Comments on: The Coming Backlash? http://www.redstate.com/pilgrim/2008/10/18/the-coming-backlash/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:22:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: gamecock http://www.redstate.com/pilgrim/2008/10/18/the-coming-backlash/#comment-280 gamecock Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:34:55 +0000 #comment-280 <p>5</p> 5

]]> By: pilgrim http://www.redstate.com/pilgrim/2008/10/18/the-coming-backlash/#comment-279 pilgrim Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:13:38 +0000 #comment-279 <p>I still believe that we are going to have to wait until after the votes have been counted to know for sure that most people have also seen enough evidence to reject Obama.</p> <p>I also do not like the gloom and doomers who pontificate what the outcome of the election is going to be days in advance. I can not stop them from doing their little kabuki dance every four years, so I'll certainly take what they have to say with a grain of salt.</p> <p>I respect your disagreements with Pat. I've had a few with him myself, but I do appreciate his latest article coming soon after some vile comments made by Carville and company about the backlash by African Americans.</p> I still believe that we are going to have to wait until after the votes have been counted to know for sure that most people have also seen enough evidence to reject Obama.

I also do not like the gloom and doomers who pontificate what the outcome of the election is going to be days in advance. I can not stop them from doing their little kabuki dance every four years, so I’ll certainly take what they have to say with a grain of salt.

I respect your disagreements with Pat. I’ve had a few with him myself, but I do appreciate his latest article coming soon after some vile comments made by Carville and company about the backlash by African Americans.

]]> By: gamecock http://www.redstate.com/pilgrim/2008/10/18/the-coming-backlash/#comment-278 gamecock Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:56:37 +0000 #comment-278 <p>Although he obfuscated some of his leftist positions as well. I have even seen him scoff at the notion he was an appeaser, when all he did was appease. He is mis-remembered as some cardinal of virtue back then. Compared to Obama most criminal defendants I have represented seem angelic. ALL liberals lie about the import of what liberalism really is. Was McGovern more honest than most. Yes. Pat makes too much of it.</p> <p>Obama is a liar, but his vague language re past votes are hardly "effective" in putting much space between his positions and McGovern's except for those that are beltway dupes into perception and admirers of liars. They can't help it in polite society. They treat a good comeback line as truth or as an effective barrier to calling spades, spades.</p> <p>I don't. I'm not impressed with those games. Obama is as obvious a leftist as McGovern. That Obama throws people under buses makes him no less guilty that a drug dealer throwing his crack stash out the window of his car while the police chase his ass.</p> <p>These beltway types always want to be able to say something nice to take the edge off since they have to make a living off their neighbors.</p> <p>I don't, and its conservatives that lack spine that has us where we are now. making distinctions without a difference.</p> <p>McGovern as president with the dem congress would have been HUGE disaster even if McGovern was honest.</p> <p>How much of a lengthy record does none need Pilgrim? I read his two marxist, racist books. I read your indictments of him based on his record, esp with respect to Odinga. I know his position of not requiring abortionists to give medical care to babies that survive attempted murder. I know he favored letting Saddam defy us before and after 911. He wants Bush tax cuts to expire and wants more taxes. He wants to socialize medicine. He wants to surrender in Iraq and have tea with a genocidal maniac.</p> <p>He voted against Roberts and Alito and slanders Clarence Thomas.</p> <p>Lengthy enough record?</p> <p>my hands hurt from tying all this with two fingers!</p> <p>smile</p> <p>Obviously.</p> <p>I left the dem party to stop plating the glazed over eyes denial conversations.</p> <p>Obama is a leftist, spread the wealth socialist out of his own mouth pure and simple.</p> <p>whew</p> Although he obfuscated some of his leftist positions as well. I have even seen him scoff at the notion he was an appeaser, when all he did was appease. He is mis-remembered as some cardinal of virtue back then. Compared to Obama most criminal defendants I have represented seem angelic. ALL liberals lie about the import of what liberalism really is. Was McGovern more honest than most. Yes. Pat makes too much of it.

Obama is a liar, but his vague language re past votes are hardly “effective” in putting much space between his positions and McGovern’s except for those that are beltway dupes into perception and admirers of liars. They can’t help it in polite society. They treat a good comeback line as truth or as an effective barrier to calling spades, spades.

I don’t. I’m not impressed with those games. Obama is as obvious a leftist as McGovern. That Obama throws people under buses makes him no less guilty that a drug dealer throwing his crack stash out the window of his car while the police chase his ass.

These beltway types always want to be able to say something nice to take the edge off since they have to make a living off their neighbors.

I don’t, and its conservatives that lack spine that has us where we are now. making distinctions without a difference.

