Terrorist Dry Run: PC AirTran and MSM Cover Up Story


Why won’t the media cover this? Oh, that’s right, they love their Messiah and don’t want to bring bad attention on his minions. It’s starting, people. They are coming for us and our politicians and media are their willing accomplices. If they get their way, burkas and sharia law will be the order of the day and you’ll either convert or pay the infidel tax till your out on the street and begging for their “mercy.”

Debbie has the lowdown here and confirmation here.

It’s been proven beyond doubt but have you herd of it in the MSM, of course not. Those sheep are silent. Spread the word to your family, friends, and, if possible, work associates. We need to let everyone, every American, know of this.

We need to have concealed carry on all airplanes so we the people can defend ourselves since the 0-government isn’t going to do it for us.


Category: , , , , , ,

RSS feed

11 Comments Leave a comment

Would you like to stand behind your words?

zroxx (Diary) Sunday, December 6th at 12:53AM EST (link)

Ok.

First, I’m going to quote the critical phrase you’ve used in your post.

It’s been proven beyond doubt …

Second, I’m going to offer up some information regarding this story that has been (for at least 24 hours before you posted this), is and continues to be available to anyone capable (and willing) to perform some cursory research online:

It’s a little easier to understand why a Houston man who claimed to have thwarted a potential terrorist attack on a flight leaving Atlanta has not answered repeated requests to tell his story.

He was not on the plane, AirTran Airways says. [cite]

After conducting additional research into this situation, we have verified, according to flight manifests (legally binding documents) that the individual that allegedly created a first-hand account of events on-board AirTran Airways flight 297, a Theodore Petruna, was never actually on-board the flight. [cite]

In the latest developments, Houston television station KHOU has done a story about the flight and has talked to the man who sent the email, Tedd Petruna. You can click this link to see the story.

The station quoted Petruna as saying: “”I’m glad it got out. Due to personal and financial reasons, I can’t speak about this.”

The report said Petruna “admits that his description of the men’s attire was wrong, and he admits he didn’t personally see anyone watching pornographic videos.” [cite]

Third, I’ll make you a friendly wager. In one week, we meet back at this posting and see where the story has gone. If it turns out that there were Muslim terrorists on flight 297 carrying out a “dry run”, but the media covered it up, then I will donate $500 to whatever charity your hero, Glenn Beck, currently advocates for.

If on the other hand it turns out these were not Muslim terrorists on flight 297, you will (a) apologize publicly, here, for dragging down the level of seriousness on RedState; and (b) never make another posting that isn’t thoroughly researched and free from irrational and hysterical conspiracy theory ranting.

What do you say? If you’re willing to back your writing up it should be an easy win for you, right?

Being as it was “proven beyond doubt”.

really, zroxx? do you really want to go down this road?

DONTREADONME (Diary) Sunday, December 6th at 1:36AM EST (link)

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17508

Now before you go off shooting your mouth, I would do a little more research into the story rather than going to snopes.com.

I am not saying the person in the email is a real person all I am saying is this story has some teeth.

Now apologize to red_dawn

more links...

DONTREADONME (Diary) Sunday, December 6th at 2:01AM EST (link)

now read this story carefully…
http://www.ajc.com/business/airtran-hero-wasn-t-226517.html

Why on earth were 13 passengers asked to exit the plane if two men were the issue? Sounds to me that there is more to this story than an email that bares a strking resemblence to the actual accounts. Just saying, there’s smoke over there? Whether its a lit cigarrette or a brush fire, there’s something and the truth seems very fleeting from the so called official sources.

 
 
 

Lets go down that road.

zroxx (Diary) Sunday, December 6th at 2:53AM EST (link)

I assume you are willing to accept the same wager I made to the OP? I am extending it to you now.

But wait – before you decide, let me try and help you out by giving you a little more information regarding the Canadian Free Press article author, Douglas Hagmann.

1) He is a frequent guest on Coast to Coast AM. That’s the late late night radio show that features discussion of, among other things, UFOs, haunted houses, and psychics.

2) He has written a number of articles (e.g. here, here, here, and here) as recently as August, 2009 regarding 44′s birth certificate. I’m not sure, but I think that may well qualify him for birther status.

