Obama’s War


Around $60 billion in U.S. tax dollars was wasted through fraud and lack of oversight in Iraq and Afghanistan over the last decade, according to a report release Wednesday by the Commission on Wartime Contracting.  Contracting waste in Afghanistan alone ranged from 10% to 20%.

And it is by no means just about the money. Sixty-six Americans died in Afghanistan this month. In fact, August 2011 has been the deadliest month to date for U.S. troops fighting in Operation Enduring Freedom.  More than 1,600 have now been lost since the initial engagement nearly ten years ago.

The Taliban has been dealt a major blow and Osama is dead.

So where do we go from here?

At this point, with the Obama administration’s rules of engagement, I’m not sure the war in Afghanistan really constitutes a war any longer. There’s the new heroic restraint medal - the medal a soldier gets for doing nothing, obviously awarded posthumously.

And today in Afghanistan, the greatest military force in the world is helping build local schools and banks, and passing out wheat seed – yes, wheat seed. From the report:

The commission cited numerous examples of waste, including a $360 million U.S.-financed agricultural development program in Afghanistan. The effort began as a $60 million project in 2009 to distribute vouchers for wheat seed and fertilizer in drought-stricken areas of northern Afghanistan. The program expanded into the south and east. Soon the U.S. was spending a $1 million a day on the program, creating an environment ripe for waste and abuse, the commission said.

Thankfully, a gradual pullout of troops is underway. By the end of 2012, we will be back to pre-surge levels, but that will still leave 70,000 American troops in Afghanistan. Then what? Every major power to engage an all-out war in Afghanistan has had it’s ass handed to it. Will we be next? It took the Soviets nine years to figure out the rock-strewn hell-hole wasn’t worth it. We’ve now been there for ten.

In the 1950′s President Eisenhower sent aid to South Vietnam, but he said he “could not conceive of a greater tragedy” for America than getting heavily involved there.

History…are we doomed to repeat it?


Snatching entitlements back from liberals


Today the federal government is looking at nearly $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities largely revolving around Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. The government now issues more IOU’s that it could ever possibly pay.

The classic liberal answer is to soak the rich for more tax revenue. The classic conservative answer is to cut spending. But what if we enacted a simple first-step compromise on entitlements that theoretically combines the two ideologies? I believe we could get the ball rolling on real reform.

Means-tested benefits for Medicare and Social Security would not significantly impact the overall budget, however, it would remove America’s wealthiest from the government dole and begin the process of shifting these programs back to ones of assistance from ones of entitlement.

There’s no doubt we live in a wealthy country, and there should always be safety nets for those Americans who cannot help themselves including children, the disabled, and the elderly. But the taxes required to subsidize all Americans in the liberal utopia of universality are too onerous and would subject us to a managed decline, ultimately ushering in a slow-growth European-like economy and moving us even closer to the tipping point where the majority of Americans become dependent upon government for their subsistence.

A frustration among conservatives is that entitlements have become social welfare for the middle class that consumes a larger share of government spending every year. Means-testing is the first step in refocusing these programs as safety nets protecting actual need, thus releasing them from the liberal grips of universality.


When in Rome, cut government spending


Reading stories of long ago people and places you quickly realize that history really does repeat itself. And, it doesn’t take long reading ancient history to see our current national crises mirrored in the story of the fall of ancient Rome.

During its heyday, Rome was connected by webs of elaborate aqueducts and roads, spectacular infrastructure projects reflecting a creeping trend of government primacy and intervention. Government built hundreds of swimming pools and public baths, fountains and libraries. The government of Rome oversaw a public works extravaganza.

But, with government growth and expansion the Romans set the plans in motion for their eventual downfall. With government spending came interest rates and a devalued currency. A wheat subsidy was created, then wheat was dumped onto the market. Then came a welfare system and food stamps. Price and wage controls were tried, but failed.

Rome’s government brought commerce and industry to its knees with confiscatory taxation and choking regulation.

The Romans didn’t have a Federal Reserve to print their way out of problems, but they increased their money supply by adding copper to the silver in coins. The amount of silver and number of coins varied according to how the state was doing. The value of the denarius sank lower and lower.

Rome, with its economy wrecked and social structure in moral tatters, was eventually invaded by barbarian terrorists who infiltrated the government and sealed its fate of decline and destruction. The question now is, will history repeat itself?

There is little doubt the plans have been set in motion for the decline and destruction of the United States as we know it. Government spending is on an unsustainable trajectory threatening nothing short of fiscal suicide. Will it continue? Will the dollar go the way of the denarius? Will Americans go the way of the Romans? It’s up to us to decide.

When in Rome, what would Paul Ryan do? Watch Ryan’s Path to Prosperity. Watch it, then send it to your friends. And remember, we are already in Rome – let’s not do what the Romans did.


Have we become a ‘You scratch my back, and…you scratch my back’ society?


I don’t think it’s too late, but we’re getting dangerously close…

Today, more Americans receive some sort of government assistance than ever before, while the number of citizens actually paying income taxes is dwindling – an unsustainable trend that is a recipe for economic and social disaster.Just look at Europe.

Europe’s relatively slower growth, higher unemployment, decreased standard of living and increasing civil discontent are precursors to what we’ll experience in the United States if policy makers continue to ignore excessive entitlement spending, or attempt to merely pay for it by increasing tax rates.

So what do we do?Republicans leaders in congress are afraid to embrace entitlement reforms since Democrats have pummeled them in the past when they’ve dared to try. At stake are the millions of votes from Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, subsidized housing, food stamp and other welfare recipients.

But, Rep. Paul Ryan has stepped forward from the crowd to offer a comprehensive reform proposal that would put entitlement programs on the path to solvency and long-term sustainability by encouraging personal responsibility and independence. Love it or hate it, Ryan’s Roadmap for America is a courageous start.

There’s been a lot of talk among conservatives regarding entitlement reform and Ryan’s Roadmap, but is anyone listening? Will anyone in the 112th Congress be willing to take on the one issue that promises to destroy the country if we ignore it?

We will never be able to balance the federal budget or significantly decrease the deficit until congress commits to the unpopular task of tackling entitlements.

Entitlement reforms will hurt, no doubt about it. But, this is one can that can not be kicked down the road any farther. Demand that it not.

Category: ,