It’s dead during the term of this administration, and never mind what TPMDC thinks. I’d give credit for the Obama administration for at least not duplicating the public relations fiasco that the Clinton administration got itself into sixteen years ago, but do we really want to reward a lack of intestinal fortitude?
Frank: Democrats Punting on ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Until 2010
Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said Thursday that Democratic leaders won’t push to repeal the controversial “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy governing gay service in the military until 2010.
“I believe we should and will do ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ next year,” said Frank, a co-chairman of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Equality Caucus. “We haven’t done the preliminary work, the preparatory work. It would be a mistake to bring it up without a lot of lobbying and a lot of conversation.”
And next year we’ll hear another reason why gay people can’t openly serve, and the year after that there’ll be yet another reason (which will probably involve the increased GOP presence in Congress), and the year after that – well, that’s an election year, and so it’s understandable that the administration will be forced by circumstances to not play up the issue, right? And so on, and so on, and so on. The truth of it is, the Democratic leadership doesn’t want to open that can of worms. Ever. It’s like DoMA all over again: if they tried repealing the law, the only thing that would happen would be an embarrassing failure in Congress as roughly half the Democratic caucus (that’s a guess) either abstained or voted against repeal.
This does not please me, by the way: I think that we should allow gay people to serve openly in the military (I’m aware that this is a minority position in my party, and in this context I’m frankly indifferent to whether you agree with me on it). I do find it exasperating that the Democratic Party is so adamantly against having this topic settled once and for all, even when it controls the executive and legislative branches of government…
Moe Lane
Crossposted to Moe Lane.
Aaron Gardner
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
It's amazing to me
Leopard1996 (Diary) Thursday, April 23rd at 10:19PM EST (link)It’s like the republicans like to be the minority party, and the dems don’t know how to act when they are the majority party. Is there any party with any balls to stand up for what they believe in.
I wonder how long Barry O will have the gay lobby. I am with you on the gays serving in the military. If they want to serve, let them serve with only the preconditions that every other soldier has.
“The accumluated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, “Save Us!”….and I’ll look down and whisper, “No”…The Watchmen
That doesn't make sense....
St_Louis_Conservative (Diary) Thursday, April 23rd at 10:22PM EST (link)Seems to me they would want to push it now, so voter anger over the issue will have subsided by next year’s election. It makes no sense to push it then with an election coming up.
“…..women and minorities hardest hit”
What they really want
papalee Thursday, April 23rd at 10:50PM EST (link)Is to have an army, a navy and an air force, to say nothing of the marine corps. When service in volunteer you need to have as much of it as possible not be so bad that you will be able to keep your volunteers. Letting homosexuals serve openly in the military would mean that you would have few heterosexuals willing to serve and especially if you began doing affirmative action promotions. And the Democrats and liberal Republicans would not be able to resist that.
You may not believe me, but you have never seen an organization corrupted until you allow homosexuals into it. Or, and worse, thinking it is a good thing having them there. I have been there and know.
You're right. I don't believe you.
Moe Lane (Diary) Thursday, April 23rd at 10:59PM EST (link)Do me – and more importantly, the site – a favor; you’ve said your piece, now pretend that this post doesn’t exist.
The Kim Kardashian of blogging.
Check out my blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://moelane.com/filthy-lucre-filthy-lucre/
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (combined) wish list.
Sorry, Moe,
papalee Friday, April 24th at 5:50AM EST (link)But I will not be silenced that easily. I have both been in the military and dealt with a large red stain on a hanger floor that was the blood of one of my predecessors as an ops officer and worked as a burearcrat in the City and County of San Francisco.
My experience in both is real life and the comments of Michael Dugas below are to the point. In far too many cases, especially if it had the sanction of the “elite” there would be homosexuals willing to attempt to take advantage of others with results disastrous for the good order of the service. We are not ancient Greece.
Who's silencing you?
Moe Lane (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 8:19AM EST (link)I’m merely suggesting that you stop embarrassing the site by spouting off nonsense about the intrinsic evil of homosexuals.
