This election, the most important of our generation, is about ideas and core concepts about the role that government should play in individuals’ lives. The Liberal-Left has and will continue to expand the size and scope of the federal government, insisting that the government has the authority to dictate personal health decisions. There is very little that the modern liberal Democrat believes is off-limits for the government.
ObamaCare, one of the most expansive federal laws ever written, is offensive to most Americans because of what it signifies. ObamaCare is not merely bad health care policy; it is a fundamental rejection of many of the founding principles of America.
The Democrats’ new health care law gives the federal government unprecedented authority to intervene in individuals’ lives. It gives entirely new authorities and regulatory power to Washington bureaucrats. It levies punitive fines on individuals and businesses that do not comply with the government’s heavy-handed regulations. For many reasons, ObamaCare is wholly unacceptable public policy.
And yet, one of the contenders in the GOP race, Mitt Romney, is himself an advocate of many aspects of ObamaCare. As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney redesigned his state’s health care system with a sweeping overhaul commonly referred to as “Romneycare.” Romneycare shares many of the key provisions of ObamaCare, including an individual mandate, an employer mandate, new taxes, and an increase in taxpayer-subsidized health care. Not surprisingly, Romneycare’s big-government approach has yielded the nation’s highest health insurance premiums in Massachusetts, as well as some of the longest wait times to see a doctor.
As much as Mitt Romney would like to discuss superficial distinctions between his health care overhaul and the President’s, the reality is that the Obama Administration relied on Romney’s plan as a template and model for ObamaCare. Even more confusing is that the Governor continues to defend this huge government intrusion as the right thing to do on the “state level.” However, Gov. Romney’s health care overhaul, with all of its various new taxes, expansion of Medicaid, and intrusive mandates, reveals a great deal about his governing philosophy – and proves, this kind of government intrusion is wrong at any level.
This year’s election ought to be about the contrast between limited-government conservatives who want to provide true reform, and status quo politicians who favor “big-government” solutions and a tighter regulatory state. Romney, the architect of many big-government policies in his own state, could appropriately be viewed as “Obama Lite” – a disappointing alternative to President Obama.
As one of the original designers of Health Savings Accounts in the early 1990’s, I have been a champion of the free market in health care. I have always believed that the private sector, unlike the government, is uniquely capable of producing innovative medical solutions and lower costs through competition. My proposals consistently prioritize the patient-physician relationship and favor giving individuals the power to make their own health care decisions.
I’m running in this election because I know what the stakes are. I believe Americans, who overwhelmingly disapprove of ObamaCare, deserve an authentic alternative to Obama and the Democrats’ policies. I stand for freedom, innovation, and consumer choice in order to improve the quality and decrease the cost of health care. I do not want Americans to experience the record-high health care premiums and waiting times of Massachusetts. Please stand with me so that we can repeal and replace Obamacare and instead embrace an American, patient-centered health care solution of choice and competition for families and businesses across our country.
Rick Santorum, a former representative and senator from Pennsylvania, is a candidate for the Republican nomination for president.
Victoria Coates
Daniel Horowitz
Please call it by its true name...
regent2009 (Diary) Monday, January 23rd at 10:40PM EST (link)Obama-lite is cute. But it is time for the candidates, on national TV, to call this beast what it really is. SOCIALISM.
The problem is that too many independents and other uninformed voters still see Obama as a good guy. So Obama-lie will not solicit any real reaction from them. But everyone knows exactly what socialism is,
Myself, I went back and forth between Bachmann and Perry in this race. But if the Senator were to take this sort of bold action, I would consider joining the next Santorum wave.
“I hope I live to see the day when, as in the early days of our country, we won’t have any public schools. The churches will have taken them over again and Christians will be running them. What a happy day that will be!,” Jerry Falwell
Obama-ism/Obama-lite is scarier than the word "socialism" to average voters
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 1:40PM EST (link)We have had degrees of socialism for a century and most Americans are economically ignorant. Bur all have lived under the policies of Obama. Our best argument is to ask voters if they like Obamaism and want 4 more years of it or a lighter version of same.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
amen
gonzo55 (Diary) Monday, January 23rd at 11:02PM EST (link)The country’s economy was in bad shape when Dear Leader Obama rode an orgy of sycophantic idolatry to the White House. As was entirely predictable, he then immediately made things dramatically worse, spending his political capital on the foolish Obamacare program,,
I am certain that the reason the economy still is not recovering is the onerous regulations and high taxes imposed by Obamacare. As our nation’s health spirals downward in a cycle of unemployment, undersupply of doctors, and poor quality of care mandated by Obamacare, one can’t help but feel like we are witnessing a modern day socialistic Holocaust of high taxes, excessive regulations, and poor health care.
