The seemingly impossible: Taking back the Senate in 2010


*Washington- Patty Murray-
Murray received 55% in her last re-election in 2004, compared to Republican George Nethercutt who recieved 43%.
The best candidate would be SoS Sam Reed. He is popular in the state, and was re-elected in 2008 with over 58% of the vote. If he is not interested ( I have heard nothing to make me believe he is) we could go with 5th district Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers. There are two advantages with her. She is a woman, helping take an important constituency from Murray and her district, R+7, is relatively safe.

Orgeon- Ron Wyden-
This could be a tough one, but, you gotta be in it to win it. In 2004, he was re-elected with 63% of the vote. That is his highest percentage in any of his senate elections. We need a scapegoat just to make him spend money. Congressman Greg Walden seems like he could atleast make this guy break a sweat, and his R+10 district shouldn’t be a hard hold. If we can’t ( which we likely wouldn’t ) get him, there is always some random term-limited legislator who may be willing to do it for statewide name recognition.

*California-Barbara Boxer-
Here, we have a chance to pick of SENATOR Barbara Boxer. The NRSC is in talks with former HP CEO, Carly Fiorina. She seems like she is likely to run. We have two benefits here: Female votes and self-funder. Self funders allow the NRSC to spend more money is closer races. Early polls have shown Fiorina close to Boxer. In the event she doesn’t get in, Assemblyman Chuck Devore has already announced.

*Hawaii-Daniel Inouye-
Again, another small window in a traditionally blue state. We have a relatively popular two-term female governor, Linda Lingle. A new poll shows her trailing, but she is a good campaigner. Sadly, she is unlikely to get in. If not, we could always try to get AG Mark Bennet in the race. Doubt we get a high-profile here though. Looks like me will be lucky to get a state legislator in.

*Nevada-Harry Reid-
What a difference a few months makes. Just a few months ago, this was a very good pick-up opportunity for us. My, how things change. We have scandal plagued Republicans in the governors and lieitinent governor’s office. Lt. Gov Brian Kolicki is still planning on running, despite his indictment. Our top recruit, former SoS and Congressman Dean Heller seems more focused on running for governor or re-election. If he wants the job, he’s got the nod. He has statewide electability as two term SoS. If he doesn’t run, former Assemblywoman Sharron Angle has formed an exploratory commitee. If he does run, she would likely run for his House seat, and become the early front-runner. State Senator Mark Amodei has also said he would consider it if Heller declined a run. He was also recently spotted in Washington. 

*Colorado- Michael Bennett-
Appointed Senator Michael Bennett may face a tough election in 2010. He remains virtually unknown in his state. Aurora city councilman Ryan Frazier has been camapigning hard and travelling the state, forming an exporatory committee. He seems like a good, and likely candidate. He is young ( 31 ) and African-American. We could have a chance here.

*North Dakota-Byron Dorgan-
A Republican leaning state, but yet we don’t have a candidate. But somehow, they have 2 democratic senators and the AL Rep is a Democrat. The state is rated R+10. Should be simple. We control the governor and Lt. Gov offices. Governor John Hoeven would become the favorite should he run. He was re-elected with an over-wheliming 74% in 2008, to a third term. He is said to be considering the race. Should he not run, Lt. Gov Jack Dalrymple could get in. He was elected Lt. three times, including in 2008. He ran once for senate in 1992. We shouldn’t have a problem hooking a popular state-wide elected Republican here.

*Arkansas-Blanche Lincoln-
In a state that voted for McCain with over 60%, this should be easy. Not so. Arkansas is only Republican for Presidential elections. Realistically, our best hope is food company Executive Curtis Coleman, a friend of Mike Huckabee. In a dream land, Huckabee would run. As a popular former governor and Presidential candidate, this would become a very competitive race. If neither run, State Senator Gilbert Baker is preparing for a run. State Senator Kim Hendren announced, but may withdraw after calling NY Sen Chuck Schumer “that Jew”

*Illinois-Roland Burris-
Things kinda look good in this traditionally blue state. Democrats have been plagued with scandal. Incumbent Roland Burris is likely to get eaten up in the Dem primary. We have a good chance with whoever emerges from that primary, unless AG Lisa Madigan, who has been wanting the Governor’s mansion switches races. Obama has asked her to run. But, she has two demands. A clear primary and and endorsement from Obama. Well, the main primary threat, Alexi Giannoulias has said he will not be bullied out the race. Obama has said he will remain neutral through the primary. We all know how good he is at keeping promises. However, if Madigan stays in the governor’s race, moderate GOP Rep Mark Kirk will likely get in. He would have a clear primary. He has been strong in polls, tieing with Alexi. Now, we just need Madigan to run for Governor and put Kirk in the Senate race. If he doesn’t run, another Rep, Peter Roskam , is also considering.

