<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Chain of Command No-Go on the New Afghanistan Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nessa</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-62</guid>
		<description>What I said, none to clearly, was that some bureaucrat LTC got promoted to COL based on that one &quot;brilliant&quot; name change.  The school is soooo much more effective now.  Bureaucrats in the Army love to &quot;change&quot; names, acronyms etc, claim it is some great and glorious advance and exaggerate their OERs/NCOERs  with them.  One of my favorites was OCOKA, Observation, Cover and concealment, Obstacles, Key terrain, Avenues of approach.  As far as I know Hadrian used the same acronym when laying out his wall.  When the manuals were updated in the early 2000s it suddenly changed to OACOK.  Same meaning, different order.  Pole-vaulting over mouse turds into the 21st century and exactly the same amount of effect as the berets you mention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I said, none to clearly, was that some bureaucrat LTC got promoted to COL based on that one &#8220;brilliant&#8221; name change.  The school is soooo much more effective now.  Bureaucrats in the Army love to &#8220;change&#8221; names, acronyms etc, claim it is some great and glorious advance and exaggerate their OERs/NCOERs  with them.  One of my favorites was OCOKA, Observation, Cover and concealment, Obstacles, Key terrain, Avenues of approach.  As far as I know Hadrian used the same acronym when laying out his wall.  When the manuals were updated in the early 2000s it suddenly changed to OACOK.  Same meaning, different order.  Pole-vaulting over mouse turds into the 21st century and exactly the same amount of effect as the berets you mention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-61</guid>
		<description>There are thousands of bureaucrats in uniform.  That was just one more.  As was General &quot;I want a beret!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are thousands of bureaucrats in uniform.  That was just one more.  As was General &#8220;I want a beret!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat_Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat_Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Bravo Company is wearing bloomers!

I just got back from trying to turn Bambi&#039;s dad into venison (he is safe for now) and I noticed Strieff&#039;s &quot;intro&quot;.  

Ahh yes, The Killer Bee&#039;s.  I will just say that Charlie Company is the one that was on the cover of ARMY magazine and COL Dandridge &quot;mike&quot; Malone shadowed us for his report to the CSA and his very complimentary article.  IIRC we also led the battalion in Ranger School grads and Correctional Custody Facility Honor Grads.  Don&#039;t make me tell the story of the &quot;bayonet duel&quot;.  

To everyone else - Wow! thanks for all the great comments (yes, I read them all).  As I mentioned I was away and so I won&#039;t try to make a bunch of replies.  It seems that most everyone agrees with the main point, which is the disconnect is not good.  The folks responsible will have to sort out the exact cause and solution(s) and we can all have our own opinion on that.   

See yinz again, soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo Company is wearing bloomers!</p>
<p>I just got back from trying to turn Bambi&#8217;s dad into venison (he is safe for now) and I noticed Strieff&#8217;s &#8220;intro&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Ahh yes, The Killer Bee&#8217;s.  I will just say that Charlie Company is the one that was on the cover of ARMY magazine and COL Dandridge &#8220;mike&#8221; Malone shadowed us for his report to the CSA and his very complimentary article.  IIRC we also led the battalion in Ranger School grads and Correctional Custody Facility Honor Grads.  Don&#8217;t make me tell the story of the &#8220;bayonet duel&#8221;.  </p>
<p>To everyone else &#8211; Wow! thanks for all the great comments (yes, I read them all).  As I mentioned I was away and so I won&#8217;t try to make a bunch of replies.  It seems that most everyone agrees with the main point, which is the disconnect is not good.  The folks responsible will have to sort out the exact cause and solution(s) and we can all have our own opinion on that.   </p>
<p>See yinz again, soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lunarmanathome</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>lunarmanathome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Exactly. What is bewildering for this reader, and veteran, is that there was a months long gap 
If a comprehensive review was actually completed and put into action in March of this year, how does that explain that the Commanders Intent was obviously not understood or communicated? 
If this is how things &quot;work&quot; with the CinC, NSC and DOD, expect a self fulfilling disaster. Frankly, this scares the cap out of me, and I mourn the loss of life as wasted. Wasted only in the sense that the CinC had his eyes focused on domestic issues while blithely, and ignorantly putting those men and women in harms way and neglecting them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. What is bewildering for this reader, and veteran, is that there was a months long gap<br />
If a comprehensive review was actually completed and put into action in March of this year, how does that explain that the Commanders Intent was obviously not understood or communicated?<br />
If this is how things &#8220;work&#8221; with the CinC, NSC and DOD, expect a self fulfilling disaster. Frankly, this scares the cap out of me, and I mourn the loss of life as wasted. Wasted only in the sense that the CinC had his eyes focused on domestic issues while blithely, and ignorantly putting those men and women in harms way and neglecting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJ "Beaglescout" Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>LJ "Beaglescout" Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-58</guid>
		<description>He was the one in charge of the deterioration in Iraq during 2005-06 who fought against Petraeus&#039; Surge and COIN strategy before  they were implemented, and instead of firing him Bush promoted him. Bush was too nice. He needed a little more bloody-mindedness. Then we wouldn&#039;t have such a bad problem with top generals who don&#039;t want to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He was the one in charge of the deterioration in Iraq during 2005-06 who fought against Petraeus&#8217; Surge and COIN strategy before  they were implemented, and instead of firing him Bush promoted him. Bush was too nice. He needed a little more bloody-mindedness. Then we wouldn&#8217;t have such a bad problem with top generals who don&#8217;t want to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1SGinTN</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>1SGinTN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I read about this meeting several days ago, sir, and was shocked and disturbed for two reasons.  First of all, that anyone could disagree with such a basic mission statement.  Why else would we embark on combat operations if not to defeat our enemy and defend the weak or defenseless?  Second, that such a failure to communicate at the highest level of command could exist and go on for such a period of time undetected and unresolved.

