Comments on: Carly Fiorina Will Not Self-Fund. Renders Moot the Principal Reason for NRSC Support. http://www.redstate.com/rs_insider/2009/09/14/carly-fiorina-will-not-self-fund/ Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:28:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: minncon http://www.redstate.com/rs_insider/2009/09/14/carly-fiorina-will-not-self-fund/#comment-43 minncon Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:01:38 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/rs_insider/?p=20#comment-43 Her tenure at HP was puffed up by PR ("she's a woman CEO! Yay!") and bull-headed actions that diluted shareholder value (the purchase of Compaq) and who knows what else? The fact that she won't spend her own money should tell you something - she's not considering the run for philosophical reasons, only reasons of power. She was forced out of HP in 2005... what's she done for the past four years? Why hasn't she rejoined corporate America? BECAUSE SHE'S TOXIC!!! Her tenure at HP was puffed up by PR (“she’s a woman CEO! Yay!”) and bull-headed actions that diluted shareholder value (the purchase of Compaq) and who knows what else? The fact that she won’t spend her own money should tell you something – she’s not considering the run for philosophical reasons, only reasons of power. She was forced out of HP in 2005… what’s she done for the past four years? Why hasn’t she rejoined corporate America? BECAUSE SHE’S TOXIC!!!

]]> By: Socrates http://www.redstate.com/rs_insider/2009/09/14/carly-fiorina-will-not-self-fund/#comment-42 Socrates Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:52:08 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/rs_insider/?p=20#comment-42 Do you support the Fiorina campaign, or not? Because it seems a little subtle to say "Bottom line is that the Fiorina campaign is a disaster before it’s even begun, with all the dysfunction and backstabbing that marked her corporate leadership." Buck up and be more clear in the future, OK? I really don't know anything of her politics, and your story, which is so circumspect and even-handed toward her on procedural inside-baseball stuff, doesn't really indicate where she is on the issues. Or are we to infer she's a squish? Do you support the Fiorina campaign, or not? Because it seems a little subtle to say “Bottom line is that the Fiorina campaign is a disaster before it’s even begun, with all the dysfunction and backstabbing that marked her corporate leadership.”

Buck up and be more clear in the future, OK?

I really don’t know anything of her politics, and your story, which is so circumspect and even-handed toward her on procedural inside-baseball stuff, doesn’t really indicate where she is on the issues.

Or are we to infer she’s a squish?

]]>