…presumably Napoleon lacked the charisma and charm of The One.

Now what’s next after this? Really, I want to know so I can find how big a fraud it is.

turning a supertanker. The wheel has been turned but now we’re waiting for the ship to respond. Copenhagen has nothing to do with man induced climate change; it has everything to do with the rationalization of global governance. The President has changed the timing of his visit to prop up his argument to the collapse of the entire argument. I read it’s been about two weeks since the hacked emails exposed this global hoax, but not one major alphabet News outlet has mentioned the story. Hmmmmm, not too hard to figure out. It matters not how much finagling they do to message the numbers, the cats out of the bag.

that a cap and trade law would cost American taxpayers up to $200 billion a year, the equivalent of hiking personal income taxes by about 15 percent.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/09/15/taking_liberties/entry5314040.shtml

—

So his administrations own economic data is against him, now the “science” has crumbled from beneath him. And he’s going to show up in Copenhagen and say what?

Al Gore actually knew AGW was a fraud and went forward selling it anyway? Or do you think Al Gore was scammed himself?

I know Obama knows AGW is a fraud but he will push forward anyway because he thinks enough people are idiots to follow him off a cliff.

If Obama perpertrates this fraud on the American people than I feel that could be grounds for impeachment.

This thing is developing very rapidly:

“The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change admitted yesterday that it needed to consider the full implications of the e-mails and whether they cast doubt on any of the evidence for man-made global warming.”

ABRUPTLY changed the date of his visit .. on a Friday.

Don’t tell me the Presdient of the World wasn’t privvy to this information – released THE SAME DAY he moved his visit some ** 9 days **.

That’s a huge shift in his schedule. Enough to allow for further developments, other countries to bail and this story to run its course.

And, of course, worse-case scenario — this “abrupt” change may be a set-up for another abrupt departure — maybe due to conflicting schedules due to some other Secretary’s screw-up.

Bad news is always conveniently delivered on a Friday, too — if he doesn’t show, there’s the weekend for a no-show to blow over.

The press will shrug his no-show over the weekend and it will be politics as usual come Monday.

I wonder what new media distraction will be brewing for the lead-up that week..

Maybe Geithner will finally be shoved under the bus.

In Praise of CO2: ‘Earth is the Greenest its been in Decades, Perhaps in Centuries’

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/blogwatch/praise_of_co2.pdf

‘The increase of CO2 is not a cause for alarm and will be good for mankind’ :
Washington, DC — Award-winning Princeton University Physicist Dr. Will Happer declared man-made global warming fears “mistaken” and noted that the Earth was currently in a “CO2 famine now.”

Obama Ignores ‘Climate-Gate’ in Revising Copenhagen Plans

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/05/obama-s-shift-copenhagen-visit-defies-climate-gate-controversy/

The controversy swirling around the leaked e-mails of climate scientists apparently trying to downplay data and exclude dissenting opinions has led to calls for President Obama to skip this month’s climate summit in Denmark until the e-mails can be investigated.

Instead, the White House announced Friday that Obama was doubling down on his commitment to the summit’s goals and moving his visit later in the month, hoping it will secure a “meaningful” agreement.

The White House is shrugging off the Climate-gate e-mails.

“I think there’s no real scientific basis for the dispute of (global warming),” White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said this week.

And Obama’s top science adviser, John Holdren, downplayed the e-mails Friday, telling Congress that the controversy involves a small group of scientists and how they have interpreted and shared global warming data.

The president’s climate czar, former Environmental Protection Agency administrator Carol Browner, said she’s sticking with scientists who believe in man’s impact on global warming.

The DING DONG is being led around by commies, mutants & flim-flam men….
This will end in a horrible train wreck for Obama – And for that I am grateful.

so close to causing massive misery, taxes, and hardship for untold millions, only to have the pure joys of disaster and decline snatched away at almost the very last minute.
The sense of loss most be almost unbearable for the dears.
But at this very moment these tireless fighters in the war against humanity are I’m sure regrouping, planning new methods of universal pain and catastrophe, new ways to subjugate and harm people they despise but don’t and can’t ever know.

But then they haven’t quite given up on this lie either.
This is what it means to be a Progressive.

Arnold Schwarzenegger unveils dramatic climate change map which shows flooded San Francisco of the future

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1232884/Arnold-Schwarzenegger-unveils-dramatic-climate-change-map-shows-flooded-San-Francisco-future.html#ixzz0YqNe7hUt

In this respect I hope Global Warming is real. At least we could get rid of much of San Francisco….LOL

Our dear reader will go to Hope-N-Haaaagen and just lie?

how is it possible to review the results when the original raw data is unavailable? I am missing something here? Or was there statement that they destroyed the raw data during a move a lie as well?

Everybody keeps talking about the ‘hacked” e-mails. The programmers notes are far more telling. They indicate a level of malfeasance in the handling of data and the the following of best practices in the analysis of the raw data. Their is no way to salvage this data now. What we need is, How do you say it? A complete reset on the research.

