IS A BROWN WIN IN MA POSSIBLE?


I believe Scott Brown has a chance, albeit a slight one, to shock the political world on January 19th. Call this assessment one part innate republican optimism and one part observations from Ward 2, Newburyport on primary day.

For starters, the lack of intensity by democrats yesterday was simply stunning. MA hasn’t had a Senate vacancy since 1984 and turnout was pathetic. What’s behind the apathy? One theory expressed to the Daily News “I think it’s because people aren’t particularly excited about this race. They don’t see a big difference in the candidates. They seem pleased with them all,” Erickson said.” I agree with the first part of this statement and think the second part is dead wrong. There wasn’t a dimes worth of difference seperating the 4 democratic candidates on the major issues of this campaign and that’s the problem.

If people are excited about a candidate they are going to express it by volunteering or at least showing up to the polls to vote. Yesterday, the only campaign that had folks holding signs was Scott Brown’s. Admittedly, it was a bit chilly out there yesterday, but it wasn’t unseasonably cold, it is December after all. This lack of excitement is the canary in the coal mine moment for the democrats and they ignore it at their peril.

The US Senate is currently debating legislation on: health care, energy, a potential second (jobs bill) stimulus and a promise/threat of taking up “immigration reform”. If enacted these bills will transfer unprecedented power to the Federal government and registered democrats responded to this by staying home. If the majority of democrats in MA were excited by this agenda they would have voted in large numbers. The truth is that this agenda is only popular with the far left of the democratic party, even here in deep blue MA and independents are scared to death by it.

Some completely anecdotal, unscientific examples from yesterday. An independent voter approached me to tell me that he had voted for Scott. He also told me the guy at the desk told him he was requesting the “wrong ballot”, just part of the joy of living in MA. Another told me he works for a small plumbing supply company and if the health care bill passes they will be forced to cut their employees from 55 down to 49. They don’t want to do this, they simply can’t afford to pay the mandates that will be imposed by this legislation.

So, how does all this help Scott? Martha Coakley will be campaigning on issues that only appeal to a small percentage of voters. If Scott Brown and this is a big if, can convince the independens that are a majority of voters in this state to cast a ballot for a republican, probably for the first time in their lives he has a fighting chance.

To give Scott a fighting chance the republicans in the US Senate need to stand up and fight instead of playing nice guy. This election needs to be fought on big issues. The principal one being a victory by Scott Brown denies the democrats 60 votes for the federal takeover of health care.


Category: , ,

RSS feed

7 Comments Leave a comment

I Tend to Agree

Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:11PM EST (link)

I have written about this. I am not delusional.Tthe odds are slim. But there are a couple of other factores too. Coakley is a terrible candidate. If Brown can get her to debate, it will be a lot like Romney – O’Brien. She cant measure up to Brown, who is more likable and has a stronger presence. Also, January19th is a nasty time of year. College break, retirees do their post holiday snow bird routine and its just too freaking cold for anyone who doesnt care much to get out and vote.

Long shot, but possible.

 

There is always hope.

Third Street (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:29PM EST (link)

But I was looking at the raw vote totals in both the GOP and Dem primaries yesterday. The total votes cast in the GOP primary (Brown and whoever the other guy was) came to about 160,000. The total votes cast for Democrats added up to around 700,000.

Granted, Brown was up against a long-shot candidate, while Coakley was facing more serious opposition. Still, I figure this race to be somewhat less competitive than the CA-10 race last month.

And yes, I hope and pray that the people of Massachusetts prove me wrong on that.

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”

vote totals

proudgop (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 12:43PM EST (link)

Considering its MA and Brown was lock on nomination its good sign around 160,000 republicans came out in Massachusetts. I didn’t think the state had that many

I’d love to see how much the Dems spent on that primary. One guy ( Celtics Owner spent around 8 million of his own money) so I’d say turnout was pretty bad for Dems in Taxachusetts

 

I'd actually say it's better than CA-10

scarlos (Diary) Wednesday, December 9th at 1:12PM EST (link)

It’s less Democratic than CA-10 (62% for Obama as opposed to 65%), and the turnout patterns are probably going to be more in our favor in an off-off year special election then they were last month.

We had bad relative turnout in the primary there as well, and considering that the CA-10 race wound up 55-45 with the Dems running a sitting lieutenant governor against our unknown, I’d say we have a better shot than you’re giving us.

At the very least, we’re likely to scare some sitting senators about their re-election prospects next year, and that will probably be worth it.

Socialism is Oligarchy in disguise

 
 

It is very possible

redtillimdead (Diary) Thursday, December 10th at 12:07AM EST (link)

Democrats *think* this one is in the bag. Many won’t bother to show up on election day. Republicans are energized. Brown is an amazing candidate. Independents are tired of Deval Patrick and the all-Democratic congressional delegation. They are looking for change. If we get Scott’s message out, he can win big with indy’s, who make up 51% of MA voters. He has momentum, coming off a primary win with 90% of the vote, over a candidate who spent $300,000 of his own money to defeat him. In 2004, he was elected to a Democratic senate district on the day that MA’s own Senator was on the ballot for the Democratic Presidential Primary. If he can overcome those odds, I think he can over come Martha Coakley.

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

 

Would love to see that

redpens (Diary) Thursday, December 10th at 7:21AM EST (link)

the Demo-commies would run full speed from Obummers’ radical agenda if we win in Taxachusetts.

 

Remember, there is a kenedy running as well

tbaleno Tuesday, December 29th at 6:41PM EST (link)

He is liable to steal some of coakleys votes because many voters don’t pay attention and might pick kenedy because of his name thinking he might be related to ted.