<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike Duncan Should Do The Honorable Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:25:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulag1955</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>paulag1955</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-168</guid>
		<description>They don&#039;t respect civility; they only take it as a sign of weakness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t respect civility; they only take it as a sign of weakness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulag1955</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>paulag1955</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Good points, Ace, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Ace, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick Brockway</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick Brockway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Enough with the &quot;Compassionate Conservative&quot; garbage. They reach out to pet snarling dogs, and then marvel when they pull back bloody stumps!
From now on it&#039;s Play to Win, Win for Keeps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough with the &#8220;Compassionate Conservative&#8221; garbage. They reach out to pet snarling dogs, and then marvel when they pull back bloody stumps!<br />
From now on it&#8217;s Play to Win, Win for Keeps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick Brockway</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick Brockway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-165</guid>
		<description>I have no clue why he&#039;d even consider running again, unless it&#039;s for power. Sure can&#039;t be his wanting to lead.
Need to have more a tech-savvy PR person in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no clue why he&#8217;d even consider running again, unless it&#8217;s for power. Sure can&#8217;t be his wanting to lead.<br />
Need to have more a tech-savvy PR person in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-164</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://skins.hotbar.com/skins/mailskins/em/110104/110104_emM5.gif&quot; alt=&quot;Thumbs Up&quot; /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://skins.hotbar.com/skins/mailskins/em/110104/110104_emM5.gif" alt="Thumbs Up" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Sure it was a tough climate

Sure President Bush was unpopular

Sure we were defending more seats in the Senate than the Democrats...

But what did this genius do to get us out of the whole? Did he try to rehabilitate Bush&#039;s image?  Did he do anything to educate the public about the fact that the Congress who had a 91% disapproval rating was run by Democrats? Did he point out the culture of corruption of William Jefferson, Charley Rangel, Tony Resco, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, all the ex Clinton Administration people like Rubin and Tyson and all the others that raided Fannie MAE and Freddie MAC and jumped out with Golden Parachutes? I think a campaign organized around a &quot;Democrat Culture Of Corruption&quot; after they won in 2006 promising to clean up the &quot;Republican Culture Of Corruption&quot; would have helped a lot. Did we hear anything from him and the RNC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure it was a tough climate</p>
<p>Sure President Bush was unpopular</p>
<p>Sure we were defending more seats in the Senate than the Democrats&#8230;</p>
<p>But what did this genius do to get us out of the whole? Did he try to rehabilitate Bush&#8217;s image?  Did he do anything to educate the public about the fact that the Congress who had a 91% disapproval rating was run by Democrats? Did he point out the culture of corruption of William Jefferson, Charley Rangel, Tony Resco, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, all the ex Clinton Administration people like Rubin and Tyson and all the others that raided Fannie MAE and Freddie MAC and jumped out with Golden Parachutes? I think a campaign organized around a &#8220;Democrat Culture Of Corruption&#8221; after they won in 2006 promising to clean up the &#8220;Republican Culture Of Corruption&#8221; would have helped a lot. Did we hear anything from him and the RNC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-162</guid>
		<description>do you think they would have won by 15 points if they had been seriously contested?

It may be a chicken and egg arguement but how do you win elections if you don&#039;t even compete?

and why did Duey Dumb AXX not have enough money? Maybe because he started out the elections telling contributors it was a lost cause ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you think they would have won by 15 points if they had been seriously contested?</p>
<p>It may be a chicken and egg arguement but how do you win elections if you don&#8217;t even compete?</p>
<p>and why did Duey Dumb AXX not have enough money? Maybe because he started out the elections telling contributors it was a lost cause ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-161</guid>
		<description>&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;To lose to the party that controls Congress who has an approval rating in single digits is a disgrace!&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;To have the majority of voters vote for the Democrats because they think Republicans still control Congress when they haven&#039;t in two years is inexcusable!&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;To start out and election telling everyone how bad things are for Republicans and we can&#039;t win with a President in office who has been there for 7 years and still expect people to contribute after you&#039;ve convinced them the election is a lost cause is shear idiocy!&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;To spend 2 years preaching that we have to moderate our message so we can reach out to moderates and independents and end up not only failing to increase moderate votes for Republicans but alienate your base at the same time is mindless and stupid!&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;To sit back now and make excuses and blame your miserable performance on Bush and refuse to take any responsibility for your pathetic incompetence is the very example and proof of what&#039;s wrong with this party&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

The only thing more enraging to me than you think you deserve another 2 to 4 years to make a mess of this party is the fact that you haven&#039;t been run out of Washington on a rail!


