It sounds like something straight out of “Brave New World.”
The Washington Post, after an investigation lasting two years, decided to expose the insanely huge spending and massive size of the intelligence community in a Monday online report entitled “Top Secret America.” Headed by notorious lefties Dana Priest and William Arkin, who normally shouldn’t be given the time of day, this massive list of over 1,900 companies – most of them based in the Eastern US – fingers everything from AT&T to Novell (sorry, Microsoft haters) as employed by the government in some capacity or another. Over a third of them (36%) are large companies with 101-500 employees, and according to a DNI memo 70% of the yearly intelligence budget is spent on contracts for everything from satellites to food service.
The Defense Intelligence Agency, created during the first year of the Kennedy administration, underwent a 225% growth from 2003 onward. In the words of the Post itself:
At least 20 percent of the government organizations that exist to fend off terrorist threats were established or refashioned in the wake of 9/11. Many that existed before the attacks grew to historic proportions as the Bush administration and Congress gave agencies more money than they were capable of responsibly spending.
Or, responsibly remembering what to do with. Agents tasked with assimilating the data couldn’t have been trusted with their lives to remember it all when it was going in one ear and out the other. Per NCTC director Michael Leiter, the Christmas underwear bomber was not defeated by trillions of dollars in spending, but by the involvement of more than 850,000 top secret contractors in the intelligence community. It became insanely hard to tell who was doing what, where or even when. Admiral Dennis Blair, former National Intelligence Director, admitted to oversight committees that he hadn’t designated clear responsibility regulating the mess to those involved.
And as if that weren’t laughable enough, senior intelligence officials are being expected to read through mountains of classified information reports – one of them, bearing the name of “Weekly Warning Forecast,” sounds more like a Weather Channel segment on Southeast hurricane activity than an intelligence briefing.
The intelligence community of today isn’t something that can reasonably be called “effective.” Not by a long shot. It’s been said that the best solutions are often the simplest, and that’s something an administration which has made its own efforts to take control of the Internet in the name of national security can take to the bank.
If Obama “came into office aware of the problems,” according to his own officials, then why has he taken so long to fix them?
Could it be that he doesn’t have any interest in truly doing so, save for those measures which will actually hurt our men in uniform?
This is little more than a convenient out for him to blame another one of his problems on Bush, yet again. And you can be sure the Washington Post’s writers will be eating it up – they never lifted a finger in protest of the plunging government deficit or, in Arkin’s case, a massive environmental racket devoted to increasing UN control over the world’s economies.
With two years working on this, but a grand total of one article in the past two years shedding light on the New Black Panther case – or rather, the Post’s lack of attention to same – there’s no reason to believe the folks that talked such a good game back in the Ashcroft years will paint a fresh target on anyone’s back.
Get ready for another round of Bush Derangement Syndrome, folks. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
William Arkin?
Repair_Man_Jack (Diary) Monday, July 19th at 11:18AM EST (link)That Anti-Military Hatemonger? Thay let him write this piece! His Storm Warning Blog was infamous!
” I side impenitently with the human race against the modern reformer.” – C.S. Lewis
Dana Priest and her husband are committed Communists
Scope (Diary) Monday, July 19th at 12:38PM EST (link)From a 2006 article in Accuracy in Media, they bring forth some very disturbing ties of Dana Priest. For one, she is married to William Goodfellow, who is described as a far left radical activist. At the time of the article he was the executive Director of the Center for International Policy, who they describe as the vanguard of many of the most rabid attacks on the Bush Administration policy. Yes, as soon as I read this article, I thought BDS. Also, there is that same name again attached to everything anti-Bush, and anti-America George Soros.
http://www.aim.org/special-report/post-reporter-dana-priests-troubling-connections/
When I started reading the WaPo’s first in a series of Intelligence Secret’s for everyone to know, I wondered why the O Administration has not renounced this series, but, I remembered reading some of the Congressional Record testimony from 1/10/63 which was entitled Current Communist Goals. Check out number 35 on the list- Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI. No question they also meant to add the CIA, and every other Secret Intelligence agency.
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
For anyone who still has any doubt that the Progressives and now the O Administration do not have the train steamrolling down the tracks to Communism, take at look at the list of 45 goals. You can already put checks marks by many of the goals on the list as being already accomplished.
We already knew that the Washington Post was a far left rag, now we can legitimately call it the Washington Communist Post for Propaganda.
2012 can’t come soon enough.
a better use of time for the American way of life
techsan (Diary) Monday, July 19th at 1:18PM EST (link)I’d like to see 2 years spent instead on the interconnections between government and non-government organizations…including where they are located, how much money they get, and who worked where over time. Wouldn’t that be a refreshing use of media time…providng the information Americans want in a way they want it. Of couse, that would imply the reporters themselves aren’t part of the research. That would be inconvenient for any future jobs they might want to do.
In the end, all we have on our side of the debate are facts and history.