I am going to post two part series over the next day or so regarding our as citizens in this great nation of ours, and why it matters.
While it is true that God is sovereign and ultimately in control – he does give us choices with consequences, just as he did Isreal.
In that vein I would like to present an article written by John Revell which discusses how God holds us accountable for who we elect to office, and what is acceptable behavior and what we should look for in our public servants. This goes beyond the traditional, moral issues which should weight on our hearts heavily.
Isaiah revealed their wickedness in 1:17, where he declared that the nation had failed to “seek justice, encourage the oppressed. Defend the cause of the fatherless, plead the case of the widow.” Isaiah continued the indictment in verse 23, where he proclaimed: “Your rulers are rebels, companions of thieves; they all love bribes and chase after gifts. They do not defend the cause of the fatherless; the widow’s case does not come before them.”
This alarming indictment was because of Judah’s civil sin. The national leadership had failed miserably in key areas of civil responsibility: justice, deliverance from oppression and protection for the helpless. They had also allowed their rulings and policies to be influenced by bribes and “gifts.” God explicitly identified this failure as “evil” in Isaiah 1:16, and equated these civil sins with the depravity of Sodom and Gomorrah in 1:10.
This applies to both parties.
Democrats seeking to remove the right of secret ballot of workers in an effort to force increased unionization and therefore pad their coffers is one example. Republicans taking money from “big business” lobbyist is a form of another.
Lets be clear though, seeking justice and defending the cause of the fatherless and case of the widow is not adhearing to Marxist belief in wealth redistribution and taxing everyone into poverty to empower the government. It is a claim of protecting the weak and re-enforces the notion that everyone should be equal under the law with no exception.
The larger point Revell makes, though, is that God ultimately holds us accountable for electing bad (immoral) leadership.
In Isaiah’s day, God not only held the leaders accountable for their civil immorality, He held the people accountable for their actions as well.
The principle we draw from this passage is this: When the citizens have a voice in the selection and direction of their civil leaders, God holds both the leaders and the citizens accountable for the civil sins of their government.
It was true of Judah, but is it fair to suggest that God applies this standard to us today? Consider the following:
The citizens of the United States elect the leaders of our nation — leaders who set civil and social policies for our nation, including policies on moral issues such as abortion, “gay marriage,” euthanasia, assisted suicide, and more. The decisions of these leaders directly impact the moral direction of our nation. Therefore, the people’s vote (or failure to vote) ultimately determines our nation’s civil, social and moral direction.
Furthermore, the president is responsible for appointing members of the federal judiciary. These judges interpret laws and make legal decisions that affect the entire nation. Therefore, the citizen’s role in each election directly impacts every level of government.
Because the American system is a representative form of government, there is an obvious relationship between an elected leader’s actions and the citizens who elected the leader — or who allowed his election by not voting.
It logically follows that God holds the citizens accountable for immoral governmental policies.
The truth is that God is not to be put aside as we enter the voting booth. As will all decisions in our lives, we should seek out what is right as defined in the Bible, not by man. To ingore those standards which God himself put into place is asking for trouble.
To believe that its okay if America elects leaders from either party who believe and entrench our society in immoral behavior while we Christians sit on our hands is irresponsible. The Bible is clear, dont expect for things to be “okay.”
God has established universal standards of justice that He expects all nations to uphold and enforce — and the United States is not exempt from these standards. If our government refuses to uphold and enforce them, we shouldn’t be surprised at the judgment that is certain to follow. But even more sobering is the reality that when the citizens choose their leaders, He holds the citizens corporately accountable for the actions of their leaders.
Our vote — or failure to vote — has a direct bearing on not only the election, but on how the Lord will deal with our land. If we fail to vote for candidates that most closely reflect God’s standards — or if we fail to vote — we should not expect to escape the consequences.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
In the Catholic Diocese of Toledo Yesterday
Strelnikov (Diary) Monday, November 3rd at 12:48PM EST (link)A bland “help people to vote with respect for the poor in mind, and for life” was the main comment heard from various Catholic priests.
