(Via Atlas Shrugs) For the next time somebody tells you that Democrat/ACORN/WFP election registration fraud does not equal election fraud, feel free to point this story coming from Troy, New York, where the one led seamlessly to the other. Feel free to also point out that it doesn’t take all that much to flip some races:
Thirty-eight forged or fraudulent ballots have been thrown out — enough votes, an election official admits, to likely have tipped the city council and county elections in November to the Democrats. Candidates would have been able to run both on the Democratic and Working Families Party lines in two weeks, and that could have given the Democrats the general election.
A special prosecutor is investigating the case and criminal charges are possible. New York State Supreme Court Judge Michael Lynch ruled that there were “significant election law violations that have compromised the rights of numerous voters and the integrity of the election process.”
[Bolding mine.]
The issue in this case has to do with New York’s very vigorous multiple-party system: the more ‘lines’ a candidate can appear on, the more likely it is that he or she can win an election. WFP is particularly useful in that regard, given that it’s pretty much an appendage of the Democratic party:
Hillary Clinton garnered 2.7 percent of her total votes from the WFP line when she first ran for Senate in 2000, which increased to 5 percent of her total vote in 2006. In September, Clinton’s former campaign manager for her 2000 Senate run, New York City Councilman Bill DeBlasio, who has been endorsed by the WFP, beat two long-established politicians in the Democratic primary. Critics also accuse the Working Families Party of having a long association with the troubled activist group, ACORN. Bertha Lewis, ACORN’s CEO, is one of the party’s co-founders. The New York Times reported this month that “Patrick Gaspard, the White House political director, worked with ACORN in New York to set up the Working Families political party and sat on the party’s board with Ms. Lewis.”
The WFP has also endorsed New York Democratic Sen. Kristen Gillibrand, who was one of only seven Senators who voted against cutting federal housing funds to ACORN in September.
See here for more on the Patrick Gaspard/ACORN/WFP connection; and see here for Sen. Gillibrand’s boosting of the WFP (prior to all of this coming out, of course). The bottom line? In New York, WFP is ACORN is the Democratic Party – and stories like this show that the enthusiasm with which all three local sub-groups break the law is only matched by the enthusiasm that all three sub-groups show in blaming somebody else when they get caught doing it.
Moe Lane
Crossposted to Moe Lane.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
Just like in math class
Deskpilot (Diary) Tuesday, October 20th at 7:02PM EST (link)1+1+1=3
A^2 + B^2 = C^2
The only way you get to the correct conclusion with the data is to link it all together. PERIOD
Without ACORN, there would be no WFP. With no WFP as a ballot line there can be no “lines” to win.
ergo, ACORN+WFP=DEMOCRAT VOTER FRAUD.
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can still read it in English, You’re Welcome
Deskpilot, AM(H)1 (AW), USN (Ret)
Join the RedState Strike Force
What is happening in Troy, NY
HoosierHistorian Tuesday, October 20th at 8:50PM EST (link)is a microcosm of how the progressives have been slowly poisoning our national elections. Through ACORN they have perpetrated fraud across America corrupting elections in several states. We may never know the full extent of the damage done by the left.
It is only 4% nation wide
Greg (Diary) Tuesday, October 20th at 9:20PM EST (link)nt
Explain Please!
HoosierHistorian Tuesday, October 20th at 9:45PM EST (link)What “is only 4% natiion wide?” ACORN? Or the Democrats’ cheating?
If you mean ACORN it really does not take that many people to steal an election if the same people vote in numerous precincts.
If, on the other hand, you mean the cheating then exactly how do you know the extent that ACORN has been cheating?
If you are going to make a comment then please be so kind as to make it one that can be understood.
I might be wrong
Hooah_Mac (Diary) Tuesday, October 20th at 9:52PM EST (link)But I interpreted this along the lines of 52-48.
Maybe my snark detector is oversensitive.
-Priorities-
1. Mission 2. Soldiers 3. Everything Else
Yes, but with a little satire
Greg (Diary) Wednesday, October 21st at 2:20PM EST (link)with the D blocking the count of Military votes may make it even higher.. The elections have be come Frankish..