Mike Duncan Should Do The Honorable Thing


Conservative author and Republican strategist, Michael Patrick Leahy, called today for RNC Chairman, Mike Duncan, to withdraw his bid for re-election effective immediately. Leahy made the case that Duncan’s lackluster leadership and failure to embrace new technology as a political tool was a major contributing factor in Republican losses in 2008. I concur.

I find it surprising that Duncan is not embarrassed to show his face in public, let alone campaign to retain his chair. It’s not so much that we lost the presidency; lost in the U.S. House and Senate; lost in state and local races:  it was the manner in which we lost that pains me and should be a source of shame to Mr. Duncan.

It is one thing to lose based on the merits of your candidates and their positions; that is an honorable loss. To lose, however, because you are out-maneuvered by a nimble, technologically savvy opponent whose policies and positions will hinder rather than help our country is inexcusable. To lose because you skirt the truth rather than offend your opponent is inexcusable. To lose because you don’t even try in Democrat strongholds is inexcusable.

It seems to me that honor demands that Mike Duncan step aside. We’re not asking him to fall on his sword in some public display of mea culpa. We’re just asking that he quietly step aside to clear the way for new leadership who can then get to work rehabilitating the Republican brand.

Mr. Duncan – please – do the honorable thing.


Category: ,

RSS feed

14 Comments Leave a comment

To Be Fair

baseketball (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 1:24AM EST (link)

He didn’t compete in Democratic strongholds because he barely had the money to compete in the battlegrounds. More than half the house will be occupied, come 2009, by Democrats who won their 2008 congressional election by more than 15 points. When you’re facing that kind of onslaught, you don’t throw money at races you’re going to lose by 35 points.

RE: To Be Fair ...

Martin Knight (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 7:03AM EST (link)

Look, the man had from the beginning of 2007 to prepare for the 2008 elections. What did he do that was in any way new and innovative during that time even knowing back then that 2008 (thanks to the number of seats we had to defend) would be a tough year?

He didn’t have money? Whose fault was that? His party was unpopular? Where was he when it was time to tell Bush to abandon the New Tone™ and start defending himself? Where was he on the Sunday Morning talkshows? He hid himself away at RNC headquarters and was so non-descript that the average plugged-in insider didn’t know his name.

While Howard Dean was pursuing his 50 state strategy, and it was showing results, what was he doing? When we lost Dennis Hastert’s seat, why did no alarm bells ring? When we lost long-held GOP seats in LA and MS, did he call any emergency meetings with Congressional leaders and RNC staff?

This was a failure long in the making. That he had barely enough money to compete in battlegrounds and nothing to devote to Democratic strongholds is not something beyond his control that just happened … and for what its worth, he’s supposed to be a great fundraiser.

The simple fact is that he messed up. He, like Mehlman before him, owed his position to Bush so he couldn’t challenge the President when the President was taking the party down with him. Which is why I wrote way back in April that we need to have the Chairman of the RNC be an elected position.

Duncan needs to go.

I think a lot of this was beyond his control.

Diogenes314 (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 7:25AM EST (link)

I serious doubt if any RNC head could have been successful under these circumstances. That being said, after a performance like this heads roll, and I have no doubt his will be one.

Dio

AceInTX (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 4:36PM EST (link)

Sure it was a tough climate

Sure President Bush was unpopular

Sure we were defending more seats in the Senate than the Democrats…

But what did this genius do to get us out of the whole? Did he try to rehabilitate Bush’s image? Did he do anything to educate the public about the fact that the Congress who had a 91% disapproval rating was run by Democrats? Did he point out the culture of corruption of William Jefferson, Charley Rangel, Tony Resco, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, all the ex Clinton Administration people like Rubin and Tyson and all the others that raided Fannie MAE and Freddie MAC and jumped out with Golden Parachutes? I think a campaign organized around a “Democrat Culture Of Corruption” after they won in 2006 promising to clean up the “Republican Culture Of Corruption” would have helped a lot. Did we hear anything from him and the RNC?

