88 Public School Teachers Fired – Good!


A group of 88 unionized public school teachers in Rhode Island is being fired for incompetence.

 

In the tiny town of Central Falls, which is one square mile in size and one of the state’s poorest communities that ranks in the lowest 5% of Rhode Island schools, the federal government cited the district’s failures and offered superintendent Frances Gallo four choices including shutting the school, having it taken over as a charter school, changing school policies from the ground up, or firing all the teachers.

 

Gallo chose the last. And it’s about time some drastic action like this was taken. In the same vein, more than two dozen failing schools are being closed in Kansas City.

 

After decades of teacher union propaganda always blaming failures on other people and particularly on the “lack of funding” – i.e., send more money to the teacher unions – the firing of these 88 teachers is a positive development in the crucial transformation of American public education from an untouchable, bureaucratic kingdom to a representative democracy where teachers are held to account for their performance.

 

In Central Falls,  only 7% of high school kids are proficient in math, while 52%  drop out before graduation. Many students are poor immigrants.

 

Naturally the teachers banded together and offered tearful sob stories about how the decision is going to disrupt their lives, and about how much they give to the kids. “I’m after school every day, I’m always available. I’m heartbroken. I’d do anything for this school system, I’ve done everything I can,” said Frank Delbonis.

 

Blah, blah, blah…

 

This kabuki theater needs to end. Public education is a disaster in America, while teachers get more and more money every year, bigger benefit packages and, more and more often, early retirement in their 50s while offering an endless litany of how much more valuable they are to society than anyone else.

 

Which they are not. Public school teachers are no more valuable than welders or insurance salesmen or waitresses. Except that welders and insurance salesmen and waitresses who fail in their jobs can be fired while teachers virtually cannot be.

 

Until now. Good for Dr. Gallo. More and more Americans are aware of the union deceptions and support her decision. And don’t believe Obama’s malarkey about how he wants school reform. He does whatever the most radical fringe of the union movement wants, which is to never interfere in union business.

 

Public school teachers are rarely fired because many are protected by two of the strongest unions in America, the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers. This is what the New York Times reported recently about efforts to fire incompetent New York City school teachers:

 

[I]n the two years since the Education Department began an intensive effort to root out such teachers from the more than 55,000 who have tenure, officials have managed to fire only three for incompetence. Ten others whom the department charged with incompetence settled their cases by resigning or retiring…. The city’s effort includes eight full-time lawyers, known as the Teacher Performance Unit, and eight retired principals and administrators who serve as part-time consultants to help principals build cases against teachers. Joel I. Klein, the schools chancellor, said that the team, whose annual budget is $1 million, had been “successful at a far too modest level.” (end of excerpt)

 

One incompetent teacher, Michael Ebewo, was found to have misspelled words on a chart, to have ignored many of his special-needs students, and to have offered answers to those students who could not respond to questions, confusing the students. But according to the Times, reporting on the proceedings to fire Ebewo:

 

Mr. Ebewo’s lawyer interrupted with objections more than two dozen times, but the arbitrator overruled him in nearly every instance. The hearing, which covered lessons dating to 2005, lasted four hours… the hearing will probably go on for months, because of a rule the city agreed to four years ago. (end of excerpt)

 

Teachersunionexposed.com gives some insight into teacher union corruption.

 

 In Los Angeles, eighth-grade teacher Carlos Polanco humiliated a student who had tried to commit suicide saying that “you can’t even kill yourself.”

 

Is Polanco going to be fired?

 

No, according to an article in the Los Angeles Times:

 

The Los Angeles school board, citing Polanco’s poor judgment, voted to fire him.

 

But Polanco, who contended that he had been misunderstood, kept his job. A little-known review commission overruled the board, saying that although the teacher had made the statements, he had meant no harm.

 

It’s remarkably difficult to fire a tenured public school teacher in California, a Times investigation has found. The path can be laborious and labyrinthine, in some cases involving years of investigation, union grievances, administrative appeals, court challenges and re-hearings.

 

…The Times reviewed every case on record in the last 15 years in which a tenured employee was fired by a California school district and formally contested the decision before a review commission: 159 in all (not including about two dozen in which the records were destroyed). The newspaper also examined court and school district records and interviewed scores of people, including principals, teachers, union officials, district administrators, parents and students.

 

Among the findings:

 

* Building a case for dismissal is so time-consuming, costly and draining for principals and administrators that many say they don’t make the effort except in the most egregious cases. The vast majority of firings stem from blatant misconduct, including sexual abuse, other immoral or illegal behavior, insubordination or repeated violation of rules such as showing up on time.

 

* Although districts generally press ahead with only the strongest cases, even these get knocked down more than a third of the time by the specially convened review panels, which have the discretion to restore teachers’ jobs even when grounds for dismissal are proved.