The Kim Kardashian of blogging.
Check out my blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://moelane.com/filthy-lucre-filthy-lucre/
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (combined) wish list.
Moe, How long have you served?
Old_Crow (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 9:10AM EST (link)How about letting the military decide what policies work the best for an effective and high morale environment.
“Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.” — James Madison
:ka-click: I didn't tolerate chickenhawking from the antiwar movement...
Moe Lane (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 9:29AM EST (link)…and I won’t tolerate it on this issue, either.
ARE.
WE.
CLEAR?
The Kim Kardashian of blogging.
Check out my blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://moelane.com/filthy-lucre-filthy-lucre/
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (combined) wish list.
Anti-war ? I've served in three.
Old_Crow (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 9:53AM EST (link)My point was let these decisions be made by the military who have the experience and knowledge to know what is best. The military is not (or should not) be a laboratory to test social experiments.
Is it ‘chickenhawking’ to ask, if someone has no direct experience, why their position should be imposed on the military?
No offense intended.
“Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.” — James Madison
I agree with your position Old Crow
SG_Lominac (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 9:59AM EST (link)My guess is Moe was referring to the title of your post, not the content.
From the movie “Hard Times”
Jill Ireland: “What does it feel like to knock somebody down?”
Charles Bronson: “It makes me feel a hell of a lot better than it does him.”
Old_Crow: Ye - hold on a second. :putting Blam Stick away:
Moe Lane (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 10:00AM EST (link)There. That’ll keep my sadism under control. Sorry for yelling.
Anyway, yes, it is; civilians dictate military policy in this country, not the other way around. We spent far too long over the last decade fighting against the notion that any one subgroup could use overriding moral authority as a weapon to make me willing to accept it now, under any circumstances.
Look, disagree with me on the topic all you like, but at least assume that I’ve taken the other side’s opinions on into account before I came to mine.
The Kim Kardashian of blogging.
Check out my blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://moelane.com/filthy-lucre-filthy-lucre/
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (combined) wish list.
Poorly worded title, my mistake - sorry.
Old_Crow (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 10:35AM EST (link)As far as the subject, yes we have (and need) civilian control of the military – absolutely no argument there.
I worked with plenty of foreign military when I was active duty and still do as a contractor, many will say (privately) that opening their services to gays has reduced their combat capability and lowered morale overall.
I guess it boils down to what the goals and missions of the military are.
“Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.” — James Madison
Well, my infamous temper didn't help any. :)
Moe Lane (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 10:56AM EST (link)As I said, sorry for blowing up.
The Kim Kardashian of blogging.
Check out my blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://moelane.com/filthy-lucre-filthy-lucre/
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (combined) wish list.
infamous temper...lol...you are a kitten Moe..;^)
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 11:01AM EST (link)you are probably the fairest moderator I have ever seen.
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
As a two branch vet I have an opinion
Michael Dugas (Diary) Thursday, April 23rd at 11:51PM EST (link)on this. There have always been homosexuals in the military, Some branches more than others I believe. I met several while I was in the Navy but none while I was with the Marines. It will be nearly impossible for an openly gay soldier to serve in a heavily masculine gung-ho combat squad environment. They would risk a large amount persecution and possibly violence for being openly gay. It’s the “openly gay” part that is the problem. You’re going to have a lot of soldiers who will be uncomfortable with it and in high stress situations it could become an issue.
There is NO doubt that they can serve and do the job but there is NO way to remove the “sex” from sexual orientation. When women began serving on carriers we began having quite a few pregnancies occur. The Navy tried to be hush hush about it but
it happened frequently. Two gay soldiers get caught indulging by their fellow soldiers…well I wouldn’t want to be them.
What I am saying applies particularly to combat MOS’s and NEC’s.
In the Navy many of the gay men I met had non squad type jobs that are more singular in nature without the close quarters that exist in say an infantry squad or tank team.
