<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good morning, Senators Collins, Snowe, and Specter.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:42:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10953</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10953</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m strange, but I actually found that interesting reading.  Thanks for digging it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m strange, but I actually found that interesting reading.  Thanks for digging it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6eorge Jetson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10952</link>
		<dc:creator>6eorge Jetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10952</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.c-span.org/guide/congress/glossary/pointord.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;contained within the above link  http://is.gd/iYt2&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.c-span.org/guide/congress/glossary/pointord.htm" rel="nofollow">contained within the above link  http://is.gd/iYt2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6eorge Jetson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10951</link>
		<dc:creator>6eorge Jetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10951</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
A POINT OF ORDER is made during floor proceedings to assert that the rules of procedure are being violated. 

A point of order halts proceedings while the presiding officer rules on whether or not it is valid. 

In the Senate, the chair&#039;s ruling may be appealed by any Senator. The Senate votes on the appeal and the chair has been frequently overturned. 

In the House tradition, appeals are also possible, but rarely entered and almost never succeed. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

which seems to me would play out as
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&#160; &#8226; A POINT OF ORDER is made during floor proceedings 
&#160; &#160; &#160; to assert that the rules of procedure are being violated. 
&#160; &#160; &#160; &lt;font color=&quot;FireBrick&quot;&gt;&#8594; A Republican raises a &quot;Point of Order&quot;&lt;/font&gt;

&#160; &#8226; A point of order halts proceedings while &lt;font color=&quot;RoyalBlue&quot;&gt;the presiding officer &lt;/font&gt;
&#160; &#160; &#160; rules on whether or not it is valid. 
&#160; &#160; &#160; &lt;font color=&quot;RoyalBlue&quot;&gt;&#8594; Biden rules no&lt;/font&gt;

&#160; &#8226; In the Senate, the chair&#039;s ruling may be appealed by any Senator. 
&#160; &#160; &#160; &lt;font color=&quot;FireBrick&quot;&gt;&#8594; A Republican would appeal&lt;/font&gt;

&#160; &#8226; The Senate votes on the appeal 
&#160; &#160; &#160; &lt;font color=&quot;RoyalBlue&quot;&gt;&#8594; The vote to overturn Biden comes no where near the 60 affirmative votes necessary. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Someone tell me that I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
A POINT OF ORDER is made during floor proceedings to assert that the rules of procedure are being violated. </p>
<p>A point of order halts proceedings while the presiding officer rules on whether or not it is valid. </p>
<p>In the Senate, the chair&#8217;s ruling may be appealed by any Senator. The Senate votes on the appeal and the chair has been frequently overturned. </p>
<p>In the House tradition, appeals are also possible, but rarely entered and almost never succeed.
</p></blockquote>
<p>which seems to me would play out as</p>
<blockquote><p>
&nbsp; &bull; A POINT OF ORDER is made during floor proceedings<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; to assert that the rules of procedure are being violated.<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <font color="FireBrick">&rarr; A Republican raises a &quot;Point of Order&quot;</font></p>
<p>&nbsp; &bull; A point of order halts proceedings while <font color="RoyalBlue">the presiding officer </font><br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; rules on whether or not it is valid.<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <font color="RoyalBlue">&rarr; Biden rules no</font></p>
<p>&nbsp; &bull; In the Senate, the chair&#8217;s ruling may be appealed by any Senator.<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <font color="FireBrick">&rarr; A Republican would appeal</font></p>
<p>&nbsp; &bull; The Senate votes on the appeal<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <font color="RoyalBlue">&rarr; The vote to overturn Biden comes no where near the 60 affirmative votes necessary. </font>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Someone tell me that I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDidSaint</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10950</link>
		<dc:creator>JDidSaint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10950</guid>
		<description>.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6eorge Jetson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10949</link>
		<dc:creator>6eorge Jetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10949</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6eorge Jetson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10948</link>
		<dc:creator>6eorge Jetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10948</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/imagescharlie-brown-lucy-football.jpg&quot; width=&quot;180&quot; /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/imagescharlie-brown-lucy-football.jpg" width="180" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle8</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10946</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10946</guid>
		<description>will never be for Senators, rich people, or Hollywood celebrities. It is only for the rabble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will never be for Senators, rich people, or Hollywood celebrities. It is only for the rabble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6eorge Jetson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10947</link>
		<dc:creator>6eorge Jetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10947</guid>
		<description>It surprises me that other conservative sites haven&#039;t spotlighted this &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;point&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; to keep everyone aware that we are but 2 Senate votes from stopping Porkulus (actually 1 if Kennedy can&#039;t vote).  

