Simple Solutions for Health Care


President Obama is planning more government control over health care which simply will shift wealth to his friends in the health-care unions – like nurses, who are the equivalent of unionized public school teachers – and power and money to the government bureaucracy.

 

Americans think that health care is some giant mystery that cannot be solved. But the rational person sees the problem quite plainly: Health care costs too much for three simple reasons:

 

First, every single action in health care is undertaken with one thought in the doctor’s mind: Is a lawyer going to sue me? Thus the cost of health care is increased dramatically right at the start by this fear alone. Every doctor, nurse and other health-care professional doubles or triples up on many treatments, surgeries and procedures to cover their tracks in the event of a legal challenge.

 

My mother once had to be transported to the emergency room from the doctor’s office because she was not feeling well. The buildings were connected by a walkway. The doctor called an ambulance because he did not want to be legally liable if something happened to her. The ambulance cost $500 for a one-minute ride. This happens every minute of every day in health care.

 

And who are these trial lawyers?

 

They are all left-wing socialists who vote strictly Democrat and give all their political contributions to the Democrat party. Go look it up. And Democrats are fighting legal reform in every way possible to protect their lawyer friends. Go look that up too.

 

These lawyers are driving thousands of doctors out of business (one-third of all Las Vegas physicians had been sued as of 2002) and are putting the entire health-care system under extreme duress. Malpractice insurance costs to cover doctors in the case of legal challenges are driving up the cost of care drastically – costs paid by the consumer – and are driving doctors away from medicine. Meanwhile, the liberal media talk endlessly about the health-care system being in crisis, which it is… at the hands of Democrats.

 

The state of Mississippi instituted legal reform and the cost of medical care was substantially contained. But liberals do not want cost-effective health care. They want health care to be expensive so that they can nationalize it and control it. That is why they fight legal reform at every turn.

 

Second, unionized health-care workers like nurses, who are allies of the Democrat party and who vote overwhelmingly Democrat, are demanding and getting artificially high wages, pushing up costs substantially and putting a big strain on every single person who pays for health care. Nurses work hard and deserve good pay, but unionization is raising the costs excessively.

 

As is the case with all unions like the auto workers, these nurses are benefiting while the public pays their higher wages through higher costs. Nurses then give their campaign contributions overwhelmingly to the Democrats. And thus the liberal media never expose them for their greed. Other unionized health-care professionals offer the same story.

 

Most nurses are classic union Democrats. They complain about their jobs all the time, and go on strike constantly. Yet nobody forced them to go into nursing. The reason they complain is because they get more money that way and the Democrats help them to get it.

 

My mother once told me that she had three visits from the Visiting Nurses Association, that the nurses did hardly anything except take her blood pressure, and that her insurance was charged $600 per visit. This must stop.

 

Third, elderly people are living longer and longer lives and are consuming hugely disproportionate amounts of health care. Elderly people simply have to stop running to the doctor every five minutes. The elderly must realize that we have the best medical care and longest lifespans in history, and that we cannot live forever.

 

They must be thankful for their long lives and must expect prudent care, but there must be a new attitude toward aging and dying, that the elderly cannot go out kicking and screaming. The nation simply cannot afford it. Said Socrates: “I am told that one should make one’s end in a reverent silence.”

 

At the same time, we must utterly reject the liberal “solution” of assisted suicide and euthanasia.

 

But many elderly today are card-carrying liberals who are taught through the socialist ‘entitlement mentality’ that they are owed everything. In fact, all elderly people are taught this entitlement mentality, while the media are feeding their frenzy by portraying old people as helpless victims who cannot get every last ounce of care. This pushes the elderly into a more irrational and selfish mindset (i.e., they become even more socialist).

 

Here’s an example. And everyone has a story like this. Last winter my aunt hit her Life Alert button and was taken to the emergency room by ambulance. The reason? She had a sore foot.

Anyone who contradicts the idea of limitless care for the elderly is called cold and cruel by the Democrats who are bankrupting our system.

 

So call me cold and cruel. Because I am right.

 

Many elderly people think they can somehow live forever if they just have more and more treatment. They cannot. And this idea is making health care unaffordable for younger people who need access to health care just to stay well and productive.