*Wisonsin-Russ Feingold-
Rising star GOP Rep. Paul Ryan is considering this race. He would be our strongest candidate, although he faces an uphill battle. If not, we could try to get AG J.B. Van Hollen in the race. He has statewide electability, and is well known. We can win this one with the right candidate.

*Indiana-Evan Bayh-
Fun, fun. We have a deep bench here. We have a hugely popular Republican governor, but he seems more likely to run for the White House than for Senate. We also have a female Lt. Gov, who with some persuading, may run. GOP rising star, Rep. Mike Pence could put together a viable campaign, and even win. If none of those three jump in, we have three other Republican reps who should have no problem with a good candidacy. I have no idea why the NRSC doesn’t have a candidate yet.

Maryland-Barbara Mikulski-
Why bother. Does anyone really think we have a shot, since the only viable candidate, Michael Stelle is out because of his RNC chairmanship? Regardless, lets look. Maybe former Governor, Rob Ehrlich? He would have the best chance, but is more likely to run for Governor in 2010. State Senator Nancy Jacobs, who also serves as minority whip, could help take some of the female vote.

*Delaware-Ted Kaufman-Retiring

Sen. Ted Kaufman was appointed to fill VP Biden’s term until a 2010 special election. Republican At-large Rep. Mike Castle is considering a run. He has been elected state wide as Governor and the AL Rep, serving nine terms in the House. He would be the front-runner, against likely Dem Candidate, AG Beau Biden, Biden’s son. Another potential take over in a Dem state!

 

*Pensylvania-Benedict Arlen Specter-

Since Specter switched partys to save his political career, his popularity has tanked. The citizens of PA must have realized that if the Republican Party can’t trust him, neither can they. Republican former Congressman Pat Toomey faces weak primary opposition, and Specter has a tough challenge from Liberal Congressman Joe Sestak. Toomey has also raised over $1m and is gaining in polls.And they call him un-electable…

 

New York-Chuck Schumer-

Former Rep. Rick Lazio, who ran against Hillary Clinton in 2000, could possibly enter this race. I wouldn’t expect a win, as most Republicans are focused on the Kirsten Gillibrand special election. He is planning a run for governor, too. But, if former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani runs for Governor, he could be persuaded to switch races. Chances of a Republican take-over= very-low, unless a BIG scandal emerges.

 

*New York-Kirsten Gillibrand-

Appointed Sen.Gillibrand will have a strong…and expensive primary challenge from downstate Rep.Carolyn Maloney. After a weakened Gillibrand or Maloney emerges from the primary, they will face the likely primary-less Republican nominee. Who this will be is in question. Former three term Governor George Pataki is being urged to run by Republicans from across the nation. Polls show him tied with Gillibrand. If he does not run, Long Island Rep. Peter King likely will. He would face a tough…but not impossible race.

 

*Connecticut-Chris Dodd-

Chris Dodd has been hit with scandal after scandal. Republicans have already landed quality candidates. Former Rep.Rob Simmons, the Republican frontrunner, State Senator Sam Caligiuri, and Former Ireland Ambassador Tom Foley are all anounced candidates. Simmons is the likely nominee. Polls show him crushing Dodd. If we don’t screw up, this is a very possible take over.

 

*Vermont-Patrick Leahy-

Leahy is a pretty safe Democrat, unless we get the right candidate. Four term incumbent Republican Governor Jim Douglas is up for re-election in 2010. He would put up a strong challenge to Leahy, as he remains popular and was re-elected in 2008 with 53% of the vote. Should he choose not to run, we still have LG Brian Dubie. He too, has served four terms and is up for re-election in 2010. He won re-election in 2008 with 55%. If we can get one of these two in the race, we have another chance in a blue state.