Reminder to self...always, always question the context!  I had unwittingly accepted that it only would take 50 senate votes to pass.  Even if other conservative sites aren&#039;t doing it.  

Thank you, barry915barry, for providing me with a lesson and a reminder of the value of conservative skepticism!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It surprises me that other conservative sites haven&#8217;t spotlighted this <i><b>point</b></i> to keep everyone aware that we are but 2 Senate votes from stopping Porkulus (actually 1 if Kennedy can&#8217;t vote).  </p>
<p>Reminder to self&#8230;always, always question the context!  I had unwittingly accepted that it only would take 50 senate votes to pass.  Even if other conservative sites aren&#8217;t doing it.  </p>
<p>Thank you, barry915barry, for providing me with a lesson and a reminder of the value of conservative skepticism!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10945</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10945</guid>
		<description>...except that at this point I&#039;ve lost my ability to be surprised at the casual incompetence of Congressional Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;except that at this point I&#8217;ve lost my ability to be surprised at the casual incompetence of Congressional Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10944</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10944</guid>
		<description>...isn&#039;t here anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;isn&#8217;t here anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10943</link>
		<dc:creator>bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10943</guid>
		<description>&quot;I ask unanimous consent to dispense with the reading of the bill.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;Without objection, so ord---&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;OBJECTION!&quot;&lt;br&gt;
(much grumbling)&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;The clerk will read the bill.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;My apologies to the Chair, but the Clerk does not have a copy of the bill.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I ask unanimous consent to dispense with the reading of the bill.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Without objection, so ord&#8212;&#8221;<br />
&#8220;OBJECTION!&#8221;<br />
(much grumbling)<br />
&#8220;The clerk will read the bill.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;My apologies to the Chair, but the Clerk does not have a copy of the bill.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scope</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10942</link>
		<dc:creator>Scope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10942</guid>
		<description>You would think he would keep in mind the fact that he would not be alive, according to the rationing of medical treatment to come as a result of the beginnings of Socialized Healthcare in this bill.  Haven&#039;t we read that the elderly will suffer the most. Specter is not a spring chicken.  The other day, someone on this site used the quote &quot;all for me, but none for thee.&quot;  I suspect that Congressional members will not be a part of the &quot;rationing&quot; that the rest of us little people will be subjected to.  Even though he has earmarked $6 million for the National Institutes of Health (why?), he is seeming to be oblivious to what is in the rest of the bill.  Wasn&#039;t thre some language lately about cutting back on developing new drugs and treatments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think he would keep in mind the fact that he would not be alive, according to the rationing of medical treatment to come as a result of the beginnings of Socialized Healthcare in this bill.  Haven&#8217;t we read that the elderly will suffer the most. Specter is not a spring chicken.  The other day, someone on this site used the quote &#8220;all for me, but none for thee.&#8221;  I suspect that Congressional members will not be a part of the &#8220;rationing&#8221; that the rest of us little people will be subjected to.  Even though he has earmarked $6 million for the National Institutes of Health (why?), he is seeming to be oblivious to what is in the rest of the bill.  Wasn&#8217;t thre some language lately about cutting back on developing new drugs and treatments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayhem</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10941</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayhem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10941</guid>
		<description>Does the GOP have the ability to force a reading of this bill by the Clerk?  It seems like that should be discussed as a legitimate option at this point.  1400 pages of reading would give people time to examine the bill, if nothing else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the GOP have the ability to force a reading of this bill by the Clerk?  It seems like that should be discussed as a legitimate option at this point.  1400 pages of reading would give people time to examine the bill, if nothing else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scarlos</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10940</link>
		<dc:creator>scarlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10940</guid>
		<description>Is the full exposure of their motives.  If they vote against the bill, we get the argument that the Dems double-crossed even the &quot;Republican Moderates&quot; who voted for cloture and Specter, Snowe, and Collins get cited for being stupid but not necessarily treacherous.