 

* Jettisoning a teacher solely because he or she can’t teach is rare. In 80% of the dismissals that were upheld, classroom performance was not even a factor. (end of excerpt)

 

Later the LA Times reported that school district bureaucrats even have purposely sabotaged the dismissal process on behalf of a unionized teacher:

 

But it is not uncommon for districts to sabotage themselves with technical missteps. In Polanco’s case, for example, L.A. Unified administrators began firing proceedings before giving him the required 45 days’ “notice of unprofessional conduct” — one factor in the commission’s decision to overturn his firing. (end of excerpt)

 

The LA Times further reported:

 

…Meanwhile, said Kendra Wallace, principal of Daniel Webster Middle School on Los Angeles’ Westside, an ineffective teacher can instruct 125 to 260 students a year — up to 1,300 in the five years she says it often takes to remove a tenured employee. (end of excerpt)

 

And not only can bad teachers usually not be fired, but…get this… good teachers who speak out against the unions can be targeted for harassment. Reported the LA Times:

 

Cynthia Acerno was a last-minute hire at an elementary magnet school in the San Diego Unified School District, according to a summary of her case by a review commission. Though known for being strict, the district veteran had had no previous problems.

 

But “vocal, politically well-connected” parents accused her of being a “menace,” and started unfounded rumors that she was screaming at children, drinking and using drugs, the panel found. Some pulled their children from her class.

 

“The case against her was a cocktail of hearsay on hearsay with an ill-will chaser,” the panel commented in its ruling in favor of Acerno, who could not be reached for comment. “. . . Many of these scurrilous and damaging things were said in front of the children of this class by parents. This was shameful.” (end of excerpt)

 

So just imagine a leftist union structure allied with leftist parents in the community ganging up on a whistleblower teacher. That is how corrupt the system has become. And that is why the Rhode Island decision is the first step in the right direction of undoing decades of  union abuses.

 

But don’t feel sorry for the Rhode Island teachers. Half can re-apply to be rehired.

 

To read more about how difficult it is to fire public school teachers, type ‘impossible to fire public school teachers’ into your search engine. Or ‘difficult to fire teachers’ or ‘unions protect incompetent teachers’. The stories are endless.

 

Please visit my website at www.nikitas3.com for more. You can print out for free my book, Right Is Right, which explains why only conservatism can maintain our freedom and prosperity.



RSS feed

9 Comments Leave a comment

An Appropriate Question

edintexas Tuesday, March 16th at 8:20AM EST (link)

My question is why the school board members, and particularly the Superintendent of the school district, haven’t done the honorable thing and resign? The Superintendent is supposed to be supervising the schools in the District, so the utter failure of this school is at least in significant part a failure of the Superintendent. And the School Board is supposed to be supervising the Superintendent and the schools, so they also are to blame.

I have no problem with firing the alleged teachers, but all these others need to be gone also. It isn’t only the fault of the teachers.

duh...

I used a temporary email service. Tuesday, March 16th at 10:36AM EST (link)

Don’t you know… its the job of the Administrators to place blame, not take it :)

I am a fake.

 

The answer is the teachers union

Kyle-MI (Diary) Tuesday, March 16th at 10:58AM EST (link)

Sure the Superintendent and the school board share some of the blame, but what could they have done? In at least some aspects, their hands were tied by the teachers union. Because of the union, they could not fire one bad teacher. Only when it got to a crisis could they fire anyone and then they could only fire all or none. The board can be voted out and the superintendent can be fired, just never the teachers.

There are probably some good and dedicated teachers who are being fired with the rest, but I have no sympathy for them. No matter how good they were, they choose to cover for the bad ones.

I am not sure that firing all of them will make any difference. They will simply be replace with other unionized teachers indoctrinated into the same liberal teaching methods

Tenure laws are the real stumbling block and

Achance (Diary) Tuesday, March 16th at 11:10AM EST (link)

they were in place long before public employees could be unionized. Put a union contract with its grievance arbitration provisions in place over tenure and you have two bites at the apple in any action to discipline or dismiss a teacher. In many states you also have some sort of administrative review process in addition to the arbitration and the court review under the tenure law.

The real issue is that most places with fully unionized teachers are really Blue and the teachers unions own the school board, the school management, the courts, and often the city, county, and state government. The union doesn’t really have to contest management actions because management won’t act without asking the union if it is OK. Even in my very Red state the NEA owns every school board and as long as local elections are held on the first Tuesday after the second Monday after the third full moon when Venus is in Aquarius and the only people who even know there is an election going on are public employees and people with their hooves in the trough, unions will own local governments and school districts.

In Vino Veritas

 
 
 

Katrina rule applies here.

acat (Diary) Tuesday, March 16th at 9:58AM EST (link)

What “Katrina rule”? The one that I just made up that says that the best way, perhaps the only way to fix public schools is to start by “destroying” them.

After Katrina and the levee system failure wiped out New Orleans schools, the replacement system, featuring a big percentage of charter and parochial schools, as well as an administrative structure unencumbered by decades of union stooges, is actually teaching the children well, based on before-and-after test scores. Evidence nobody can ignore.