 

The map for 2010 is great for us, if we field the right candidates. If the NRSC does this, we can gain the majority back in 2010. To do so, we need to gain 11 seats ( Unless Coleman wins in MN, then only 10 seats to gain majority). I figure that, if we can strongly compete in 14 states, giving us room for loses, we can do this. The races marked with a * are ones I feel we should compete in, should we get than candidates I have suggested. I have actually marked 15 with a * though. So, John Cornyn, get on it!


Category: , , , ,

RSS feed

32 Comments Leave a comment

I don't think the NRCC and NRSC

redstatebluestate123 (Diary) Monday, June 29th at 3:03AM EST (link)

will have the money to do anything near what you’re talking about, for a couple of reasons:

1) My guess is most of the focus will be on taking back the house, sapping money from Senate candidates.

2) There are defensive races they have to play too. Specifically, open seats in Ohio, Florida, and possibly Texas will be monstrously expensive to protect, plus other races like Missouri, New Hampshire, and Kentucky.

With that in mind, I don’t think they’ll be sinking serious cash into races like North Dakota, Arkansas, or Hawaii. And I’d imagine that they’ll write off California REALLY quick if Fiorina doesn’t run. If the Dems keep the house by 3 seats and they burned millions trying to oust Boxer, whoever made that decision would get flayed alive. Same with New York.

Arkansas is doable

scarlos (Diary) Monday, June 29th at 3:38AM EST (link)

Blanch Lincon is polling negative among independents, and Arkansas is moving republican. If she winds up voting for Card check though, she will rocket up the target list, given Walmart’s roots in the state. We still lack a good statewide candidate outside of Huckabee, though.

North Dakota and Hawaii however, are close to impossible. North Dakota’s Byron Dorgan regularly wins re-election by amazing margins, and Hawaii has recently emerged as the most solidly democratic state (D + 14 according to CPVI) and both senators are very popular there.

Wisconsin is also not likely to amount to much, as Russ Feingold is fairly popular statewide. if he decides to retire (not likely) this is a good shot for a pickup.

The New York and Vermont races are pretty much impossible–al the incumbents poll well (schumer won over 70% of the vote in 2004). If Gillebrand gets beaten by a Manhattan-style Liberal in the democratic primary, maybe, but at this point it’s out of the question.

Something you didn’t mention however, is the possibility of Robert Byrd’s seat (WV) being up for grabs (the senator is currently being cared for as he has a brain tumor). He’s missed alot of votes, and might resign before the 2010 elections. Democrats usually dominate state-wide races in West Virginia though, but it’s certainly a better bet for a pickup than Vermont.

Socialism is Oligarchy in disguise

 
 

aww,shoot!

redtillimdead (Diary) Monday, June 29th at 4:34AM EST (link)

When it was announced Byrd wouldn’t be returning to senate, I wanted to add his seat but I totally forgot!
Anyway, to defend my stance on Hawaii, ND, Washington, CA, etc.
Hawaii- ONLY if Linda Lingle runs should we spend a DIME on this race.
ND- Only if the popular governor ( won 74% in 2008) Lt. Gov is poular too, and would give him a run for his money, and a good chance at taking his seat.
Washington- Again, only a good chance if we can get Reed or the AG in. We cant win with a non-statewide elected official here, but we do have a chance with the right candidate.
CA- Only with Fiorina should this race be considered a toss-up, and we wouldnt have to spend much, as she is a self funder.
AR- If Coleman runs, he may have a chance. The NRSC could spend some money here, but he too could be a self-funder.
WI-Feingold is popular, but with the right candidate, we could have a chance at beating him. But, in swing states, we cant let anyone go un challenged
Vermont- With a popular statewide elected official, we can win this thing.
NY- Not a dime againsy Schmer, he’s one of the safest incumbents. I’m suggesting we fight for Sen-B, against a badly wounded Gillibrand or Maloney, with Pataki, and, depending on the Dem primary, Peter king, should pataki not run
Fl- Face it, despite our wishes, Crist will likely be the GOP nominee. The NRSC needs to spend no money on him
KY- After campaign finance reports, this race will take shape. If Greyson does well, Bunning will possibly retire, and this will become a much easier hold for us, however, we will still need to work on it, unless the Dem primary is too bad, which it likely will be
OH- Yeah, definately need to work HARD here!
But, with self-funders, in CA, FL, possibly AR, we won’t have as bad a cash situation. Also, the NRSC would be working on Senate races, not house races too. The NRCC will be working on house races. If I have time, I will try a house version, which will take longer and be harder with soo many districts.

