That’s the speculation, of course. I don’t know whether a Clinton appointment as Secretary of State will come to pass but if it does, Clinton will be the latest in a long line of . . . er . . . Clintonites to join the Clinton Obama Administration.
Perhaps I should not be so snarky. After all, the Clintonites are the last Democrats to people a Democratic Administration so it is natural that with the return of the Democrats to the White House, there should be a fair number of Clintonites coming on board. But this many? Amusing. So much for Change We Can Believe In; one can be forgiven for wondering which candidate really won the Iowa caucus back in the snows of January. Oh, and despite the derision of lobbyists during the Presidential campaign, we see that at least one Clintonite lobbyist is joining the Obama White House. Imagine that. Betcha there will be others.
Because no absurd story would be complete without Andrew Sullivan’s involvement in it, consider this post in which Barack Obama’s Unofficial Press Secretary praises the Hillary choice because “[l]eft to fester in the Senate, Clinton will plot against the president if he doesn’t actively seek her support and engagement and ‘spread the political wealth’ of his mandate.” Gushes Sullivan, “[i]t’s an elegant and shrewd move; both public spirited and yet coldly calculating at the same time. Pure Obama.” Whatever. Not once in his post does Sullivan express any concern that basing the choice of America’s chief diplomat on the need to ensure that said diplomat doesn’t spend time in the Senate “plotting” against the President means that the presence of actual diplomatic acumen and international savvy at Foggy Bottom is being sacrificed to naked re-election considerations four years down the road, after a Presidential campaign that has lasted two years just ended. Not once in his post does Sullivan state any unease with the prospect of having Hillary Clinton–a politician Sullivan raged against and obsessed over before Sarah Palin came to the fore–as Secretary of State. What Obama dictates shall be, as far as the writer for the Daily Dish is concerned. Give Sullivan his due; if Caesar had such loyal acolytes, Brutus and Cassius would have been murdered in their sleep, their infamous deed undone and their names unknown to posterity.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
They ridiculed her
Mom4Hillary Saturday, November 15th at 10:30AM EST (link)for misspeaking about being having to land in Bosnia amid sniper fire — and yet they trust her to be Secretary of State? God help us.
As one who supported Senator Clinton in the primaries (and left the Democratic party after the corrupt DNC leadership coronated Obama) and voted for McCain in the GE, I think that regardless what insane, koolaid drinking Sullivan, et.al., say — she would be a voice of sanity in that administration. Furthermore, she would never subject herself to run for president again given how the radical left eviscerated her. Fear of strong women is an equal-opportunity prejudice. Just look at what happened to Gov. Palin — yet another strong and competent female leader.
Whatever else she may be,
ColoKid Saturday, November 15th at 10:54AM EST (link)Clinton is certainly not stupid. If we can see the true intent behind Obama’s choice of her for SoS, she does as well. So what’s in it for her, versus staying where she is? I find it hard to believe that she’d take the job.
Kennedy and Henry Cabot Lodge
Al Sparks Saturday, November 15th at 2:48PM EST (link)This reminds me of JFK’s appointment of Henry Cabot Lodge to the ambassadorship of Viet Nam.
Lodge was a prominent Republican with presidential ambitions. He was Richard Nixon’s running mate in 1960. And Kennedy would rather have run against Barry Goldwater, and the appointment would seem to take Lodge out of the presidential sweepstakes. The problem was that Lodge was to the left of Kennedy in foreign policy. He was the one that ok’d the assassination of Viet Nam President Ngo Diem against Kennedy’s express wishes. What followed, after Kennedy’s assassination, was our increased involvement there.
While Clinton and Obama probably agree more on foreign policy than Kennedy and Lodge did, putting your enemies in charge of critical positions in government can be dangerous, especially if they have their own political base. And Clinton would be hard to fire.
Another analogy is Bush’s appointment of Colin Powell. He was also hard to fire, even though they obviously disagreed on foreign policy fundamentals. In Bush’s defense, he appointed Powell before 9/11 and it’s probably his foreign policy outlook that changed whereas Powell’s did not.