Note which was primary in the statement, a code for “go ahead and vote for the Dems” if you want, even though you know they will A. not stop or even limit abortions and B. will in fact expand abortion and start working on euthansia next.
As of November 4, 2008, the Code Words will be: “Klaatu – Borada – Nikto!”
We have Euthenasia
I was previously Tlaloc, and I was banned last year. (Diary) Monday, November 3rd at 3:19PM EST (link)here in Oregon. Have for 14 years now. So far, at least, no pillars of salt or raining sulfur.
How Nice For You In Oregon!
Strelnikov (Diary) Monday, November 3rd at 4:37PM EST (link)The cultural atmosphere created by a pro-Death attitude, rather than a natural laissez-faire pro-life attitude on the result of disease, is to be resisted and lamented.
Even without brimstone!
As of November 4, 2008, the Code Words will be: “Klaatu – Borada – Nikto!”
If you are Catholic and vote for BHO
ILLINOIS_CONSERV (Diary) Monday, November 3rd at 4:55PM EST (link)I hope you are ready to explain yourself when it is time to be judged by the true Messiah. I imagine Teddy K has had a few thoughts on this since he was diagnosed. Anyway, when I was in 7th grade and the debate over Roe vs Wade raged, my 7th grade teacher, Sister Martin, warned that if abortion became the norm, the next group to be targeted would be the old and infirm. Seems as if, in Oregon at least, she was right.
The only thing necessary for the triumph [of evil] is for good men to do nothing – Edmund Burke
True
I was previously Tlaloc, and I was banned last year. (Diary) Monday, November 3rd at 5:04PM EST (link)it is a little scary when the Blackguards come around in their vans, kicking open doors and hauling away those who are too old or weak to resist.
The stench of the charnal pits around the gas chambers blisters the eyes and throat for miles around.
Oh wait…
How exactly is offering someone a choice targeting them?
You surely do not want to argue choice with me, Tamblin
ILLINOIS_CONSERV (Diary) Monday, November 3rd at 9:49PM EST (link)I have been fighting Planned parenthood and their ilk for a long time and I will continue to fight them until I have no breath left in my body. So do not go there. Go read THE CASE AGAINST BARACK OBAMA, especially the chapter that tells the story of the Chicago Nurse that held an unsuccessful abortion baby until it died in her arms. A baby that couldn’t even cry because its lungs were underdeveloped. Go read that Tamblin and then speak to me about choice. Or is that baby a candidate for your vision of choice when it comes to euthanasia? Millions of babies had their choice taken away. No need to kick in doors when the doors at the local Planned Parenthood are open and waiting.
As for Euthanasia, you feel you have the wisdom and knowledge to pick and choose the people you want to offer this opportunity of euthanasia to? Are you ready to assist in something like that? Are you willing to play God in that scenario? Decide who and when someone should die? Are you going to pull that plug? Inject that needle? You believe you can be 100% certain that the person you are “offering a choice” to is capable of making that kind of a decision? You think you can be absolutely certain that someone is so ill that they will NEVER recover? And you are so smart and so smug that you are going to be the one to give them that choice eh? If you think so then all I can say is that BHO isn’t the only Messiah in town.
The only thing necessary for the triumph [of evil] is for good men to do nothing – Edmund Burke
I'm cool with it if you are
I was previously Tlaloc, and I was banned last year. (Diary) Monday, November 3rd at 11:35PM EST (link)Your first paragraph doesn’t really relate to what I said so I’ll focus on the second.
I’m in favor of letting people decide they want to end their lives, and also of allowing them assistance when they can’t. The Oregon law works as follows:
From here
That’s a pretty robust law with a lot of safeties built in. It does not require me (or anyone else) to play god and decide who lives and who dies.
Let me ask you this- if someone wants to die and I am willing to let them but you want to force your will upon them by stopping them, which of us is really engaging in hubris?