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

 

poll

redtillimdead (Diary) Monday, June 29th at 4:38AM EST (link)

I just found a poll from earlier this month, Feingold in low 50′s against Ryan, certainly not bad, but not un-beatable

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

 

I'm Recommending This Because...

IJB Monday, June 29th at 11:19AM EST (link)

…While it’s unquestionably a long-shot, it does go to show that if the stars line up your way, you can actually accomplish the unimaginable (as the ’93-’94 Senate elections showed).

If things get bad enough in 2010, yes – even those like Dorgan & Feingold can(will sometimes) go down.

Is it likely? No.
Is it possible? Sure.

Thank you

redtillimdead (Diary) Monday, June 29th at 3:39PM EST (link)

Thanks for recomending it! I sent this to Cornyn and the NRSC

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

 
 

Recommended

Finrod (Diary) Monday, June 29th at 4:17PM EST (link)

We have chances to pick up Sen seats in very blue states– New York, Delaware and Illinois all have appointed Senators that will be vulnerable or an open seat. Even if we don’t retake the Senate in 2010, we can get ourselves a lot closer to that goal, and the political tradewinds will be favoring us in the Senate in 2012 and 2014, as all those first-term Dems elected in 2006 and 2008 will have to defend votes for Obama policies.

Let’s get down to brass tacks here. How much for the ape?

Recommend. And amen, Finrod

redneck_hippie (Diary) Wednesday, July 1st at 11:58AM EST (link)

“…as all those first-term Dems elected in 2006 and 2008 will have to defend votes for Obama policies.”

If we make these campaigns about running on the record of voting with Obama, Pelosi and Reid, we can pick them off. And won’t it be marvelous fun way in the future (2012) when Obama has to actually run on HIS record, not his predecessor’s.

My wish would be that we stuff their racism, cultism and thuggism down their throats, but results on that may have to be more long term before we see results (I’m thinking of Wright/Ayers/ACORN/Rezko/Chavez/Castro etc. etc. etc. We must concentrate on the policies and votes.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 
 

Exactly.

redtillimdead (Diary) Monday, June 29th at 5:13PM EST (link)

Dems like Landrieu in 2014, a potential Feinstein open seat in 2012, Nelson vs Rubio, should he lose prmary, and many more seats. In 2012 and 2014, the map really favos us right now

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

 

"You Gotta Be In It To Win It!"

Repair_Man_Jack (Diary) Monday, June 29th at 8:00PM EST (link)

That, right there, is the attitude a newly rejuvinated GOP needs. Thanks for an excellent diary.

” I side impenitently with the human race against the modern reformer.” – C.S. Lewis

Ditto all of that

E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Thursday, July 2nd at 1:32PM EST (link)

I am tired to death of all the sideline-standing do-nothing critics. If we risk nothing, play to only lose a little, we’ll get exactly what we asked for.

If we take bold steps, you give the base a reason to be motivated, people to volunteer time and money, and this momentum of bad news for the Democrats will provide some tailwind.

We might pick up only 1 or 2, but if we are in position to take advantage of more bad news, scandals, etc, we can gane 5,6,7. Or 1994 might happen.

Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO

EPU what happened in 1994? nt

mom2oneson (Diary) Thursday, July 2nd at 1:44PM EST (link)

mom2, we took Congress back from the Dems

janis (Diary) Thursday, July 2nd at 1:54PM EST (link)

and right under Billy Bob Clinton’s nose. And the way the R’s did it was to come up with the “Contract with America”. It laid out principles, goals and made promises.

And that scenario is why the Dems are doing all they can to prevent from happening again.