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 
 

Well duh...

AceInTX (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 3:32PM EST (link)

do you think they would have won by 15 points if they had been seriously contested?

It may be a chicken and egg arguement but how do you win elections if you don’t even compete?

and why did Duey Dumb AXX not have enough money? Maybe because he started out the elections telling contributors it was a lost cause ?

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 

Broken link?

RottDawg (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 1:45AM EST (link)

And and opportunity for shameless self promotion!

Broken link can be found here:

http://www.redstate.com/rottdawg/2008/12/21/tcots-co-founder-asks-mike-duncan-to-step-aside/

Man is not free unless government is limited.
Ronald Reagan

 

Excellent. All Republicans (esp. "moderates") should have this kocked hard into their heads.

Martin Knight (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 5:56AM EST (link)

To lose because you skirt the truth rather than offend your opponent is inexcusable.

If you’re afraid to offend, it means you’ll never win.

Liberals are offended by the proposition that the individual can be better trusted to spend his own money to his own benefit than a faceless bureaucrat in some government agency.

Liberals are offended by the notion that parents will make better choices about their children’s education than government.

Liberals are offended by the belief that the free market is a better distributor of resources and provides the best environment for innovation and improvement in standards of living.

Liberals are offended by the fact that the Second Amendment guarantees the individual the right of self-defense to protect themselves, their families and their property … and as a check against government.

Liberals are offended by people who believe that a child in the womb is a human being whose life has worth.

In other words, if Republicans (and this goes quadruple for “moderates” and “Bipartisans”) continue to place any importance on not offending Democrats, because of some stupid concern for “Bipartisanship” or “comity”, we’re going to spend another 40 years in the wilderness, and we’ll deserve it.

preach it brother

AceInTX (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 4:43PM EST (link)

Thumbs Up

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson
 
 

Martin Knight got it right

beaming Monday, December 22nd at 8:16AM EST (link)

We need a candidate, a leader who says ” bring it on “. Enough wussing around.

 

Hey...you missed a couple...

AceInTX (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 3:27PM EST (link)
  1. To lose to the party that controls Congress who has an approval rating in single digits is a disgrace!
  2. To have the majority of voters vote for the Democrats because they think Republicans still control Congress when they haven’t in two years is inexcusable!
  3. To start out and election telling everyone how bad things are for Republicans and we can’t win with a President in office who has been there for 7 years and still expect people to contribute after you’ve convinced them the election is a lost cause is shear idiocy!
  4. To spend 2 years preaching that we have to moderate our message so we can reach out to moderates and independents and end up not only failing to increase moderate votes for Republicans but alienate your base at the same time is mindless and stupid!
  5. To sit back now and make excuses and blame your miserable performance on Bush and refuse to take any responsibility for your pathetic incompetence is the very example and proof of what’s wrong with this party

The only thing more enraging to me than you think you deserve another 2 to 4 years to make a mess of this party is the fact that you haven’t been run out of Washington on a rail!

Grrrr

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

Amen, brother!

itsonlywords (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 9:06PM EST (link)

Good points, Ace, thanks.

Tu ne cede malis sed contra audientor ito. ~Virgil
Do not give in to evil, but proceed evermore boldly against it.

 
 

Dittos;

Erick Brockway (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 8:12PM EST (link)

I have no clue why he’d even consider running again, unless it’s for power. Sure can’t be his wanting to lead.
Need to have more a tech-savvy PR person in there.

PS;

Erick Brockway (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 8:18PM EST (link)

Enough with the “Compassionate Conservative” garbage. They reach out to pet snarling dogs, and then marvel when they pull back bloody stumps!
From now on it’s Play to Win, Win for Keeps!

Exactly, Erick.

itsonlywords (Diary) Monday, December 22nd at 9:07PM EST (link)

They don’t respect civility; they only take it as a sign of weakness.

Tu ne cede malis sed contra audientor ito. ~Virgil
Do not give in to evil, but proceed evermore boldly against it.