I came to the conclusion some time ago that that the people in charge and the ones getting the most support in the media have an aversion to identifying our enemies.  This is evident by avoiding  words or concepts like &quot;victory&quot;.  Talk of negotiation with the Taliban comes from this mindset.  This sort of thing makes me wonder what happened to the country I thought I was a part of.  Did the sheep decide they didn&#039;t need the sheepdogs anymore?  The wolves can&#039;t believe their good fortune.

Achance&#039;s decription of management by committee is bureaucracy personified.  We need leaders rather than managers.  Nessa&#039;s Samuel Adams quote describes bureaucrats to me, their tranquil servitude does us a disservice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read about this meeting several days ago, sir, and was shocked and disturbed for two reasons.  First of all, that anyone could disagree with such a basic mission statement.  Why else would we embark on combat operations if not to defeat our enemy and defend the weak or defenseless?  Second, that such a failure to communicate at the highest level of command could exist and go on for such a period of time undetected and unresolved.</p>
<p>I came to the conclusion some time ago that that the people in charge and the ones getting the most support in the media have an aversion to identifying our enemies.  This is evident by avoiding  words or concepts like &#8220;victory&#8221;.  Talk of negotiation with the Taliban comes from this mindset.  This sort of thing makes me wonder what happened to the country I thought I was a part of.  Did the sheep decide they didn&#8217;t need the sheepdogs anymore?  The wolves can&#8217;t believe their good fortune.</p>
<p>Achance&#8217;s decription of management by committee is bureaucracy personified.  We need leaders rather than managers.  Nessa&#8217;s Samuel Adams quote describes bureaucrats to me, their tranquil servitude does us a disservice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qixlqatl</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>qixlqatl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I wish I could say it comes as a surprise........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could say it comes as a surprise&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stixxxnstones</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>stixxxnstones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I good-naturedly give the Marines a really hard time -- and they give it back, trust me -- but I will say this, in all seriousness: They are my frickin&#039; hero, all of them.  Nobody does so much with so little with such a can-do attitude as the Marines do.

I&#039;m proud to know the ones I do.

I&#039;ve met scumbags from every branch of the military EXCEPT the Marines.  When they play, they play hard...but when it comes to doing business with the enemy, there&#039;s nobody else I&#039;d want between me and the bad guys.

Oorah, Marines.  They can march in the shadow of my wings anytime :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I good-naturedly give the Marines a really hard time &#8212; and they give it back, trust me &#8212; but I will say this, in all seriousness: They are my frickin&#8217; hero, all of them.  Nobody does so much with so little with such a can-do attitude as the Marines do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m proud to know the ones I do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve met scumbags from every branch of the military EXCEPT the Marines.  When they play, they play hard&#8230;but when it comes to doing business with the enemy, there&#8217;s nobody else I&#8217;d want between me and the bad guys.</p>
<p>Oorah, Marines.  They can march in the shadow of my wings anytime <img src='http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proudmarinemom</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>proudmarinemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-54</guid>
		<description>They only threw your son&#039;s buddy off the third floor balcony?  Pansies.

