(H/T: Hot Air) That’s a serious question, because he signed his name to an article saying precisely that back in college. The quote goes:
The military not only discriminates on the basis of sexual preference, but on the basis of sex and race. Women are not allowed to serve in combat even if they are physically superior to males who do serve in combat. And, while there are not explicit rules discriminating against minorities, the Congressional Black Caucus has found that “racism has become institutionalized at all levels of the military. Black and other minority service men are victims of discrimination from the time that they enter the services until the time that they are discharged.” Will Harvard choose to ignore this discrimination?
Murphy went on to declare that military values – which he proceeded to get wrong, as only a liberal Democratic Ivy League student can – are directly contradictory to those of Harvard University, or at least the Harvard University of twenty years ago. I would like to say that Harvard’s grown up a little since then, but it’d be a lie. Still, I’d like to know: has Murphy?
Moe Lane
PS: Jazz Shaw has more; so does this site, even if they can’t get the name of the NRCC right. But one of their commenters noted that parts of this district were once Gerald Solomon’s (I think), so that works out. And, of course, see also Erick’s post on the subject.
PPS: Jim Tedisco. Republican. Running for the seat. Doesn’t hate the military. Donate here.
Crossposted to Moe Lane.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
So let me get this straight....
Jeff Emanuel (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 3:25PM EST (link)Scott Murphy (D-NY) thinks the military is racist and sexist because (a) they follow a law passed by Congress stating that women cannot serve in combat, and (b) because a Racist group of pigment-based-discriminating Congressmen says so?
There’s a reason I think so poorly of idiot, head-stuffed-with-fluff, self-important students (and adult Liberals, which are just an older version of the same).
JE
Yup! He also thinks that soldiers are brainless automatons, too.
Moe Lane (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 3:29PM EST (link)And he hates the idea that any of them would be let onto Ivy League campuses, where real people might be forced to pretend that they were fully sentient creatures.
The Kim Kardashian of blogging.
Check out my blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://moelane.com/filthy-lucre-filthy-lucre/
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (combined) wish list.
That's the part that really got me.
aesthete (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 5:52PM EST (link)Aside from the part where he disparages the idea of economically disadvantaged students signing up in the military in exchange for a degree, because they’re so stupid that they have no idea what the military suckered them into. /
The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton
Soldier doubts eligibility, defies president's orders
izoneguy (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 3:31PM EST (link)http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=89837
The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.
Typical lefty . . .
BlueStateSaint Tuesday, February 24th at 3:41PM EST (link)I think that Jim Tedisco should win this race by 12 or so percentage points.
NY-20 isn't an uber liberal area.
Old_Crow (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 4:02PM EST (link)There’s still some military in the area (active and reserve) although the numbers have gone down over the years. Plenty of retired military though. The Dems only got the seat because the Republican incumbent screwed up. Me thinks Tedisco has a good shot.
“Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.” — James Madison
Over at Blackfive there is a great start to the disconnect...
phxg (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 4:29PM EST (link)From Blackfive
Laughing_wolf was asking for user input on this topic and one post to me stood out as very true; the basic premise of disdain for the military resides in the fact that (most) people do not know what the military does.
By Jordan:
With a reply from RallyMom82 who sums it up perfectly:
I can only hope that that somewhere Morgan Freemans’ words have hit a chord with people:
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. –Aristotle
"Black History is American History."
Moe Lane (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 6:20PM EST (link)Precisely.
The Kim Kardashian of blogging.
Check out my blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://moelane.com/filthy-lucre-filthy-lucre/
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (combined) wish list.
There is more wisdom in that video clip
woodsman (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 8:27PM EST (link)than any of the talking heads have stated thus far.
Warriors ain't cool in polite society.
Achance (Diary) Tuesday, February 24th at 6:41PM EST (link)They make men who lay at home abed question their own manhood. Whether the soldier, the ultimate warrior, or the man or woman who has their name on the door and take responsibility for it, the looters and moochers really, really don’t like to be around warriors, don’t like even to acknowledge their existence.
In Vino Veritas