To nominate the ultimate author of Obamacare, Mitt Romney, would make our side as complicit in this debacle as the Belgians were in enabling Hitler. I’m still undecided between Speaker Gingrich and Senator Santorum, but I thank the senator for his thoughtful discussion of health care and stuff.
“Facts are stubborn things” — Ronald Wilson Reagan
An attack diary?
znjs (Diary) Monday, January 23rd at 11:18PM EST (link)Still disappointed you declined to respond to any of the questions posted about your Iran diary, and on the off chance you do read the responses even if you didn’t respond to them.
Granted, I’m sure you get more then enough advice from armchair “political strategists”, most of which is terrible, but honestly even though I disagreed with your ideas on Iran I recommended it because I thought your thoughts should be heard. I won’t be doing the same on this diary – we need more then another attack on Romney. Most posters here do more then a good enough job on that already. What we need is solutions. Let’s face it – Obamacare didn’t happen in a vacuum. Health care in this country was broken well before Obama came into office – and he was elected touting a far more leftist approach then he eventually passed! The question has to be asked – repeal and then what? It’s create that you pushed HSA’s in the past – I’m a happy owner of such an account. That gives you credibility. Now what else do you have – and please say more then “free market solutions”. That phrase could mean just about anything with how much it’s been thrown around. And pushing your solution will automatically make us think about the solution Mitt came up with while he was govt – you don’t need to even attack for us to make that connection.
Wrong on Iran is right....
nocontest (Diary) Sunday, January 29th at 3:42AM EST (link)and how do you explain Mr. Santorum how it is wrong to have an abortion after being raped and yet still be for the death penalty knowing a small percentage are innocent. At what age can we kill Mr Santorum?
The Death Penalty is absolutely conservative and absolutely right.
Dave_A (Diary) Sunday, January 29th at 6:04AM EST (link)The religious answer to your question is simple: According to the Bible, God ordered the death penalty be applied to certain crimes, therefore the use of capital punishment as part of an official judicial process cannot be a sin, because God would never order man to sin. To contrast, abortion in the overwhelming majority (eg, to the point of statistical irrelevancy) of cases is the taking of a human life for the personal convenience of another – which is a sin. No one is saying we should force a woman to raise a child conceived by rape – we’re just saying she shouldn’t be allowed to kill it.
The non-religious answer, is that the death penalty exists for the same reason we put down dangerous animals – there are some convicts who are absolutely not reformable – no action we can take will ever render them safe to release into society. At the point where an individual proves by his actions that he cannot be reformed, he should be put down. Currently, this ‘point’ is the commission of aggravated murder, treason, and various other abjectly heinous crimes. Personally, I’d extend it to 3-time repeat felons as well (after 3 felony convictions (and presumably countless lesser offenses, given how hard it is for felony charges to stick through to conviction), you have demonstrated an abject inability to live within the law). This is a logical use of government power, not medically-delivered death for personal convenience.
Finally, in BOTH the religious and the non-religious perspective, Americans DO NOT believe in punishing one person for the independent acts of another – the evil committed by a rapist does not justify the killing of a child simply because said child came to be as a result of said rape.
Formerly known as dcacklam – they finally fixed my access to the ‘profile’ page
You're absolutely right Mr. Santorum. Now
mbecker908 (Diary) Monday, January 23rd at 11:36PM EST (link)is the perfect time to leave the race and go back to PA and get a real job. Oh, and you can endorse Newt on the way out the door.
5
lizzie Thursday, January 26th at 1:28AM EST (link)I am even more of a disillusioned dem since Rick Perry did the courageous tactical retreat.
I do not want to live in America if it is Romney, Paul, or Santorum v Obama.
The health care system, and economy, is so broken, only Perry’s endorsement of Gingrich keeps my glimmer of hope alive.
Sorry, Mr. Santorum.