Seriously, there are some kids in LeJeune who would volunteer to be duct-taped and thrown off a balcony.  Into a dumpster full of broken glass.

Considering the living conditions there, it&#039;s a wonder they survive long enough to get to combat.  My son returned home from his second tour in Iraq just short of two months ago.  He wouldn&#039;t let me go up to the barracks with him that night.  His room had no toilet (hole in floor), no running water in the half-demolished shower, no heat (that was fixed, now it&#039;s 90 degrees in there and it can&#039;t be turned off), broken windows, doors, etc.  All of which is seen as a minor inconvenience.  I&#039;ve never heard sounds coming from living quarters like those I&#039;ve heard there.  Other-worldly, wild animal sounds.

God help Osama if these guys catch him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They only threw your son&#8217;s buddy off the third floor balcony?  Pansies.</p>
<p>Seriously, there are some kids in LeJeune who would volunteer to be duct-taped and thrown off a balcony.  Into a dumpster full of broken glass.</p>
<p>Considering the living conditions there, it&#8217;s a wonder they survive long enough to get to combat.  My son returned home from his second tour in Iraq just short of two months ago.  He wouldn&#8217;t let me go up to the barracks with him that night.  His room had no toilet (hole in floor), no running water in the half-demolished shower, no heat (that was fixed, now it&#8217;s 90 degrees in there and it can&#8217;t be turned off), broken windows, doors, etc.  All of which is seen as a minor inconvenience.  I&#8217;ve never heard sounds coming from living quarters like those I&#8217;ve heard there.  Other-worldly, wild animal sounds.</p>
<p>God help Osama if these guys catch him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nolan</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-53</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s what the 2d Amendment was for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s what the 2d Amendment was for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-52</guid>
		<description>many would welcome a weak boss who said, &quot;you guys work this out.&quot;  I gotta admit that I loved it when the boss checked out though I always had a wary eye for his checking back in and wanting to know WTF I did that for.

For a bunch of lefty intellectuals who don&#039;t believe in leaders or autocratic management, who basically reject authority and who rely on consensus, a dithering head of an agency means the whole agency dithers because nobody will just assume reponsibility and run with it.  These guys think talking about something doing something about it.  There really isn&#039;t anyone in Comrade Obama&#039;s regime that has ever actually done anything except talk and be born with the right pedigree or get an affirmative action scholship to a school they wouldn&#039;t otherwise qualify for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many would welcome a weak boss who said, &#8220;you guys work this out.&#8221;  I gotta admit that I loved it when the boss checked out though I always had a wary eye for his checking back in and wanting to know WTF I did that for.</p>
<p>For a bunch of lefty intellectuals who don&#8217;t believe in leaders or autocratic management, who basically reject authority and who rely on consensus, a dithering head of an agency means the whole agency dithers because nobody will just assume reponsibility and run with it.  These guys think talking about something doing something about it.  There really isn&#8217;t anyone in Comrade Obama&#8217;s regime that has ever actually done anything except talk and be born with the right pedigree or get an affirmative action scholship to a school they wouldn&#8217;t otherwise qualify for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: septembergurl</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>septembergurl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-51</guid>
		<description>but in the CIC role they are dangerous.

When I read the story about McChrystal&#039;s troop request in August, the WH reaction, it was clear to me that Obama had not the slightest comprehension of the policy he had approved in March, and Gen McChrystal acted on.  Obama simply signed off on whatever Jones put in front of him.  The consequences of this staggering ineptitude and ignorance on the part of the President are huge -- leading to the disastrous months of public dithering, leaks, undermining of various principals and so on.  At various times leaks portrayed McChrystal as leading a coup, Karzai entirely unreliable, and so on.

The Post story (known in the biz as a tick-tock) confirmed my view.  The problem lies with the fact that Obama has no understanding of, no talent for, no experience in the duties of the executive:  these are, prioritizing, delegating, and decision-making.  

This failure to understand leadership, let alone any ability, has doomed Obama&#039;s Presidency.  This is obvious on a host of issues.  In the area of national security, defense and war leadership, his Presidency is a disaster.