Allowing openly gay people to serve sounds great but then there’s that whole reality thing that creeps in and I have to wonder if it’s worth it to either side of the debate.
Intro to Federalist Papers; section 5;
paragraph 4.
“…dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the zeal for a firm and efficient government.”
Remember: A Citizen on the dole is a Liberal Vote at the Polls.
END ENTITLEMENTS!
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum !
I agree with this post because I was with my son...
JadedByPolitics (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 9:59AM EST (link)at the recruiters last week and the Sargent and I discussed this and he said exactly what you just said.
Unified Patriots – How-To:
Activists Taking Action
Jaded, is your son signed up yet?
Uma Richie (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 12:37PM EST (link)Thank you for supporting his consideration of military service. I know you do a lot for other people’s children who are in the armed forces. Hopefully, they’ll take good care of your own.
Apologies for the threadjack.
Openly gay implies openly talking about sex
Neil Stevens (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 10:06AM EST (link)That pretty much settles the issue of whether it’s appropriate, I think.
RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder
Hey Neil nice to see ya. Don't know if you ever served
Michael Dugas (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 3:00PM EST (link)But if you haven’t picture this scenario. You’re on your second year of service. You’ve been living in tight quarters with the same seven guys for the last 17 months. Living, eating, sleeping, training and fighting day in and day out. Each of you have saved each others lives numerous times, you’ve helped each other struggle to succeed, watched each others backs and helped each other deal with the loss of a brother to a wound or even death.
You end up talking about everything, there is nothing off limits most of the time. You each end up knowing the others wives, kids, families like they were your own a lot of times never even having met them personally. The relationships you foster, particularly if you were in combat together, that are totally unique to the military in my opinion. You are, on occasion, literally trusting people with your life on a daily basis and that does something to you, it changes you and they way you interact with your brothers. To this day there are men I served with that I have rarely seen or not seen at all since I mustered out that I would come running if they called. I have family members I won’t do that for! =)
Sorry about ranting on, I know I sorta used your reply to keep blabbing on.
Again nice to see ya, hope you’re doing well.
Intro to Federalist Papers; section 5;
paragraph 4.
“…dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the zeal for a firm and efficient government.”
Remember: A Citizen on the dole is a Liberal Vote at the Polls.
END ENTITLEMENTS!
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum !
It's alright
Neil Stevens (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 3:13PM EST (link)Sometimes I reply to people to agree, too. No harm in it. “Reply to this” doesn’t mean “disagree with this.”
RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder
And no I never joined up
Neil Stevens (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 3:14PM EST (link)I wouldn’t have done well if I did. Not temperamentally suited to it I think, heh.
RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder
generational thing...
Gyorc Nacain Friday, April 24th at 11:13AM EST (link)…I have a question – how old are you? Or more to the point, when were you in the military? I ask because it seems that this is partially a generational issue. I hear a lot of people who say similar things to this, about why openly gay people in the military would be bad, but usually they served awhile ago. Even, say, 15-20 years ago the attitudes were pretty different compared to now, and I think that most people of my generation (I am 21) don’t care as much.
I have “served” on sports teams, with a few openly gay members, and nobody was really bothered.
I'm 45 but the "generation" issue does not play
Michael Dugas (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 2:39PM EST (link)so much of a part as the community and mindset of those in the military. I totally understand that that the current generation is less
concerned with homosexuality in general and that in your personal peer group “nobody was really bothered.” That’s your community and your peer group that you are familiar with and that makes sense to you. I have to say though that as far as the sports teams go I would hazard a abet there were more than you were aware of who might have been uncomfortable say..showering with their gay teammates
but may have kept it to themselves out of fear of being ostracized
in the same fashion as this recent beauty contestant is being treated for being honest about her views on same sex marriage.
Now back to the soldiers reality. Quite a large percentage of those drawn to serve their country in the military are conservative in nature, religious and come from a community / family structure
that, to be honest, is not comfortable with homosexuality. And though some may say it sounds silly combat troops foster a strong
masculine, gung ho , testosterone ridden environment that the vast majority of the soldiers will not be able to associate with being gay.