I am willing to put aside my ardent pro-choice position to again vote GOP, but not with a candidate who was part of Bush43′s irresponsible fiscal policies, let alone well, . You should take care of your family and stop trying to impose your belief system on everyone else..
How insulting.
sandiegovoter Saturday, January 28th at 4:34PM EST (link)Why don’t you show a little courtesy to our guest? Please.
Why should he do that?
Dave_A (Diary) Sunday, January 29th at 7:15AM EST (link)The only worse choice than Newt is Ron Paul.
Formerly known as dcacklam – they finally fixed my access to the ‘profile’ page
Winning Iowa Gets You What These Days?
izoneguy (Diary) Tuesday, January 24th at 12:17AM EST (link)Winning Iowa Gets You What These Days?
Rick – take a cue from Fred….
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
Iowa has made itself irrelevant.
sandiegovoter Saturday, January 28th at 4:37PM EST (link)2008 was the beginning of a cycle that will continue for some time.
Iowa has turned into the evangelical-endorsement caucus.
Huckabee and Senator Santorum (God bless you, Senator) have proven that Iowa no longer matters.
It’s place at the beginning of the election-year primaries/caucuses should be re-examined.
States like Ohio and Florida (which are needed in the general election) should get priority over Iowa.
Can we consider Goodhart's Law?
acat (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 8:09PM EST (link)I propose allowing States with 7 or fewer electoral votes, a closed primary, and a strong State GOP party to enter a lottery for the first, second, and third slots.
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
I say we vote on the same day and end this primary season bit...
texastaxpayer (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 8:31PM EST (link)It sucks and I prefer my bad news early versus dragging it out for months.
“Texas will again lift it’s head and stand among the nations. It ought to do so, for no country upon the globe can compare with it in natural advantages.” Sam Houston
I dunno, texastaxpayer. Dragging it out has some advantages ...
acat (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 8:40PM EST (link)in balancing the field in favor of underfunded long-shots.
If all States voted for the GOP nominee on the same day, the field would tip seriously toward the well-funded who can run a nationwide campaign from day one…
Mew
——

Caveat Suffragator
I certainly understand your point and the merit of your position....
texastaxpayer (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 8:44PM EST (link)But this drawn out process is turning me into a bitter alcoholic. My wife is going to start moving out every election year and refusing to return until I stop screaming at the television. Just sayin its not healthy……
“Texas will again lift it’s head and stand among the nations. It ought to do so, for no country upon the globe can compare with it in natural advantages.” Sam Houston
Free corn?
Ed54 (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 7:59PM EST (link)nt
“If all men were just, there would be no need of valor.”
- Agesilaus
More Obamacare discussion needed
Freedoms Truth (Diary) Tuesday, January 24th at 12:47AM EST (link)Senator Santorum was right to bring up Obamacare in the debate and point out that it is THE issue, right after jobs and economy that is number one. it was sad that he had to do it in a pivot on another question. Bad debate questions from the liberal moderators.
It is indeed important to know how and what we will do after Obamacare is repealed. Thanks for giving an answer to that question and for a great answer to the Schaivo question.
Freedoms Truth,
Travis Monitor – http://travismonitor.blogspot.com
Austin, TX
I hated that Health Savings Account because it had to be used up or lose it in
lizzie Thursday, January 26th at 1:20AM EST (link)the calendar year.
since then, having been downsized out of my career in 2001 at age 49 due to the pervasive ageism in the USA which NOT ONE CANDIDATE EVER talks about, (possibly because politics seems to be perfect job security for the elderly)
I have found the quest for patient-centered health care to be unknown.
just try asking what a procedure will cost. Only dentists will answer.
just try shopping for a competent endocrinologist.
PPACA was a disaster, but only Newt Gingrich seems to actually be offering some solutions to the totally dysfunctional way that medicine is PRACTICED in the USA. altho the whole system is rigged to push legal drugs from Big Pharma.
Now I discover I am in the 3% who have private longterm care insurance, even though I am in the bottom 40% on income. I had a portable LTC plan that I started when I was 40. Now my premium is more than $900 per year, and as I descend closer to poverty, I question why I should be so responsible when 97% of adult Americans are relying on scamming Medicaid for their LTC.
I would be much healthier in France, Germany, or Finland where they have real health care with cost effective outcomes. and it is NOT socialized.
Britain has socialized National Health where the doctors are state employees..