Thank you Janis! nt

mom2oneson (Diary) Thursday, July 2nd at 2:10PM EST (link)
 
 
 

Have to do *better* than 1994.

naraht Friday, July 3rd at 2:51PM EST (link)

In 1994, the Republicans took 8 seats in the Senate in the General Election (two more after election day after Shelby and Nighthorse switched).

In Arizona, Maine, Michigan and Ohio, the Incumbent had retired.

In Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Tennessee (won by Thompson) the Democrats they were facing were incumbents who had either been appointed or won special elections and were trying for their first six year term.

Only the seat where Frist beat Sasser did a Republican Challenger beat a incumbent who had served a full term.

At this point, the states where the Republican candidate will *not* face a Senator who has won a full term on their own are Illinois, Colorado, Delaware and New York (Gillibrand). (You can add maybe add Specter to that list who hasn’t won a full term as a Democrat)

Presuming all five of those are won, six more seats are needed (with VP Biden, 51 are needed) and all six of these would have to be gotten against sitting Democratic senators who have served two terms (there are no Democrats in the Senate first elected in 2004).

Over the course of 2010 and 2012 perhaps, but in one election, no.

yup

dingo (Diary) Friday, July 3rd at 4:21PM EST (link)

While you can never say “never” in politics, the GOP is lucky if it has a 1% chance of regaining the Senate in 2010.

What is doable, however, is a small pickup of seats. In the past decade, every election cycle has produced a headwind for one of the Parties (2002 & 2004 for the GOP; 2006 & 2008 for the Dems). What this means is that in each of those elections, most of the competitive seats went to one of the Parties. Thus, if 2010 leans GOP (which I think is pretty likely) then it could be possible for the Republicans to hold onto most of their (five) open seats and weak incumbents (Bunning, Vitter and Burr) while picking off a Democratic seat in a few places. The most likely GOP targets – CT, DE, CO, NY, PA, and IL. But others could develop as well, if recruiting is good and/or the Dem incumbent makes a mistake.

Dingo

agreed on the weak incumbent

naraht Friday, July 3rd at 4:41PM EST (link)

I actually think it is more like .2% (1 chance in 500) , the hill is just too high to climb in one election unless Obama completely craters (Both a scandal and an economy still in the dumps)

Bunning falls into that very rare group of politicians who haven’t had any scandals who his own party wants to retire and the other party wants them to stay put. I don’t think that really applies to either Byrd or Kennedy.

I’m not sure that Vitter is that weak, the state has been moving red for a while even before Katrina.

Burr, I don’t know what it is about that NC Senate Seat, but it seems like no one can keep it.

I personally think the Republican Leadership in the Senate would be happy with +4 or so.

 
 
 
 
 

Ryan isn't running for Senate in WI

Jon E. Schultz II (IlliniJon) (Diary) Tuesday, June 30th at 10:53AM EST (link)

And nobody else is going to beat Feingold…

Nice post though.

Not in 2010, Anyway n/t

Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Tuesday, June 30th at 11:04AM EST (link)

n/t

 

You Never Know, Actually (nt)

IJB Tuesday, June 30th at 11:28AM EST (link)
 
 

FYI There are rumors of a challenger to Leahy...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Tuesday, June 30th at 1:33PM EST (link)

Brian Dubie would be awesome, but I haven’t heard anything about him running.

I will let you know if the VTGOP fields a candidate.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


You are way too optimistic on ND, PA, DE, and IL

its_a_right_wing_thing (Diary) Wednesday, July 1st at 6:39PM EST (link)

WA-Will go Democratic. It always does. Education and Healthcare, two Democratic and Socialist pillars are big issues out there and they will run on that. If Martha Cantwell, a supposed “weak” Senator can get re-elected that shows you something. There is a reson this state has 2 Women’s Senators and a crooked, but woman Gov. They are crazy leftist out there. Perfect Obama-drones who will do his bidding.

OR-No chance. This is a mini-WA. Lost Gordon Smith and Wyden is soon to follow. How they had 2 Republicans in the Senate is beyond me. Keen to Socialism here too. Crazy liberals in Portland which controls the state basically even though its not the capital.

CA-Boxer no chance. Wildly popular. Fiorina will be linked to the Bush years/support and she’d lose because of this ala McCain and Coleman. Next.