This creates the strong possibility that the gay individual will end up being an outsider with his team or squad. Such a reality can effect team function, morale and cohesiveness and lead to casualties. Socialization and camaraderie are invaluable to creating a team/squad that trusts each other and functions as a unit. Damage that, interrupt it, diminish it and you risk failure.
Sempre Fi
Do or Die
God
Country
Corps!
That little ditty gives you a bit of insight into those who choose to
become Marines. It’s an extremely Alpha Male mindset and I don’t
believe that that will ever really change that much.
Intro to Federalist Papers; section 5;
paragraph 4.
“…dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the zeal for a firm and efficient government.”
Remember: A Citizen on the dole is a Liberal Vote at the Polls.
END ENTITLEMENTS!
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum !
Agree with all your responses
LibRick (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 4:22PM EST (link)on this thread. I’m former service and was an military brat too. While that doesn’t make me an expert on the military, it does give me some insight regarding the military community. You described the attitude well.
One of my favorite movie quotes that is marginally appropriate :
“We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use then as the backbone of a life trying to defend something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said “thank you,” and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest that you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don’t give a d**n what you think you are entitled to.” (Col. Jessup, A Few good Men)
If you are 21
E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 3:18PM EST (link)then what do you really know about the attitudes 15-20 years ago? That would be by “people telling you”. or perhaps watching ‘The 70s Show”.
I hang out multi-generationally. I am in the fast-car scene, so I am somewhat in tune with generational differences in attitudes. I’m also former military (out 9 years now). So I have a little bit of experience, one way or another, to gauge this topic. You have no context, no knowledge, no insight. Just an opinion based on God-knows what.
I don’t think you know much outside your bubble, and I’d guess from your comments that you don’t have a single good friend that has joined the military. If you have one, then I suggest you have a long sit-down and ask him about this whole topic.
It ain’t about gay-bashing, it ain’t about some terrible dark fear that somebody might be checking you out in the shower. Just ask. Maybe you’ll get it.
Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO
friends
Gyorc Nacain Friday, April 24th at 4:24PM EST (link)I do have friends who joined up after HS…I haven’t asked them specifically about this but judging on my graduating class as a whole, and them in particular, I doubt that they are too concerned about it. As for attitudes from 15-20 years ago, like I said i am basing that on what I have heard other people on forums such as this say. Obviously I know people from that age group, and I am also partially basing what I say on their attitudes, but I haven’t exactly taken a poll as to what they think. But like I said, of the people I know of my age, the vast majority just don’t care about “gay issues.”
Even friends of mine who are conservatives, even the socons among them, aren’t particularly against ending DADT. People I know, of my age, break down into those in favor of ending it, and those who don’t care.
Military is different. Ask them.
E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 10:07PM EST (link)That was the point. And you may have to press them, especially if they were in a combat unit. If they will actually, really open up to you (which is 50-50, maybe 30-70) they’ll tell you – openly gay guys in combat units, it just won’t play. It’s not homophobia, its not all this redneck stuff. It’s reality. It changes the dynamics in ways that breaks down the unit’s cohesiveness.
It’s another wasted point I am betting, but for most guys who have been over there and seen combat, seen death, killed enemies themselves, the whole world is divided into those who have experienced that and those who have not.
Hypothesize all you want. Extrapolate your very small fishbowl world to it all you want. But you do not know what you are talking about. It’s a big deal and you are sorely mistaken about the reality.
Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO
dadt
Gyorc Nacain Saturday, April 25th at 1:46PM EST (link)I don’t think it’s homophobia or redneck stuff…what are you basing what you say on? Your own experience in the military? What would really be useful here is a poll of the military, though I don’t know that one exists.
BTW lemme add to the list of people on whom I am basing this, a few times I have partied with some West Point kids, and I have asked a bunch of them…though if it does have to do with those who have actually seen combat – well I suppose someone still at West Point has not actually seen combat yet.