That was an FSA, not an HSA
JSobieski (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 1:27AM EST (link)HSA’s can hold the money indefinitely.
My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.
STOP THE MADNESS!
A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!
Mr. Santorum. Can You Imagine 90% of Health Transactions Requiring No Paperwork?
quill67 (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 8:03AM EST (link)Everybody talks about bringing down the cost of healthcare. One of the biggest costs of healthcare is the paperwork.
Health Savings Accounts allow people to get health care without paperwork (except receipt). No insurance papers to file, no primary care physician to see, and no pre-approvals needed.
Our goal should be that 90% of medical transactions require no insurance form (government or private) to be completed. Instead of nurses working full time on filing out insurance forms–they could see patients. This would drive down costs and increase the quality of care.
Maybe being a doctor would be enjoyeable again. Fewer people want to be doctors because much of the joy of being a doctor has been removed. People become doctors to help people—not fill out paperwork. People become doctors to enjoy a good quality of life—not be told how much they can earn.
HSA's are a good idea, but all HSA transactions require insurance paperwork.
deVere Thursday, January 26th at 3:41PM EST (link)Your insurance company sets the pre-negotiated price, and also keeps track of how much you have spent toward your annual deductible.
I think you are coupling two things together
JSobieski (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 4:08PM EST (link)that are not inherently the same.
(1) HSA monies
(2) Applicaiton of HSA spending against the deductible
I can use my HSA debit card card without any insurance paperwork, but if I want that transaction to count towards my deductible, then I need to comply with the insurance company requirements (aka paperwork).
I typically operate on the assumption that I will never hit my deductible (if I do, it means I have bigger problems than arguing about the incremental impact of a smaller transaction counting against that deductible),
My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.
STOP THE MADNESS!
A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!
Some Insurance Plans Require What You Describe
quill67 (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 7:23PM EST (link)But that is because most people are still operating on the old insurance type system. Once barriers to buying insurance across state borders is eliminated, this will be a non-issue.
obama stole ...
elizaliza Friday, January 27th at 7:21AM EST (link)the republican plan of buying and selling insurance across state borders, which is why those same Republicans are against it now, which seems to me a good thing.
russians would also love that
elizaliza Friday, January 27th at 7:18AM EST (link)because they’re master hackers, along with the Chinese. doing everything electronic is a recipe for disaster. Just like electronic voting
I wonder, what would happen if patients die cos of a computer glitch? if thousands get the wrong medication, cos someone copy-pasted wrong? It has happened before.
Sen. Santorum, Please
aj_0000 Thursday, January 26th at 3:07PM EST (link)I respect what you’ve done as a legislator, and as a candidate. But at this point the only thing you can do in this race is hand the nomination to Romney by splitting votes with Newt. The Republican Party establishment is now trying to use you for just that purpose. They are encouraging you to stay in on the idea that Gingrich will implode and you’ll still have a path to the nomination. That’s impossible. Even if such an “implosion” happens, by that time it will be too late and Romney will already be on his way. The only way he can be stopped is for there to be one conservative candidate opposing him. It has to be Newt. It’s too late for it to be anything else.
You have a run a respectable campaign. Please do not let your ultimate role in this election be handing the nomination to Mitt Romney. Gov. Perry understood the big picture of what’s happening, and he did the right thing. Please follow his lead, and retain the respect and admiration of conservatives.
The way Romney and Gingrich are savaging each other, Santorum may wind up as the compromise nominee.
deVere Thursday, January 26th at 3:45PM EST (link)He would be wise to stay out of “winner take all” states, run only in the rest, and smile at everyone.
I never thought I'd find something scarier than a potential Huckabee candidacy.
NightTwister (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 3:50PM EST (link)Yeah, Santorum does that.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill
No less frightening than Gingrich
In The Hook (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 4:00PM EST (link)And at least the guy is a decent human being and consistent in his social issue stances.
“Hello? You play to win the game.”
Support conservatives that can win.
http://www.marcorubio.com
And he doesn't support a government funded lunar colony
bonnman Thursday, January 26th at 4:04PM EST (link)while we’re in the middle of a debt crisis
as long as repubs spend my money
elizaliza Friday, January 27th at 7:14AM EST (link)it’s okay. at least newt has some ideas, and he won’t give my money to these poor slobs who make less than 100 grand per year. I earn 30 times more than Joe Sixpackl cos i work 30 times as hard! I know this cos I put in 30 times more hours than Joe Sixpack.
a lunar colony will be a huge boost to our economy, right now, the russians and the chinese are the only ones capable of manned space flight, can you believe that? Obama killed the Space Shuttle too!
