On The “Birthers”


For their end cannot come soon enough.

Many of us get into politics for similar and yet far different reasons. Some just want to impact their local community. Others have more devious and self-serving motives. For me, it was being a young boy and reading about ordinary men doing extraordinary things.

But those who stay around long enough learn one common truth: at its core, politics is all about the art of the sale. There are many who actually go around and kick the tires, but the election of Barack Obama last year proved this one truth: most people don’t care about what you are selling, but rather about who is selling it. Ask the average person what Obama ran on, and you will get a blank stare. Ask the average person how they feel or felt about Obama, and they felt good. They weren’t necessarily buying Obama’s ideas, but they were buying the man himself.

In essence, you are selling one key item (yourself), and hoping as an added bonus that the consumer will buy other products (your ideas) as well.

We are reaching a time and place where Obama’s ideas are losing credibility. People see that the stimulus, rushed and rammed through Congress, is an abject failure. People are seeing that the idea of the cap-and-tax bill will prove to be a failure as well. And we see Obamacare slowly withering on the vine, and Obama desperate to ram this bill through like everything else. Several members of Congress are facing the unwelcoming prospect of coming back home in August with an irate public asking them questions that they don’t want to answer. In short, despite the media’s outcry that Republicans are dead, if nothing else, we are selling the public on the fact that Obama’s ideas are a bad direction for the country.

Which brings me to the Birthers.

Granted, when Obama first came on the scene, this story might have deserved due diligence. After all, we have not had a president whom had a foreign parent since the founding of the nation. The tires needed to be kicked. But, a year or two later, the question has been answered. The president, like it or not, has provided the credentials to prove that he is a native citizen. Let it go.

Why? Let’s analyze the situation.

You have essentially two routes to go to force Obama to provide the birth certificate that he has already provided: Congress or the courts. For it to move through Congress will essentially require a two-thirds majority vote. Considering that we don’t have a simple majority, it’s unlikely we can pursue that route.

So, let’s go to the courts. You have to convince a district court, the inevitable appeals court, and finally the Supreme Court, that you have a case and that Obama needs to prove (again) that he is a native American.

But let’s say that you somehow get that to happen. You then have to hope Obama doesn’t have the ability to prove his birth.

In analysis and theory, you have to hit the political equivalent of a pitcher who plays outfield on his non-pitching days playing a morning game at Yankees Stadium where he plays for the 2,632nd game in a row and hits for the 57th consecutive game, while simultaneously pitching a perfect game and also hitting five home runs…then going down to Jersey for a afternoon game of football where he rushes for 350 yards, passes for 550 yards, and kicks 8 field goals, then rushes back up to the Garden for a mid-evening game of Knicks basketball where he scores 101 points, and then topping off the evening by fighting at the Garden and knocking out the rejuvenated (just for kicks) Muhammed Ali, who happens to have the reincarnated Jack Dempsey in his corner.

So, we’ve established that you have to be the miracle king to pull this off. What are the risks if you don’t succeed?

Well, for starters, not only do you look like fools, but you also make out conservatives and libertarians in general to look like fools. You additionally pull down some well-meaning politicians who don’t want to say anything substantive one way or the other and run the risk of offending you or someone else. You make the top story be about something crazy and that doesn’t affect one item of legislation, rather than about a bevy of bills that could sink the Republic.

And, you end up looking like nativists and racists through the prism of those who would use anything we do for political gain—the last thing we need when we are trying to diversify our membership and win in a country that is increasingly becoming more ethnically diverse. Granted, you may not be a racist, but once again, politics is all about the art of the sale. Perception is everything, and belaboring this issue on the first president who doesn’t happen to be a white male Christian when we already have a (wrongly-deserved) image problem with minorities kind of makes it easy for our opponents to sell that issue.

Not to mention that pretty much everything that can be done has been done to prove Obama’s citizenship.

