Comments on: Carly Fiorina: Supporting a free Internet means supporting child rape?

By: audax

audax — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:26:06 +0000

Some thoughts in an email about avoiding the slippery slope ala Newt

Dear Senator Coburn,

I have always been an admirer of your service both as a doctor and in Congress, your honor in keeping your term limit pledge in the House, your support of fiscal discipline in the House and Senate, your respect for human life. BUT, I must ask if your are willing to throw away all of the goodwill you have generated among the voters of Oklahoma and contributors from other States by endorsing Carly Fiorina (possible RINO after seeing who is endorsing her, by these shall ye know her) over Chuck Devore (a true RED State conservative) BEFORE the primary election in California. Let the people of California decide in the primary election first.

Newt has gone from a hero of the American Conservative movement, ranking just under Ronaldo Magnus to pariah in one short year after his support of the global warming baloney, DeDe Scarrafazzo, etc. I hope you are not Scarrafazzo’d over this. Seeing your good name lumped in with all those Republican RINO’s endorsing Fiorina is sickening AND not good for your excellant (until today) reputation.

NOW is the time to revoke your support of this Fiorina endorsement, apologize and get it behind you! Tell everyone you will wait until the voters in California decide BEFORE you make an endorsement. AND PLEASE, whatever you do stay out of the Florida senate primary until the voters have decided wether they prefer that Rino Crist over Rubio! That would be too much even after all the good you have done in the past.

Best Regards
Gregory L. Wilson
Reagan Delegate (MI) 1976 Kansas City MO
Member Club for Growth

By: Dave

Dave — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:11:18 +0000

And it’s rapidly coming off without a hitch, too, as most of the sheeple have their attention elsewhere.

Sad.

-Dave

By: Richard Mullins

Richard Mullins — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:59:11 +0000

regulating a major voice of freedom for Americans. This is part of a well worked out plan.

By: Dave

Dave — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:57:05 +0000

…to protect “the children.”

Like anything else, once the feds get their claws into the Internet, they will never, EVER be removed.

-Dave

By: JoeG

JoeG — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:33:14 +0000

The only hit on Google is back to your post.

Time to go viral.

By: JoeG

JoeG — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:30:42 +0000

I love, totally awesome.

By: aesthete

aesthete — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:12:58 +0000

Amen! Whatever happened to the (apparently archaic) idea that parents should friggin’ raise their kids?

By: Finrod

Finrod — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:43:30 +0000

Pretty much everyone who wants to slap their favorite restrictions on the Internet says the want to do it ‘for the children’. I propose a Mrs. Broflovski’s Law (from South Park) for this.

The answer to children being exploited on the Internet is easy: ban children from the Internet without their parents’ consent. It takes parents to raise a child, not bloody government regulation.

By: lostinpaloalto

lostinpaloalto — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:38:14 +0000

Carly is a master of being vague. Exactly the same as when she was at HP.

BTW – a rather hillarious spoof at: http://www.karlaforsenate.com

By: lostinpaloalto

lostinpaloalto — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:38:14 +0000

Carly is a master of being vague. Exactly the same as when she was at HP.

BTW – a rather hillarious spoof at: http://www.karlaforsenate.com