HI-while I agree Lingle is the only hope, too many minorities means Democratic voters. The ancient Inouye wins again-easily.

Nevada-while Reid seems vunerable here is where ACORN comes in to save the day-bet on it (no pun intended for NV). This is where ACORN makes their money and swings elections. All signs point to him losing, and that’s precisely when and why he’ll win.

Colorado Bennett-Why not former Gov. Bill Owens or former challenger to Salazar Pete Coors? Bennett should be seen as vunerable but CO has been going left in recent years, proving it by going blue in ’08. Largely due to immigration as Latinos vote Democratic (figure it out people, they aint conservates-just act like it)

ND Dorgan NO 0% chance he loses. If Hoeven runs he maybe gets only 60% of the vote. Either way, he wins due to farmers’ reliance on farm subsidy money (see progressive Iowa)

Arkansas-Lincoln if Huckabee ran I’d say she’d be in trouble however, with him out persumably, she’ll win. As someone noted they go blue in everything but election years. SCARLOS, not sure where you are getting your info that AR is moving red or “doable” quite the opposite. Poor states like them need big Gov.

IL-Burris, in ObamaLand and with the Chicago political machine AND ACORN do you honestly expect a fair election? For this reason Burris will win. Mix in the fact this state is one of the most fiercely left and blue and its not even close. They like them some minorities up in PC corrupt land.

WI Finegold-if Ryan were to run it could get really interesting similar to Huckabee AR situation. However last 3 elections 53-46, 51-48, 55-44 with that last one being in 2004, his largest margin indicating he’s getting stonger, more popular and set in his ways. Doubt very highly he loses. (WI votes blue in Pres. elections for a reason too)

IN Bayh-used to think Bayh was an okay Democrat, the over-used “blue Dog” if there ever was one. However, his nasty ’08 attacks on Republicans proved to me he’s a Dem-through and through. Some things just don’t make sense Dorgan in red state ND and I feel Bayh is the same here in FORMERLY red IN. That too should tell you something. He’s safe.

MD no shot but you have the right ideam Ehrich has the best shot. If he doesn’t run forget about it.

DE with the popularity of Obama-Biden no way his son Beau loses (at least if ACORN has anything to say about it-notice a trend????) Biden wins 65% of the vote here.

PA everyone thinks Specter is a goner. I disagree. PA has shifted evidenced by true conservative Santorum’s ouster. They are now just another pathetic blue state (which they’ve always been save for 1984). Unions too dominant here. Toomey seen as weak. While Toomey is the right guy, he’s likely too conservative for these hacks. Specter the defector is rewarded for his traitorism.

NY Shumer safe.

NY Gillibrand vs. King would be very interesting. If Pataki can truly win then he’s the way to go. Why not run King vs. Shumer and Pataki vs. Gillibrand or vice versa? Then you’ve got something! ACORN will be key and lurking here if it looks like a R may win…..

CT-Dodd like Specter a lot of you are too optimistic. CT is a navy blue state for a reason and Dodd is the Kennedy of the Consitution state. I don’t think he can be beat. The name is too ingrained and he’s been in too long. ACORN will be doing their worst here. (can you sense a theme that as LONG AS ACORN IS AROUND, NO ELECTION IS LEGIT? THERE IS NO DEMOCRACY ONLY FRAUD INEVITABLE)

Besides, can you really expect a R in New England? Maine is one thing (RINO’s as they are) but CT is another. Douglas may have a shot but again, its CT and I’ll believe it when I see it.

VT Leahy. In the land of child predators geting light sentences, and blue bloods, can you see a R winning? How would they represent the people? What incentive would they have in voting for an “R”? That label is like a scarlet letter to those liberal freaks up there. The Democratic party is too ingrained into psyche’s from the cradle. Leahy 70% win.

I'm Seeing a Lot of Negativity Here...

IJB Wednesday, July 1st at 9:29PM EST (link)

…And not much in the way of helpful suggestions.

Also, you ignored the point that if you end up with a truly ‘wave’ election, you can throw the ‘rulebook’ out, and forget about calling anyone “safe” or “unbeatable”.

Most of these are long-shots – but almost none of them (outside of maybe MD) are what I’d call “unwinnable” in all scenarios.

