<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I have to disagree with Allahpundit on this one.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2008/08/30/i-have-to-disagree-with-allahpundit-on-this-o/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2008/08/30/i-have-to-disagree-with-allahpundit-on-this-o/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: misterd</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2008/08/30/i-have-to-disagree-with-allahpundit-on-this-o/comment-page-1/#comment-2644</link>
		<dc:creator>misterd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2644</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you don&#039;t have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone to run from.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone to run from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle8</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2008/08/30/i-have-to-disagree-with-allahpundit-on-this-o/comment-page-1/#comment-2643</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2643</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;nt&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olderthangandalf</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2008/08/30/i-have-to-disagree-with-allahpundit-on-this-o/comment-page-1/#comment-2642</link>
		<dc:creator>olderthangandalf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2642</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;from a tactical and strategic viewpoint.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Obama wants - maybe needs - to run against George W Bush. If the election is a referendum on the George W Bush years, Obama starts off in a good political spot, because by a 2-1 margin Bush is unpopular right now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The math is not so compelling if the election is a referendum on whether Obama is qualified or right on the issues, whether McCain would make a good leader, or who has the best running mate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Look for this to continue through November. Whatever the question, whatever the event, the Obama camp&#039;s response will be some version of, &quot;Do you want more George W Bush?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This ad runs against George W Bush. It tries to tie McCain and the VP candidate to Bush. That&#039;s his message, and it&#039;s the right message for his side to be making given the current polling numbers. It goes to his core  strategy - not being George W Bush.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;McCain, of course, won&#039;t sit still for that. He&#039;s going to be busy saying that - while he respects George W Bush and much that he&#039;s done - he&#039;s not George W and will do things his own way. Choosing Palin, with no ties to the Bushes or DC, is part of that. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Watch the convention, where the Bush legacy will handled carefully, for more of that. The word cloud for McCain as he presents it will be less &quot;Bush&quot; and less &quot;Republican,&quot; and more   &quot;independent,&quot; &quot;maverick&quot; and &quot;reformer.&quot; To help counter Obama&#039;s Bush-Bush-Bush strategy, we will see Bush speak on Monday, and then he will disappear to Camp David for the rest of the week, making him literally a less visible target.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s going to be an interesting couple of months, and the Palin pick just makes it more interesting.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from a tactical and strategic viewpoint.</p>
<p>Obama wants &#8211; maybe needs &#8211; to run against George W Bush. If the election is a referendum on the George W Bush years, Obama starts off in a good political spot, because by a 2-1 margin Bush is unpopular right now.</p>
<p>The math is not so compelling if the election is a referendum on whether Obama is qualified or right on the issues, whether McCain would make a good leader, or who has the best running mate.</p>
<p>Look for this to continue through November. Whatever the question, whatever the event, the Obama camp&#8217;s response will be some version of, &#8220;Do you want more George W Bush?&#8221;</p>
<p>This ad runs against George W Bush. It tries to tie McCain and the VP candidate to Bush. That&#8217;s his message, and it&#8217;s the right message for his side to be making given the current polling numbers. It goes to his core  strategy &#8211; not being George W Bush.</p>
<p>McCain, of course, won&#8217;t sit still for that. He&#8217;s going to be busy saying that &#8211; while he respects George W Bush and much that he&#8217;s done &#8211; he&#8217;s not George W and will do things his own way. Choosing Palin, with no ties to the Bushes or DC, is part of that. </p>
<p>Watch the convention, where the Bush legacy will handled carefully, for more of that. The word cloud for McCain as he presents it will be less &#8220;Bush&#8221; and less &#8220;Republican,&#8221; and more   &#8220;independent,&#8221; &#8220;maverick&#8221; and &#8220;reformer.&#8221; To help counter Obama&#8217;s Bush-Bush-Bush strategy, we will see Bush speak on Monday, and then he will disappear to Camp David for the rest of the week, making him literally a less visible target.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be an interesting couple of months, and the Palin pick just makes it more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhxG</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2008/08/30/i-have-to-disagree-with-allahpundit-on-this-o/comment-page-1/#comment-2641</link>
		<dc:creator>PhxG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2641</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Avoid comparisons to Obama by not promoting the inexperience story. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although I think he is wrong in that assumption as we saw with the DNC failing to consider her on the &quot;Next Cheney&quot; promotion. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is simply a completed ad with missing 5 seconds of VP footage dropped in once Palin was announced. An indication, to me at least that the DNC has a playbook in place they were going to follow no matter who was selected. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m waiting to see if they keep on the McSame attack plan now. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avoid comparisons to Obama by not promoting the inexperience story. </p>