And consistently wrong on everything else.
NightTwister (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 4:04PM EST (link)Big spender. War in Iran. Union support. Most polarizing candidate since Pat Buchanan. The guy is a walking disaster. He’d make Goldwater look like he lost a close race.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill
Which is also true of Gingrich.
sandiegovoter Saturday, January 28th at 4:40PM EST (link)Anyway. I appreciate Senator Santorum stopping by to say hello. He is responsible for making sure that the voice of social conservatives does not get ignored during the Republican primaries. He has pulled the dialog to the right.
Really, sandiegovoter? Looks to this cat like he helped splinter their support....
acat (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 8:05PM EST (link)letting the squishy moderates win while the mighty (in political stupidity at least…) social conservatives were too busy arguing over who to follow.
As I predicted, based on every GOP race where there’s not an incumbent President or veep, the social conservatives have set themselves up to be defeated in detail.
(shakes head, walks away)
——

Caveat Suffragator
Oh Yeah?
WillWong (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 4:06PM EST (link)And why would a pro-life guy endorse a 100% pro-choice Arlen Specter over a pro-life Pat Toomey, may I ask?
Nope
aj_0000 Thursday, January 26th at 4:10PM EST (link)The race is a dead heat between Romney and Gingrich. Santorum primarily pulls votes from Gingrich. If Santorum stays in, he greatly increases the chance that Romney will win. Anyone who says otherwise is trying to hand the nomination to Romney.
Santorum should tell his voters to voter for Gingrich in Florida, but stay in the race.
deVere Thursday, January 26th at 10:31PM EST (link)After tonight’s debate performance he is a plausible nominee.
Gingrich should tell his voters to vote for Santorum.. where is our " Great Debater "
snowshooze (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 10:35PM EST (link)Pretty sad, what I was able to watch. Santorum was kicking Mitt… I thought that was Newt’s job.
Looks like Santorum voters are Newt's only chance after Mitt's performance tonight?
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Thursday, January 26th at 10:49PM EST (link)But then again, could some of them also have been wowed tonight as Mitt finally defended his business career? I just think that after tonight, Santorum looks irrelevant.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
Santorum does not have a chance in FL, and should endorse Gingrich, otherwise its over for everyone.
Common_Cents (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 6:02PM EST (link)Perry stepped up and saw the big picture and graciously stepped back. Santorum should do the same.
Obama=Golfer in Chief, Leading from,
behind, the Back Nine.Leaders don’t create movements. Movements create leaders. Get involved. Your future depends on it.
Govt “invests” YOUR tax money for POLITICAL return rather than economic return.
Is there evidence that Santorum would endorse Newt
znjs (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 6:10PM EST (link)I’m legitimately asking – I’ve heard this sentiment before that Santorum would endorse Gingrich but I’ve never seen any evidence to support the claim. I’d think he’s support whoever he thinks would have a better chance of winning the general election and would give him some cabinet position, which I would guess would put him as more likely to get behind Romney (or stay in as a stalking horse for him – not that I’m saying that’s what I think is happening).
And if he did
Ed54 (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 7:56PM EST (link)Is there evidence that Santorum’s supporters would go to Newt?
I saw one poll in SC that suggested that 2/3 of Santorum voters favored Gingrich as their second choice, while 1/3 favored Romney. But that was in SC, which was very tough terrain for Romney. I suspect in Florida it would be closer to an even split, and thus a wash.
Besides, the polls are consistently showing Romney leading Gingrich by 8, and that was BEFORE the Thurs debate. I’d guess he is leading by 10+ now. Santorum is polling at 12% support. If 2/3 of his voters (8%) went to Gingrich and 1/3 (4%) went Romney, that would still not be enough to put Gingrich over the top. So why would Santorum, as his last act in the race, endorse a guy whose own demise is imminent?
No, Santorum’s strategy is to wait for Gingrich to implode and then present himself as the sole alternative.
“If all men were just, there would be no need of valor.”