On an unrelated note, I have considered joining up after college, but I haven’t really looked into it too much quite yet…as a vet do you have any advice, or have an idea where to look to get a good idea of whether I ought to (and if I do, what branch, in what capacity, etc)?
ask and you shall receive Gyorc...
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:00PM EST (link)and if you really cared you could have found this information in less that 2 minutes on the google
Army Times poll #9 of 10
Only 29% of those polled support the repeal of DADT, 58% are against repeal and 14% had no opinion.
Furthermore 23% would either not re-enlist or consider not re-enlisting.
As far as what branch you should join and information about the Military…each one has a website and yo can get a lot of information there.
Good luck to you if you do decide to join, it changed my life and made me a better man and person.
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
actually it was quicker to just ask
Gyorc Nacain Saturday, April 25th at 2:09PM EST (link)especially since I was doing laundry between comments
With that in mind Gyorc...
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:12PM EST (link)if you ever decide to be intellectually lazy with me again you will earn my scorn…just a heads up.
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
I'll take that under advisement...nt
Gyorc Nacain Saturday, April 25th at 2:22PM EST (link)I'm sure you won't...in fact you just proved it....
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:24PM EST (link)Why don’t you go ahead and respond to the information you received from the poll you requested. I mean it can only be useful if you actually take it into consideration…right?
Or were you just being disingenuous as is the want of many liberals who stumble upon RedState?
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
You're about to be stomped into oblivion.
mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:33PM EST (link)God’s grace is unlimited. You’ve used up your quota here though. So far Aaron has been very gentle with you. You’re about to meet HBunny if you don’t lose the cutesy attitude and figure out how to make a cogent argument. Right now boy, you’re headed for the woodshed at full tilt.
Bottom line, you’ve managed to wear out your welcome.
fine...
Gyorc Nacain Saturday, April 25th at 2:59PM EST (link)…if i have worn out my welcome then i’ll leave.
I can’t help but point out, that it doesn’t make a difference to me if you post a picture of “HBunny.” So it’s not like this threat has any bearing on what I do. But that said, if it’s true that I have worn out my welcome then I’m done posting, at least on this thread.
No Gyorc...I would like you to admit that you are being disingenuous....
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 3:01PM EST (link)because you and I both know that you are…and the link I provided has all the information that you have requested…so either prove your are right or admit that you are wrong…or admit that you were being disingenuous from the beginning and apologize for wasting everybody’s time on your pathetic arguments.
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
Bye.
mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 5:21PM EST (link)And, as far as posting elsewhere on RS, you can expect to be followed and outed for the brain dead little troll you are.
Personally, I hope you hang around. There’s not much that’s more fun after hard day that kicking a stupid troll to the curb.
My Two Cents
exitsfunnel Saturday, April 25th at 5:54PM EST (link)I think that Gyorc is half right as are the responders who have all piled on against him. It’s true that repealing DADT doesn’t have close to majority support amongst people currently serving in the military and it’s also true that servicemen are, on average, more conservative and religious than the general population. But none of that undermines Gyorc’s fundamental point which was that there is a large generational gap on (for lack of a better term) gay acceptance issues in general.
So, the interesting question in my mind isn’t so much, what support is there amongst servicemen for gays serving openly as it is, how much support is there today, versus how much support was there 15 years ago. Much of the rebuttel to Gyorc ‘s assertion seems to imply that the military lives in a cacoon as such manages to resist altogether the greater cultural shifts and I can’t imagine that that is really the case.
(as an aside, this all obviously ignores the fact that are military is under civilian control, which in my mind is a crucial piece of the discussion)
-exits
are == our in the last sentence
exitsfunnel Saturday, April 25th at 5:56PM EST (link)I really wish that RS allowed one a short grace period to edit his posts
.
-exits
that's a strawman argument exits...you should know that...
