the UN and their FRAUD with the supposed “pandemic” with regards to swine flu and the money that was given because of their LIES and in the article it brought up Climategate…..I will look around and see if I can locate the link but the beauty is that the LIARS are about to be OUTED and these SCHEMES will most HOPEFULLY DIE A PAINFUL DEATH!

I would say I feel your pain .. but I have found it quite useful in the condensation & prestation of info, no?

great link, Moe, thanks.

Computer Science (minor in Communication), Regis University (4 classes to go…)

Fear the geek who can communicate…

Now that is a post like none other. Just the thought of this being updated by a “fly on the wall” gives me hope that I can believe in.

Came out in emails, US was among those making grants to Phil Jones unit. UK Telegraph, 12/5/09, by Robert Mendick, “Climategate professor Phil Jones awarded 13m pounds in research grants.” No need for special degree to weigh in on climate. The BBC describes Pachauri as the UN’s chief climate scientist, but the guy has no training on the subject. His advanced degrees are in economics and industrial engineering (he’s a locomotive expert).

Climategate emails April, 2002. Pachauri was choice of “most conservative” of the fossil fuel industry. via EUReferendum

This guy, Dr Mann had a pretty snotty amateurish letter to the editor in the Wall Street Journal the other day. Wonder if Penn State is going to go after him. Be nice to see this crook loose it all.

http://algorelied.com/?p=3464

From Science Daily (orig. in Geophysical Research), 12/31/09: No more CO2 in atmosphere than in 1850. Data re-analyzed at the U of Bristol finds no change in % of CO2 in air in century and 1/2 and no increase in recent decades.

Those scientists sure seem to be more interested in publicity than actually spending time investigating and coming up with better climate models. I am not a climatologist, so I can’t say I know much about global warming. But one doesn’t need to be a climatologist to see how much those AGW evangelists are into politics and public image over serious science. It’s sad how those researchers act no differently than rabid mindless drones that believe everything on the mainstream media.

Having worked as a manager in medical research funding for years, it cracks me up that we let these shysters get away with shouting down everyone who questioned them and their solutions with the slogan “settled science.” It is unbeleivable that they got away with stacking their peer review with like minded political radicals!

Real researchers do not act like this. They do not fret over disagreement and they surely do not shout down those with conflicting research as they see it as progress in science. This new attitude of nasty, attacking scientist is new to the American research culture. Science is now political which means it is as good as the science of the former Soviet Union. We need to get the radical left out of a position of driving science and harming politically incorrect peers.
Science and politics do not mix!

Or some such anecdotal nonsense, with this morning’s freezing temperatures in central Florida clearly and conclusively proving, beyond any further debate, that man-made global cooling is taking place and MUST BE STOPPED.

of my degree from Penn State.

’til then it stays hidden in the box.