if they vote in favor of it, find some way to get rid of them, primary specter and figure out how to get rid of the Maine sisters.  They are just undermining our message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the full exposure of their motives.  If they vote against the bill, we get the argument that the Dems double-crossed even the &#8220;Republican Moderates&#8221; who voted for cloture and Specter, Snowe, and Collins get cited for being stupid but not necessarily treacherous.</p>
<p>if they vote in favor of it, find some way to get rid of them, primary specter and figure out how to get rid of the Maine sisters.  They are just undermining our message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeG</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10939</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10939</guid>
		<description>as wondering if there were any Senators on the Continental airplane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as wondering if there were any Senators on the Continental airplane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eschristian</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10938</link>
		<dc:creator>eschristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10938</guid>
		<description>Sen. Specter - you have had health conditions that required medical treatment or you would not be here with us today (unless there was a miracle - which I believe in) and in this porkulus bill there is a portion of this bill that requires a federal &quot;overseer&quot; to watch and approve medical treatment ordered by a person&#039;s doctor - what if this unethical (in my opinion as a Registered Nurse) were in place when you needed treatment?  Would you have gotten the treatment you needed?  And as I remember you had to have more required medical treatment again after that episode?  Would the federal &quot;overseer&quot; approve that treatment?  If any of that would have stopped your treatment Senator would you be with us today?  I am not trying to be mean but bring you back down to earth with the rest of us - back to reality - please Sen. Specter think of this before you vote.

To all three of you Senators in the Gang of 3 - do you think ACORN will get out the vote for you when reelection comes up?  I don&#039;t know possibly if you vote like a democrat maybe they would but I doubt it.  Why is ACORN being funded?  Remember those pesky little federal investigations into VOTER FRAUD by this sham of a group!!!