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 6:47PM EST (link)first the military is comprised of more younger people than it is older people…second no polls were taken 15 years ago as far as I can find. His argument is nothing because he has no proof he merely has a conclusion and he is hypothesizing [notice I didn't say extrapolating since he doesn't even has a single fat to extrapolate from] on what the truth could be. Bring the fact or concede…those are the only two option in a debate between rational people.
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
fat == fact....nt
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 6:48PM EST (link)conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
It's not a strawman
exitsfunnel Saturday, April 25th at 8:07PM EST (link)I don’t even understand that charge.
Gyoruc implied that people in the military today would favor the repeal of DADT – about that he was wrong, likely because he doesn’t appreciate the extent to which the military population is more conservative and more religious than the general population. But he raises the issue of the generational shift on gay acceptance issues in general, which is crucial and I think, finally (though not yet) will be decisive on DADT.
In any event, I also wasn’t able to find 15 year old polling data (specific to the military) and even if it existed it likely wouldn’t be directly translatable as that was just shortly after DADT became law and the questions certainly would have been framed differently. Nonetheless, attitudes towards gays in society have changed a lot (all kinds of polling bears this out) and I find it almost inconceivable that this isn’t reflected in the military population as well.
I think that the situation with DADT and the attitudes of people in the service is similar to the gay marriage question with respect to the more conservative states in the South and Midwest. I believe that thirty years from now (maybe sooner) there will be gay marriage everywhere in the United States (I’m sure that you disagree), but obviously it’s going to come to Illinois before it comes to Tennessee.
-exits
exits, I fully understood the argument...
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 8:27PM EST (link)but it’s an unprovable argument with no basis in fact…furthermore a general acceptance of homosexuality in society cannot be extrapolated from in order to estimate trending on the issue of DADT…. Take a libertarian, he may say he doesn’t care two hoots about gays in general because he believes in liberty, but take that same libertarian and asked them about DADT and their position could be dramatically different, and add to that a libertarian who is or was in the military. There are too many variables for that to be taken seriously, and it will continue to be so until he can provide some evidence.
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
I'll take your question under consideration
E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 4:48PM EST (link)Gyorc, I don’t much like you so far, but that’s neither here nor there.
To answer the one question, I base my opinion not only on my service, but on the interactions I have had almost continuously for 18 years since the beginning of my service, and the culture that I see in specific, fairly regular action with Air Force and Marines in their own domain (on base, in uniform, etc). Alot less Navy and Army , just the people I know and don’t know.
I further base it on my experience wtih *real* combat veterans, And still further I base it on known polls which regularly show that military rank and file do not want to experience the social engineering that Democrats so love doing.
So, I don’t really care for it when a little wet-behind-the-ears ingenue drops in here and presumes to have any knowledge of military culture.
But as to your question about your own possible future service. Let’s put it this way. Let RedState be your test. I’m pretty easy to find around here. If you are still around and have a posting history that is not completely lefty agitprop, in say a month, get my attention and we’ll talk.
Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO
My Marine Corps son, now 26
mbecker908 (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 10:46PM EST (link)and – as a young man should be – a flaming liberal, was very outspoken about the idea of homosexuals in his SpOps unit. He cared a lot and he wasn’t in favor of it. He REALLY wasn’t in favor of it.
liberal
Gyorc Nacain Saturday, April 25th at 1:49PM EST (link)if young men should be liberals…then how can anyone here be mad at me for being one? I am even younger than your son.
we aren't mad that you are a liberal Gyorc...we're concerned...nt
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:01PM EST (link)conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
next time I see some comment in response to one of mine that could be best characterized as "mad" rather than "concerned"...
Gyorc Nacain Saturday, April 25th at 2:07PM EST (link)…I’ll respond with something like “Look over here, Aaron Gardner!”
Though I likely won’t be around too much over the next few days, so it may have to wait.
well let's think about that Gyorc...
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:11PM EST (link)if you say something stupid and someone gets mad…it isn’t because you are a liberal…it is because you said something stupid. There is a difference.
BTW what did you think about that poll?
