<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are We Going To Talk About This At All?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/01/14/are-we-going-to-talk-about-this-at-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/01/14/are-we-going-to-talk-about-this-at-all/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:10:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kowalski</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/01/14/are-we-going-to-talk-about-this-at-all/#comment-3727</link>
		<dc:creator>Kowalski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/?p=907#comment-3727</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know whether you saw on Drudge yesterday that Christopher Hitchens already asked a version of this question, but the fact that he did means:

&quot;Nobody Cares.&quot;

That&#039;s the kind of power Hitchens wields these days.  Sure, he writes for &lt;em&gt;Slate&lt;/em&gt;, but let&#039;s look at what Slate has to offer these days:

There are stories about why the Obama White House will serve better wine than the Bush White House did.

There are stories about why Facebook is so superb.

And of course there are &quot;Bees on Blow.&quot;

It&#039;s become a much harder news outlet than it once was, and the amount of interest you&#039;re seeing based on Christopher Hitchens&#039; article is a measure of the public&#039;s respect for that, and all its writers and contributors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know whether you saw on Drudge yesterday that Christopher Hitchens already asked a version of this question, but the fact that he did means:</p>
<p>&#8220;Nobody Cares.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the kind of power Hitchens wields these days.  Sure, he writes for <em>Slate</em>, but let&#8217;s look at what Slate has to offer these days:</p>
<p>There are stories about why the Obama White House will serve better wine than the Bush White House did.</p>
<p>There are stories about why Facebook is so superb.</p>
<p>And of course there are &#8220;Bees on Blow.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s become a much harder news outlet than it once was, and the amount of interest you&#8217;re seeing based on Christopher Hitchens&#8217; article is a measure of the public&#8217;s respect for that, and all its writers and contributors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magic2171</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/01/14/are-we-going-to-talk-about-this-at-all/#comment-3726</link>
		<dc:creator>Magic2171</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/?p=907#comment-3726</guid>
		<description>Because she is a Democrat and the normal  rules do not apply.

Dummy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because she is a Democrat and the normal  rules do not apply.</p>
<p>Dummy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kowalski</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/01/14/are-we-going-to-talk-about-this-at-all/#comment-3725</link>
		<dc:creator>Kowalski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/?p=907#comment-3725</guid>
		<description>I meant the collective &quot;you.&quot;  ;)

It&#039;s a little like the collective &quot;we&quot; -- as in:

&quot;The Democrats are all getting together to show their we-ness to Hillary Clinton, who you expect to be confirmed as Secretary of State &lt;em&gt;because&lt;/em&gt; of her conflicts of interest.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant the collective &#8220;you.&#8221;  <img src='http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a little like the collective &#8220;we&#8221; &#8212; as in:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Democrats are all getting together to show their we-ness to Hillary Clinton, who you expect to be confirmed as Secretary of State <em>because</em> of her conflicts of interest.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kowalski</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/01/14/are-we-going-to-talk-about-this-at-all/#comment-3724</link>
		<dc:creator>Kowalski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/?p=907#comment-3724</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re not talking about it because you don&#039;t understand Newspeak.

For Republicans, a &quot;Conflict of Interest&quot; means a career-ending mine that they stepped on which blows off their legs if they&#039;re running for any important position, destroys their lives, and the lives of all their family members.

For Democrats, a &quot;Conflict of Interest&quot; is actually a positive entry in their &lt;em&gt;curriculum vitae&lt;/em&gt; which suggests that they are even more qualified for the job than they would have been if they had submitted a simple resume.

Understand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re not talking about it because you don&#8217;t understand Newspeak.</p>
<p>For Republicans, a &#8220;Conflict of Interest&#8221; means a career-ending mine that they stepped on which blows off their legs if they&#8217;re running for any important position, destroys their lives, and the lives of all their family members.</p>
<p>For Democrats, a &#8220;Conflict of Interest&#8221; is actually a positive entry in their <em>curriculum vitae</em> which suggests that they are even more qualified for the job than they would have been if they had submitted a simple resume.</p>
<p>Understand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OccamsRazor</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/01/14/are-we-going-to-talk-about-this-at-all/#comment-3723</link>
		<dc:creator>OccamsRazor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/?p=907#comment-3723</guid>
		<description>Get yourself back on track. You are an &#039;American Spirit Rubber Stamp&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get yourself back on track. You are an &#8216;American Spirit Rubber Stamp&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/2009/01/14/are-we-going-to-talk-about-this-at-all/#comment-3722</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pejman_yousefzadeh/?p=907#comment-3722</guid>
		<description>No they will not talk about it.  I am glad they won&#039;t.  Let them have it all and then be patient.  They will self destruct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No they will not talk about it.  I am glad they won&#8217;t.  Let them have it all and then be patient.  They will self destruct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