I am very happy to see Central Falls has been paying attention.

Mew

——
self-portrait

“All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost”. –Tolkein

 

I'm excited to see the turn around.

dvdmsr (Diary) Tuesday, March 16th at 10:15AM EST (link)

Finally the barrier to these kid’s educational achievement has been lifted, hala lu ya!

Although, I have to wonder why any of those teachers are eligible for rehire. Why would the district want to rehire those teachers if this is truly about competence?

Personal Responsibility Conservative

 

I'm a teacher in a private school, but...

Merrie16 Tuesday, March 16th at 11:06AM EST (link)

I think your comment about “…school teachers are no more valuable than welders or insurance salesmen or waitresses”shows exactly how little respect teachers are shown, public or otherwise. I understand that these teachers were in a union, which are generally disreputable, were working in low performing schools, etc, but the administration was obviously lax in their duties of performing observations/evaluations, perhaps giving mentors to new teachers, etc. I am evaulated several times a year by two administrators and the head of my department. Every weakenss/strength is discussed and, if needed, improvements are expected. If not, teachers are fired. We are also sent to conferences and workshops to improve our teaching and garner ideas, paid for by the school. Money is a factor in improving the quality of teaching and available resources.

Concerning the comment about N.O. – a lot of money was poured into New Orleans after Katrina, giving schools the opportunity to improve their resources.

Anyway, I agree with a lot of what you have said, but you still are obviously ignorant of what a difficult job teachers have to do, the impact we have on the lives of our students, and how it’s hard to believe that all 88 of these teachers were bad teachers, deserving of losing their jobs.

No, merrie16, teachers are NOT worth any more

Achance (Diary) Tuesday, March 16th at 11:28AM EST (link)

than any other trade or profession that requires the same term of instruction, and most are worth considerably less than those that have much more rigor in the instruction than does education. There is no original or creative endeaver really required, though I’ll admit that some bring it, and basically a teacher is a government employee paid to deliver a government developed and approved curriculum in the manner that the government dictates that it will be delivered in the same manner that the welder assembles the parts in the order and manner dictated by the plans – and the welder is evaluated solely on the quality of the welds he produces while teachers claim that they should not or cannot be evaluated on the outcome of their teaching.

There is pretty much zero academic rigor in Ed Schools; if you go and pay you get your degree. If you do your student teaching and your probationary period and the administration “likes” you, as much a comment on personality and ideology as on teaching effectiveness, you become tenured and are employed for life so long as you vote Democrat; they will fire you for being a conservative/Republican.

And as to the in loco parentis duties imposed on teachers these days, the Ed Schools and the educational management establishment, with some help from poverty pimps and trial lawyers, have brought it on themselves; they have eliminated all discipline and behavior standards in the name of celebrating diversity and then wonder why children act like wild animals at school.

Words are being used sloppily here; I don’t think any of these teachers were “fired” as that term means dismissed for cause. I think the entire staff was removed under provisions of NCLB and most if not all retain their credential and have re-employment rights elsewhere in the district or state. I think the purpose of the provision is not dismissal for cause or for incompetence but rather to break up an non-performing culture and work environoment.

In Vino Veritas

 
 

The comparison made

Merrie16 Wednesday, March 17th at 11:23AM EST (link)

was not to professions the had the same term of instruction. Nikitas3 compared teachers to waitresses. You all are perfect examples of how little respect teachers have. I have two degrees, one in Secondary Education and one in Spanish. My Spanish degree did not ensure that I could teach the language. I also had to pass an oral proficiency exam, a written exam on culture, geography, grammar and an exam on teaching philosphy and classroom practices in addition to my hours of observation of classroom teachers before my student teaching for a semester. In order to maintain my certification, every 3 years I am required to prove I have a certain amout of educational/professional coursework completed. I am observed randomly every quarter of the school year. Not to mention all that I am required to do to maintain curriculum guides for my subject and the work I do for the school to maintain SACS accreditation.
The head of my department and his wife have a combined teaching experience of almost 50 years. We have a teacher from Notre Dame in a program to get her masters and is an excellent new teacher. This is a private school, and I assure you that more was required of me in the public school and I do not teach a subject that is on any of the state tests. So, teachers who teach English, Math, Science and History have a harder time and are held accountable with test scores. I have taken issue with the way American History is being taught in some schools, but there are a variety of books available to schools, and it is the department of a school that determines what book to buy. If the community has an issue with the way their tax dollars are being spent on books, get involved and complain.
In the 5 years I have been teaching, out of the hundreds of teachers I’ve worked with, 3 teachers in my memory were so bad that they deserved to be fired. In most cases, incompetent school boards and administrations are the main problem. Yet, it is the teachers who get the boot. Certain areas and schools are worse than others.
It is a gross injustice to lump all teachers in with low performing teachers/administrations. No blame is given to parents, either. Teaching is a difficult, and more often than not, thankless job. Maybe if more community support/input for schools existed from people who seem to like to complain rather than be active, there would be improvements where needed.