Maybe I’m being paranoid, but this strikes me as strange. Granted, the meetings took place 2 weeks ago, but I don’t recall hearing anything in the media about it.
From Politico:
Hillary Clinton calls historic meeting of ambassadors
Ambassadors from almost all 260 U.S. embassies, consulates and other posts in more than 180 countries are expected to convene at the State Department for what’s being billed as the first meeting of its kind.
Officials say the meeting will include discussion of foreign policy priorities for 2011, The Associated Press reported, as well as an assessment of the fallout from the release of secret diplomatic cables by WikiLeaks. Clinton will meet individually with diplomats working in unstable countries.
…The ambassadors hold meetings with their regional bureaus Monday and Tuesday. Clinton is set to address the ambassadors Wednesday about “leading through civilian power,” after a welcome from her chief of staff and counselor, Cheryl Mills. U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice will then forecast the year ahead at the United Nations, and Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Bill Burns will do the same for the year ahead in foreign policy.
The ambassadors will also hear from Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen on civilian-military operations in the 21st century, and USAID chief Raj Shah will speak on results-based development.
After doing a little further digging I found this on the State Department’s website.
On January 31, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton convened the first ever Global Chiefs of Mission Conference. This will be the first time U.S. Ambassadors will gather from around the world simultaneously. The Conference, which runs through February 4, presents an unprecedented opportunity to mobilize and coordinate the work of America’s Ambassadors overseas.
A principal aim of the conference will be to prepare for the implementation of the recommendations in the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR), which Secretary Clinton announced last month.
According to the State Department’s website, Clinton said this about the QDDR:
“How can we do better?…we will build up our civilian power: the combined force of civilians working together across the U.S. government to practice diplomacy, carry out development projects, and prevent and respond to crises. Many different agencies contribute to these efforts today. But their work can be more unified, more focused, and more efficient.
The State Department and USAID will take a lead role in making that happen.”
The QDDR provides a blueprint for elevating American “civilian power” to better advance our national interests and to be a better partner to the U.S. military.
Some of the objectives of the QDDR
* Creating an Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment
* Establishing a new Bureau for Energy Resources
* Creating an Under Secretary for Civilian Security
* Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security Affairs
* Establish a Bureau for Counterterrorism
* Establishing a Coordinator for Cyber Issues
As I said before, I may be paranoid, but whenever I hear anyone from this administration talking about “civilian security” or “civilian military”, I get a queasy feeling in the pit of my stomach.
Victoria Coates
Daniel Horowitz
WTF
usadying (Diary) Wednesday, February 9th at 12:34AM EST (link)Now the State Department is duplicating agencies we already have???
“Bureau of Energy Resources”, what happened to Dept of Energy?
“Under Secretary for Civilian Security”, sounds like the Gestapo.
“Under Secretary of Arms Control..”, there go our guns.
“Bureau of Counterterrorism”, what happened to Homeland Security?
“Coordinator for Cyber Issues”, to help Obama pull the internet plug.
The progressives have pushed their agenda into overdrive. I, too, have a queasy feeling in the pit of my stomach. And where is all the money coming from????
They did not call her Komrade Klinton for no reason.... nt
olsmithie (Diary) Wednesday, February 9th at 5:22PM EST (link)There is so much going on....(oh and they love the cover!)
bobmontgomery (Diary) Wednesday, February 9th at 4:01PM EST (link)..but I did see a blurb about this a few days ago. You’re right to perk up when you hear these terms like ‘civilian’ and ‘security’ and such used so frequently, especially when you know the UN is pushing for things like the small arms treaty. Kind of reminds you of when The Janet, et al, started talking about who to be suspicious of in the ‘domestic terrorism’ arena. When you get all of this added to the ‘czars’ and the new usubjects like the presidential ‘kill switch’ for the Internet, you have every reason to ask questions.
Thanks for your research.
If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
George Washington
She's Helping the Unemployed
idiotan Wednesday, February 9th at 4:15PM EST (link)More of what we need less!
But don’t these new offices/departments have to be funded by cogressional action?
I guess not.
Obey mentioned his private security force
olsmithie (Diary) Wednesday, February 9th at 5:19PM EST (link)back when he was running. As I recall they were to be trained comparable to the US military.
Probably still have uniforms, though.
Maybe brown shirts?
Regards