In the area of decision-making, consider the following, from a fawning New Yorker study of Obama&#039;s economic team (another team of geniuses) and their handling of the economic crisis of 2008-9.  The story (11/12/09) describes a meeting where rivals argue over whether to adopt Little Timmy&#039;s plan to use your money to bail out the banks, and if so should the amount be changed.  After hours of arguing, Obama announces his decision:

&quot;You guys work this out, and when I come back I want you to tell me what your agreed-upon approach is.&quot;

This is what thinks decision-making is -- signing off on a consnsus.  The problem, of course, is that there is no agreed-upon approach to Afghanistan.   I venture to guess that Obama tried some variation of the above quote over the six-months of dithering, and someone explained to him that his job was to actually decide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but in the CIC role they are dangerous.</p>
<p>When I read the story about McChrystal&#8217;s troop request in August, the WH reaction, it was clear to me that Obama had not the slightest comprehension of the policy he had approved in March, and Gen McChrystal acted on.  Obama simply signed off on whatever Jones put in front of him.  The consequences of this staggering ineptitude and ignorance on the part of the President are huge &#8212; leading to the disastrous months of public dithering, leaks, undermining of various principals and so on.  At various times leaks portrayed McChrystal as leading a coup, Karzai entirely unreliable, and so on.</p>
<p>The Post story (known in the biz as a tick-tock) confirmed my view.  The problem lies with the fact that Obama has no understanding of, no talent for, no experience in the duties of the executive:  these are, prioritizing, delegating, and decision-making.  </p>
<p>This failure to understand leadership, let alone any ability, has doomed Obama&#8217;s Presidency.  This is obvious on a host of issues.  In the area of national security, defense and war leadership, his Presidency is a disaster.</p>
<p>In the area of decision-making, consider the following, from a fawning New Yorker study of Obama&#8217;s economic team (another team of geniuses) and their handling of the economic crisis of 2008-9.  The story (11/12/09) describes a meeting where rivals argue over whether to adopt Little Timmy&#8217;s plan to use your money to bail out the banks, and if so should the amount be changed.  After hours of arguing, Obama announces his decision:</p>
<p>&#8220;You guys work this out, and when I come back I want you to tell me what your agreed-upon approach is.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is what thinks decision-making is &#8212; signing off on a consnsus.  The problem, of course, is that there is no agreed-upon approach to Afghanistan.   I venture to guess that Obama tried some variation of the above quote over the six-months of dithering, and someone explained to him that his job was to actually decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nessa</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-50</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nessa</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-49</guid>
		<description>The Commander&#039;s Intent.  I know you know, but for those who don&#039;t, it lets every individual involved in the Mission understand what the end result needs to be, that way, when, &quot;No plan survives initial contact&quot;, each individual if he must can adapt his plan to achieve the desired endstate.  

Never forget the Rule of LGOPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Commander&#8217;s Intent.  I know you know, but for those who don&#8217;t, it lets every individual involved in the Mission understand what the end result needs to be, that way, when, &#8220;No plan survives initial contact&#8221;, each individual if he must can adapt his plan to achieve the desired endstate.  </p>
<p>Never forget the Rule of LGOPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martellus</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>martellus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-48</guid>
		<description>under Kissinger and Nixon for BO not to know this is criminal.  I do fault him.  Everything I have heard is that he is intellectually lazy.  He does not read the reports to sent to him.  He delegates all authority even within the White House.  He is the image not the intellect behind his administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>under Kissinger and Nixon for BO not to know this is criminal.  I do fault him.  Everything I have heard is that he is intellectually lazy.  He does not read the reports to sent to him.  He delegates all authority even within the White House.  He is the image not the intellect behind his administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nessa</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-47</guid>
		<description>...developing &quot;Mission Statements&quot; and all the associated BS that follows.  To include Strategic plans, Operational Plans, nesting the Commander&#039;s Intent within each successive level of the mission...  His entire staff had probably just finished it in March and delivered the first assessment of how well it was working when he asked for more troops in August.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;developing &#8220;Mission Statements&#8221; and all the associated BS that follows.  To include Strategic plans, Operational Plans, nesting the Commander&#8217;s Intent within each successive level of the mission&#8230;  His entire staff had probably just finished it in March and delivered the first assessment of how well it was working when he asked for more troops in August.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nessa</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-46</guid>
		<description>for anyone outside the Army, that may not make any sense.  Sorry.  If it helps, the kind of cheese he seeks is &quot;frumunda&quot;.  Ask a Soldier, this is a family website, I can&#039;t go into more detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for anyone outside the Army, that may not make any sense.  Sorry.  If it helps, the kind of cheese he seeks is &#8220;frumunda&#8221;.  Ask a Soldier, this is a family website, I can&#8217;t go into more detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nessa</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-45</guid>
		<description>...They did provide that young Marine with protective gear before tossing him off the balcony.  