 

These steps sounds too simple to be true. But like all conservative ideas, they would fix things easily. The only problem is the Democrat party and its greed and obstructionism.

 

All Americans could easily be covered for their health insurance needs if costs were lowered this way.

 

Please visit my website at www.nikitas3.com for more. You can print out for free my book, Right Is Right, which explains why only conservatism can maintain our freedom and prosperity.



RSS feed

6 Comments Leave a comment

Don't be sad, cause two out of three ain't bad.

Mr_Ed (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 10:00AM EST (link)

You’re right on with your first two points. The third point, however, is a non-starter. While there may be some truth, rationing care to the elderly — or even merely expecting them to voluntarily reduce their care is:

1) not appropriate
2) not realistic
3) explosive to the point that single payer proponents and the government controlled media will latch on to this argument, providing a needless distraction to debating other substantive and more appropriate solutions.

Mr. Ed
Straight from the Horse’s Mouth

Props for the Meat Loaf reference

Finrod (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 11:01AM EST (link)

There’s a middle ground on the third point that can be reached– require copayments that increase by usage. This will penalize the types that think that stubbed toes require hospital visits, without affecting those that only go to the hospital when they need to.

Let’s get down to brass tacks here. How much for the ape?

 
 

Nikitas3, I can't believe you think that, I am appalled!

penguin2 (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 11:03AM EST (link)

I’ll not debate you on number 1and 2, even though I am a non-union nurse. But your your statements about the elderly and their, care are beyond the pale.

As a matter of fact, I have been a Home Health nurse for many years, most of my patients were the “elderly”. Where do you draw the line? Age 60, 70, 80 for joint replacements, cardiac surgeries, cancer treatments? My in-laws are healthy 80 year olds, Yet my mother-in-law had to have quadruple bypass 20yrs ago. She didn’t work outside the home, so are we going to cut off the non-economic producer? The disabled, through no fault of their own at 40 or 50? What about the developmentally disabled, they often are a lifetime of economic and emotional burden to their families and on society. You sound like the former Gov. Dick Lamm of Colorado, who said almost the exact same thing about the elderly, they should get out of the way.

The moment we start playing God, in choosing who lives and who dies, we are no different from Hitler. He started with the infirm and elderly, progressed rapidly to political opponents and Jews. Lest we forget, not only did six million Jews die in the Holocaust, it is estimated another six million gypsies, Christians, political prisoners, etc. also were put to death.

With your thinking, we start with abortion, move onto the developmentally disabled, God help one if injured in their young years and they become dependent upon the state for care, then move to the middle-aged, and your “elderly.” Are we going to use chronological years or other “year” measurements?

What an incredible slippery slope you would have us on; you essentially will have us on a “cap and trade” for health care.

Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. – Benjamin Franklin
When Good stands up to Evil, Evil blinks. – Vassar Bushmills

Conservative Education: Suggested Reading List

Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 

Don't forget the 3rd party payer problem

Kyle-MI (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 11:08AM EST (link)

There is no freedom to shop around for health care providers who meet your needs at a cost you are willing to pay. It is all controlled by your employer who has different priorities. This leads to dissatisfaction with health care and pressure to create (state and federal) government mandates that force policies to pay to options that people don’t necessarily want.

 

Sorry for the typos, obviously in strong reaction mode. (nt)

penguin2 (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 11:09AM EST (link)

Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. – Benjamin Franklin
When Good stands up to Evil, Evil blinks. – Vassar Bushmills

Conservative Education: Suggested Reading List

Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 

The first point is correct, the second depends on the state and the third doesn't work in real life

Richard Mullins (Diary) Friday, June 19th at 11:11AM EST (link)

While some nurses are unionized, that usaly applies to states that are not right to work. Most of the hospital systems that I know are not unionized( Baptist Health system in San Antonio{Vangard Health} where my dad work as a Medical Technologist is not unionized).

Richard Phillip Mullins BlogThe Squash Satire SiteNews on Happy Jet Airlines
Rmullins Pics
Rpmullins Twitter

Joe Biden is like a Decrepit Park owner with a Meth lab that happens to not only be a dealer but a user.

Let’s Bankrupt the Democratic paty. Make spend all the money to defend thier candidates.