Last but not least Senators please consider this - what you worked on to get taken out is now rumored to have been put back in.  In a sane world I would ask you to read the bill and consider your vote being you were USED by Obama/Pelosi/Reid but there is a big problem - not many people are going to be able to look at the bill before they vote - I hear about 4% of all of Congress will have that opportunity - so take chance, be a fool, send your Country down a path of hardship so that you can have $$$ sent to your two states and help with your personal political power but please remember this too - this will backfire on you and already have as far as the democrats and you will be challenged when reelection comes up if you choose the selfish route and not the route that is best for the Country.  I hope someone gets our comments to you.  I hope you consider this and remember why you wanted to go to D.C. in the first place and why you chose to be a Republican - obviously you have forgotten why you went and forgotten that you are Republicans even if in name only.  I pray you stop this and let people see what Pelosi and Reid have added to this mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Specter &#8211; you have had health conditions that required medical treatment or you would not be here with us today (unless there was a miracle &#8211; which I believe in) and in this porkulus bill there is a portion of this bill that requires a federal &#8220;overseer&#8221; to watch and approve medical treatment ordered by a person&#8217;s doctor &#8211; what if this unethical (in my opinion as a Registered Nurse) were in place when you needed treatment?  Would you have gotten the treatment you needed?  And as I remember you had to have more required medical treatment again after that episode?  Would the federal &#8220;overseer&#8221; approve that treatment?  If any of that would have stopped your treatment Senator would you be with us today?  I am not trying to be mean but bring you back down to earth with the rest of us &#8211; back to reality &#8211; please Sen. Specter think of this before you vote.</p>
<p>To all three of you Senators in the Gang of 3 &#8211; do you think ACORN will get out the vote for you when reelection comes up?  I don&#8217;t know possibly if you vote like a democrat maybe they would but I doubt it.  Why is ACORN being funded?  Remember those pesky little federal investigations into VOTER FRAUD by this sham of a group!!!</p>
<p>Last but not least Senators please consider this &#8211; what you worked on to get taken out is now rumored to have been put back in.  In a sane world I would ask you to read the bill and consider your vote being you were USED by Obama/Pelosi/Reid but there is a big problem &#8211; not many people are going to be able to look at the bill before they vote &#8211; I hear about 4% of all of Congress will have that opportunity &#8211; so take chance, be a fool, send your Country down a path of hardship so that you can have $$$ sent to your two states and help with your personal political power but please remember this too &#8211; this will backfire on you and already have as far as the democrats and you will be challenged when reelection comes up if you choose the selfish route and not the route that is best for the Country.  I hope someone gets our comments to you.  I hope you consider this and remember why you wanted to go to D.C. in the first place and why you chose to be a Republican &#8211; obviously you have forgotten why you went and forgotten that you are Republicans even if in name only.  I pray you stop this and let people see what Pelosi and Reid have added to this mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10937</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10937</guid>
		<description>I know... not funny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know&#8230; not funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10936</link>
		<dc:creator>bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10936</guid>
		<description>Giving it another 48-72 to fester out in the open before the final vote is probably the best case scenario for us. It could be that they allow it to the floor and then all vote against it, so that there isn&#039;t a single GOP vote in either chamber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giving it another 48-72 to fester out in the open before the final vote is probably the best case scenario for us. It could be that they allow it to the floor and then all vote against it, so that there isn&#8217;t a single GOP vote in either chamber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry915barry</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10935</link>
		<dc:creator>barry915barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10935</guid>
		<description>the bill will be subject to a &quot;point of order&quot;.  So, while there is no filibustering a conference bill, there is still the need for 60 votes to Wave the point of order, specifically because, this a Deficit Spending Bill.

See Congress Matters: http://is.gd/iYt2

I hope the hyper link works.  It makes for some amazingly dull reading.  Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the bill will be subject to a &#8220;point of order&#8221;.  So, while there is no filibustering a conference bill, there is still the need for 60 votes to Wave the point of order, specifically because, this a Deficit Spending Bill.</p>
<p>See Congress Matters: http://is.gd/iYt2</p>
<p>I hope the hyper link works.  It makes for some amazingly dull reading.  Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adjoran</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/02/13/good-morning-senators-collins-snowe-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-10934</link>
		<dc:creator>Adjoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/?p=1404#comment-10934</guid>
		<description>from the Senate bill already passed.  I believe that means another chance to filibuster, meaning Democrats must get 60 votes again.  

Gregg&#039;s presence or absence is irrelevant.  The number of &quot;NO&quot; votes doesn&#039;t matter in a cloture vote:  there must be 60 votes to shut off debate and schedule the final vote.  Without Kennedy, the defecting Republicans are key.  They must be enticed to vote FOR the package - if they even abstain it is as good as a &quot;NO&quot; vote.

As a Christian, I believe in redemption.  Snowe, Collins, and Specter have the chance; it is up to them to take it.

America is slowly beginning to sober up and wonder, &quot;We elected WHO, again?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the Senate bill already passed.  I believe that means another chance to filibuster, meaning Democrats must get 60 votes again.  </p>
<p>Gregg&#8217;s presence or absence is irrelevant.  The number of &#8220;NO&#8221; votes doesn&#8217;t matter in a cloture vote:  there must be 60 votes to shut off debate and schedule the final vote.  Without Kennedy, the defecting Republicans are key.  They must be enticed to vote FOR the package &#8211; if they even abstain it is as good as a &#8220;NO&#8221; vote.</p>
<p>As a Christian, I believe in redemption.  Snowe, Collins, and Specter have the chance; it is up to them to take it.</p>
<p>America is slowly beginning to sober up and wonder, &#8220;We elected WHO, again?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

