How can a President of the United States of America intentionally divide the Country? His intent should be to unify through upholding the Constitution.

Where is the tipping point in this, where will all the people start to revolt because they found nothing remaining? The revolt is here and it is growing….

There has never been an American president so utterly devoid of love for his country and his people, and in fact so full of contempt and loathing. Well, what goes around comes around. For some of us, sooner, for some of us, later. For those of us who did not vote for this man because we knew exactly what he was, there is a feeling of righteousness flavored with an overwhelming sadness. Those who did vote for him – at least some of them – will sooner or later come face to face with the abject horror of what they have done. I still think he is cruising for the most vicious backlash ever.

If they call you a tea bagger, you call them a disgusting pervert throwing tantrums over their adolescent obsessions. Tell them when they grow up you hope they stop practicing the kind of language that a prostitute would use. You have to shock them with your attack. Get as obscene and scatalogical as you feel comfortable with. Rock them back on their heels. Don’t give them a chance to recover. Keep on chewing them a new one and then turn and leave. Don’t give them a chance to recover or retaliate. Make them feel bad about their own crap. That is the only thing that will get them to change it.

From evoking the “tea bag” pejorative, to implying that this “revolt” is based on a personal or partisan dislike, to insinuating that the concerns brought forward are juvenile, as well as general body language and vocal inflections, it seems that this is more than a simple disagreement for him, and that he genuinely disdains the people on the other side of the divide, and not just the political system that they espouse. He is going out of the way to attack the upstanding Americans involved in these protests, rather than just sticking to attacking the ideas behind the protests.

Though I don’t like making these comparisions, I think that it is telling that Pres. Obama didn’t have such a reaction when meeting with leaders like Chavez and Ortega. I don’t know if this is because he doesn’t care about their transgressions, or if it is that he hid his objections behind a mask of “politeness”, but I wish that he had extended the same courtesy to his fellow countrymen.

From evoking the “tea bag” pejorative, to implying that this “revolt” is based on a personal or partisan dislike, to insinuating that the concerns brought forward are juvenile, as well as general body language and vocal inflections, it seems that this is more than a simple disagreement for him, and that he genuinely disdains the people on the other side of the divide, and not just the political system that they espouse. He is going out of the way to attack the upstanding Americans involved in these protests, rather than just sticking to attacking the ideas behind the protests.

Though I don’t like making these comparisions, I think that it is telling that Pres. Obama didn’t have such a reaction when meeting with leaders like Chavez and Ortega. I don’t know if this is because he doesn’t care about their transgressions, or if it is that he hid his objections behind a mask of “politeness”, but I wish that he had extended the same courtesy to his fellow countrymen.

But who can be expected to do math when there are more zeros in this budget than fit on most calculators!

We just got rid of Specter.

-No you are not. You have slipped funding into every bill that was shielded from scrutiny or representative discussion. That’s a rather undemocratic “debate”. Where I come from, that tactic is called usually called tyrranical or disengenuous mendacity.

- Yes, costs will be driven down by cutting services, denying treatments, cutting the ability for private providers to offer an alternative and using taxpayer money to subsidize everyone including non-citizens. Cut costs, indeed.

” how we are going to stabilize Social Security.”

- Oh yes, by moving out the retirement age, cutting payments, making people pay more and denying the “rich” access to money they already paid. I suppose you also now intend to fully fund this unfunded liability (that would close the cell door on any corporation) which on any other planet would surpass the Madoff Ponzi scheme? Really? More borrowing from the Treasury and taxpayers? I didn’t think there was anything left.

Email me and we can have that debate. Although you might want to make it a phone call, lest you publicly embarrass yourself.

ReTeaParty (for 4th of July) site

Contact the other sites and urge them to organize for the subsequent dates also:
09/12/09 DC Tax Protest
Tax Day Tea Party site with Daily email update signup
Tea Party Revolution site
FreedomWorks