After that, all bets are off. I will be no longer in his charge – he will be in mine. I hope he understands that, but I don’t think he does.

But then again, I’m just a “teabag extremist.” and not worthy of his attention.

Yet.

I feel a bit torn. Is the CinC a domestic enemy?

No.

He was elected properly by my fellow citizens and is in charge IAW the Constitution. I will go where he tells me and do what he tells me to do.

Will I agree with it? Maybe, maybe not. Who hasn’t had a boss they disagreed with?

Will I oppose him politically? You bet. I have the franchise. I have the ability to petition my government for redress of grievances. I cannot do it in uniform, or let anyone think I represent my Navy or the government.

As a citizen, he is not MY President for just as long as he feels he isn’t. That may change next year, but I doubt it. I don’t feel the same vibe I got from Bill Clinton way back in 1993. He doesn’t have the political acumen or the smart advisors to tell him to moderate. They’ll just tell him we’re “teabag extremists” and don’t deserve his ear.

More’s the pity for a “post-partisan” administration that won’t reach out to the opposition.

So I will say it again you are as worthless as they are!

This guy? He obviously thinks he’s President of only the part of the country that “counts” – the part that agrees with him.

Well, okay, I can play that game, too.

Once again, the Cavuto link I supplied is to a very positive and celebratory report on the group of people he referred to as Teabaggers.

Really, do a quick search on RedState for “teabaggers.” The early posts and comments use Teabaggers as a legitimate and accepted term. Look at Free Republic: It still uses Teabaggers as a keyword for straightforward posts about protest activities.

Don’t you think it’s bizarre to heap such scorn on Obama for using “teabag” (and as an adjective!) when a good many of the people in the protest group refer to themselves as teabaggers?

http://www.independentnews.com/fullstory.php?newsid=593

Soorry, I know this probably should violate Redstate’s No Profanity policy, but I am quoting a recenlty elected congressman and president here.

I had lots of problems with President Bush, but I can say that he was at least above getting down in the mud to disparage his opponents. I am sure glad we live in a post-poartisan era.

You seem to have an exceptional facility for creating interpretations that have no logical connection to that which has been written. While I admire your creativity, it does make for a rather disjointed discussion.

They have their flaws, of course, but this can just be chalked up to elitist snubbing on Obama’s part.