McGovern as president with the dem congress would have been HUGE disaster even if McGovern was honest.

How much of a lengthy record does none need Pilgrim? I read his two marxist, racist books. I read your indictments of him based on his record, esp with respect to Odinga. I know his position of not requiring abortionists to give medical care to babies that survive attempted murder. I know he favored letting Saddam defy us before and after 911. He wants Bush tax cuts to expire and wants more taxes. He wants to socialize medicine. He wants to surrender in Iraq and have tea with a genocidal maniac.

He voted against Roberts and Alito and slanders Clarence Thomas.

Lengthy enough record?

my hands hurt from tying all this with two fingers!

smile

Obviously.

I left the dem party to stop plating the glazed over eyes denial conversations.

Obama is a leftist, spread the wealth socialist out of his own mouth pure and simple.

whew

]]> By: pilgrim http://www.redstate.com/pilgrim/2008/10/18/the-coming-backlash/#comment-277 pilgrim Sat, 18 Oct 2008 19:03:59 +0000 #comment-277 <p>Are you saying that you disagree with Pat about Obama and McGovern running their campaigns differently? I think they have ran them differently because Obama has never missed an opportunity to disassociate himself with a friend or an ally when he felt any pressure for being allied with that person. On every major issue Obama has been confronted with he always tries to find an obfuscation or nuance to take the heat off of him. George McGovern did not run that way.</p> <p>I agree that there are some votes in the sum total of his political career that tell us something about him, but don't you agree that there is not a lengthy political record?</p> <p>I worry about the MSM hyping up a backlash so much that additional restraints on our liberty and our freedom could be considered as necessary precautionary measures. I certainly hope I'm wrong.</p> Are you saying that you disagree with Pat about Obama and McGovern running their campaigns differently? I think they have ran them differently because Obama has never missed an opportunity to disassociate himself with a friend or an ally when he felt any pressure for being allied with that person. On every major issue Obama has been confronted with he always tries to find an obfuscation or nuance to take the heat off of him. George McGovern did not run that way.

I agree that there are some votes in the sum total of his political career that tell us something about him, but don’t you agree that there is not a lengthy political record?

I worry about the MSM hyping up a backlash so much that additional restraints on our liberty and our freedom could be considered as necessary precautionary measures. I certainly hope I’m wrong.

]]> By: gamecock http://www.redstate.com/pilgrim/2008/10/18/the-coming-backlash/#comment-276 gamecock Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:43:42 +0000 #comment-276 <p>I don't consider Obama a mystery, as Pat and too many in the beltway give lip service to. Me and Rush know liberals like every square inch of our glorious naked bodies.</p> <p>One of the things I have tried to do in many of my blogs about The One, is to lay out how his own words and votes show perfect consistency with the views of his extremist allies.</p> <p>I'm not fooled and I don't think the American people will be either by the cool present votes.</p> <p>I also don't thing there will be a dime's worth of difference between Obama and Pelosi.</p> <p>maybe 9cents</p> <p>Obama might go pragmatic as he has in some policy shifts as he gets less ignorant and wants to be re-elected, if he beats the odds and gets elected in the first place. But he is a born and raised, literally Marxist, with Marxist dreams from his father, a Marxist education and anti-American afrocentric Marxist associates for 20 years.</p> <p>Backlash?</p> <p>yes, there will be a backlash no matter what</p> <p>Pilgrim, there is no place on Earth to run. If things get bad enough here, you belong with the rebels, not with expatriates abroad!</p> <p>more later</p> I don’t consider Obama a mystery, as Pat and too many in the beltway give lip service to. Me and Rush know liberals like every square inch of our glorious naked bodies.

One of the things I have tried to do in many of my blogs about The One, is to lay out how his own words and votes show perfect consistency with the views of his extremist allies.

I’m not fooled and I don’t think the American people will be either by the cool present votes.

I also don’t thing there will be a dime’s worth of difference between Obama and Pelosi.

maybe 9cents

Obama might go pragmatic as he has in some policy shifts as he gets less ignorant and wants to be re-elected, if he beats the odds and gets elected in the first place. But he is a born and raised, literally Marxist, with Marxist dreams from his father, a Marxist education and anti-American afrocentric Marxist associates for 20 years.

Backlash?

yes, there will be a backlash no matter what

Pilgrim, there is no place on Earth to run. If things get bad enough here, you belong with the rebels, not with expatriates abroad!

more later

]]> By: gamecock http://www.redstate.com/pilgrim/2008/10/18/the-coming-backlash/#comment-275 gamecock Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:53:03 +0000 #comment-275 <p>5</p> 5

]]>