I am all for conservation. I think that it is important that we leave something in the Middle East for for our enemies to eat when we transition away from oil for our transportation uses. We need more nuclear and we need to transition to natural gas in the transportation fleet until such day as other forms of energy are viable for that purpose.

WE need to pursue new technologies to make coal cleaner. We we do not need to do is to commit economic suicide by adopting a massive tax that transfers wealth and sovereignty to the UNwhich is the real agenda of the IPCC and the wacked out communists leading the “Green” movment. . The destruction of western western civilization will create far more problems than it would solve.

“Not One Red Dime for the NRSC or NRCC till they stop trying to elect liberals”

Join the RedState Strike Force

In the near-term, climate research that requires global-temperature datasets will produce questionable, unverifiable results until all of the datasets are reconstructed and independently validated.

The Science and Public Policy Institute, in compiling its global-temperature graphs for the authoritative Monthly CO2 Reports, had originally relied upon all four of the major datasets.

We were compelled to drop the NASA GISS/NOAA NCDC dataset when it became apparent that the data from more than half a century ago were being deliberately manipulated in an improper manner with the manifest intention of artificially inflating the true rate of observed warming in the 20th century.

We must now also cease to use the Hadley/CRU dataset, which – on the evidence made public by the courageous whistleblower at the University of East Anglia – is little better than science fiction.

In future, therefore, the SPPI monthly surface-temperature graphs will exclude the two terrestrial-temperature datasets altogether and will rely solely upon the RSS and UAH satellite datasets.

We shall also in future carry a warning that since these two datasets were originally calibrated against the surface datasets they may contain a substantial – though inadvertent and not readily quantifiable – inbuilt warming bias.

Three years to complete the analysis and reconstruction? That seems overly optimistic in my estimation.

The script is so unbelievable.Does anyone truely think for one minute that CRU would let data such as this just be erased? When these “scientist” put their alledged data together? And then if they really believed in the maneur their shoveling? I would think several copies of their proof would be kept. on hand THEY DON’t HAVE PROOF BECAUSE THEY NEVER DID! NOT BECAUSE THEY LOST IT. And according to them , there’s no time to waste.So how now do they figure there’s enough time for a reset?

he-representing the evul oil companies, she rooting for the evul, incompetent, communist tree-hugger scientist.

“Not One Red Dime for the NRSC or NRCC till they stop trying to elect liberals”

Join the RedState Strike Force

he-representing the evul oil companies, she rooting for the evul, incompetent computer code writing, communist tree-hugger scientist.

“Not One Red Dime for the NRSC or NRCC till they stop trying to elect liberals”

Join the RedState Strike Force

Came across this gem:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/browse_thread/thread/68e1f0664cfb43e2

The AGW Virus

The AGW Anthropogenic Global Warming or Human Induced Climate Change
virus was first isolated in a lab at the Climate Research Unit of the
University of East Anglia.

Virus Signature:
The AGW virus can be recognized by the following signature
-
valadj=[0.,0.,0.,0.,0.,-0.1,-0.25,-0.3,0.,-0.1,0.3,0.8,1.2,1.7,2.5,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6]*0.75
; fudge factor
yearlyadj=interpol(valadj,yrloc,x)
densall=densall+yearlyadj
-

Detection:
The external effect of the virus is visible as a tendency of graphed
data to dip in the middle and then rise sharply at the end for no
apparent reason.

Pathology:
The AGW virus and been found to infect both IDL computer programs and
research papers. Attempts to stop the spread of the virus using peer
review and analysis have been unable to contain the spread of the
infection. In severe cases the virus has been seen to affect the
central nervous system in humans although no direct link to the rabies
virus has been demonstrated.

Patient Zero:
It currently appears that patient zero was an IDL program known as
“FOI2009/FOIA/documents/harris-tree/briffa_sep98_e.pro”. It is not
known at this time what other artifacts may have been contaminated by
the virus.

Preventing the spread of AGW:
Although appearing asymptomatic, papers can become infected on sight.
Papers that have cited an infected paper should be treated as infected.
Prudence in this regard is highly recommended.

If you detect the virus has infected one of your papers you should
place the paper in a suitable quarantined environment. The peat bogs of
northern England and Scotland will provide sufficient protection to the
environment if the hole is at least 1.47 meters deep.

If you have any software that is infected with the AGW virus the proper
procedure for disposal is to maintain an alternating 1 Tesla field in
the immediate vicinity of the infection for not less then 2 hours, 4
hours is recommended.

Help prevent the spread of the AGW virus, please model responsibly.

Exposes ‘Fudge Factor’ in ClimateGate Global Warming Computer Programming Code

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/12/05/bbc-exposes-fudge-factor-climategate-global-warming-computer-programming-