Hey, aren’t we supposed to have a Secretary of Commerce?


Especially if there\'s going to be that trade war thing that Francis mentioned.

OK, I understand that it was completely unexpected* that Gov Bill Richardson (D-NM) (and author of the book Leading by Example**) might have been caught up in pay-for-play shenanigans, but he dropped out January 4th. That was over two weeks ago: why are they still vetting people? Didn’t they have a backup?

You’d think that they would have had a backup for Commerce, given that we’re in the middle of one thoroughly messed-up economy. What if Richardson had been hit by a bus, or something?

Moe Lane

*Warning: this sentence may contain irony.

**Not to mention, wanton cruelty.

Crossposted on Moe Lane.


RSS feed

5 Comments Leave a comment

Obamabus did not run over Richardson

RedFox84 Friday, January 23rd at 8:26AM EST (link)

No one gets run over by Obamabus. You get thrown under Obamabus.

Zing! 555 (nt)

asleep06 (Diary) Friday, January 23rd at 9:53AM EST (link)

nt

Small is beautiful.

 
 

All agreed except for one thing

Dan McLaughlin (Diary) Friday, January 23rd at 9:30AM EST (link)

The Commerce Secretary has no particular role in US trade policy, which runs through the US Trade Rep. Commerce mostly handles the fisheries, the weather bureau and the census. It’s not at all what people think it is.

“No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong.” – Winston Churchill

Point taken, but it still *looks* kind of weird. N/T

Moe Lane (Diary) Friday, January 23rd at 10:31AM EST (link)
 

Obama does not believe in Commerce

izoneguy (Diary) Friday, January 23rd at 10:18AM EST (link)

So no great loss for the one. Why worry about commerce when you can just print money and make everything appear out of thin air with the wave of a pen?

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.