<p>Although I think he is wrong in that assumption as we saw with the DNC failing to consider her on the &#8220;Next Cheney&#8221; promotion. </p>
<p>This is simply a completed ad with missing 5 seconds of VP footage dropped in once Palin was announced. An indication, to me at least that the DNC has a playbook in place they were going to follow no matter who was selected. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting to see if they keep on the McSame attack plan now. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fleischen</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2008/08/30/i-have-to-disagree-with-allahpundit-on-this-o/comment-page-1/#comment-2640</link>
		<dc:creator>Fleischen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2640</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They obviously had the ad with voiceover ready to go, planning to simply plug in some video of McCain&#039;s VP choice at the last minute.  As a result, it comes across as amateurish and has a low-budget, generic feel to it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They obviously had the ad with voiceover ready to go, planning to simply plug in some video of McCain&#8217;s VP choice at the last minute.  As a result, it comes across as amateurish and has a low-budget, generic feel to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crowe</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2008/08/30/i-have-to-disagree-with-allahpundit-on-this-o/comment-page-1/#comment-2639</link>
		<dc:creator>Crowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2639</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s a smart ad from Obama&#039;s POV, but only because it avoids attacking Palin. I think this ad demonstrates that tying McCain to Bush really is the only thing left to Obama. They can&#039;t attack Palin because any attacks they use can be turned back on Obama -- I think they realize that. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Smart, I&#039;ll give that. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Effective? I think it still has some shelf life, but only until more people realize/remember that McCain is not Bush, and more people re-convert to supporting the efforts in Iraq (both of which are advanced by the selection of Palin).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the constant negativity about the state of the union coming out of the Obama campaign will wear thin as gas prices continue to fall and Iraq success continues and the economy continues to grow faster than people are led to believe. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In short, I think Obama has reached his last redoubt -- &quot;McCain is Bush, and Bush is evil&quot; -- and even that won&#039;t last much longer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;--&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to McCain getting 300 EC votes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a smart ad from Obama&#8217;s POV, but only because it avoids attacking Palin. I think this ad demonstrates that tying McCain to Bush really is the only thing left to Obama. They can&#8217;t attack Palin because any attacks they use can be turned back on Obama &#8212; I think they realize that. </p>
<p>Smart, I&#8217;ll give that. </p>
<p>Effective? I think it still has some shelf life, but only until more people realize/remember that McCain is not Bush, and more people re-convert to supporting the efforts in Iraq (both of which are advanced by the selection of Palin).</p>
<p>I think the constant negativity about the state of the union coming out of the Obama campaign will wear thin as gas prices continue to fall and Iraq success continues and the economy continues to grow faster than people are led to believe. </p>
<p>In short, I think Obama has reached his last redoubt &#8212; &#8220;McCain is Bush, and Bush is evil&#8221; &#8212; and even that won&#8217;t last much longer.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>Looking forward to McCain getting 300 EC votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjd27</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2008/08/30/i-have-to-disagree-with-allahpundit-on-this-o/comment-page-1/#comment-2638</link>
		<dc:creator>rjd27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2638</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;if your a Liberal and Lefty. It has no substance and really isn&#039;t great in style, either. It says nothing. It attacks McCain, but doesn&#039;t promote Obama. It attacks Bush, but doesn&#039;t do anything to define what Obama would do differently.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In my opinion, Obama&#039;s Camp needs to keep it up. He&#039;s preaching to his base here. I think most of America is going to want a little bit more substance than this ad provides.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if your a Liberal and Lefty. It has no substance and really isn&#8217;t great in style, either. It says nothing. It attacks McCain, but doesn&#8217;t promote Obama. It attacks Bush, but doesn&#8217;t do anything to define what Obama would do differently.</p>
<p>In my opinion, Obama&#8217;s Camp needs to keep it up. He&#8217;s preaching to his base here. I think most of America is going to want a little bit more substance than this ad provides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QueenOfCups</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2008/08/30/i-have-to-disagree-with-allahpundit-on-this-o/comment-page-1/#comment-2637</link>
		<dc:creator>QueenOfCups</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mostly because their moral compass is pointing to a leader who is mostly illusion.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mostly because their moral compass is pointing to a leader who is mostly illusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

