I have some suggestions for the New York Times. When you provide stories like this:
Federal agents on Wednesday fatally shot a man they described as the leader of a violent Sunni Muslim separatist group in Detroit.
The 53-year-old man, Luqman Ameen Abdullah, was killed in one of three raids conducted in and around the city, in which six followers of his were taken into custody.
…there are things that you need to mention.
- If the group that this guy was affiliated with is “a group of mostly African-American converts to Islam, which seeks to establish a separate Sharia-law governed state within the United States,” we need to know that. A story about domestic terrorists is a different story than one about foreign terrorists. It just is.
- Likewise, if Luqman Ameen Abdullah – the leader who got shot – was born with the name “Christopher Thomas,” we need to know that.
- And finally: if the guy is saying things like “Obama is a Kafir. McCain, all the rest of them Kuffars, are Kuffars,” we need to know that. Especially that first sentence.
Let’s be blunt: the FBI shut down a proto-cell* of radical fringe Black Muslim domestic terrorists – which is something that’s going to please everybody, with the possible exception of CAIR. And as can be seen from the links, most news organizations are capable of reporting on this in a forthright fashion… but the New York Times takes until the second-to-last paragraph to even hint at it. Which is problematical; after all, the idea here is for a newspaper to report on what happened. Not to make its readers have to go out and find out what really happened…
Moe Lane
*They were still at the ‘criminal activities to fund illegal firearms purchasing’ stage. I’m not going to pretend that I haven’t read of this particular organizational arc before.
PS: Glenn Reynolds wonders why we’re seeing more domestic counter-terrorism operations these days. At a guess, I think that we got some very good intelligence a few years ago and started up a variety of investigations. We are now rolling them up because the targets are starting to look like they’re ready to switch from rhetoric to action, now that Big, Scary Bush isn’t in the Oval Office any more…
Crossposted to Moe Lane.
KnightsofMalta
Steve Maley
Caleb Howe
The Times actually went farther than normal...
RedBeard Thursday, October 29th at 10:58AM EST (link)…by listing the man’s current alias, with the risk involved of someone actually deducing the religious affiliation thereof. Very bold of The Times, I must say.
Standard-bearer for grouchy curmudgeonry since, oh, 1975 or so.
Another possible answer to Reynold's question:
bdshepherd Thursday, October 29th at 11:29AM EST (link)Law-enforcement agencies are trying to wrap up some long-running investigations now because they are afraid of being called off if they wait.
Yeah...too bad we're rolling up our inteligence gatherin operations now...
AceInTX (Diary) Thursday, October 29th at 11:45AM EST (link)making it inevitable that one of these groups will fly underneith the radar and succeed because we don’t want to profile anyone and/or continue the excesses of the Bush era!
Kafirs...and all the like terms...
DefendUSA (Diary) Thursday, October 29th at 11:53AM EST (link)Well, click the link. The Pagad, what terrorist in South Africa are called, use it all the time. Scary stuff and to omit it just proves how in the bag for the Pied Piper those people are.
*starred thought*
To be a leader is to do the uncomfortable thing. Man up, Mr. President.
He is a prophet
JoeG Thursday, October 29th at 12:42PM EST (link)“These pigs don’t even know, their department will have a bad day when they deal with me.”
No officer likes the idea of having to kill someone when they violently resist arrest. So yes, I’m certain that more than one agent had a bad day.