medicine is NOT the answer.
***under scenario #2 - young people (legal or illegal citizens here in the U.S.) would have received treatment at no cost and my great-grandmother who worked in the Mill and raised 4 girls and has always taken care of herself would not have received treatment - see anything wrong with that?  I do!!!

As a nurse I would not be able to live with myself and practice under those conditions - Medicare/Medicaid and all of the other government programs have a big enough hold on us now - government is NOT the solution - government is the PROBLEM and if Americans let them take total control of our healthcare system then we will be heading south to somewhere to get our care like the Canadians do now (from their socialized medicine) - if it is so great why do Canadians come to America for treatment?  Where would they go if America becomes as foolish as their system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and I am here to tell you when/IF Obama and his liberal friends are able to get socialized medicine here in the U.S. &#8211; I WILL LEAVE the healthcare profession (and I am not alone).  I actually have went back to college to get another degree in prep. for this possibility and to pursue my goals.</p>
<p>Why I as a Registered Nurse will NOT work in the healthcare system IF socialized medicine (under any name) is put into place:</p>
<p>1) I cannot ethically and with good conscience stand by and watch people not get treatment because the government decides the financial benefits outway the risks of helping a person.<br />
***example &#8211; my 95-year-old great-grandmother still lives at home and cooks and able to take care of herself with slight assistance by our family.  Last spring she fell and broke her hip &#8211; under our current system she had her hip replaced, went to a rehab center, and returned home to home health (for less time than most of our younger patient&#8217;s stay under our care) and back to cooking and able to live comfortably in her home.<br />
***so let&#8217;s take this to scenario #2 &#8211; under socialized medicine my great-grandmother wound meet one of two fates &#8211; either she would have to wait 6 months or more for hip to be replaced and SUFFER with a broken hip and not be able to return to home,  OR the most likely scenario she would not qualify for hip surgery, the decision would have been taken out of the hands of my great-grandmother and our family and into the hands of the government &#8211; she would have suffered until she dies.<br />
*****THANK GOD we have the system that we have &#8211; I know our system has problems but trust me socialized medicine is NOT the answer.<br />
***under scenario #2 &#8211; young people (legal or illegal citizens here in the U.S.) would have received treatment at no cost and my great-grandmother who worked in the Mill and raised 4 girls and has always taken care of herself would not have received treatment &#8211; see anything wrong with that?  I do!!!</p>
<p>As a nurse I would not be able to live with myself and practice under those conditions &#8211; Medicare/Medicaid and all of the other government programs have a big enough hold on us now &#8211; government is NOT the solution &#8211; government is the PROBLEM and if Americans let them take total control of our healthcare system then we will be heading south to somewhere to get our care like the Canadians do now (from their socialized medicine) &#8211; if it is so great why do Canadians come to America for treatment?  Where would they go if America becomes as foolish as their system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-198</guid>
		<description>while he was busy spending his billions kneecapping every conservative alternative to himself and McCain!

He deserves to be brought into this discussion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while he was busy spending his billions kneecapping every conservative alternative to himself and McCain!</p>
<p>He deserves to be brought into this discussion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-197</guid>
		<description>hadn&#039;t signed it into law?

I mean Come on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hadn&#8217;t signed it into law?</p>
<p>I mean Come on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Once again we have a Republican laying the foundation for a socialist scheme to be built upon by successive liberal administrations...and we&#039;re gonn a make this guy president?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again we have a Republican laying the foundation for a socialist scheme to be built upon by successive liberal administrations&#8230;and we&#8217;re gonn a make this guy president?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve W</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-195</guid>
		<description>.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-194</guid>
		<description>The very first sentence of the diary brings Mitt into the equation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very first sentence of the diary brings Mitt into the equation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve W</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Why are you thread jacking? This very insightful, and thoughtful diary is about the state of Massachusetts medical system and how possible changes to it - by the CURRENT governor/legislators - &lt;u&gt;cannot possibly get the results that they want&lt;/u&gt; - &lt;b&gt;NOT &lt;/b&gt;about Mitt Romney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you thread jacking? This very insightful, and thoughtful diary is about the state of Massachusetts medical system and how possible changes to it &#8211; by the CURRENT governor/legislators &#8211; <u>cannot possibly get the results that they want</u> &#8211; <b>NOT </b>about Mitt Romney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve W</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Why do so many, seemingly knowledgeable and educated people, want to blame the &lt;u&gt;executive &lt;/u&gt;for things that the &lt;u&gt;legislature &lt;/u&gt;is supposed to do - or does??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do so many, seemingly knowledgeable and educated people, want to blame the <u>executive </u>for things that the <u>legislature </u>is supposed to do &#8211; or does??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidSage</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/2009/01/07/massachusetts-provides-further-example-of-how-not-to-solve-health-care/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidSage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/simpson316/?p=79#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Romney single biggest &quot;achievement&quot; as Governor was passing what I consider to be a big step towards socialized medicine.  Even Ted Kennedy was on board with Mitt&#039;s health care plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney single biggest &#8220;achievement&#8221; as Governor was passing what I consider to be a big step towards socialized medicine.  Even Ted Kennedy was on board with Mitt&#8217;s health care plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