 

No way Burris is the Dem Nominee.

naraht Friday, July 3rd at 3:16PM EST (link)

Unless there are 4 or more other candidates in the Democratic Primary, there is no way Burris is getting elected. Even if Burris managed to get the Black portion of the Chicago machine behind him (which isn’t a guarantee, Jesse Jackson III doesn’t like him at all and has more pull in that area), that still only 20% of the Democratic vote and he has *no* support in the suburbs or downstate. Also every other potential Democratic Candidate is from Chicago (Chris Kennedy, Davis, Giannoulias, Hynes, Cheryle Jackson and Lisa Madigan) so there isn’t much geographical variety there…

 
 
 

ND

redtillimdead (Diary) Tuesday, June 30th at 4:43PM EST (link)

the NDGOP said Hoeven wants to run

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

 

Well. . .

swatenginguy Wednesday, July 1st at 3:59PM EST (link)

Ok, so we could take back the Senate. But I think at the moment we should be more worried about keeping our ability to filibuster (yes I know, we can’t actually filibuster with only 40 senators, but on most issues we can pick up Ben Nelson, or Mary Landrieu or some other moderate Dem..)

You left out the races in Florida, New Hampshire, Missouri, and Ohio, all of which have retiring Republicans. With the exception of Florida, they all seem to be leaning Democrat.

I’m all for going all out to win seats, but let’s not overreach looking for a pie-in-the-sky 10 seat pickup. We need to hold what we have a maybe pickup a few more. That will allow us to act as an efficient check on Obama’s agenda. If we get ahead of ourselves, we could end up opposing a 62 or 63 seat democratic senate, which would make the second half of Obama’s term even more extreme than what we’ve seen so far.

Because...

redtillimdead (Diary) Wednesday, July 1st at 7:29PM EST (link)

I was only doing seats with Dem incumbents. Also, in all of those races ( except NH, with Sununu officially out, Ayotte will jump in any day now) we have candidates.

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

 
 

Fiorina would make the Dems crazy

jonreagan (Diary) Wednesday, July 1st at 6:43PM EST (link)

As we were reminded when Gov. Palin was nominated for VP, liberals think they “own” the groups they’ve defined as victims; as we’ve found out repeatedly, those who stray off the plantation become targets and are demonized. An appealing woman running under the GOP banner makes them nuts, drives them into character-assasination mode, and worse. Carly Fiorina would drive them crazy; ex-CEO of Hewlett Packard challenging some hag like Boxer who’s fed at the public trough all her life? That race would be too much fun.

And I’d like the odds: CA voted for Prop 8 (even with an Obama landslide in CA), and followed that up months later by voting emphatically against any new taxes. The state is not a lost cause, by any stretch.

You did a great re-cap of the Senate races. Only ones I’d say are absolutely lost causes are Evan Bayh and Chuck Schumer. Dorgan will be tough to beat, but not impossible. That said—and I think you touch on this—it’s key to put up candidates everywhere. Any time an election cycle becomes a “re-aligning” type of race, things happen on election day that nobody expected. Think Foley/Nethercutt in ’94.

Right

redtillimdead (Diary) Wednesday, July 1st at 7:31PM EST (link)

Even if the NRSC and RNC don’t give them money, we still need to look for someone to run. They can get their name out their, and force the incumbents to spend money. We can’t let them go unchallenged and let them keep raking in the cash, and not spending it, because, until a huge scandal or retirement, its impossible to beat them

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

 
 

No Kirk in IlIinois.

Stan(ley) Pruss (Diary) Wednesday, July 1st at 8:56PM EST (link)

After he voted for cap&tax many conservatives would vote for anyone else,

 

In the primary

redtillimdead (Diary) Thursday, July 2nd at 12:29AM EST (link)

Yeah, I’m conservative, I’d vote against Kirk in a primary, but after the primary, would I vote for the moderate Republican or the Liberal Democrat?

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

 

Nevada - a cunning plan

bk (Diary) Thursday, July 2nd at 2:22PM EST (link)

Ensign resigns. Governor Gibbons appoints the top candidate who was going to run against Reid if that’s how it works there. Ensign says he was doing a good job and wants the voters to decide whether he should continue – by running against Reid.