Well, not really, but it seems that everyone else is. Most of my platform, you’ll agree with but for the more interesting part, scroll to the bottom.
o Jim DeMint who said there was no way is now considering it.
o Sarah Palin is doing what ever the heck she is doing.
o Rick Perry is now re-considering it.
o Mike Huckabee said he might reconsider (please, no!)
o Chris Christie is talking to people in Iowa even though he says he’s not considering it
Personally, I blame Mitch Daniels (or maybe Cheri Daniels since the marriage thing appears to be the issue).
Don’t get me wrong, I’m fine with Tea-Paw if that’s where we need to go.
My platform would be pretty standard fair for a conservative:
o Cut the size of government by getting rid of federal regulations and putting a hiring freeze in place and eventually getting rid of some departments.
o Put the Ryan plan or something very close to it into place.
o Ask congress to pass a balanced budget amendment.
o Check all current federal laws to see if they meet the enumerated powers clauses and revoke the ones that don’t.
o Would require all companies to use E-Verify
o All illegal alien males of working age would be sentenced to six months of construction on the border fence until it’s complete.
o I’d take some prison fencing architecture and turn it inside out to use on the border.
o I would take the conservative parts of Newt’s platform that he spoke of on MSNBC (i.e. cut corporate taxes, cut regulations, make equipment 100% write-offable in the first year, rollback Sarbanes/Oxley etc).
o Permanently get rid of the death tax.
o Implement a flat tax somewhere in the neighborhood of 19% and get rid of all tax deductions.
On the financial end of things I would differ from my conservative friends a bit, I would create the Keep American Money at Home plan which would have three main parts:
PART ONE
– For any product where two or more distinct USA companies produce the product in the 50 states, 100% of money spent on said product by the Federal government would need to be spent with those companies.
– In order to increase the number of companies doing such business, for any product that wasn’t already manufactured in the US, I would offer cash incentives for companies that started producing those goods and did so for each of five years (rewards would be increasing as the five years went on).
–
PART TWO
I would replace social security with a massive mutual fund scheme that would be divided like this:
– 40% of funds would go into publicly traded US companies with more than 50 US employees and 75% of their employees are US citizens.(reward the behavior you want to encourage).
– Another 20% of funds would go into US headquarters based companies with more than 50 US employees and 50% of their employees were US citizens.
– Another 20% of funds would go into any company stock (no matter where they are based) that has at least 25% of their employees as US citizens.
– This last part is trickier. The last 20% of funds would go into the company stock of foreign companies who meet two criteria: a) Are in proportion to the percentage of their employee base that are US citizens; b) Are co-signers of some new whizbang anti-terror treaty that cuts off all funding to Hamas, Iraq, etc.
PART THREE
o I would identify any “too big too fail” or “too key to fail” and do whatever was necessary to remove that label including breaking up monopolies or forcing said companies to hold less than X percent of market share.
o Once the first section of this plan was done, I’d start letting those companies fail — it’s the American way.
FOREIGN AFFAIRS
o I’d give Israeal the go-ahead to nuke Iraq’s nuke facilities (play with fire/get burned).
o I’d implement Stephen Pressfield’s plan for Afghanistan ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJsB9-wFAEQ ) ….
o I’d get out of Libya
Victoria Coates
Daniel Horowitz
Why let Israel nuke 'em when we could do it ourselves? nt
audax (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 8:57AM EST (link)Audeamus pro audere est facere
Plausible deniability must be maintained :-) N/t
Change Jar Conservative (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 9:09AM EST (link).
********
Formerly know as “Oz” in these parts
Why? OK, just say the smiley face...LOL! nt
audax (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 9:39AM EST (link)Audeamus pro audere est facere
Iraq has nuke facilities?
Jim Tomasik (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 10:12AM EST (link)I did not know that…
Or was that your first gaff?
Ha! Yes, that was my first gaff
Change Jar Conservative (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 1:50PM EST (link)Looks like I’ll be keeping Newt company.
********
Formerly know as “Oz” in these parts
Sawing off the beams holding up your platform
civil truth (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 1:43PM EST (link)If your platform is based on reducing government involvement in private sector, that has to include moving away from the government manipulating the tax code and creating legislative mandates to try to direct activity into directions that the government deems “desirable”. This has been the plague of government programs since FDR (or perhaps the earlier Roosevelt).
Unfortunately your financial program involves more government intrusion into financial affairs, not less, which is just more of the same as we head for the waterfall.
Your platform seems more like a scaffold. I won’t want to join you there.
The greatest evil…is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern. -C.S. Lewis
http://www.gmsplace.com/
Huh?
sarg01 Thursday, June 2nd at 2:41PM EST (link)I thought he called for a flat tax and eliminating all tax deductions?
The stuff about picking companies to invest in was his plan for dealing with the Social Security Mutual Fund. His criteria are also pretty broad.
I was reading government intervention here
civil truth (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 3:46PM EST (link)…trying to manipulate business decisions by these investment criteria and subsidies (Parts One and Two). I’d be happier with Part Three if this were accomplished by reversing enabling/complicit legislation – but the author’s term “breaking up” or “forcing” divestment implies more government action (which got us into this predicament), not less
This is a totally separate issue from changes in personal income tax rates/deductions.