- Agesilaus
No, there isn't any evidence of it
lapert Saturday, January 28th at 10:16PM EST (link)In the most recent PPP poll, the 2nd choice of Santorum supporters was 41% Gingrich, 33% Romney, 19% Paul.
That would amount to a 2% swing to Gingrich, nowhere near enough to matter.
The big picture was he was irrelevant
lapert Saturday, January 28th at 6:38PM EST (link)What Perry saw was that he was no longer relevant in the race polling in low single digits so he did the only thing he thought that could keep him relevant going forward. No one ‘graciously’ exits and endorses the competition when doing so matters at all – at least I can’t think of a single time it happened.
Santorum will eventually drop out and likely endorse Mitt since he will at the time be walking away with the nomination and it will be the only way for him to stay relevant, some time after that Newt will do the same thing.
The myth that all these candidates are fighting for the same voters against Romney may make for fine blogs but it lousy political tactics.
even if he married that woman, i forgive him.
elizaliza Friday, January 27th at 6:44AM EST (link)This ObamaCare is bad, real bad. Just last week my neighbor said ObamaCare saved his life, because it gave him some access to some treatment or whatever. It’s gut wrenching and heartbreaking. And get this, just ’cause of that, he’s gonna betray us and switch his vote! Lifelong Republican at that! I seriously don’t know what this country is coming to, But there’s also good news, someone i went to college with emigrated to Canada, he called himself a health care refugee, cos in his state they sort of blocked ObamaCare. His wive’s Canadian, and they told him his kids would suffer some sort of illness which the Canadians foolishly cover. Good riddance! Let them all go to these commie nations, like Switzerland, and Sweden
I feel very strongly that I should not pay to save my neighbors life! We’re Americans, we don’t save each others life by paying the government! We save each others lives on the battlefield, even if we use government funded guns to do so. In every other matter, we save OUR SELVES.
“The Democrats’ new health care law gives the federal government unprecedented authority to intervene in individuals’ lives.”
This is essentially correct and that is a very, very bad thing. Our government should ONLY intervene in individuals’ lives when it’s about marriage, or about abortion because:
- the government has a sacred duty to clearly state that only certain people can marry each other, who can marry who, but NOT a duty to cure us all. It’s true, neither is in the Constitution, but you just FEEL that the marriage thing SHOULD be in the Constitution.
- government should also clearly tell women that there are limits to what they can do with their bodies. Listen, maybe life starts at conception, who the heck knows? But I know abortion is wrong, I know that for a fact, because that’s how it FEELS: wrong.
It’s much better to let your kid be adopted by rich people who know better what to do with your kids than you do. Infinitely better. I mean, if you’re so irresponsible to get pregnant out of wedlock, it’s probably better to give the kid away to some poor barren woman.
Santorum married an abortionist’s mistress, that’s true, but I forgive him for that. Because by looking at them, you can tell they’re really sorry about that.
Dear Slandering Moby ...
Freedoms Truth (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 10:53PM EST (link)Your attempt to share with us a liberal’s charicature of a conservative is pathetic. Your personal slanders are vile …
“Santorum married an abortionist’s mistress”
And your other statements are incoherent and irrational.
“Listen, maybe life starts at conception, who the heck knows? ”
Anyone who has taken high school biology knows life begins at conception.
we also know that liberals base positions on FEELINGS, conservatives on reason, traditional and empiricism.
But you wouldn’t know that because you waste your time pretending to be almost as stupid as you really are.
Get out of your Momma’s basement, and get a life.
Freedoms Truth,
Travis Monitor – http://travismonitor.blogspot.com
Austin, TX
Sorry Rick, but I wouldn't hire you to be President.
Tbone (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 5:35PM EST (link)You are unqualified for the position. Please get out of the race. You will not win it, thankfully.
Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.
For those of you wanting Santorum to drop out
Ed54 (Diary) Saturday, January 28th at 10:15PM EST (link)and endorse Newt, guess what: it won’t help Newt. In fact, it will hurt him.
Take a look at the crosstabs at page 10 on the latest PPP poll, which has Romney at an 8 point lead: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_FL_128.pdf
Among likely Santorum voters, 27% picked Newt as their second choice, while 43% picked Romney. If Santorum drops out, Romney GAINS votes in Florida.
“If all men were just, there would be no need of valor.”
- Agesilaus