Just days before Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner was scheduled to lay out his much-anticipated plan to deal with the toxic assets imperiling the financial system, he and his team made a sudden about-face.
According to several sources involved in the deliberations, Geithner had come to the conclusion that the strategies he and his team had spent weeks working on were too expensive, too complex and too risky for taxpayers.
They needed an alternative and found it in a previously considered initiative to pair private investments and public loans to try to buy the risky assets and take them off the books of banks. There was one problem: They didn’t have enough time to work out many details or consult with others before the plan was supposed to be unveiled.
The sharp course change was one of the key reasons why Geithner’s plan — his first major policy initiative as Treasury secretary — landed with such a thud last Tuesday. Lawmakers, investors and analysts expressed dismay over the lack of specifics. Markets tanked, and fresh doubts arose about the hand now steering the country’s financial policy.
Public acceptance of the plan suffered from several missteps, said sources involved in the decision-making or in close contact with those who were.
The Obama administration, they said, failed to rein in the grand expectations built for the plan on Wall Street and in Washington, concluding that they would rather disappoint the markets with vagueness than lay out a lot of details they might have to change later — a failing they saw in the Bush administration’s handling of the crisis.
Meanwhile, the sources said, Obama’s senior economic advisers were hobbled in crafting the plan by a shortage of personnel. To date, the president has not nominated any assistant secretaries or undersecretaries at the Treasury, and the handful of mid-level staffers who have started work were still finding their offices and getting their building passes and BlackBerrys.
(Emphasis mine.) Disaster ensues, I guess, when an Administration tries to roll out a massive economic plan while at the same time being too scared to send up sub-Cabinet nominees to the Senate for confirmation. And let it be noted that the Obama Administration is besieged with problems on other personnel matters as well.
Weren’t these guys supposed to be professionals, or something? Weren’t they supposed to be better than that bungling Bush Administration? I could have sworn that was the narrative.
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
Bush/Paulson had a commercial paper overnight meltdown on their hands
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Tuesday, February 17th at 3:29AM EST (link)Paulson acted in October as if he was making it up as he went along…because he was!!! Paulson addressed an immediate crisis. And after Paulson realized no one had a clue as how to price the toxic assets and after he saw the Brits employ the multiplier effect of added capital,
he switched course. I don’t think you expect Paulson to bat 1.000 in those hectic circumstances.
Now along comes Geithner, four months later in the midst of a relatively stable (albeit pessimistic) market, and he shows up without an answer.
Thank God it wasn’t Geithner last Sept/Oct!
I wouldn't go out of your way to defend Paulson
JSobieski (Diary) Tuesday, February 17th at 6:56AM EST (link)his handling of the situation was terrible. PR is part of the job. As is EDUCATING the public.
Going around saying “do this, I don’t have time to explain, or die” is not part of his job description.
My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.
STOP THE MADNESS!
A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!
You're 100% right on the PR angle
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Tuesday, February 17th at 7:37AM EST (link)On “Degree of End-of-term Socialist Sentiment” the Bush administration gets an F.
Geithner was here in Sept/Oct
Scope (Diary) Tuesday, February 17th at 7:54AM EST (link)Geithner had been right alongside Paulson since before the meltdown. I had linked a very detailed article here many weeks ago showing the deep connections. The fact that Geithner was there all along, involved in the Paulson/Bush bungling, and still now seemingly has no viable plan doesn’t speak well to how much confidence he has garnered. If Geithner didn’t say anything at all it would have been much better. To come out and say basically nothing made him look even more incompetent and unprepared. In the markets- confidence is everything. I suspect he has already made his path to success that much harder to walk. The again, I’m not sure that he didn’t purposely hold back until the Stimulus passed and was safely signed into law. That is to happen today, and now I hear Geithner will speak tomorrow. As serious as it all is, it is now becoming one big con game.
As to the size of the con game...
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Tuesday, February 17th at 9:05AM EST (link)the value of all outstanding mortgages stood at $12 trillion before the credit crunch. I’d like to see where the estimated “$2 trillion” of losses is coming from.
Is some due to inter-bank swap contracts?
I’m guessing around $3 trillion of sub-prime was issued.
While we know many couldn’t pay and housing prices have fallen, the collateral hasn’t vanished.
How much is due to walk aways of more credit-able (not worthy) folks?
Tax problem should have iced Geithner
jeburke242 (Diary) Tuesday, February 17th at 3:38AM EST (link)Just goes to show you hat no one is indispensable. Obama gives Geithner a pass on cheating on his taxes (and so does the Senate), and it turns out the guy may be out of his depth!
Lesson: If you think something about a guy is wrong, you’re probably righ
http://thepurplecenter.blogspot.com/
John Burke