Every deploying Soldier (and Marine) complains of &quot;not enough training&quot; BEFORE they deploy.  In rare instances it is true, in the vast majority of instances, it is the equivalent of worrying about your teenager when you allow them to borrow the family car before going out unsupervised on friday night.  You gave them everything they needed, you just wish they had more.  

As for the hazing, I still complain about the &quot;blood wings&quot; my partners gave me upon my graduation from Airborne School, but I wouldn&#039;t trade those memories, or those friends for anything.  I&#039;m now looking forward to giving some of those same memories, and hazing, to my daughter when she graduates in July.

Thank you for supporting your son&#039;s service, God bless you all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;They did provide that young Marine with protective gear before tossing him off the balcony.  </p>
<p>Every deploying Soldier (and Marine) complains of &#8220;not enough training&#8221; BEFORE they deploy.  In rare instances it is true, in the vast majority of instances, it is the equivalent of worrying about your teenager when you allow them to borrow the family car before going out unsupervised on friday night.  You gave them everything they needed, you just wish they had more.  </p>
<p>As for the hazing, I still complain about the &#8220;blood wings&#8221; my partners gave me upon my graduation from Airborne School, but I wouldn&#8217;t trade those memories, or those friends for anything.  I&#8217;m now looking forward to giving some of those same memories, and hazing, to my daughter when she graduates in July.</p>
<p>Thank you for supporting your son&#8217;s service, God bless you all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warrior</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Warrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-44</guid>
		<description>in anything but academics and posturing.  And he&#039;s poor at the former, at least, he won&#039;t let us see his grades...

His expertise is posturing so that he achieves whatever he needs for the next advancement of THE OBAMA LEGACY.  

Need street cred as an authentic &amp; angry black?--  Attend The &quot;Rev&quot; J. Wright&#039;s &quot;church&quot; for twenty years, have your daughters baptized there, etc.

Need public proof that you&#039;re not a racist hack?--  Throw the aforementioned J. Wright under the bus.

Need further proff that you&#039;re not a racist?--  Trash and then throw the grandmother who raised you under the bus.

Need cred that you&#039;re not a commie?  Throw your pal Van Jones under the bus.

Need an endorsement from the far loonie left?  Castigate your predecessor and make ridiculous campaign claims.

Need to not look like a fool after realizing your campaign promises were nonesense?--  Throw Gen. McCrystal and the troops to the wolves.

And so it goes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in anything but academics and posturing.  And he&#8217;s poor at the former, at least, he won&#8217;t let us see his grades&#8230;</p>
<p>His expertise is posturing so that he achieves whatever he needs for the next advancement of THE OBAMA LEGACY.  </p>
<p>Need street cred as an authentic &amp; angry black?&#8211;  Attend The &#8220;Rev&#8221; J. Wright&#8217;s &#8220;church&#8221; for twenty years, have your daughters baptized there, etc.</p>
<p>Need public proof that you&#8217;re not a racist hack?&#8211;  Throw the aforementioned J. Wright under the bus.</p>
<p>Need further proff that you&#8217;re not a racist?&#8211;  Trash and then throw the grandmother who raised you under the bus.</p>
<p>Need cred that you&#8217;re not a commie?  Throw your pal Van Jones under the bus.</p>
<p>Need an endorsement from the far loonie left?  Castigate your predecessor and make ridiculous campaign claims.</p>
<p>Need to not look like a fool after realizing your campaign promises were nonesense?&#8211;  Throw Gen. McCrystal and the troops to the wolves.</p>
<p>And so it goes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nessa</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/2009/12/10/a-chain-of-command-no-go-on-the-new-afghanistan-strategy/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/pat_walsh/?p=1#comment-43</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