So, what do you say? Want to stand with the rock solid Douglas Hagmann and meet me back here in one week? Between this guy’s outstanding credibility and red_dawn’s “proven beyond doubt”, you can’t possibly lose, can you?

PS – here is the original AJC story from November 18th that covered the incident. If you want an account that is closest to what actually happened, that is probably it.

Careful now, zroxx

Neil Stevens (Diary) Sunday, December 6th at 3:34AM EST (link)

I know you fascists seem to think that questioning The Leader is inherently disqualifying, but outside of your OfA rallies you’re gonna have to do better than that.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

 

zroxx, you're a coward, "reply to this"...

DONTREADONME (Diary) Sunday, December 6th at 3:55PM EST (link)

I would say your about as unreliable as they come. Next, if you fail to answer my questions directly, I tend to believe that you have absolutely no confidence in your argument.

 

you're a...

DONTREADONME (Diary) Sunday, December 6th at 4:03PM EST (link)

twit. I love how you reply to me by creating a different comment. You knew that I would check my comments and see if anyone responded, and I would see 0 replys and assume no response, so you can have the last word. I love it when people like you try the absent argument. Consider this my last argument with you, do not want to disturb the little world view you created. No those imams on the U.S. Airways plane never existed, it was just a bad seatbelt. cue X-files theme…

Do you accept the wager?

zroxx (Diary) Sunday, December 6th at 6:12PM EST (link)

You knew that I would check my comments and see if anyone responded, and I would see 0 replys and assume no response, so you can have the last word.

[Rolls eyes]

The assertion made was, “It’s been proven beyond doubt” that there was a terrorist dry run that occurred on Flight 297. That assertion was made in spite of easily available information, including a point by point response by AirTran, casting serious doubt and calling into question the reliability of Tedd Petruna’s “eye witness” account that prompted all of this.

You chimed in with an article from Douglas Hagmann of the Northeast Intelligence Network. I told you why I don’t think he is a credible source of information.

if you fail to answer my questions directly, I tend to believe that you have absolutely no confidence in your argument.

What questions? The only question I see is, “Why on earth were 13 passengers asked to exit the plane if two men were the issue?” According to AirTran, “The entire party complied fully with Crew Members’ instructions to exit the aircraft in order to ascertain the situation.” (emphasis mine).

Now, if you have confidence in the assertion that’s been made in this post, stop misfiring and accept the wager. Easy win right? I’ve got more to lose than you, $500 on my end, a mere apology from you on yours.

Or will you continue to stamp your feet, call names, and refer to events not in dispute?

wow, zroxx, you can read directions, I do not make wagers...

DONTREADONME (Diary) Sunday, December 6th at 6:52PM EST (link)

with cowards. Now if you do not mind, I think I stated quite obviously that I have no desire to engage you in a conversation. Case closed. BTW, if I am wrong I am wrong, but not likely in this case. Something happened and the chatter from the Gov these days is something more than a cell phone incident occurred. Again, I do not much care for your annual return to redstate, now bugger off.

btw, zvoxx, lalalalalalala ... I got the last word... lalalalalala-nt

DONTREADONME (Diary) Sunday, December 6th at 7:03PM EST (link)

hahaha, you’re funny. Sucks not getting the last word doesn’t it? lalalalalalala… haha

 
 
 
 
 

Wow.

Christine (Diary) Sunday, December 6th at 8:20AM EST (link)

What a confusing set of conflicting accounts, just from the links so far on this diary.

Regardless of what the truth is, this to me speaks to a couple of huge problems that I fear won’t go away anytime soon. We’re seeing an extreme lack of trust in the MSM that is getting stronger by the day. As a result we use blogs and other internet mediums as our source….but there’s no validation of these sources (again, because that is traditionally an MSM job and few trust them anymore). So, an email like this can “go viral” and once “confirmed” by a blog it is truth.

The fact that the email author wasn’t on the plane speaks volumes – and should have been verified before the word “confirmed” was applied to the story. That said, AirTran’s official story seems to have a lot of holes in it as do the MSM reports…so it sure seems like more than a cell phone incident.

I hope the truth comes out.

The primary process is FLAWED. Two states should not decide our candidate.

“I would be a poor Commander in Chief”
– Barack Obama, July 3 2008