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
poll
Gyorc Nacain Saturday, April 25th at 2:42PM EST (link)interesting…but it doesn’t change my position. I would also like to see a breakdown by age (and also a breakdown by age, of who people supported in the election) because that would shed light on whether it is an age thing…but what can you do.
Gyorc...nice lefty tactic there...
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:53PM EST (link)You ask for evidence…evidence is provided…you discount evidence and move the goal posts.
You are a disingenuous little troll…thanks for playing!!
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
Whaaat... I was napping.
HappyBunny Saturday, April 25th at 3:01PM EST (link)Oh.
Don’t get me waked up again punk.
I am not surprised you won't be around, gyorc
Jack_Savage (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 3:57PM EST (link)Crap on the carpet and then cut and run. We see it a lot from you guys.
And from what I am reading, you have not given one substantive rebuttal to evidence refuting your “concerns”. Maybe that is another reason you suddenly have really important stuff to do.
Mommy made lunch. nt
mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 4:05PM EST (link)Ah yes
Jack_Savage (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 4:52PM EST (link)PBJ time normally does reduce the lefty traffic around here. I forgot.
Not even concerned. Disappointed would be better.
mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:20PM EST (link)Note however, on issues that directly affect him, he’s a conservative.
On all issues relating to the military, he supported the right and was appalled that those on the left could be that stupid. His opinion of Jack Murtha is slightly to the right of mine.
On taxes, now that he’s a tax paying citizen, he’s sounds a lot like me. And I’m pretty sure that as he hangs around more and more liberals, he’ll sound a whole lot more like me. For example, when he first left the Corps he started college and was majoring in journalism. I make no negative comments about the profession and encouraged him because I know he’s smart enough to figure out the obvious. It only took him half of his first quarter. He went from “excited” to “dad, these aholes are totally clueless” in about three weeks of exposure. He’ll be fine. It’s you I wonder about.
55555....nt
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:21PM EST (link)conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
did he join up after 9/11?
Gyorc Nacain Saturday, April 25th at 2:00PM EST (link)cuz doing some quick math, he would have been 18 then…
No. He was in a DEP program
mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:23PM EST (link)(delayed enlistment program) for his last two years of HS – 1998 & 99 – and went to boot camp in March of 2001. He had scores high enough to qualify for any MOS, but chose an infantry MOS and went to a SpOps unit after his MOS school and that was after 9/11. He loved deployment and hated sitting around in the US.
my question is why does that matter Gyorc??...nt
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:26PM EST (link)conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
doesn't particularly matter...I was just curious...
Gyorc Nacain Saturday, April 25th at 2:31PM EST (link)…after all if mbecker’s bugged by the question he doesn’t have to answer.
good to know you are still here...Gyorc...
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:33PM EST (link)care to respond the the poll statistics now?
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
i did...
Gyorc Nacain Saturday, April 25th at 2:45PM EST (link)…there is just like 8 different parts to this comment thread so it took some time to get around to it. but anyways….
Consolidate it in one place. You want to make an argument,
mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:52PM EST (link)make it in one place where it can be followed and commented on in a cogent manner.
Not bugged at all, punk. You asked another
mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:38PM EST (link)question related to pretty much nothing and I gave you a straight answer.
I’ll also note that the only reason he’s out of the Corps is because he fell off a mountain in training and ended up with a medical discharge. He’s fine, he can do any civilian job around, he just can’t put on an 80 pound pack, 40 pound of body armor and run 10 miles with a 27 pound machine gun anymore. The only reason for this note is that I want to make sure you understand that he left the Corps for reasons other than politics.
Oh, and just so we're clear on two other points...
mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, April 25th at 2:41PM EST (link)1. Where is your discussion on the poll statistics. You’re going to be asked that until you comment.
2. I used the word “punk” in terms relating to corrections.
Heterosexual adulterers
Uma Richie (Diary) Friday, April 24th at 4:06PM EST (link)are also not allowed to serve openly. Sodomy, even with one’s spouse, is also a no-no. Just so you know, the military closet isn’t just for gay guys and gals.