&lt;img src=&quot;http://img124.echo.cx/img124/3829/sc1093ss.gif&quot; alt=&quot;Grrrr&quot; /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>To lose to the party that controls Congress who has an approval rating in single digits is a disgrace!</li>
<li>To have the majority of voters vote for the Democrats because they think Republicans still control Congress when they haven&#8217;t in two years is inexcusable!</li>
<li>To start out and election telling everyone how bad things are for Republicans and we can&#8217;t win with a President in office who has been there for 7 years and still expect people to contribute after you&#8217;ve convinced them the election is a lost cause is shear idiocy!</li>
<li>To spend 2 years preaching that we have to moderate our message so we can reach out to moderates and independents and end up not only failing to increase moderate votes for Republicans but alienate your base at the same time is mindless and stupid!</li>
<li>To sit back now and make excuses and blame your miserable performance on Bush and refuse to take any responsibility for your pathetic incompetence is the very example and proof of what&#8217;s wrong with this party</li>
</ol>
<p>The only thing more enraging to me than you think you deserve another 2 to 4 years to make a mess of this party is the fact that you haven&#8217;t been run out of Washington on a rail!</p>
<p><img src="http://img124.echo.cx/img124/3829/sc1093ss.gif" alt="Grrrr" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beaming</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>beaming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-160</guid>
		<description>We need a candidate, a leader who says &quot; bring it on &quot;.  Enough wussing around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need a candidate, a leader who says &#8221; bring it on &#8220;.  Enough wussing around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes314</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes314</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-159</guid>
		<description>I serious doubt if &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; RNC head could have been successful under these circumstances. That being said, after a performance like this heads roll, and I have no doubt his will be one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I serious doubt if <i>any</i> RNC head could have been successful under these circumstances. That being said, after a performance like this heads roll, and I have no doubt his will be one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Look, the man had from the beginning of 2007 to prepare for the 2008 elections. What did he do that was in any way new and innovative during that time even knowing back then that 2008 (thanks to the number of seats we had to defend) would be a tough year?

He didn&#039;t have money? Whose fault was that? His party was unpopular? Where was he when it was time to tell Bush to abandon the &lt;i&gt;New Tone&lt;/i&gt;&#8482; and start defending himself? Where was he on the Sunday Morning talkshows? He hid himself away at RNC headquarters and was so non-descript that the average plugged-in insider didn&#039;t know his name.

While Howard Dean was pursuing his 50 state strategy, and it was showing results, what was he doing? When we lost Dennis Hastert&#039;s seat, why did no alarm bells ring? When we lost long-held GOP seats in LA and MS, did he call any emergency meetings with Congressional leaders and RNC staff?

This was a failure long in the making. That he had barely enough money to compete in battlegrounds and nothing to devote to Democratic strongholds is not something beyond his control that just happened ... and for what its worth, he&#039;s supposed to be a great fundraiser.

The simple fact is that he messed up. He, like Mehlman before him, owed his position to Bush so he couldn&#039;t challenge the President when the President was taking the party down with him. Which is why I wrote way back in April that we need to have the &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.redstate.com/blogs/martin_a_knight/2008/apr/05/building_a_permanent_republican_majority_i&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chairman of the RNC be an elected position.&lt;/a&gt;

