Shorter Nancy Pelosi


“Contraception is a good thing because it will reduce the costs of the state and federal government in providing services.”

No. Really. She said that.

I am not one of these people who thinks that contraception is a sin. Far from it. I just never had it in me to suggest the positively ghoulish idea that providing contraceptives would be desirable so that the state and federal governments can reduce costs in the long term. What’s next? Adoption of the Chinese “one child” policy?


Category: , ,

RSS feed

10 Comments Leave a comment

Great Minds Think Alike...

DONTREADONME (Diary) Monday, January 26th at 11:09PM EST (link)

I must have just said this to my wife about an hour ago when I listened to Rush’s show archived for today. My wife agrees, if we thought I can guarantee you many others thought it today.

I must clarify...

DONTREADONME (Diary) Monday, January 26th at 11:09PM EST (link)

China’s one child policy seems to be the best program for our country according to Nancy Pelosi.

 
 

Red Nan

stazec Monday, January 26th at 11:19PM EST (link)

Population Control….
Change you can believe in…..

 

How does this impact the social security models

Old_Crow (Diary) Monday, January 26th at 11:26PM EST (link)

regarding future wage earners?

Or is Paloozi just bailing out the state programs because the taxpayers would cut them in these challenging financial times..

“Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.” — James Madison

It'll be an unmitigated disaster.

mikefisk (Diary) Monday, January 26th at 11:38PM EST (link)

China, due to their One Child policy, needs to have their economy grow at roughly a 7% annual clip in order to cope with the damaging effects of turning their demographics upside-down. They can get away with it short term; their per-capita GDP is mere pittance compared to even some of the poorest countries in Eastern Europe, and they have upward movement for a while. We don’t.

And copying them, to say nothing of their barbaric enforcement practices, is a good idea… why?

“Once within the maw of Leviathan, degree of digestion is irrelevant.” – Michael Fisk

9.25, -4.77

 
 

One word away...

RedFox84 Monday, January 26th at 11:55PM EST (link)

To saying “Abortion is a good thing because it will reduce the costs of the state and federal government in providing services.”

In her reality

MikeO Tuesday, January 27th at 9:22AM EST (link)

In her reality, to what end were we put on this earth?

On the one hand, her deranged worldview dictates that we need to be clients of the state. On the other, we should limit our numbers so as not to be such a nuisance to the state.

What we really need is to roll-back the Community Mental Health Act and to make Madame Speaker state’s client #1. She belongs in a rubber room.

 
 

Does this mean that by using Condoms

cump Monday, January 26th at 11:55PM EST (link)

There will be LESS Nancy Pelosi’s, Harry Reids, and Keith Olbermanns running around in the future? mmmmmmm I’ll wait for my free boxes and then give them to my liberal friends!

 

Illegal Immigration

casel21 (Diary) Tuesday, January 27th at 5:50AM EST (link)

If what Pelosi says is true, she should be against amnesty right?

 

Racist

rguyshipe Tuesday, January 27th at 7:23AM EST (link)

I’m not sure how her comments are not racist. Margaret Sanger would be proud. It IS population control, but really it is population control of a particular part of the population that needs controlling in her view.