Since the recount in Minnesota is going badly for Al Franken, he is contemplating asking the Senate to intervene. To be sure, the Senate has the Constitutional authority to do so but few things could de-legitimize Franken more than having a Democrat-controlled Senate state that he is the winner when the election officials in the state of Minnesota–no red state, that–seem to think differently. Indeed, who doesn’t think that the Senate would decide the election purely on partisan grounds–especially with Harry Reid at the helm.
We have, of course, seen this kind of controversy before. The seating of Frank McCloskey enraged and embittered House Republicans and was remembered when the GOP swept to power in the aftermath of the 1994 midterms. I suppose that it would be fairly easy for Republicans to be cynical and make hay amongst the base if Al Franken is seated by Harry Reid & Company. But as the state of Minnesota seems to be handling this issue just fine so far and as there are no federal issues at stake, it seems to me that it would be good policy if branches of the federal government stayed out of the matter. And wouldn’t it be nice if good policy triumphed from time to time?
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
Speaking of McCloskey . . .
Heinlein (Diary) Tuesday, December 2nd at 9:06AM EST (link)Recall that when Republicans took the House in 1994, Ed Munster was 21 votes behind Sam Gejdenson in Connecticut’s Second District. Rather than seat Munster out of partisan loyalty, the House Republicans sat Gejdenson because he was the winner (albeit by a slim margin).
Some challenged ballots
blogan (Diary) Tuesday, December 2nd at 9:27AM EST (link)The StarTribune has a place where you can see challenged ballots. I see many of them are challenged for “indentifying marks”. Some of these are odd scratches, some I can’t find, and some are the presence of write-in votes. So if I wrote in “Moe Lane” for an office, that would be considered an identifiable ballot and be challenged.
True Obama supports will not mark their ballot on Election Day. Voting “Present” is how The One would like you to vote.
How quickly the 2000 uproar is forgotten ,
johnt Tuesday, December 2nd at 11:12AM EST (link)how easily we change our standards, how nice to be a liberal.
“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville
Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe firm hired
JLenardDetroit (Diary) Tuesday, December 2nd at 1:21PM EST (link)the “let every ILLEGAL vote count” is the new cry of the Left.
Regards from NoMoTown (the MOTORlessCITY)
“Liberals, looking to do for? America what they’ve done for? Detroit! which is DESTROY IT!”
“I think, therefore I am Conservative”
“Conservative by choice, Republican by necessity”
“You can lead a Liberal to the Truth/Facts, but you cannot make them THINK!”
“Romney [No, not my first choice] does NOT have a MORMON problem. He has a, far too many Americans; these days; are MORONS problem!”
Follow @JLenardDetroit
(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (message) (Warning: Children Will Die!!)
Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
“The first Liberal was Satan” – a Rush caller (other Quotes)