(sent as an email to the office of John McHugh, and cross-posted at SLC Republitarian)
Dear Congressman,
Thank you for selling out your constituents, and your countrymen, by supporting the Cap & Trade bill. A bill which you, like your colleagues, could never have had the time to read before the vote. A bill which even 44 Democrats crossed the aisle to prevent because even they understood that the mandates contained in the bill would be disastrous for business, for our economy, and for both workers and consumers.
Congressman, this is the second letter I’ve written you inre your failure to read a bad bill, and your willingness to vote for it anyway.
Mr. Congressman, if I get a response, I suspect that response will be, much like the one I got for the above-mentioned letter, a form letter extolling what you view as the virtues of this legislation — or at least, the fact that they included your own amendment. Kindly allow me to rebut in advance:
So?
Mr. Congressman, if you’ll allow me to be so blunt, neither I, your constituents, nor indeed most thinking Americans, could give two sh*ts whether your amendment prevents acid rain, saves the whales or turns corn starch into dandelion-excreting fuel alternatives. And why don’t we care? Because the REST of the bill, Mr. Congressman, presents us with far more pressing problems. Problems like how we plan on feeding our families, or driving to work.
There’s this thing that should be taken into account, sir, before agreeing to pass legislation. A thing upon which the lives and livelihoods of your countrymen depend far more than bad science and mandates. It’s called Economics. Perhaps, at some point during your career as a Legislator, you’ve heard of it?
As relates to the Cap & Trade bill you so cavalierly signed, it works like this:Producers’ costs go up, as demanded by following the C&T mandates. That cost is passed on to Consumers. (Consumers, just so we’re clear here, are your basic taxpayers. Folks, like those in your state of New York who have less money every year thanks to tax and fee increases). Consumers have to make choices about what they buy, because they can no longer afford to buy everything they otherwise would. Thanks to the price increases. So… producers must find ways to cut costs. How? By cutting production. Which means cutting personnel. Which means — have you figured it out yet? — unemployment goes up. And with Cap&Trade, we’re not talking about a percentage point here. We’re talking about an astronomic increase in good, taxpaying men and women who suddenly don’t have a means of supporting their families.
All thanks to you and seven other turncoat Republicans.
I hope the fact that those of your constituents you sold out don’t have the option of voting you out of office helps you sleep at night.
Yours, sincerely
(edit: I fixed a bit of profanity I forgot to edit before cross-posting. My apologies to Mgmt)
Steve Maley
Daniel Horowitz
Jake Walker
Victoria Coates
Great Letter Randy, Recommended!!...nt
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Monday, June 29th at 3:39PM EST (link)conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
Ya just can't say it any better than that...
AceInTX (Diary) Monday, June 29th at 4:37PM EST (link)Whole heartedly recommended
better than my rant to...
DONTREADONME (Diary) Tuesday, June 30th at 12:45AM EST (link)Connolly. Of course my letter to him regarding reasons for not voting for this I assumed when unheard, but your letter after the vote was much more coherent than mine.
Cong. McHugh's problem is like Judd Greg's
Conquistadora Tuesday, June 30th at 3:42PM EST (link)because he accepted an offer from Obama to become the Secretary of the ARMY. He hasn’t been confirmed yet, so he is still a Member of Congress. BUT – unlike Judd Greg, he decided to support the Obama policy of Cap and Trade rather than stand up for his Republican principles.
Even the C&T Bill Admits it's a tax increase
GregInFla (Diary) Tuesday, June 30th at 9:25PM EST (link)It has sections on returning to the poor folks the decrease in buying power they experience as a result of this bill.
Who determines the impact? Feds.
How does poor get money? direct deposit.
Sounds like income redistribution to me, folks. The bill itself makes the claims. So if you vote for it, you agree with it.
h/t to Mark Levin and Cong. Bachmann
– A true evolutionist would let endangered species die off. Think about it.
– The sign outside the courthouse said no signs allowed. So I took it down.
– Atlas Shrugged is now on the non-fiction aisle at Amazon.
Great letter....
marshmom (Diary) Wednesday, July 1st at 12:47PM EST (link)Now the name needs to be changed and sent to every other Republican who voted for this mess.
Read The Bill Stupid!
deweyfromdetroit (Diary) Wednesday, July 1st at 4:47PM EST (link)The arrogance of legislators claim of not having time to read the whole bill reflects a contemptuous attitude towards their job and their constituents. But it provides the cover of implausible deniability later when the crap (as in crap and trade) hits the fan. Like Chris Dodd with the AIG bonuses. “I knew nothing about it, except I voted for it before I voted against it. Or vice-versa.”
Why do we keep voting for these morons? Read my lips: no more incumbents.
Also blogging as
DeweyfromDetroit