Political History FAIL


Pelosi FAIL

Via RS’s sister site Human Events, it turns out that Speaker Pelosi’s office is working hard to react to yesterday’s strong, principled, and unanimous opposition to the Obama/Pelosi/Reid debt bill. The only problem is, knowledge of political history seems pretty limited in Pelosi’s circles, which is pretty bad since she was in office when the relevant events happened!

In other words, she’s wrong, and she’s not even predicting the kind of events that I think she wants to predict here.

Quoting the leaked Pelosi memo that Human Events uncovered:

This is not the first time the Republicans in the House have unanimously voted against a needed economic package. The last time, in 1993, when Democrats voted for tough action to clean up after Republican economic mess, not a single Republican voted for the legislation that produced record surpluses and a balanced budget.

Where to begin, where to begin? First of all, in the period from 1993 to 1997, government spending growth was held below 2%, and in fact went down in 1993, according to figures from the Heritage Foundation. That, combined with 4-7% growth in tax receipts annually, is what balanced the budget. The debt bill rejected by Republicans yesterday increases spending by unimaginable amounts, figures beyond any ordinary American’s reckoning.

Secondly, the deficit dropped by 22% and 21% in 1994 and 1995, the two years of spending controlled by Democrats in the Congress and President Clinton. Deficit reduction only accelerated when Republicans took over. The deficit went down by 36% and 80% in 1996 and 1997, and then finally we endured a surplus of taxation in 1998. Republicans got the job done, not Democrats. The difference? We cut some taxes and we truly held the line on spending. No midnight basketball. No multi-billion dollar giveaways.

Thirdly, what happened after President Clinton’s tax hike that we opposed? Did the American people side with us, or with Democrats? If Speaker Pelosi wants a re-run of 1994, I’m all for it. So let’s keep up the fight, House Republicans!


RSS feed

4 Comments Leave a comment

Too bad we don't have...

fmaidment (Diary) Thursday, January 29th at 5:56PM EST (link)

…another Newt to give us a second Contract with America.

Maybe we should start suggesting a new Contract.

Hey, I know what my next diary is going to be…

Follow Me on Twitter

“I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.”
– - Thomas Jefferson, to Archibald Stuart, 1791

 

A return to the basic principles

Adjoran (Diary) Friday, January 30th at 3:46AM EST (link)

is what is needed.

Limited government is only possible through tax rate reduction and spending restraint. Republicans have been fairly faithful to the principle of tax cuts, but failed miserably on spending when we held the helm.

Cutting Democratic spending initiatives by 10% will never stem the explosive growth of government. Republicans may be able to turn Democrats’ excesses to their benefit but if, upon their return to power, they once again merely use the majority as a cookie jar for their cronies instead of the Democrats’, they will have forfeited their traditional advantage in fiscal policy.

And this has to do with my post HOW? (nt)

Neil Stevens (Diary) Friday, January 30th at 9:40AM EST (link)

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

 
 

Madam Speaker

theBlur (Diary) Friday, January 30th at 11:50AM EST (link)

Might also be reminded that that bill just barely passed, 218-216 in a House nearly as evenly divided then as it is today, and that Al Goracle had to come in to cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate (also nearly the same division as today). The smart Dems back then knew that the bill was bad, and as Neil points out, the results in the ’94 midterms proved them right.