We are winning the battle, folks. As much as Olbermann and Maddow and Markos try to convince us and the people otherwise, we are proving that Obama doesn’t have what it takes for the job.

But we need to avoid the pitfalls that could be our undoing. And this is one of them. When Lou Dobbs gets debunked on his own show, by his own fill-in who (presumably) was hand-picked by Lou Dobbs, it’s time to admit that you have lost the battle. You fought well, but the facts are not on your side.

So, please—from one conservative/libertarian to another—accept the facts and pull out, before you cause more harm and cause our side to lose the sale.


A Veteran Takes Down Obamacare


The ball's in your court, Claire Bear.

U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill held a town hall meeting in St. Louis.  This was promoted by Americans for Prosperity in order for Claire to hear the voices of the people, and counter-promoted by Daily Kos as a way to support Claire.

In one minute and 42 seconds, though, a local veteran gave one of the best reasons to vote against Obamacare.

Extraordinarily well said, and it makes me proud to know that I served alongside such fine individuals.


“All Your Honors Are Belong To Obama”, Vol. 8,946: St. Louis Edition


Hey, remember that great war that President Barack Obama led and won?  What about that great economy?  Oh, and that bill he got Congress to pass, with those reforms?

Oh, wait, none of that has happened?  Obama hasn’t even been sworn in yet?  No, you have to be wrong.  Otherwise, the St. Louis Board of Aldermen would look silly for naming their most major street in his honor!

Back to reality.  St. Louis, after a long struggle, has decided to honor the 44th President-elect by ‘honorarily’ designating the Delmar Loop as Barack Obama Boulevard.  A city that has approximately two or three items in their “Honoring the Presidents” series has decided to give a huge honor to a man who might end up being the worst president in history, other than obviously George W. Bush.

Usually, I say I’m proud to be from Missouri, that I’m proud to be from the Show-Me State, and that’s it.  Thank God that today, though, I can proudly say that St. Louis is not the part of Missouri I’m from, and that where I’m from, if you want me to honor you, you still have to show me.


Election Tips From the Show-Me State


How to win even with the odds against you

Promoted from the diaries by Erick.

DISCLAIMER: I work as the legislative assistant for state representative Mark A. Parkinson of Missouri’s 16th House district (part of St. Charles County), and volunteered without pay for his campaign on quite a few occasions. The views and suggestions below do not necessarily reflect the views or suggestions of Rep. Parkinson.

Over the past year or so, I’ve had the pleasure to work in an official capacity with Mark Parkinson of St. Charles, Missouri, and to volunteer in a campaign capacity. What I observed (which is the same as I’ve observed in most successful campaigns) should serve as a guidepost for those wishing to run for office at the state or local level.

Read More →


“Liberal bias [in journalism] is not a bad thing”


So sayeth a journalism professor at the University of Missouri

For the longest time, we’ve lived with the notion that journalists should be unbiased-that the reporter should practice his or her craft with an unfiltered lens so as to allow people to make their own choices.

Thank goodness we can let go of that stupid principle:

So the so-called “liberal bias” is not a myth, after all. No news there. The news is that this is a very good thing for society.

So says George Kennedy, a professor emeritus of the journalism school at my current institution of higher learning, the University of Missouri.

Read More →


And Now For Something Completely Different…


Maybe Obama's plan for dealing with Iran will work!

Just something off the beaten path, but a friend sent this to me on Facebook and I laughed so hard I cried.


Weeping For Our Future


When Children Can Leave You Speechless

As I was mowing my yard this morning, a couple of the neighborhood boys came by and said hello. Cute, innocent, 9 & 7 years of age. As I told them about my time in the Navy, they were enthralled, and at the same time, upset. They then proceeded to tell me why not only the Iraq war is wrong, but all war is wrong. Before they left, the little 7-year old emphatically said he would never join the military, because he didn’t want to get killed.

Pondering this, I started to wonder what the future of this country has in store if this is what we are turning out.

Read More →