The greatest evil…is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern. -C.S. Lewis
http://www.gmsplace.com/
a bit more than that....
BA Cyclone (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 3:58PM EST (link)“…Keep American Money at Home plan…”
That is pure populism. Should we subsidize American companies to make pencils, paperclips, and erasers when we can just import those and have American companies making something else more lucrative?
Why don’t we *gasp* let businesses decide what they should produce?
JUST GET THE GOVERNMENT OUT ALTOGETHER.
If the government is picking a “winner”, that means by default the customers are not.
“If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions.” — James Madison
“Electing Republicans who don’t have the courage of their convictions may be easier in some circumstances, but it won’t save our country.” — Jim DeMint
BA Cyclone’s blog
BA Cyclone on Twitter
The problem I see....
gekster (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 4:01PM EST (link)is that if the government is picking the winners,
then they are also picking who loses.
They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.
We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway
Ok folks, 2012 is here. Get involved
Yes, we should pay our people to make the pencils
Change Jar Conservative (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 4:40PM EST (link)It’s not “pure populism” (though I’m sure it would be popular), it’s a matter of re-investing American tax dollars into American jobs.
Why do we want to send American tax dollars overseas?
Send them back into American jobs where we can reap the lower costs of unemployment and fewer people on food stamps.
I don’t want to subsidize Chinese citizens with American dollars.
********
Formerly know as “Oz” in these parts
except that history shows, it never works that way
kyle8 (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 5:12PM EST (link)tarifs and protection never result in more domestic employment. They result in lower employment and a weaker economy.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
There are no tariffs here or protection
Change Jar Conservative (Diary) Friday, June 3rd at 10:16AM EST (link)US citizens are free to do what they want with their money.
TAX money should go back into the country though … not flow out of it.
********
Formerly know as “Oz” in these parts
Your plan does exactly the opposite - hurt taxpayers
civil truth (Diary) Friday, June 3rd at 5:04PM EST (link)It’s from the same cloth as Bacon-Davis: costing the taxpayers by incurring above market costs. Or in this case, we get to buy 20 widgets from American companies for the same price as 25 Chinese widgets. And since the Chinese don’t get the money, they don’t end up buying 25 wazzits from another U.S. company. Thus we’re rewarding inefficient businesses and penalizing efficient businesses, which is backwards. This falls under the category of Comparative Advantage.
Same issue with formalizing investment criteria on political grounds (Part Two) – you end up with less efficient allocations and opportunity costs by limiting ability to optimize your portfolio, which again cost taxpayers. And you’re thereby providing a massive capital influx to less efficient enterprises.
Although this Part Two is probably moot since current SS and Medicare are financed by U.S. government debt and our legislators won’t want to point out the nature of the emperor’s clothes. Overall, the concept of changing the investment strategy that includes equities (and non-U.S. government bonds) is a sound idea, but not with politically-driven investment criteria.
The greatest evil…is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern. -C.S. Lewis
http://www.gmsplace.com/
and it is hard to see how politics could be kept out of it.
kyle8 (Diary) Friday, June 3rd at 5:56PM EST (link)probably it would be best to keep such investments in low risk investments like municipals, money market instruments and CD’s.
And spread it out. Otherwise you would have some industries and companies lobbying and paying off officials to invest in them.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Exactly, c_t
aesthete (Diary) Friday, June 3rd at 8:16PM EST (link)The US government would be much better off if it could buy “un-American” cars from Honda, Toyota and Hyundai, instead of GMs (Fords are alright).
The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton
changejar, when's the money bomb - but first,
Melody Warbington (rwm52) (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 3:06PM EST (link)I’m waiting on your social issues platform. And there’d better not be any truce talk, or I’ll take my vote elsewhere.
The woman saith unto him, I know that Messiah cometh (he that is called Christ): when he is come, he will declare unto us all things. (John 4:25)
No truce talk from me.
Change Jar Conservative (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 4:46PM EST (link)I support DOMA and am definitely in favor of “right to life” issues.
There should be zero government dollars going to organizations that fund abortion.
I do think that the details are trickier than some people think they would be.
For instance, for all those candidates out there that espouse a “except in the case of rape” exception, I think that if you got your way, you’d see a whole lot more accusations of rape if that was the only way that abortions could be handled legally.
I think I would look for state laws that relied on new medical discoveries to push the allowable timeframe for abortions back slowly but surely to push the numbers down.
In addition, I would make sure there was a law protecting pharmacists and pharmacies from being forced to carry/dispense the morning after pill.
You’d also get very, very conservative judges and I’d be filling that pipeline as quickly as possible because people need judges and they need conservative ones at that.
********
Formerly know as “Oz” in these parts
Love your social platform, changejar, and
Melody Warbington (rwm52) (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 5:24PM EST (link)I agree 100% about the “rape” exception.
Let me know when you decide!
The woman saith unto him, I know that Messiah cometh (he that is called Christ): when he is come, he will declare unto us all things. (John 4:25)