<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Picture Of Dysfunction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/02/17/a-picture-of-dysfunction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/02/17/a-picture-of-dysfunction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:10:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6eorge Jetson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/02/17/a-picture-of-dysfunction/#comment-4059</link>
		<dc:creator>6eorge Jetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/?p=1196#comment-4059</guid>
		<description>the value of all outstanding mortgages stood at $12 trillion before the credit crunch.  I&#039;d like to see where the estimated &quot;$2 trillion&quot; of losses is coming from.

Is some due to inter-bank swap contracts?

I&#039;m guessing around $3 trillion of sub-prime was issued.  
While we know many couldn&#039;t pay and housing prices have fallen, the collateral hasn&#039;t vanished.

How much is due to walk aways of more credit-able (not worthy) folks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the value of all outstanding mortgages stood at $12 trillion before the credit crunch.  I&#8217;d like to see where the estimated &#8220;$2 trillion&#8221; of losses is coming from.</p>
<p>Is some due to inter-bank swap contracts?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing around $3 trillion of sub-prime was issued.<br />
While we know many couldn&#8217;t pay and housing prices have fallen, the collateral hasn&#8217;t vanished.</p>
<p>How much is due to walk aways of more credit-able (not worthy) folks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scope</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/02/17/a-picture-of-dysfunction/#comment-4057</link>
		<dc:creator>Scope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/?p=1196#comment-4057</guid>
		<description>Geithner had been right alongside Paulson since before the meltdown.  I had linked a very detailed article here many weeks ago showing the deep connections.  The fact that Geithner was there all along, involved in the Paulson/Bush bungling, and still now seemingly has no viable plan doesn&#039;t speak well to how much confidence he has garnered.  If Geithner didn&#039;t say anything at all it would have been much better.  To come out and say basically nothing made him look even more incompetent and unprepared.  In the markets- confidence is everything.  I suspect he has already made his path to success that much harder to walk.  The again, I&#039;m not sure that he didn&#039;t purposely hold back until the Stimulus passed and was safely signed into law.  That is to happen today, and now I hear Geithner will speak tomorrow.  As serious as it all is, it is now becoming one big con game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geithner had been right alongside Paulson since before the meltdown.  I had linked a very detailed article here many weeks ago showing the deep connections.  The fact that Geithner was there all along, involved in the Paulson/Bush bungling, and still now seemingly has no viable plan doesn&#8217;t speak well to how much confidence he has garnered.  If Geithner didn&#8217;t say anything at all it would have been much better.  To come out and say basically nothing made him look even more incompetent and unprepared.  In the markets- confidence is everything.  I suspect he has already made his path to success that much harder to walk.  The again, I&#8217;m not sure that he didn&#8217;t purposely hold back until the Stimulus passed and was safely signed into law.  That is to happen today, and now I hear Geithner will speak tomorrow.  As serious as it all is, it is now becoming one big con game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6eorge Jetson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/02/17/a-picture-of-dysfunction/#comment-4055</link>
		<dc:creator>6eorge Jetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/?p=1196#comment-4055</guid>
		<description>On &quot;Degree of End-of-term Socialist Sentiment&quot; the Bush administration gets an F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On &#8220;Degree of End-of-term Socialist Sentiment&#8221; the Bush administration gets an F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSobieski</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/02/17/a-picture-of-dysfunction/#comment-4054</link>
		<dc:creator>JSobieski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/?p=1196#comment-4054</guid>
		<description>his handling of the situation was terrible. PR is part of the job.  As is EDUCATING the public.

Going around saying &quot;do this, I don&#039;t have time to explain, or die&quot; is not part of his job description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>his handling of the situation was terrible. PR is part of the job.  As is EDUCATING the public.</p>
<p>Going around saying &#8220;do this, I don&#8217;t have time to explain, or die&#8221; is not part of his job description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeburke242</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/02/17/a-picture-of-dysfunction/#comment-4051</link>
		<dc:creator>jeburke242</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/?p=1196#comment-4051</guid>
		<description>Just goes to show you hat no one is indispensable.  Obama gives Geithner a pass on cheating on his taxes (and so does the Senate), and it turns out the guy may be out of his depth!

Lesson:  If you think something about a guy is wrong, you&#039;re probably righ

http://thepurplecenter.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just goes to show you hat no one is indispensable.  Obama gives Geithner a pass on cheating on his taxes (and so does the Senate), and it turns out the guy may be out of his depth!</p>
<p>Lesson:  If you think something about a guy is wrong, you&#8217;re probably righ</p>
<p>http://thepurplecenter.blogspot.com/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6eorge Jetson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/02/17/a-picture-of-dysfunction/#comment-4050</link>
		<dc:creator>6eorge Jetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/?p=1196#comment-4050</guid>
		<description>Paulson acted in October as if he was making it up as he went along...&lt;font color=&quot;FireBrick&quot;&gt;because he was!!!&lt;/font&gt;  Paulson addressed an immediate crisis.  And after Paulson realized no one had a clue as how to price the toxic assets and after he saw the Brits employ the multiplier effect of added capital,
he switched course.  I don&#039;t think you expect Paulson to bat 1.000 in those hectic circumstances.

Now along comes Geithner, four months later in the midst of a relatively stable (albeit pessimistic) market, and he shows up without an answer.

&lt;font color=&quot;FireBrick&quot;&gt;Thank God it wasn&#039;t Geithner last Sept/Oct!&lt;/font&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paulson acted in October as if he was making it up as he went along&#8230;<font color="FireBrick">because he was!!!</font>  Paulson addressed an immediate crisis.  And after Paulson realized no one had a clue as how to price the toxic assets and after he saw the Brits employ the multiplier effect of added capital,<br />
he switched course.  I don&#8217;t think you expect Paulson to bat 1.000 in those hectic circumstances.</p>
<p>Now along comes Geithner, four months later in the midst of a relatively stable (albeit pessimistic) market, and he shows up without an answer.</p>
<p><font color="FireBrick">Thank God it wasn&#8217;t Geithner last Sept/Oct!</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