Duncan needs to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, the man had from the beginning of 2007 to prepare for the 2008 elections. What did he do that was in any way new and innovative during that time even knowing back then that 2008 (thanks to the number of seats we had to defend) would be a tough year?</p>
<p>He didn&#8217;t have money? Whose fault was that? His party was unpopular? Where was he when it was time to tell Bush to abandon the <i>New Tone</i>&trade; and start defending himself? Where was he on the Sunday Morning talkshows? He hid himself away at RNC headquarters and was so non-descript that the average plugged-in insider didn&#8217;t know his name.</p>
<p>While Howard Dean was pursuing his 50 state strategy, and it was showing results, what was he doing? When we lost Dennis Hastert&#8217;s seat, why did no alarm bells ring? When we lost long-held GOP seats in LA and MS, did he call any emergency meetings with Congressional leaders and RNC staff?</p>
<p>This was a failure long in the making. That he had barely enough money to compete in battlegrounds and nothing to devote to Democratic strongholds is not something beyond his control that just happened &#8230; and for what its worth, he&#8217;s supposed to be a great fundraiser.</p>
<p>The simple fact is that he messed up. He, like Mehlman before him, owed his position to Bush so he couldn&#8217;t challenge the President when the President was taking the party down with him. Which is why I wrote way back in April that we need to have the <a href="http://archive.redstate.com/blogs/martin_a_knight/2008/apr/05/building_a_permanent_republican_majority_i" rel="nofollow">Chairman of the RNC be an elected position.</a></p>
<p>Duncan needs to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-157</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;To lose because you skirt the truth rather than offend your opponent is inexcusable. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you&#039;re afraid to offend, it means you&#039;ll never win. 

Liberals are offended by the proposition that the individual can be better trusted to spend his own money to his own benefit than a faceless bureaucrat in some government agency. 

Liberals are offended by the notion that parents will make better choices about their children&#039;s education than government.

Liberals are offended by the belief that the free market is a better distributor of resources and provides the best environment for innovation and improvement in standards of living.

Liberals are offended by the fact that the Second Amendment guarantees the individual the right of self-defense to protect themselves, their families and their property ... and as a check against government.

Liberals are offended by people who believe that a child in the womb is a human being whose life has worth.

In other words, if Republicans (and this goes quadruple for &quot;moderates&quot; and &quot;Bipartisans&quot;) continue to place any importance on not offending Democrats, because of some stupid concern for &quot;Bipartisanship&quot; or &quot;comity&quot;, we&#039;re going to spend another 40 years in the wilderness, and we&#039;ll deserve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>To lose because you skirt the truth rather than offend your opponent is inexcusable. </i></p></blockquote>
<p>If you&#8217;re afraid to offend, it means you&#8217;ll never win. </p>
<p>Liberals are offended by the proposition that the individual can be better trusted to spend his own money to his own benefit than a faceless bureaucrat in some government agency. </p>
<p>Liberals are offended by the notion that parents will make better choices about their children&#8217;s education than government.</p>
<p>Liberals are offended by the belief that the free market is a better distributor of resources and provides the best environment for innovation and improvement in standards of living.</p>
<p>Liberals are offended by the fact that the Second Amendment guarantees the individual the right of self-defense to protect themselves, their families and their property &#8230; and as a check against government.</p>
<p>Liberals are offended by people who believe that a child in the womb is a human being whose life has worth.</p>
<p>In other words, if Republicans (and this goes quadruple for &#8220;moderates&#8221; and &#8220;Bipartisans&#8221;) continue to place any importance on not offending Democrats, because of some stupid concern for &#8220;Bipartisanship&#8221; or &#8220;comity&#8221;, we&#8217;re going to spend another 40 years in the wilderness, and we&#8217;ll deserve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RottDawg</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>RottDawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-156</guid>
		<description>And and opportunity for shameless self promotion!  

Broken link can be found here:

http://www.redstate.com/rottdawg/2008/12/21/tcots-co-founder-asks-mike-duncan-to-step-aside/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And and opportunity for shameless self promotion!  </p>
<p>Broken link can be found here:</p>
<p>http://www.redstate.com/rottdawg/2008/12/21/tcots-co-founder-asks-mike-duncan-to-step-aside/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baseketball</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/2008/12/22/mike-duncan-should-do-the-honorable-thing/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>baseketball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/paulag1955/?p=45#comment-155</guid>
		<description>He didn&#039;t compete in Democratic strongholds because he barely had the money to compete in the battlegrounds.  More than half the house will be occupied, come 2009, by Democrats who won their 2008 congressional election by more than 15 points.  When you&#039;re facing that kind of onslaught, you don&#039;t throw money at races you&#039;re going to lose by 35 points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He didn&#8217;t compete in Democratic strongholds because he barely had the money to compete in the battlegrounds.  More than half the house will be occupied, come 2009, by Democrats who won their 2008 congressional election by more than 15 points.  When you&#8217;re facing that kind of onslaught, you don&#8217;t throw money at races you&#8217;re going to lose by 35 points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

